RocketSwitch625
Getbig IV
   
Gender: 
Posts: 2208
Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
|
 |
« Reply #41500 on: August 15, 2008, 02:42:25 PM » |
|
holy shit, look at the size of Ronnie's calves!  He does do a good job of hiding his weak calves in some poses I will say that about Coleman. He seems to always stick one leg out at an angle in order to hide the weak inner calf. Most pro bodybuilders have big outer calves but inner calves are usually weak and that is definitely true with Coleman. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hulkster
|
 |
« Reply #41501 on: August 15, 2008, 03:20:18 PM » |
|
An offseason Yates destroying an in contest shape Coleman.
yeah, sure, ronnie's waist looks half as thick yet his lats are just as wide..
|
Flower Boy Ran Away
|
|
|
|
bigbobs
|
 |
« Reply #41502 on: August 15, 2008, 03:22:37 PM » |
|
yeah, sure, ronnie's waist looks half as thick yet his lats are just as wide..
Also, his legs are much bigger too, and you can see roundness in his delts even from the rear lat spread pose which you can't in Dorian's version. The Dorian nuthuggers like to blindly take any of his poses from one of his better years and claim it "destroys" Ronnie or anyone else. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hulkster
|
 |
« Reply #41503 on: August 15, 2008, 03:25:35 PM » |
|
Also, his legs are much bigger too, and you can see roundness in his delts even from the rear lat spread pose which you can't in Dorian's version. The Dorian nuthuggers like to blindly take any of his poses from one of his better years and claim it "destroys" Ronnie or anyone else.  very true. also note the wrinkles of loose skin on dorian's lower back that he is known for..  never see that on a 98/99 Coleman lat spread. never.
|
Flower Boy Ran Away
|
|
|
RocketSwitch625
Getbig IV
   
Gender: 
Posts: 2208
Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
|
 |
« Reply #41504 on: August 15, 2008, 05:53:09 PM » |
|
Are the Coleman nut-huggers ready for more punishment? I sure hope so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iceman1981
|
 |
« Reply #41505 on: August 15, 2008, 08:35:25 PM » |
|
Are the Coleman nut-huggers ready for more punishment? I sure hope so.
Great back and calves............ Wide waist, small arms, little quad sweep, bloated gut etc............... What else is new?    ?
|
|
|
|
|
BillyGuns
Getbig II
 
Gender: 
Posts: 120
I hope you got your tickets to the gun show!
|
 |
« Reply #41506 on: August 15, 2008, 11:53:13 PM » |
|
|
genetic phenom
|
|
|
BillyGuns
Getbig II
 
