Author Topic: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums  (Read 31164 times)

rocket

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10727
  • Not a champion
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #75 on: June 15, 2006, 10:12:01 PM »
Ron, careful sport, he's called a boycott.  This could have dire consequences on the board!

Ron

  • Getbigistrator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12309
  • Getbig!
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #76 on: June 15, 2006, 10:27:37 PM »
Geroge has a right to speak his mind - that is what is great about Getbig and the boards, as long as it is no malicious bashing.  He is cool about me posting his emails to me - I asked him if it was ok - so here are some more of them... I am all for discussion and debate on female bodybuilding, perhaps the sport will change back to symmetry and physique rather than just muscularity.

----------------

As I told you in my last email...if you ever learn one thing about me... it's that I don't lie. That being said, I just got an email from one of your members... who does agree with me... and he included your post... I guess it must
have been from yesterday or today....  You're almost there Ron.... The issue isn't really about opinions pro or con...the issues is how those opinions are expressed. Calling a female bodybuilder a tranny?...come on... you know thats bs.... it's a stereotype... and then someone posts pictures that were clearly morphed to prove a point?.... that's what I mean... I have no problem with differing opinions.... none whatsoever....in fact criticizm may be a good thing...but like I said before... if done responsibly...and not using low life comments....

Actually Ron, I do get along with a lot of people...and I'm in contact with many pros and amateur bodybuilders....male and female...loyalty, trust and friendship are hard things to just give away... I don't... not to sound high and mighty... you or people in general have to earn them from me. I'm not a young guy...I'm almost
55 so I'm not some highschool kid whose wet behind the ears.

I explained to you that I too don't really like the idea of the women jucing beyond recognition... but the reality is... just like it is with the men... they feel they have to in order to compete/win.... yes... it's wrong... for both
sexes....and in my opinion...it's cheating!...but until the federation judges get it...until they start awarding the win to athletes with asthetics, symetry and conditioning rather than monster hugeness.... nothing will change.... and the monster men and women will keep on coming...

And the reason I declined to be "interviewed" is that I know you and Issac are working together....but I won't have anything to do with Isaac. I have my reasons...and they really don't involve anyone else but he and I.  I see that you mentioned the bashing was over... I take it you meant you will start to delete the malicious posts?....if so...I appplaude you...but...I have to be honest with you...I'm going to take the wait and see stance...

I wouldn't say anything in an email that I wouldn't say in public unless it were a protected conversation...i.e. I was asked specifically not to reveal the info from a protected source... like my source from the pecker meeting in which he stated..."those women will never be on my stage"...I believe I was the one who broke that story...and it spread around the net.. However.when asked not to divulge information I always comply...that's the reason I'm trusted by most...

I know for a fact that Betty Pariso officially submitted it to Manion at the IFBB meeting... and not to Bob as the letter wasn't address to Bob it was addressed to Manion, IFBB, et al....and anyone saying that she didn't is a liar
plain and simple!

No woman I know of FBB or otherwise, would want to show up to a meeting called by the male rep.... especially since he was the one who had just trashed them publically in national print....As far as caring...you have a point. I've been saying it for years in several broadcast emails to the women that they have to stop the me... me... mentality and take on a we... we... mentality.... and just like the men... it never happens....

The Blame Game: The premise that the women have no one to blame but themselves is partially true. No one forces them at gunpoint to take enhancement substances (drugs/steroids,HGH...whatever). However, much of the blame falls directly on the shoulders of the federations and their judges.

A) for consistantly awarding higher placement to women with size over women with aesthetics, symetry, and
conditioning... B) for not using a consistant criteria to determine placement... C) for total disregard of the federations own mandate of 20% less muscularity... albeit that mandate is arbitrary at best... 20% less water?... 40% less weight?... D) the abolishment of weight classes....and lastly....politics...whi ch I see NO solution to.....

----------

As a ps to the previous post....you said the FBB's asked for zero changes?.. .wrong... What they asked for was justice... which fell on deaf ears and was swept under the rug....Just for your edification, I've included a copy
of the official complaint that was presented at the IFBB meeting....you be the judge... it used the IFBB's own rules and code's as a basis for the complaint.... so you see Ron.... they have every right to be pissed....

