Author Topic: Gamma-O doing great without Cook  (Read 79006 times)

Lift Studios

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4998
  • http://www.liftstudios.com
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #125 on: June 22, 2006, 02:01:57 PM »
Ah yes - What Chris has to say will be very interesting. Mr. Prez left a few things out of his message on here...

Elevate Your Image.™

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #126 on: June 22, 2006, 02:02:42 PM »

....wow, I'm amazed to see Chris in that kind of shape.  Basically, Gammo-O guy and Boss Blechman said their side and Chris hasn't, but really WHO THE HELL CARES.  I thought that perhaps Gamma-O guy was retorting to some bashing but I haven't heard anything.

I just wonder why MD would have given Chris a column which only lasted a few months for no other reason apparently than his getting dumped by a supplement company.  If that's the reason, then what's up with that, Steve?  You've got a guy like Chris Cormier who hasn't placed well in years and yet he still has his column.  Simply because MuscleTech ponies up some cash for you to keep him on board?  That's 'compassion' for bodybuilders, eh?

Anyhow, I hope Chris figures out that there's more to life than pro bodybuilding and I hope he does well for himself in the future.

I have to agree. I had no idea that this is the way things worked. I thought people got columns, because they (mags) actually thought "X" pro brought something to the mag, not just cause their sponsor wanted them to have one.
HAHA, RON.....

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #127 on: June 22, 2006, 02:04:01 PM »
Ah yes - What Chris has to say will be very interesting. Mr. Prez left a few things out of his message on here...



You've made some great points (for a schmoe  ;)) this stuff just isn't adding up.
HAHA, RON.....

puredrive

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 121
  • Getbig!
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #128 on: June 22, 2006, 02:21:23 PM »
well, at least it is nice to know that there are so many gracious businessmen on here who would allow someone they pay to not do the job they pay them to do and continue to pay that person out of the goodness of their heart without a hint of thought about profit and loss or good business. since he is a pro bb'er he should be afforded some specific special rights? well, this thread has been going, it has been sent to him, he hasnt answered it. maybe becuase he knows he will get destroyed by the so-called truth seekers who only call bullshit on here when it is. which is laughable since this is the most hypocritical board i have ever been on.

Lift Studios

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4998
  • http://www.liftstudios.com
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #129 on: June 22, 2006, 03:11:44 PM »
well, at least it is nice to know that there are so many gracious businessmen on here who would allow someone they pay to not do the job they pay them to do and continue to pay that person out of the goodness of their heart without a hint of thought about profit and loss or good business. since he is a pro bb'er he should be afforded some specific special rights? well, this thread has been going, it has been sent to him, he hasnt answered it. maybe becuase he knows he will get destroyed by the so-called truth seekers who only call bullshit on here when it is. which is laughable since this is the most hypocritical board i have ever been on.
Ron will be putting up his interview with Chris soon and you will read what Chris had to say... including his pending lawsuit against Gamma-O...
Elevate Your Image.™

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5810
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #130 on: June 22, 2006, 03:54:22 PM »
well, at least it is nice to know that there are so many gracious businessmen on here who would allow someone they pay to not do the job they pay them to do and continue to pay that person out of the goodness of their heart without a hint of thought about profit and loss or good business. since he is a pro bb'er he should be afforded some specific special rights? well, this thread has been going, it has been sent to him, he hasnt answered it. maybe becuase he knows he will get destroyed by the so-called truth seekers who only call bullshit on here when it is. which is laughable since this is the most hypocritical board i have ever been on.
None of us have a problem with this company deciding to give chris the shaft for whatever reason (it's their money afterall).

But why come on here and announce it the way he did? Show some class, a simple press release would suffice...

timfogarty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7108
  • @fogartyTim on twitter
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #131 on: June 22, 2006, 03:59:29 PM »
since this is the most hypocritical board i have ever been on.

cynical yes, hypocritical no.

I left mayheim when all my posts explaining why the HGH sprays were snakeoil were deleted.  the person doing the deleting was the wife of a bodybuilder who was promoting the product.

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25838
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #132 on: June 22, 2006, 06:14:09 PM »
cynical yes, hypocritical no.

I left mayheim when all my posts explaining why the HGH sprays were snakeoil were deleted.  the person doing the deleting was the wife of a bodybuilder who was promoting the product.


Same here, I was one of the original members back in 2002 but they started deleting my post and articles I wrote. 

Getbig is the voice of all voice....a true protector of the First Amendment
A

xpac2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1242
  • Getbig!
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #133 on: June 22, 2006, 06:22:48 PM »

Same here, I was one of the original members back in 2002 but they started deleting my post and articles I wrote. 

