Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

good catch!

ahahahaha hey ND what are you going to do now? you are FUCKED.

right here in black and white Peter is saying that Ronnie 99 advanced the sport, notice, ahead of dorian, ahead of EVERYONE!

the article ENDS WITH RONNIE 99!  hahahahahaha

According to Peter McGough, as of Sept 2005 at least Ronnie Coleman 1999 is the best most advanced physique we have seen to date.

hahahahahhaah

run away little boy. go and hide now


hahahhahahhaa

I love it.

ND you are totally fucked now!

meltdown 

that has NOTHING to do with if he was harder or drier

Ronnie Coleman | 1999

In his first defense of the Mr. O title, Coleman exhibited size, condition and sinew-splitting fullness he lacked a year earlier. At 257 pounds, he was so separated that he looked like a walking anatomy chart. That being said, I still think he achieved his best-ever physique for the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic.

2001 ASC 

[gymguy]

Hell YES!

[kyomu]

Best is Ronnie. Greatest is Arnold or Haney.

[NeoSeminole]

I know what density & conditioning are , I'm explaining it to you ( as usual ) and the point still stands MORON they're listed separately in the criteria which was my point , density is a step beyond condition although part of it , density is ' highly prized ' I might add along with muscular bulk which is Dorian Yates , one can be dry but NOT dense the two is much sort after which is why Yates dominated

no, you don't know what density is b/c you keep saying it's a separate criteria than conditioning. One is the direct result of the other. So they cannot be separate. The purpose of conditioning is to rid oneself of body fat, which results in the person looking denser. For you to argue otherwise is foolish. No other criteria is affected by another (e.g. bulk and symmetry or shape and conditioning).

yawn nice try though

yawn, I merely copied you to show the stupidity of your post. So any weakness in my argument is a reflection of your own.

[Matt C]

Best is Ronnie. Greatest is Arnold or Haney.

And the greatest troll is ND!  He even created an alias - SD!  lol!  Although to his credit, he is 5'11.

[pumpster]

And the greatest troll is ND!

Stating what is obvious to all, ND the miserable troll LOL

Best is Ronnie. Greatest is Arnold or Haney.

Can't agree with Haney anywhere near Oliva, Coleman or Schwarzenegger. Two-thirds of the physique-arms and legs-was out of balance with that great torso. Flaws way out of proportion to those of the true greats. If those areas had been bigger &  balanced then yes, he'd have been great with no reservations.

[Matt C]

Stating what is obvious to all, ND the miserable troll LOL

I just find it hilarious that NarcissisticDeity registered an alias account "Sarcastic Deity" and expected no one to notice even though "Deity" are in both user names, LOL!

[figgs]

I would be very impressed if this thread manages to never exceed 1600 pages.

[pumpster]

I would be very impressed if this thread manages to never exceed 1600 pages.

Excellent grammar there. He's already immensely qualified as a possible addition to the 3-member "team Yates".

[England_1]

Coleman robbed more deserving BBs 

[NarcissisticDeity]

no, you don't know what density is b/c you keep saying it's a separate criteria than conditioning. One is the direct result of the other. So they cannot be separate. The purpose of conditioning is to rid oneself of body fat, which results in the person looking denser. For you to argue otherwise is foolish. No other criteria is affected by another (e.g. bulk and symmetry or shape and conditioning).

yawn, I merely copied you to show the stupidity of your post. So any weakness in my argument is a reflection of your own.

no, you don't know what density is b/c you keep saying it's a separate criteria than conditioning. One is the direct result of the other. So they cannot be separate. The purpose of conditioning is to rid oneself of body fat, which results in the person looking denser. For you to argue otherwise is foolish. No other criteria is affected by another (e.g. bulk and symmetry or shape and conditioning).

idiot did you miss the part of the criteria where it was listed separately? did you miss that? because I can post it again  one can be dry and NOT be dense

yawn, I merely copied you to show the stupidity of your post. So any weakness in my argument is a reflection of your own. ;

no you tried in vein as usual to fluff up his ' advantages ' and you didn't copy me because density is listed as a separate entity from definition so nice try .

