Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3557475 times)

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #41225 on:** July 10, 2008, 11:11:27 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 07, 2008, 07:45:19 PM

no, even Peter McGough himself says Ronnie 99 was better than 98.

remember the article he wrote that you morons love to ignore?

99 made the list of the best ever Mr. O's.

98 was no where to be found, and for good reason:

99 was much better.

Sure, this is probably the reason why McGough prefers Ronnie's 2001 ASC form over 1999, or why Uncle Joe himself stated that Ronnie looked his best in 1998. Let's face it: the only reason why you push so hard the blatantly false argument that Ronnie's conditioning in 1999 was as good as 1998 is because you want a version of Ronnie where he has Dorian's size besides the conditioning, because if you acknowledged that 1998 was Ronnie's best, it would allow us to claim that, sure, he had conditioning as good as Dorian's, but he is inferior in size, so he loses anyway. You want the cake and eat it too, but that's not possible.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Pecs · « **Reply #41226 on:** July 11, 2008, 02:23:47 AM »

jay looks like a cartoon in that pic!

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #41227 on:** July 11, 2008, 03:21:09 AM »

Quote from: Pecs on July 11, 2008, 02:23:47 AM

jay looks like a cartoon in that pic!

True, but don't those delts look suspect to you???

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #41228 on:** July 11, 2008, 12:45:59 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on July 10, 2008, 11:11:27 PM

Sure, this is probably the reason why McGough prefers Ronnie's 2001 ASC form over 1999, or why Uncle Joe himself stated that Ronnie looked his best in 1998. Let's face it: the only reason why you push so hard the blatantly false argument that Ronnie's conditioning in 1999 was as good as 1998 is because you want a version of Ronnie where he has Dorian's size besides the conditioning, because if you acknowledged that 1998 was Ronnie's best, it would allow us to claim that, sure, he had conditioning as good as Dorian's, but he is inferior in size, so he loses anyway. You want the cake and eat it too, but that's not possible.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hulkster, I'm still waiting for you reply to this one.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #41229 on:** July 11, 2008, 01:00:48 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on November 10, 2006, 03:49:04 AM

Hopefully we can get our resident cumstain Suckmymuscle to post another fantastic essay on why Yates would beat down your boy

Quote from: Sir William Idol on April 28, 2006, 10:05:05 AM

suckmalemuscle, i bet you're the type of guy that wanders into the Man-Hole bar in San Francisco and acting angry and surprised yells "hey, what the fuck is wrong with this place?!!?! whats a guy gotta do to get some cock around here!?!?" then spends the rest of the weekend in the bathroom stall gagging on strange dick!!!!! gayer than a gallon of Sherwin-Williams "Creamy Cum #7449" interior semi-gloss!!!!!!!

Quote from: Dingleberry on April 28, 2006, 10:20:06 AM

hahaha, suckmoremuscle is the kind of guy that rides around naked on a bicycle with no seat, sitting on the seat-post, and looking for bumps in the road. Gayer than watching the HBO Documentary on Rosie O'Donnell's "Family" Cruise while wearing a pink robe w/matching slippers, and sipping Zima

Quote from: kiwiol on September 20, 2006, 05:51:19 AM

Don't mind Suckmymuscle. He's just upset his dad didn't feed him his daily dose of manmilk straight from his tap.

Hulkster · « **Reply #41230 on:** July 11, 2008, 05:48:03 PM »

Quote

Sure, this is probably the reason why McGough prefers Ronnie's 2001 ASC form over 1999, or why Uncle Joe himself stated that Ronnie looked his best in 1998. Let's face it: the only reason why you push so hard the blatantly false argument that Ronnie's conditioning in 1999 was as good as 1998 is because you want a version of Ronnie where he has Dorian's size besides the conditioning, because if you acknowledged that 1998 was Ronnie's best, it would allow us to claim that, sure, he had conditioning as good as Dorian's, but he is inferior in size, so he loses anyway. You want the cake and eat it too, but that's not possible.

your post makes no sense.

where do you get the idea that I think Ronnie was in as good of shape in 99 as in 98 ONLY because I want him to have the added size too?

here is a hint:

what I WANT means NOTHING.

What ACTUALLY WAS DISPLAYED ON STAGE IS WHAT COUNTS and that I have no control over..

McGough has publicly documented that he feels that 99 was better than 98 (by omitting 98 from his article and focusing in on 99) but he also thinks that 2001 AC was even better.

so, McGough thinks that:

2001 AC> 99 O. >> 98 O.

So, why do you keep insisting that 98 was Ronnie's best?

clearly, it is NOT - and few people seem to think it is anymore.