October 11, 2005:  Betty Pariso, IFBB Women?s Athlete Representative

In regards to: Bob Cicherello, IFBB Mens?s Athlete Representive

Jim Manion
Chairman
IFBB Professional Division
P.O. Box 3224
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
USA 15230

Attention: IFBB Professional Committee Members:

As the IFBB Women?s Representative I, Betty Pariso, am filing an official complaint on behalf of the IFBB Professional women in response to Bob Cicherello?s comments in FLEX Magazine. We are exercising our right to file a complaint pursuant to the IFBB Constitution Article 5.1, number 14 which states an object of the IFBB is ?to discipline Members whose acts are judged contrary to the Constitution and Rules.?

Please note the following excerpt from the article in question featured in FLEX magazine (September 2005 pg. 55) by Julian Schmidt:

CHICK ON CHICKS

Cicherillo explains, "It has never been viable. Year after year, women's bodybuilding has consistently lost money. One year, the Ms Olympia sold 38 tickets... 38! So the fans have spoken: from a business perspective, it
doesn?t make sense, because it doesn?t survive; nor can it survive. "It?s a niche market, say its advocates. No, men?s bodybuilding has its niche market; women?s bodybuilding has no market; what little market it has
is made up of schmoes and fetishists.

Women's bodybuilding is an oxymoron. Nothing in the term or the concept matches up. Beautiful, sexy and muscular do not make a harmonious package. Notice the hopeless desperate trend: when women?s bodybuilding became bestial and alienated all interest, women?s fitness had to be created to fill the gap.
When that became too muscular and abandoned its audience, it had to be replaced with figure. What?s next, bikini contests?

"There is something to be said when Ms. Olympia herself, Lenda Murray - a lovely feminine lady - drops out of the sport because it has become ugly. Sure, they train hard, but they should be trying to become better women, not better men. End it, once and for all. It?s dragging down the entire sport."

Our complaint is supported in several areas of the IFBB 2005 Professional Rules and the IFBB Constitution Code of Ethics:   

 Article 14.5, Unsportsmanlike Conduct: an athlete cannot attack another athlete, judge or official, whether verbally or through malicious innuendo, gossip and/or rumor mongering,

Article 14.6, Public comments (including, but not limited to, those made via print publications, websites, public gatherings or other public forums) by registered IFBB athletes or officials made against other athletes or officials,
the IFBB or the sport in general, which are deemed personal, abusive, slanderous, libelous or prejudicial to the good image of the sport, are contrary to the IFBB Code of Ethics and will result in disciplinary measures
being taken by the Pro Division against the person responsible for the comments.

Athletes section # 6  of the IFBB 2005 Constitution Code of Ethics: athletes should ?assist the IFBB in the promotion of the sport by acting as a goodwill ambassador of the sport, promoting the sport in a positive manner, and protecting the good image and integrity of the sport and the IFBB.?

We respectfully request the Professional Committee take action as per Section 14.5 of the IFBB Professional Rules which state: ?If an athlete attacks another athlete, judge or official, whether verbally or through malicious
innuendo, gossip and/or rumor mongering, that athlete will be subject to a fine of US $10,000.00 and a one year suspension.

Respectfully,

Betty Pariso, IFBB Athlete Representative


suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #77 on: June 15, 2006, 10:49:58 PM »
"constantly spew vile messages of hate and disrespect towards women athletes."

Women?

Athletes?

Persons who's on male hormone therapy are definitely not 100% women.

For more info: http://www.isna.org/  ;)

http://web.mit.edu/hudson/www/terminology.html (discusses some of the hormones which these persons are on)

YIP
Zack

  HA HA HA! Even the moderator makes fun of female bodybuilders! They don't understand that, on the getbig.com boards, the moderators are some of us. The guys who are modertors here re the same who go fed up with the sick censorship on other boards. They seldom delete posts - except racist stuff, illegal pornogrphy and threats - because they know, from experience, wht it's like being on the other side, under the mercy of a nazi moderator. Right, Hedge? ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #78 on: June 16, 2006, 12:29:09 AM »

I haven't followed the arguments here... but i must chime in...

