its funny how someone who the dorian side (incorrectly) claims has 'better conditioning" than Ronnie can have arms and legs so blurred and waterlogged in comparison to the dry conditioned and ripped muscle of Ronnie Coleman: 
its funny, the 93 olympia musclemag (which I found today) talks about how "deep ripped striated muscle is the true indicator of conditioning..
LOL looks they magazine writers agree with what the ronnie side has been saying all along: Ronnie was in better condition at his best...
now, what excuses will ND come up with? 
You're mistaken as usual Dorian himself said he has better conditioning than Ronnie , Lee Priest has said Dorian has better conditioning , Peter McGough and Kevin Horton said to this day Dorian's conditioning hasn't been matched
Striations are PART of conditioning , they're also genetic and Yates has plenty you think because Ronnie has more that he's better conditioned , and Dorian's are harder to see in some pictures than others this isn't an excuses its a fact , Dorian's chest is covered in striations , as well as his intercostals/obliques and his lower lats and erector spinae oh and glutes and triceps , stop mistaken striations as the ONLY indicator of great conditioning DENSITY is the high water mark for conditioning to remove the intramuscular fat is highly prized in contests , and your fucking stupidity Yates is carrying water in his arms isn't even worth a response
and NO the magazines don't agree that Ronnie was better conditioned thats your bullshit claim of trying to link Ronnie to having better conditioning and its pathetic , Dorian's conditioning is legendary , Ronnie's is NOT
Dorian 260 + pounds bone dry & rock hard , Ronnie 249 pounds bone dry & rock hard . Dorian's conditioning & mass unmatched to this day.