[NarcissisticDeity]

And the greatest troll is ND!  He even created an alias - SD!  lol!  Although to his credit, he is 5'11.

the irony of you calling anyone a troll lol I love it and enough with the alias nonsense

[NarcissisticDeity]

Stating what is obvious to all, ND the miserable troll LOL



Can't agree with Haney anywhere near Oliva, Coleman or Schwarzenegger. Two-thirds of the physique-arms and legs-was out of balance with that great torso. Flaws way out of proportion to those of the true greats. If those areas had been bigger &  balanced then yes, he'd have been great with no reservations.

Stating what is obvious to all, ND the miserable troll LOL

LMFAO you are hands down the biggest troll who ever posted on the truce thread the same lame pictures and the same lame conspiracy theories .

Can't agree with Haney anywhere near Oliva, Coleman or Schwarzenegger. Two-thirds of the physique-arms and legs-was out of balance with that great torso. Flaws way out of proportion to those of the true greats. If those areas had been bigger &  balanced then yes, he'd have been great with no reservations.

Haney dominated much like Yates & Schwarzenegger a feat Coleman couldn't replicate and the irony of you questioning Haney's balance , again pure evidence of your title as #1 Troll 

[England_1]

Can't agree with Haney anywhere near Oliva, Coleman or Schwarzenegger. Two-thirds of the physique-arms and legs-was out of balance with that great torso. Flaws way out of proportion to those of the true greats. If those areas had been bigger &  balanced then yes, he'd have been great with no reservations.

Odd considering Coleman is embarrassed here badly by Haney. Coleman looks like a fat pig in comparison.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Odd considering Coleman is embarrassed here badly by Haney. Coleman looks like a fat pig in comparison.

Great post !

[NeoSeminole]

idiot did you miss the part of the criteria where it was listed separately? did you miss that? because I can post it again one can be dry and NOT be dense

show me where it lists conditioning and density in the same sentence.

"The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition."

no you tried in vein as usual to fluff up his ' advantages ' and you didn't copy me because density is listed as a separate entity from definition so nice try.

refer to above.

[Mussolini]

All one has to do is look at the competition Dorian faced in his prime vs Ronnies Competition.

Ronnie didnt even make top 6 once when Dorian was in his prime.

[NarcissisticDeity]

show me where it lists conditioning and density in the same sentence.

"The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition."

refer to above.

it doesn't list it in the same sentence who said that? I said they are list them separately

[England_1]

All one has to do is look at the competition Dorian faced in his prime vs Ronnies Competition.

Ronnie didnt even make top 6 once when Dorian was in his prime.

Exactly. Dorian was a winner right out of the box too 

[NeoSeminole]

it doesn't list it in the same sentence who said that? I said they are list them separately

now you are just playing dumb. Using your logic, then conditioning and definition are separate criteria since they are listed separately. But if density is different than conditioning (according to you) and definition is different too, then what is conditioning? I contend the reason they mentioned density is b/c conditioning is an umbrella term. It can refer to density and definition, hence why both are listed instead of conditioning.

[pumpster]

Odd considering Coleman is embarrassed here badly by Haney. Coleman looks like a fat pig in comparison.

DUH...that pose is taylor-made for guys with weak arms, namely Yates, Haney and Columbu, it hides it nicely. As if you didn't know that already lol.

Here Coleman obliterating Haney or Yates.

[NarcissisticDeity]

now you are just playing dumb. Using your logic, then conditioning and definition are separate criteria since they are listed separately. But if density is different than conditioning (according to you) and definition is different too, then what is conditioning? I contend the reason they mentioned density is b/c conditioning is an umbrella term. It can refer to density and definition, hence why both are listed instead of conditioning.

no definition is the official word and its an old term , definition is conditioning and of course density is part of conditioning but again its listed separately for a reason , people can be dry and not dense , again I've said before when a person is out of shape NO ONE says ' his definition was off ' its an outdated term

[NeoSeminole]

Odd considering Coleman is embarrassed here badly by Haney. Coleman looks like a fat pig in comparison.

[AVBG]

Lee Haney is the greatest

[NarcissisticDeity]

DUH...that pose is taylor-made for guys with weak arms, namely Yates, Haney and Columbu, it hides it nicely. As if you didn't know that already lol.

Here Coleman obliterating Haney or Yates.

lmfao Coleman sucked at the front latspread and always did , old news sorry slick in ANY pose all the criteria is used and thats exactly why Coleman loses this shot ( among others )

Yates by a country mile.