This has to be the perfect mix of muscle & femininity.

http://tangelamorgan.com/


You may return to what you were doing.

rocket

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10727
  • Not a champion
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #79 on: June 16, 2006, 12:35:33 AM »
What George fails to recognise is that female bodybuilders who have adverse manface effects do like like transexuals.  Honestly, I don't understand why he is bothering to fight this.  As I said before, what this guy is fighting is people expressing their true opinion on things.  He might not like the way some people say it but the fact of the matter is they do look like men/transexuals.

It is fine to stop people from saying Bob Chic had sex with kamali's wife because its just plain stupidity, its a baseless attack but if you post a picture of these girls people just react genuinely.  They're not trolling, they are just saying what everybody is thinking.  Sometimes it is cruel the way they express it but if there was not a shred of truth in what they were saying there wouldn't be anywhere near as much of a problem.

The problem is of course these girls are probably some really nice individuals who would be worth talking to and I'm sure George feels bad because it would be tough on them to hear this.  If I personally knew a girl with a manface I'd feel bad for her having to read this too.  I'd feel worse if she actually thought she didn't have a problem though.

Reminds me of the time that female bodybuilder was on whos line is it anyway.  Really, that was a brutal example of how scorned these girls are.  I don't know whether the individual who went on had any idea of the "vibe" that was being created using her but to me you really don't even need to outright say anything.  Its just obvious.

gtbro1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #80 on: June 16, 2006, 12:41:29 AM »
What George fails to recognise is that female bodybuilders who have adverse manface effects do like like transexuals.  Honestly, I don't understand why he is bothering to fight this.  As I said before, what this guy is fighting is people expressing their true opinion on things.  He might not like the way some people say it but the fact of the matter is they do look like men/transexuals.

It is fine to stop people from saying Bob Chic had sex with kamali's wife because its just plain stupidity, its a baseless attack but if you post a picture of these girls people just react genuinely.  They're not trolling, they are just saying what everybody is thinking.  Sometimes it is cruel the way they express it but if there was not a shred of truth in what they were saying there wouldn't be anywhere near as much of a problem.

The problem is of course these girls are probably some really nice individuals who would be worth talking to and I'm sure George feels bad because it would be tough on them to hear this.  If I personally knew a girl with a manface I'd feel bad for her having to read this too.  I'd feel worse if she actually thought she didn't have a problem though.

Reminds me of the time that female bodybuilder was on whos line is it anyway.  Really, that was a brutal example of how scorned these girls are.  I don't know whether the individual who went on had any idea of the "vibe" that was being created using her but to me you really don't even need to outright say anything.  Its just obvious.


Good Post Rocket.

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19466
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #81 on: June 16, 2006, 02:37:18 AM »
What George fails to recognise is that female bodybuilders who have adverse manface effects do like like transexuals.  Honestly, I don't understand why he is bothering to fight this.  As I said before, what this guy is fighting is people expressing their true opinion on things.  He might not like the way some people say it but the fact of the matter is they do look like men/transexuals.

It is fine to stop people from saying Bob Chic had sex with kamali's wife because its just plain stupidity, its a baseless attack but if you post a picture of these girls people just react genuinely.  They're not trolling, they are just saying what everybody is thinking.  Sometimes it is cruel the way they express it but if there was not a shred of truth in what they were saying there wouldn't be anywhere near as much of a problem.

The problem is of course these girls are probably some really nice individuals who would be worth talking to and I'm sure George feels bad because it would be tough on them to hear this.  If I personally knew a girl with a manface I'd feel bad for her having to read this too.  I'd feel worse if she actually thought she didn't have a problem though.

Reminds me of the time that female bodybuilder was on whos line is it anyway.  Really, that was a brutal example of how scorned these girls are.  I don't know whether the individual who went on had any idea of the "vibe" that was being created using her but to me you really don't even need to outright say anything.  Its just obvious.


