Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3497063 times)

pumpster · « **Reply #31800 on:** July 27, 2007, 09:45:24 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on July 27, 2007, 08:17:57 PM

Like I said, stop being a PUSSY and "Start a new thread about about what you just said ^^^^^ and watch your british a$$ get owned by the whole board, LOL, you're pathetic".

Sounds like a reminder that someone who looks like this on a BB board is talking out of his ass.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #31801 on:** July 28, 2007, 02:01:17 AM »

This is you:

phyxsius · « **Reply #31802 on:** July 28, 2007, 02:17:21 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 27, 2007, 09:45:24 PM

Sounds like a reminder that someone who looks like this on a BB board is talking out of his ass.

that's Dorian's arms. No?

pumpster · « **Reply #31803 on:** July 28, 2007, 07:08:25 AM »

Quote from: phyxsius on July 28, 2007, 02:17:21 AM

that's Dorian's arms. No?

Uncanny resemblance in H-taper and arms.

Rocket's mania for the keg makes sense after seeing this.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #31804 on:** July 28, 2007, 09:12:11 AM »

The crazy thing is, the yates fan club is saying that 98 and 03 Ronnie didn't deserve to win, LOL, and these 2 years are considered to be his best and probably the best physiques of all time. Yet they bash Ronnie, yeah, great logic

.

On the other hand we Coleman fans atleast say that a 93 and 95 dorian deserved to win, which is his 2 best years.

See what we are dealing with here? Morons who don't know jack shyt about bodybuilding and they are as biased as they come.

Hulkster · « **Reply #31805 on:** July 28, 2007, 11:06:03 AM »

Quote

See what we are dealing with here? Morons who don't know jack shyt about bodybuilding and they are as biased as they come.

yes, thats why you have getbiggers coming posting in this thread saying they are stupid..

these guys are the laughing stock of getbig.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #31806 on:** July 28, 2007, 11:15:18 AM »

Even if Coleman did deserve to win in 98 I don't think his victory was as clear cut as Yates' victory was in 93. He certainly doesn't look better than Nasser in some of the 98 shots I have seen posted on here. I would like to see a video of the prejudging.

Hulkster · « **Reply #31807 on:** July 28, 2007, 11:18:19 AM »

LOL

ronnie's back is so much thicker than dorian's its not even funny.

ronnie's back is just in other league than ol' pancake back. lol

phyxsius · « **Reply #31808 on:** July 28, 2007, 04:08:05 PM »

I must say Dorian looked pretty ripped!!

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #31809 on:** July 28, 2007, 04:18:37 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 28, 2007, 11:18:19 AM

LOL

ronnie's back is so much thicker than dorian's its not even funny.

ronnie's back is just in other league than ol' pancake back. lol

I like the way you post pics that clearly show Yates' superiority and you try to say he is losing to Coleman. LOL

Shockwave · « **Reply #31810 on:** July 28, 2007, 05:18:14 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 28, 2007, 11:18:19 AM

LOL

ronnie's back is so much thicker than dorian's its not even funny.

ronnie's back is just in other league than ol' pancake back. lol

Bad idea on your part.
Dorian is destroying Ronnie there.
Better separation, no water...

Hulkster · « **Reply #31811 on:** July 28, 2007, 05:30:28 PM »

well, its an impressive but not very clear shot of Ronnie and Flex...

his back was ripped and still much thicker than dorian's:

here is a clearer shot. amazing.

and, while dorian was ripped from the back, he was soft and watery in the extremeties from the front:

Hulkster · « **Reply #31812 on:** July 28, 2007, 05:34:17 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on July 28, 2007, 04:18:37 PM

I like the way you post pics that clearly show Yates' superiority and you try to say he is losing to Coleman. LOL

is that like how coleman was owned by most of the top 6 in 98?

Hulkster · « **Reply #31813 on:** July 28, 2007, 05:44:17 PM »

Matt is stating the obvious!

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #31814 on:** July 28, 2007, 08:32:59 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on July 28, 2007, 11:15:18 AM

Even if Coleman did deserve to win in 98 I don't think his victory was as clear cut as Yates' victory was in 93. He certainly doesn't look better than Nasser in some of the 98 shots I have seen posted on here. I would like to see a video of the prejudging.

Yes, exactly. Dorian won both the muscularity and symmetry rounds with straight-firsts scores from all the judges in 1993, while Ronnie won the 1998 Olympia by 3 measly points. Peter McGough even said that, if Wheeler had shown for the show with his best conditioning ever, he would have won.

SUCKMYMUSCL

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #31815 on:** July 28, 2007, 08:38:48 PM »

Being completely unbiased, I think that, if Ronnie entered the 1996 Olympia with the conditioning that he had at the 1996 CPC, he would have finished a solid second to Dorian or even won - Dorian was not at his best. I still think Yates' drier-than-bone conidtioning would give him the nod, but I can see Ronnie winning. However, the 1995 Dorian would defeat the 1996 CPC or 1998 Olympia Ronnie with straight-firsts scores.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #31816 on:** July 28, 2007, 10:28:22 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on July 28, 2007, 04:18:37 PM

I like the way you post pics that clearly show Yates' superiority and you try to say he is losing to Coleman. LOL

What superiority? Ronnie has a wider back, thicker back, better rear delts, better bi's and tri's, thicker lats, better glutes, better hams. The only thing yates has on Coleman in the rdb is back conditioning and calves.

Now who is losing, LOL

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #31817 on:** July 29, 2007, 10:16:37 AM »

I must apologise. I appear to have upset a few Coleman fans by not agreeing with their opinion of his undeniable superiority to Yates. Well, from now on I will only post pics that show Coleman at his best. I hope my fellow Yates fans will understand this risky move of mine. LOL

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #31818 on:** July 29, 2007, 10:40:33 AM »

Will Pubes be on Dorian's or Ronnie's side next week? Cast your vote!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito · « **Reply #31819 on:** July 29, 2007, 11:03:52 AM »

SUCKY's just mad becuase he's been OWNED by several people smarter than him within a 24 hour period LOL.

Quote from: suckmymuscle on July 27, 2007, 03:31:05 PM

Just because the tiny amount that bodybuilders take is not enough to damage the kidneys. it doesen't mean that damage isn't being done.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Only an imbecile could contradict himself like this.

Now SUCKY wants to compare SAT scores like a little child hahahaha too bad I've already tested into the 99th percentile

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #31820 on:** July 29, 2007, 11:17:21 AM »

More:

Hulkster · « **Reply #31821 on:** July 29, 2007, 11:37:40 AM »

this is really sad:

dorian at 263 vs Ronnie at 294... $:-\$

pumpster · « **Reply #31822 on:** July 29, 2007, 12:17:27 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on July 29, 2007, 10:40:33 AM

Will Pubes be on Dorian's or Ronnie's side next week? Cast your vote!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Pubes already admitted Coleman's superiority several hundred pages ago, now backpeddles through his stooge icecold.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #31823 on:** July 29, 2007, 01:28:32 PM »

Considering that the word pump means fart in England this always reminds me of our friend Pumpster:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC5pSuzldzs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV8boXLV0ik

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MAqG6BObmc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzotNayAtBE

Bear · « **Reply #31824 on:** July 29, 2007, 03:13:06 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on July 29, 2007, 01:28:32 PM

Considering that the word pump means fart in England this always reminds me of our friend Pumpster:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC5pSuzldzs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV8boXLV0ik

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MAqG6BObmc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzotNayAtBE

I am from England and 'Pump' must be a regional thing, localised entirely to Borstal lol!!