Getbig is the voice of all voice....a true protector of the First Amendment

Fuck Off

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #134 on: June 22, 2006, 06:24:52 PM »
Same here, I was one of the original members back in 2002 but they started deleting my post and articles I wrote. 

Astounding how egotistical you are Vince.

Gamma-O President

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 37
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #135 on: June 22, 2006, 08:50:08 PM »
I started this post in response to the gamma-o is broke post.  I in no way tried to bash or disrespect Chris.  The contract Chris has is unexecuted.  It was never signed.  Even if it was it clearly states that if Cook becomes a finical burden to the company we can let him go. (read that twice so it sinks in)

When we first started the Cook ads you all bashed him.  Then we let him go and he's everyones hero?  As the Pres of Gamma I have a crazy idea that I want the company to turn a profit.  Go figure.  What a scum bag I am.  I know you all work for free.

The deal with MD was this.  They get exclusive rights to Cook in exchange for x number of free pages in the Mag and other perks.  We save on the ads and that off sets the cook fee.  Steve did not live up to all the things we were promised.  We called him for months with no return calls.  When we stopped the ads we were still paying Cook.  Remember that the whole time I was paying the contracts were not signed and all we did was have him at 2 shows and some pictures.  The guy did well.  It's not like he dug ditches.

If Chris is really honest in his interview he will tell you that our phone conversation was not an easy one for me to make and I told him I would recommend him and do all I could to futher his career.  I never had to let someone go before that I really liked.  I had many dinners with him and his wife and I did not want to see this end.  Unfortunately, I had to do what was best for the company.

As for the BS pictures you moron's post of him in the off season....I have seen Ronny and Jay look just as bad.  That's why it's called off season.  We started talking to him after those pictures so that was not the issue.  It was purely a return on investment.

John Napolitano

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #136 on: June 22, 2006, 08:55:12 PM »
It's not like he dug ditches.

Do you think he would have shown better back development this year if he had?

irejistirred4deena

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 162
  • Getbig!
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #137 on: June 22, 2006, 09:34:54 PM »
I started this post in response to the gamma-o is broke post.  I in no way tried to bash or disrespect Chris.  The contract Chris has is unexecuted.  It was never signed.  Even if it was it clearly states that if Cook becomes a finical burden to the company we can let him go. (read that twice so it sinks in)

When we first started the Cook ads you all bashed him.  Then we let him go and he's everyones hero?  As the Pres of Gamma I have a crazy idea that I want the company to turn a profit.  Go figure.  What a scum bag I am.  I know you all work for free.

The deal with MD was this.  They get exclusive rights to Cook in exchange for x number of free pages in the Mag and other perks.  We save on the ads and that off sets the cook fee.  Steve did not live up to all the things we were promised.  We called him for months with no return calls.  When we stopped the ads we were still paying Cook.  Remember that the whole time I was paying the contracts were not signed and all we did was have him at 2 shows and some pictures.  The guy did well.  It's not like he dug ditches.

If Chris is really honest in his interview he will tell you that our phone conversation was not an easy one for me to make and I told him I would recommend him and do all I could to futher his career.  I never had to let someone go before that I really liked.  I had many dinners with him and his wife and I did not want to see this end.  Unfortunately, I had to do what was best for the company.

As for the BS pictures you moron's post of him in the off season....I have seen Ronny and Jay look just as bad.  That's why it's called off season.  We started talking to him after those pictures so that was not the issue.  It was purely a return on investment.

John Napolitano


If everything you said is true, I don't blame you at all for your decision.  As a pro, Chris has been a dud.  At least this far.  If he's had health problems like rumored, I don't blame Chris for taking time off at all, but he should realize he's not pulling his end of the bargain and bow out from your company's sponsership gracefully. 

But you're dead wrong about one thing.  There's no way in hell Ronnie or Jay ever guestposed in that (lack of) condition.  Whatever his reasons were for taking time off, he should have declined that guest pose.  I'd of been pissed if I had gone primarily to see him and he looked like that.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #138 on: June 22, 2006, 09:36:39 PM »
But you're dead wrong about one thing.  There's no way in hell Ronnie or Jay ever guestposed in that (lack of) condition.  Whatever his reasons were for taking time off, he should have declined that guest pose.  I'd of been pissed if I had gone primarily to see him and he looked like that.

I've seen pics of Ronnie with that much bodyfat- but he still had pro levels of muscle.

Cook looked like a high school football lineman at that show.  All cafeteria food and whatnot.

irejistirred4deena

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 162
  • Getbig!
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #139 on: June 22, 2006, 10:02:30 PM »
I've seen pics of Ronnie with that much bodyfat- but he still had pro levels of muscle.

Cook looked like a high school football lineman at that show.  All cafeteria food and whatnot.