Good post.

The question is if the schmoes who help feed these girls twisted self images really are the good guys in this instance?

I don't think there's any higher, noble cause behind the bashing of these persons. But at least those who bashes "female" bodybuilders aren't actively supporting bodies being virilized forever.

I doubt there are very few "female" bodybuilder who after reading Getbig thinks: "Yeah, I'm gonna up the dosages, so I can look real freaky".

The question is, can the same be said about the schmoe community? This George character needs to take a good look in the mirror and ask himself what the consequenses are for these persons, and if he really is in the right position to call ANYONE a destructive force to female bodybuilding.

If this George guy ever goes on here, he will notice that natural female bodybuilders and the likes of Rachel McLish are held in very high regard here. But perhaps George only wants  his muscle mama pumped up on test and Winstrol?

YIP
Zack
As empty as paradise

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #82 on: June 16, 2006, 07:14:23 AM »
all I know is that will all the test flowing through these women, they must be savage horn-dogs  :o ;D

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #83 on: June 16, 2006, 07:17:06 AM »
all I know is that will all the test flowing through these women, they must be savage horn-dogs  :o ;D

HAAAYYY LLLUUUVVVERRRR >>>>>> chills up my spine<<<<<<<<


ewwwwww
L

UK Gold

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Riding on the Getbig wind
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #84 on: June 16, 2006, 08:11:46 AM »
The girl in supersize she was beautiful before she went on the gear. Gorgeous face, toned, fit, sculpted body. Yep, i got a few good wanks out of her. But now..... I feel really sorry for her and hope she finds happiness doing something else. [i'd still shag her though]

bic_staedtler

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1209
  • That is all.
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #85 on: June 16, 2006, 08:21:54 AM »
rocket, Zack - excellent posts.

Rachel McLish was a favourite of Bertil Fox and Berry DeMay also!  They both disliked female bodybuilders.  This leads me to assume they were healthy, straight males.  :P  Berry said (paraphrase) "I'll put it to you like this - if you wanted to know what I considered to be the ideal female body, I wouldn't pick up a bodybuilding magazine."


I don't think female bodybuilders have the slightest idea what femininity is.

...we gotta look a little further here too, dudes.  What Berry says is the SAME for nearly ALL WOMEN!...if a woman wanted to know find what they consider the IDEAL male body, a bodybuilding magazine is the LAST place they'd look too.  So the chicks and the guys don't have this ideal, it's an "ideal" that the industry has created for itself...it's just that men's bodybuilding have enough fans to justify the freako mass look.  If the women had the same numbers for the amount of folks to make money off of like the men do, we wouldn't be having this discussion..MONEY talks!

Neither mens NOR womens bodybuilding display a form that is considered 'ideal' to MANY people.  Everything that's been said here negatively, constructively or otherwise can be said about the guys too.  

Chicks have schmoes?  Men get the gays!  It's simple, sex sells and BOTH sides take 'advantage' of this market.  Johnny Jackson anybody?...but very FEW here have anything bad to say about Johnny for marketing himself to gays....but OH NO, a female bodybuilder posing for schmoes??!?!....hang her high!  This is hypocritical.

In essence I believe female and male bodybuilding have the SAME problem.  Judging!  We reward ugly physiques.  Until that changes, the sports won't grow.  If you had girls who looked like Rachel McClish and Cory Everson you'd have a growing sport...but what happens when you get a better proportioned female body, but not as attractive in the face?  Give the trophy to the ugly chick with the better body?  YES, as long as the body doesn't look overly male!  They've had NO problem using this against the best looking (facewise) girls in figure like Monica Brant...why couldn't they do it in bodybuilding?  Sex sells, and female bodybuilding is sexy!...who can't agree that Cory and Rachel were great not just because of their bodies but they were SEXY women who looked like models?  

