Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
October 20, 2014, 11:58:17 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Proviron vs Arimidex  (Read 1875 times)
!@#$%
Getbig III
***
Posts: 313



« on: May 29, 2006, 03:45:01 AM »

Proviron vs. Arimidex?

Which is better, what are the pros and cons of each?
Report to moderator   Logged
LurkerNoMore
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 12840

Tossing sand in your Va-Jay-Jay


« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2006, 07:56:35 AM »

They are completely different compounds and each serving a different purpose.  Armidex doesn't pack the androgenic (though slight) that proviron does.  Proviron is used as a mild anti-e at best and mostly as supplemental precautions when running things like tren and deca (for libido issues).

Armidex will control androgen bloat and estrogen levels much better than proviron by a wide margin.  Though aromasin is even better.
Report to moderator   Logged
!@#$%
Getbig III
***
Posts: 313



« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2006, 11:36:02 AM »

They are completely different compounds and each serving a different purpose.  Armidex doesn't pack the androgenic (though slight) that proviron does.  Proviron is used as a mild anti-e at best and mostly as supplemental precautions when running things like tren and deca (for libido issues).

Armidex will control androgen bloat and estrogen levels much better than proviron by a wide margin.  Though aromasin is even better.

Isn't Proviron supposed to be anti-progesterone as well? Progesterone is supposed to be a big problem with Tren.
Does Armidex help with progesterone as well?
Report to moderator   Logged
LurkerNoMore
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 12840

Tossing sand in your Va-Jay-Jay


« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2006, 09:10:16 PM »

Proviron works better much akin to winstrol in that department.  Many believe that both compete for sites that progestrone activates upon.  They don't work as anti-e's for PR activity, rather clogs up the sites (for lack of a better description) so PR can not get a chance to activate at all.   While there is no scientific proof of this other than many people simply saying "it worked for me", it is really up in the air and will come down to your body dynamics and sensitivity towards PR related activation. 

Arimidex doesn't faze PR issues at all.
Report to moderator   Logged
!@#$%
Getbig III
***
Posts: 313



« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2006, 05:25:02 PM »

Proviron works better much akin to winstrol in that department.  Many believe that both compete for sites that progestrone activates upon.  They don't work as anti-e's for PR activity, rather clogs up the sites (for lack of a better description) so PR can not get a chance to activate at all.   While there is no scientific proof of this other than many people simply saying "it worked for me", it is really up in the air and will come down to your body dynamics and sensitivity towards PR related activation. 

Arimidex doesn't faze PR issues at all.


So if Armidex doesn't effect progesterone at all and Proviron might help, would you agree that Proviron should always be used with Tren?

Also are the progesterone issues with Tren proven?
Report to moderator   Logged
Arnold jr
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 7255


fleshandiron.com


WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2006, 05:41:49 PM »

Not to be an ass, but a simple google search will answer all your questions.
Report to moderator   Logged
udeluz
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1340


CLICK...CLICK...BOOM !!!!!!!!


« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2006, 05:47:04 PM »

So is A-dex "Needed" eod or if symtoms begin to occur? And why do I hear some are taking 1mg eod and some .7 eod? why would .3 make a difference?
Report to moderator   Logged

U
!@#$%
Getbig III
***
Posts: 313



« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2006, 06:51:43 PM »

Not to be an ass, but a simple google search will answer all your questions.

Okay, I did, this is what I found:

All the experts seem to think that there is no progesteronic activity with Tren and that Tren one of the safest most effective steroids out there. Many board members disagree.

It is the same with using test as a base in every cycle. Experts (those who write books and articles) say you don't need it, most board members disagree.

When people vehimently disagree with the experts, I pause because there aren't endless studies on performance enhancing drugs. I wonder how anyone can be absolutly sure about any of it.

But I'm giving a thumbs down to the Proviron with Tren.

Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!