I can't help it if 99 was an effective blend of the sort of detail displayed at the AC combined with added size that was absent at the AC.

its not my fault:

ask this man:

you are acting as if I am making up the fact that Ronnie was just as hard in 99 as he was at the AC but with 10 pounds more weight.

here is a lesson for you Sucky:

compare for yourself:

first two shots from 99, last one from AC.

its right here for your (blind) eyes and mind in denial.. $:-\$

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #41231 on:** July 11, 2008, 05:57:46 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on July 11, 2008, 01:00:48 PM

I get it, SemenHole. You are getting frustrated due to your inability to argue with a superior intellect. I understand.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #41232 on:** July 11, 2008, 06:50:50 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on November 24, 2007, 09:52:39 PM

You are an idiot. The thread was never locked. NarcissisticDeity changed the title, that's all.

Quote from: chaos on November 24, 2007, 10:57:31 PM

Ahem, you may want to publically apologize for calling that gentleman an idiot. The thread was locked and a couple threads were started about it being locked.

Who's the idiot now, fuckface?

ASJChaotic · « **Reply #41233 on:** July 11, 2008, 07:09:20 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on July 08, 2008, 01:52:19 AM

Coleman is sporting some serious bitch tits in that video. I'm sorry but I don't think it looks good. It indicates heavy drug use. A steroid taking cop. Whatever next?

wow, hahahahaha, and went on stage like that? WTF is that? its like one of his nipples exploded or something

Hulkster · « **Reply #41234 on:** July 11, 2008, 08:52:36 PM »

Quote from: MemberX on July 11, 2008, 07:09:20 PM

wow, hahahahaha, and went on stage like that? WTF is that? its like one of his nipples exploded or something

don't forget that dorian went onstage like this:

gyno is nothing compared to a missing arm.. $:-\$

England_1 · « **Reply #41235 on:** July 11, 2008, 09:37:28 PM »

Damn, sans the left biceps, Ronnie's front double bi NEVER looked that good. Dorian's torso was perfection.

m8 · « **Reply #41236 on:** July 11, 2008, 10:27:54 PM »

Dorian is the man. Dominating the competition even at his worst + a missing arm.
The best Mr. Olympia with Arnold.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #41237 on:** July 12, 2008, 12:37:10 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on July 11, 2008, 06:50:50 PM

Houston, we have a stalker. So you save in your hard drive every negative thing anyone says about me, so that you can post them in moments like this, huh? It goes to show that I truly own you, and that I clearly affect you.

Brutal self-ownage on your part.

You know why I don't save the posts where I owned you, despite the very large number of such posts? Here's the answer: because I don't give a fuck about you.

You, frankly, are not in my league, as I am a god-genius while you are a filfthy Mexican who hates white people.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #41238 on:** July 12, 2008, 05:13:10 AM »

Flawless

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #41239 on:** July 12, 2008, 06:28:05 AM »

anyone remember this classic post about "hardcore muscle?"

Quote from: suckmymuscle on February 09, 2007, 09:19:22 PM

What separated Dorian from the other competitors was that he had hardcore muscle. That is distinguished from mere muscle because the later is an amalgamation of muscle protein tissue, intra-muscular glycogen and water, as well as subcutaneous water. Dorian always had flat muscles because he was very depleted; what you saw covering his bones was essentially tendoms, actin and myosin rapped in skin. That's it. There was no water either inside or outside the muscles.

Hardcore muscle is a quality seldom seen anywhere, anytime. Muscle is a dime a dozen; hardcore muscle is not. Dorian's muscles looked flat and shrinked like dried prunes because only the contractile portion of the muscles was left after he lost all that fat and water from the body.

Ronnie never displayed hardcore muscle in his entire career: at the 1998 Olympia, he was dry but still full, and indication of having intra-muscular water stores, and at the 2003 Olympia his muscles were covered under a thick layer of lard and water, besides that his incredible muscle fullness indicates that he carb-loaded for that contest. Dorian Yates: last bodybuilder ever to display hardcore muscle onstage. Enjoy those clips on youtube and the Olympia tapes, folks, because that's the only time in your lives that you'll get to see hardcore muscle.

Camel Jockey · « **Reply #41240 on:** July 12, 2008, 06:30:45 AM »

cigarette man = suckymuscle = fag

Necrosis · « **Reply #41241 on:** July 12, 2008, 08:40:07 AM »

it is clearly him. he is a gimp of epic proportions

Hulkster · « **Reply #41242 on:** July 12, 2008, 06:07:22 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on July 12, 2008, 05:13:10 AM

Flawless

LOL other than the fact that he has the left arm of a nationals' competitor...

he does look good there...that is, until you put him next to Ronnie Coleman:

then he looks like garbage: doesn't matter whether its 257 pound Ronnie or 287 pound Ronnie

the result is the same: whether it was early in his olympia reign or later on..he was that much better..