And who cares if men's bodybuilding also appeals to women when you pick the aesthetic guys?  Cause some guys who want MASS at all costs because that appeals to the non-genetic equipped gym rats out there who outnumber the genetic guys?  It seems mens bodybuilding fans are either "women hating" or "afraid of appearing gay" depending on what they're looking at..who gives a rats ass?  Bodybuilding will have a sexual component, always.  I don't worry about gays in bodybuilding because if they were THAT important of a market you'd have the stage full of fruity looking dudes like Kenny Jones!  And we don't see that.

AWARD aesthetic physiques on both sides of the sport, period.  What's so hard about that?  Change the damn judging criteria and stick to it, or be happy with the way things are.

Lift Studios

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4998
  • http://www.liftstudios.com
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #86 on: June 16, 2006, 08:41:42 AM »
And the reason I declined to be "interviewed" is that I know you and Issac are working together....but I won't have anything to do with Isaac. I have my reasons...and they really don't involve anyone else but he and I.  I see that you mentioned the bashing was over... I take it you meant you will start to delete the malicious posts?....if so...I appplaude you...but...I have to be honest with you...I'm going to take the wait and see stance...
Oh George - AKA "PICSMAN"... Check your inflated ego at the door. You're not going to do an interview because of one person, yet you claim to care about female bodybuilders? Hmmm...Yeah you're priorities are in line. Glad to see I still get under your skin though. I know you're on here reading this and will post on another board about it.



George has posted on here and had a meltdown after his photos received a seemingly less then positive response...
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=66731.25

hey guys...go f*ck yourselves....you've earned it....too bad this women put you to shame...you guys must really be pathetic losers to be intimidated by a female bodybuilder...lol...you pussys....don't worry...I won't post any more pics here....of anyone...including the figure/fitness chicks...so I guess you got what you wanted....but you know what....I don't give a rats a*ss....yeah yeah...I know...your pussy expression is comin up...melt down...blow me...now you can go nuthug some male bodybuilder...lol...path etic...

And he wonders why he doesn't receive any support.  ??? Have a good weekend and good luck on your crusade George.

Isaac
The one George hates.
Elevate Your Image.™

ieffinhatecardio

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5202
  • More proof God is a man.
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #87 on: June 16, 2006, 08:43:26 AM »
Nice job Lift, I was just going to ask you what happened between you and that guy.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #88 on: June 16, 2006, 08:49:14 AM »
...we gotta look a little further here too, dudes.  What Berry says is the SAME for nearly ALL WOMEN!...if a woman wanted to know find what they consider the IDEAL male body, a bodybuilding magazine is the LAST place they'd look too.  So the chicks and the guys don't have this ideal, it's an "ideal" that the industry has created for itself...it's just that men's bodybuilding have enough fans to justify the freako mass look.  If the women had the same numbers for the amount of folks to make money off of like the men do, we wouldn't be having this discussion..MONEY talks!

Neither mens NOR womens bodybuilding display a form that is considered 'ideal' to MANY people.  Everything that's been said here negatively, constructively or otherwise can be said about the guys too.  

Chicks have schmoes?  Men get the gays!  It's simple, sex sells and BOTH sides take 'advantage' of this market.  Johnny Jackson anybody?...but very FEW here have anything bad to say about Johnny for marketing himself to gays....but OH NO, a female bodybuilder posing for schmoes??!?!....hang her high!  This is hypocritical.

In essence I believe female and male bodybuilding have the SAME problem.  Judging!  We reward ugly physiques.  Until that changes, the sports won't grow.  If you had girls who looked like Rachel McClish and Cory Everson you'd have a growing sport...but what happens when you get a better proportioned female body, but not as attractive in the face?  Give the trophy to the ugly chick with the better body?  YES, as long as the body doesn't look overly male!  They've had NO problem using this against the best looking (facewise) girls in figure like Monica Brant...why couldn't they do it in bodybuilding?  Sex sells, and female bodybuilding is sexy!...who can't agree that Cory and Rachel were great not just because of their bodies but they were SEXY women who looked like models?  

