Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3492492 times)

IceCold · « **Reply #30700 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:02:23 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 28, 2007, 04:00:55 PM

They were both seriously flawed and the best of the tier-B Olympians because of those flaws-both of them were all torso.

if they are tier b, what are zane, franco, sergio, samir then?

Hulkster · « **Reply #30701 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:03:01 PM »

Quote from: The Squadfather on June 28, 2007, 03:53:17 PM

honestly Hulk their arms are about even there when you consider that Dorian's triceps are better than Ronnie's there but Ronnie's biceps are definitley rounder and bigger.

they are not even when you look at the pics.

ronnie's arms are full big and shapely.

dorian's arms look like someone hacked half of them off..stubby as can be..

The Squadfather · « **Reply #30702 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:03:20 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 28, 2007, 04:00:55 PM

They were both seriously flawed and the best of the tier-B Olympians because of those flaws-both of them were all torso.

i would definitely say that Haneey was all torso way more so than Dorian, Dorian's legs were damn good even for a Mr. Olympia, not the sheer size of Ronnie's but still damn good. Haney probably had the thickest chest, one of the thickest backs in history though.

pumpster · « **Reply #30703 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:03:23 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on June 28, 2007, 04:02:23 PM

if they are tier b, what are zane, franco, sergio, samir then?

They're under those guys in tier-b

Hulkster · « **Reply #30704 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:07:43 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 28, 2007, 04:01:48 PM

Shit, even in his neonate form, Yates with a better front double biceps than Ronnie could ever dream of - no weaknesses.

sorry dorian, you get owned.

and besides, neophyte dorian had a way better double bi than Mr. O. dorian - Mr. O. dorian had a waist way thicker than that..

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #30705 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:08:01 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 28, 2007, 03:42:09 PM

You are nothing but a biased guy so stupid you cannot even form an argument for yourself LOL.....so you must resort to bb.com (read: 14 year olds) to confirm in your pea brain that Coleman is better hahahahah

Reality Check:

LOL, oh kid, would you grow up.

I'm biased and you post a pic of Ronnie before he became Mr. Olympia against yates? You never learn.

You're just mad because you can not intelligently reply to my post.

I guess you missed this post by me. Why won't you answer it? Scared? I think so.

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=69359.msg2194146#msg2194146

IceCold · « **Reply #30706 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:08:28 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 28, 2007, 04:03:01 PM

they are not even when you look at the pics.

ronnie's arms are full big and shapely.

dorian's arms look like someone hacked half of them off..stubby as can be..

good point.

The Squadfather · « **Reply #30707 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:09:07 PM »

i gotta say Hulk that Dorian's legs look better than Ronnie's in that comparison.

Hulkster · « **Reply #30708 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:10:13 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on June 28, 2007, 04:08:28 PM

good point.

thanks for posting that.

totally stubby compared to a GOOD arm:

IceCold · « **Reply #30709 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:10:43 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on June 28, 2007, 04:08:01 PM

I'm biased and you post a pic of Ronnie before he became Mr. Olympia against yates? You never learn.

you could make that argument for any bber or any sport and any athlete.

"well, they werent at their prime".

all that matters is the day of the conest, and ronnie failed against dorian. for 7 straight years.

delta9mda · « **Reply #30710 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:11:05 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 28, 2007, 04:00:55 PM

They were both seriously flawed and the best of the tier-B Olympians because of those flaws-both of them were all torso.

stop talking tier shit. haney got 8 mr o's first and ronnie has yet to top it. he is not the best mr o ever, not yet.

pumpster · « **Reply #30711 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:11:32 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on June 28, 2007, 04:11:05 PM

stop talking tier shit. haney got 8 mr o's first and ronnie has yet to top it. he is not the best mr o ever, not yet.

STFU and come back in another 40 pages.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #30712 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:12:57 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on June 28, 2007, 04:10:43 PM

you could make that argument for any bber or any sport and any athlete.

"well, they werent at their prime".

all that matters is the day of the conest, and ronnie failed against dorian. for 7 straight years.

LOL. this thread is about who would win at their best. Not the biased pic pubic posted.

The Squadfather · « **Reply #30713 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:13:37 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on June 28, 2007, 04:11:05 PM

stop talking tier shit. haney got 8 mr o's first and ronnie has yet to top it. he is not the best mr o ever, not yet.

Haney had small arms and legs for an AVERAGE IFBB pro or even a top NPC heavyweight of his time let alone a Mr. Olympia and that's the truth.

pobrecito · « **Reply #30714 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:13:49 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on June 28, 2007, 04:12:57 PM

LOL. this thread is about who would win at their best. Not the biased pic pubic posted.

The problem is, Ronnie's back double biceps was no better than that in either 99 or 01.

delta9mda · « **Reply #30715 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:14:28 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 28, 2007, 04:11:32 PM

STFU and come back in another 40 pages.

awww come on pumpy, i thought we were friends

IceCold · « **Reply #30716 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:14:40 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 28, 2007, 04:10:13 PM

thanks for posting that.

totally stubby compared to a GOOD arm:

extremely amusing how you only seem to remember certain poses.

owned.

pobrecito · « **Reply #30717 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:14:51 PM »

Hulkster · « **Reply #30718 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:16:45 PM »

notice how ronnie's tricep is big and full and dorian's disappears from existance.

thanks pubes.

when will you morons realize that Ronnie's arms blow dorian's out of the water?

The Squadfather · « **Reply #30719 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:17:44 PM »

watch Dorian train triceps on Blood and Guts and get back here and tell us how weak his triceps looked.

Hulkster · « **Reply #30720 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:23:08 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on June 28, 2007, 04:14:40 PM

extremely amusing how you only seem to remember certain poses.

owned.

yes, if you take a 2001 ronnie in not so great shape

.

when you take a shot of Ronnie from 98 or 2003 for example, dorian gets crushed $:-\$ :

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #30721 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:23:51 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 28, 2007, 03:56:53 PM

Dorian's biceps were never in Ronnie's league, but they weren't nearly as bad as Ronnie's calves.

Exactly. Yates had arms but Coleman has no calves at all.

The Squadfather · « **Reply #30722 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:24:30 PM »

shit i don't know Hulk they still look pretty even to me there.

pobrecito · « **Reply #30723 on:** June 28, 2007, 04:25:40 PM »

Dorian's condition is miles ahead of Coleman in all these comparisons - Coleman is much softer.

phyxsius · « **Reply #30724 on:** June 28, 2007, 05:38:49 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 28, 2007, 04:23:08 PM

yes, if you take a 2001 ronnie in not so great shape .

when you take a shot of Ronnie from 98 or 2003 for example, dorian gets crushed $:-\$ :

sorry Hulkster, but that side tricep pose, Ronnie got owned