Gender: 
Posts: 120
I hope you got your tickets to the gun show!
|
 |
« Reply #41507 on: August 15, 2008, 11:53:58 PM » |
|
|
genetic phenom
|
|
|
|
NeoSeminole
|
 |
« Reply #41508 on: August 15, 2008, 11:57:28 PM » |
|
please leave your personal life out of this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
suckmymuscle
|
 |
« Reply #41509 on: August 20, 2008, 03:18:49 PM » |
|
yeah, sure, ronnie's waist looks half as thick yet his lats are just as wide..
No, his lats look just as thick because his waist is smaller. In reality, Dorian's lats are wider, thicker and longer than Ronnie's in all but his 2003 and 2004 shapes. SUKMYMUSCLE
|
Team Junkie
|
|
|
|
Hulkster
|
 |
« Reply #41510 on: August 20, 2008, 03:29:32 PM » |
|
No, his lats look just as thick because his waist is smaller. In reality, Dorian's lats are wider, thicker and longer than Ronnie's in all but his 2003 and 2004 shapes.
SUKMYMUSCLE
bullshit: compare kevin vs ronnie to kevin vs Yates:
Ronnie owns them all: dorian is barely wider than Kevin and Ronnie is noticably wider than kevin:
thus, Ronnie was wider than yates AND with a smaller waist.next.
|
Flower Boy Ran Away
|
|
|
|
NeoSeminole
|
 |
« Reply #41511 on: August 20, 2008, 06:38:11 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
suckmymuscle
|
 |
« Reply #41512 on: August 20, 2008, 07:17:10 PM » |
|
bullshit:
compare kevin vs ronnie to kevin vs Yates:
Ronnie owns them all: dorian is barely wider than Kevin and Ronnie is noticably wider than kevin:
thus, Ronnie was wider than yates AND with a smaller waist.
next.
Again, both Kevin and Ronnie have smaller waists than Yates, so the fact that Kevin's lats look almost as wide as Dorian's doesen't indicate that it's really almost as wide; it indicates that it looks as wide due to the smaller waist. You point is mute. SUCKMYMUSCLE
|
Team Junkie
|
|
|
|
England_1
|
 |
« Reply #41513 on: August 20, 2008, 07:22:27 PM » |
|
Dorian's back way thicker than Coleman's, especially in the lower back. 
|
Team Yates
|
|
|
|
NeoSeminole
|
 |
« Reply #41514 on: August 20, 2008, 07:27:03 PM » |
|
Again, both Kevin and Ronnie have smaller waists than Yates, so the fact that Kevin's lats look almost as wide as Dorian's doesen't indicate that it's really almost as wide; it indicates that it looks as wide due to the smaller waist. You point is mute. for all intents and purposes, looking as wide = being as wide. This is bodybuilding - NOT a mathematics fair. The judges don't get on stage with rulers. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
NeoSeminole
|
 |
« Reply #41515 on: August 20, 2008, 07:30:00 PM » |
|
Dorian's back way thicker than Coleman's, especially in the lower back. your comparison shows the opposite, dumbass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
England_1
|
 |
« Reply #41516 on: August 20, 2008, 07:38:46 PM » |
|
You must be blind. Dorian hits the pose much better too, not crunching forward.
|
Team Yates
|
|
|
|
johnny
|
 |
« Reply #41517 on: August 20, 2008, 09:11:15 PM » |
|
.......................
|
|
|
|
|
|
NeoSeminole
|
 |
« Reply #41518 on: August 20, 2008, 09:26:52 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HTexan
|
 |
« Reply #41519 on: August 21, 2008, 02:10:51 AM » |
|
epic makeup over acne. 
|
Allegedly.
|
|
|
|
Wiggs
|
 |
« Reply #41520 on: August 21, 2008, 02:16:19 AM » |
|
I thought this thread was dead.....oh well.... Ronnie is better. 
|
G
|
|
|
|
Hulkster
|
 |
« Reply #41521 on: August 21, 2008, 02:09:59 PM » |
|
Again, both Kevin and Ronnie have smaller waists than Yates, so the fact that Kevin's lats look almost as wide as Dorian's doesen't indicate that it's really almost as wide; it indicates that it looks as wide due to the smaller waist. You point is mute.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
epic excuse for Ronnie being noticably wider than Yates.  the proof is right there and you cant handle it..
|
Flower Boy Ran Away
|
|
|
|
Red Hook
|
 |
« Reply #41522 on: August 26, 2008, 04:39:47 AM » |
|
I hear that ND knows a thing or 2 about photoshop..sad sad sad
|
I
|
|
|
|
Antony77
|
 |
« Reply #41523 on: August 26, 2008, 04:42:42 AM » |
|
    Yes all of these things have something in common they're famous photos of an unusual occurrence which existed in a brief microcosm of time and then were never seen again, they were also only viewed by a couple of people first hand at the time they were taken, and yes while there have been other occurrences that have been noted by crack pots and conspiracy theorists (who are also crackpots) who claim that these things were in fact seen again there has been no proof at least not any as famous as these photos. So yes all these photos have become just about legendary the stuff of myth almost but are they proof? Do aliens exist? Is Bigfoot real? What about the Loch Ness Monster? And finally was there a period when Dorians arms actually looked decent when not squeezed against his side during a side triceps pose? Well in the interest of time I'm only going to discuss the Dorian Yates images captured by one lucky individual on a cold foggy England morning in a dingy basement in 1993. In these images Dorian who was a bodybuilder has achieved a look that appears impressive with large full muscles that while having very little separation still appears well proportioned and to a degree aesthetic, to some would be believers these photos are not only proof that Dorian at one time had decent arms but also that he was in fact the best bodybuilder of all time........ at least at the time the photos were taken. But others who have chosen not except them have pointed out the fact that he was never able to reproduce this look ever again, even a month or two later when he unveiled his physique for the world to see during the 1993 Mr Olympia competition, where Dorian who looked decent was drastically smaller than the fabled photos. So what was the reason for the discrepancy? Did Dorian who was known for having a dry condition for contests over diet to the point of sacrificing a significant amount of muscle, and if so why did he not learn from this mistake and bring that shortly held size to the stage in future competitions? What is the real reason that he never was able to produce a size even close to those photos in the next 4 years of his competitive days? And why did he in fact become even smaller and smaller with arms that most would agree did not belong on a Mr Olympia winner in the years ahead. Perhaps we will never know but one thing is for certain and that is the handful of photos captured on that fateful day will remain the source of much controversy and defensive whining from the fans of Dorian until the internet ceases to exist and damn dirty Apes rule the earth. The End.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antony77
|
 |
« Reply #41524 on: August 26, 2008, 04:47:09 AM » |
|
 Ronnie is so far beyond Dorian it's just not funny. Seriously, and enough with the fucking black and white offseason photos of Dorian they literally are the stuff of myth and legend at this point. Fact is Dorian never looked like that on stage and even at his biggest he still had weak arms. 93 is the best look he managed to bring to the stage and that is what should be compared with Ronnies best stage appearance. Not any offseason pics of either guy but their best ever Mr Olympia contest package. 
|
|
|
|
|
|