And who cares if men's bodybuilding also appeals to women when you pick the aesthetic guys?  Cause some guys who want MASS at all costs because that appeals to the non-genetic equipped gym rats out there who outnumber the genetic guys?  It seems mens bodybuilding fans are either "women hating" or "afraid of appearing gay" depending on what they're looking at..who gives a rats ass?  Bodybuilding will have a sexual component, always.  I don't worry about gays in bodybuilding because if they were THAT important of a market you'd have the stage full of fruity looking dudes like Kenny Jones!  And we don't see that.

AWARD aesthetic physiques on both sides of the sport, period.  What's so hard about that?  Change the damn judging criteria and stick to it, or be happy with the way things are.

  But you're forgetting something: bodybuilding is MASCULINE. On a purely physiological level, the single trait which most distinguishes men from women is muscularity. Men are more muscular than women. Hence, bodybuilding, in the case of men, is simply an exaggeration of that which makes men manly.

  Female bodybuilding is abnormal, in the sense that it is an enhncement of something women are supposed to not want for themselves, namely, big muscles. Dorian Ytes hitting a rear lat spread, or Ronnie hitting a front double biceps might be freakish and even gross - to those who are not bodybuilding fans - to look at, but at lest it's MANLY. Kim Chisevsky or Lenda Murray doing the same, conversely, is just shocking and repulsive to the Human eye, because it is unnatural. "Unnatural", in this case translating into "unwomanly".

  You're right that many, many people are disgusted by the sight of male bodybuilders. But there are still enough people who find it interesting to justify it being a sanctioned sport. In the case of men, bodybuilding is a celebration of MASCULINITY, whereas in the case of women it's just an unnatural exercise in grossness. The interest in male bodybuilding might be compared to those magazines which displayes pics of women ith extremely large, deformed racks: it is large to the point of deformity, but there are still tons of men attracted to it because it's an exaggeration of FEMININITY :o ;D. So, just like masculinity to an exteme degree might be freakish but also interesting, so is extreme feminity. If you don't believe me, just ask Pamela Anderson, a woman who men throughout the World turned into  millionaire, as a reward for her being hyper-feminine - both in looks and personality.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #89 on: June 16, 2006, 08:58:17 AM »
  But you're forgetting something: bodybuilding is MASCULINE. On a purely physiological level, the single trait which most distinguishes men from women is muscularity. Men are more muscular than women. Hence, bodybuilding, in the case of men, is simply an exaggeration of that which makes men manly.

  Female bodybuilding is abnormal, in the sense that it is an enhncement of something women are supposed to not want for themselves, namely, big muscles. Dorian Ytes hitting a rear lat spread, or Ronnie hitting a front double biceps might be freakish and even gross - to those who are not bodybuilding fans - to look at, but at lest it's MANLY. Kim Chisevsky or Lenda Murray doing the same, conversely, is just shocking and repulsive to the Human eye, because it is unnatural. "Unnatural", in this case translating into "unwomanly".

  You're right that many, many people are disgusted by the sight of male bodybuilders. But there are still enough people who find it interesting to justify it being a sanctioned sport. In the case of men, bodybuilding is a celebration of MASCULINITY, whereas in the case of women it's just an unnatural exercise in grossness. The interest in male bodybuilding might be compared to those magazines which displayes pics of women ith extremely large, deformed racks: it is large to the point of deformity, but there are still tons of men attracted to it because it's an exaggeration of FEMININITY :o ;D. So, just like masculinity to an exteme degree might be freakish but also interesting, so is extreme feminity. If you don't believe me, just ask Pamela Anderson, a woman who men throughout the World turned into  millionaire, as a reward for her being hyper-feminine - both in looks and personality.

SUCKMYMUSCLE


Exactly!

To put it in perspective, the male equavalent of female bodybuilders (women who take male hormones and become manly) would be transexuals (men who take female hormones and become feminine), not male bodybuilders (men who take male hormones). Despite what george thinks, when we call female bodybuilders transexuals we are not making a baseless attack, but are instead painting a very accurate picture of the situation.

Ron: "I am lazy."

Tre

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16549
  • "What you don't have is a career."
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #90 on: June 16, 2006, 08:59:18 AM »
For the record, I admire George's passion and generally like his photography now, too...he's done some great work lately.  

I think he lets his emotions get the best of him on these issues, though, which compromises his ability to influence the people he is attempting to win over.  

Samourai Pizzacat

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2019
  • Meeoow!!
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #91 on: June 16, 2006, 09:00:26 AM »
Making rude or baseless attacks is never a good thing, even if the subject is as unattractive as female bodybuilding.

But I have to say, as reasonable and polite as I normally am, I have a VERY hard time doing that when it comes to this topic.

Like John Romano said, women have the right to turn themselves into men, completely destroy any remnants of femininity they ever had, and essentially look like cirus sideshows, just as we have a right not to like it and not to support it financially.

Do female bodybuilders think they look attractive to the general male populace?  Do female bodybuilders think we must support or encourage what they do?

I think the majority of them look disgusting.  If they need my approval to do what they do, that's too damn bad.  Serves them right for being so insecure.

I would say my reaction to a female bodybuilder is an evolved tendency.  Does that make me a bad person?  Maybe some things are just better left unsaid, and if you can't say anything good...

Do you think male BB-ers look attractive? 99% of the population will say no
Male BB-ers perhaps have a similar starting point as the women, insecurity. I'd even say that's the case even more in men, notice most of the BB are quite short? I think there's some decent correlations to be found between height and BBing


If you can clearly rationalise your thoughts you can apply a morale on your actions and reasonings! The morale in this case is that you should judge the female BB-ers the same as male bb-ers. 

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #92 on: June 16, 2006, 09:03:24 AM »
you should judge the female BB-ers the same as male bb-ers. 

When male bodybuilders start taking the hormones of the opposite sex, I'm sure we'll judge them equally harshly.  Until then, we're not talking about the same thing.

Hope this helps.
Ron: "I am lazy."

anvil

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2068
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #93 on: June 16, 2006, 09:10:36 AM »
When male bodybuilders start taking the hormones of the opposite sex, I'm sure we'll judge them equally harshly.  Until then, we're not talking about the same thing.

Hope this helps.


Game, set, and MATCH!

Tre

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16549
  • "What you don't have is a career."
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #94 on: June 16, 2006, 09:12:21 AM »
Game, set, and MATCH!

Not really, but nice try.

anvil

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2068
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #95 on: June 16, 2006, 09:15:38 AM »
Not really, but nice try.

Uh, yeah really.  You're on the titanic here 8)

buffbodz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5533
  • It's only a board
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #96 on: June 16, 2006, 09:16:40 AM »


Monster delusional persons.

YIP
Zack
Just what women need to hear,  load yourself with male hormones and win, but at what cost?  That's the message I got.

Now that sounds like a very informative board.  As the old sane goes.  Publicity, good or bad, is still publicity.  Long live Get Big.  And boycot Chicks with Dicks, or almost their.
6 meals lift heavy and 1/2 hr cardio

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19466
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #97 on: June 16, 2006, 09:20:24 AM »
You can have whatever opinion on males using male hormones to get bigger.

If the persons in pro "female" bodybuilding were using female hormones, there is NO way this debate would exist.

Time to stop this ridiculous shit. Give girls who are trying to become world class bodybuilders without male hormones the recognition instead.

The question could be raised why this George guy isn't trying to do this. Why is he putting the spotlight on the transgender persons?

Credit to Tre for leaning towards at least somewhat moderate persons. You have to start somewhere...

YIP
Zack

As empty as paradise

Samourai Pizzacat

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2019
  • Meeoow!!
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #98 on: June 16, 2006, 09:52:37 AM »
Game, set, and MATCH!

Misguided fool, I pity you....

Both sexes abuse hormones, because the personal outcome is in some way different they should be judged differently?

JKDMan

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1498
  • The G.O.A.T.
Re: Femuscle site's attack on Getbig forums
« Reply #99 on: June 16, 2006, 09:55:35 AM »
When male bodybuilders start taking the hormones of the opposite sex, I'm sure we'll judge them equally harshly.  Until then, we're not talking about the same thing.

Hope this helps.

Ding, ding, ding! Give this man a prize!  ;)
Lee