Yeah by condition I meant bodyfat and size.  When Ronnie's smooth he looks like he could take a round out of King Kong. 

Gamma-O President

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 37
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #140 on: June 22, 2006, 10:03:11 PM »
you guys are right.  i have seen Ronnie REALLY fat but still huge.  Chris made a bad decision and he rectified it by refunding the promoter even though he told the guy ahead of time he was in bad shape.

He should not have done it.  we all make mistakes.  cant turn back time or I for one would have changed the name on the post thread.  I see what you all mean but I was just trying the clear the air and say were not going out of biz even though Chris is not with us.  My bad.

Lift Studios

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4998
  • http://www.liftstudios.com
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #141 on: June 23, 2006, 12:34:55 AM »
But what about your statements in the ad? They contradict what you are saying here. You're either lying here or you ran false advertising stating that Chris SIGNED a contract and had shares in the company.

Care to address that?



Elevate Your Image.™

Ron

  • Getbigistrator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12492
  • Getbig!
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #142 on: June 23, 2006, 12:54:53 AM »
Interview with Chris Cook on various subjects...


http://www.getbig.com/iview/cook062106.htm






The president of Gammo-O said that you do not have a signed contract?

No - not only do I have a signed contract, but I also have a signed promissory note that that was faxed prior to the contract which was done it late September. Then everything was consummated around the 15th of October which was at the 2005 Olympia. At the Olympia, when I sat at their booth, they paid me my very first paycheck.



Muscular Development said that they do not have a contract with you? Is that true?

Muscular Development had the contract with Gammo-O. Gamma-O and I agreed that I will sell them my publication rights because at the time, I was with Weider, and in order to consummate my deal with Gamma-O, they wanted me to be with Muscular Development instead. So I agreed to the deal. Within the contract, I sold them my publication rights. In other words, they own my publications rights and they own me as the athlete for their company for a certain price, which by the way $130,000 guarantee, plus 5% of the company's growth, plus 2% company ownership, which I have in a contract. Regarding the magazine, Muscular Development and Gamma-O had an agreement in which they would give them $7,500 worth of free advertisement for the use of me being exclusive with MD. But MD also told them that in order to do that, they also have to pay an additional $7,500 a month for more advertising. $15,000 a month of advertising for half the price - not a bad deal, and I was included. Well, a few months later, Gammo-O got upset because they thought that MD was not giving them their extra $7,500 worth of free advertisement a month. So they stopped paying the other $7,500 that was agreed upon, so somewhere, it fell apart there.



$130,000??? Are you kidding me? Guaranteed a year???

Yes, and they paid me that monthly, every month, and I have the check stubs to prove it. What we did was the 5% of the company growth, was we had a deal that they pay me a little less on the monthly check and every quarter, they would pay me 5%, so it would end up being a little more every quarter, which was totally fine, because at the end of the year, I would end up with all of what was owed to me, which was perfectly fine to me.



So when MD said they had no choice but to terminate you, that is true?

First of all, MD didn't terminate me. The only termination that transcribed was that Gamma-O failed to pay me. They ran out of money. Gamma-O basically is almost bankrupt. The way the were spending money is almost ridiculous. For example, I had to meet them in Vegas to do a photo shoot six weeks at, and they asked us to meet them at a $200 a plate restaurant twice a day. It was unreal how much money was wasted. Plain and simple, they ran out of money. They started bouncing checks to me about three months before this happened, and finally, the beginning of April, I talked to them about it. They promised me that I would have my check guaranteed overnight by the 2nd of the month. When it didn't come in overnight as promised, I called again, and asked him where is my check, he said that we are not going to send you the money, because to make a long story short, we are out of money, and our investor is not willing to give us any more money unless we cut all our athletes?



They bounced your checks?

Oh yes, they bounced three checks on me, but they eventually got covered. They gave me some poor excuse that they are putting some money into a new account, so I just wrote that off, no big deal. But then they couldn't pay me in April. Later on, they sent me a letter that said we are not terminating our agreement with you, not due to your performance, but due to financial hardship with the company.



And you have this letter?

Yes, it is sitting at my lawyer's house, in a package.



Have you talked to John about this after it happened?

What happened was when that happened, they owed more other expenses. Because they told me to buy five pair of sweatsuits, tops and bottoms, and have them embroidered. Which is very expensive. And they also had me do my personal Chris Cook 'Blond Bomber' shirts also - they had me silkscreen Gamma-O on all of the sleeves on the shirts which I sell at various events. They told me they were going to pay for all of that, close to $4,000 in various expenses. They also owe me for expenses for the Ironman Pro, Arnold Classic and the San Francisco Pro show. After they told me that they weren't going to pay me my regular check in April, I asked them if they are at least going to send me the money for expenses? Well - I got into it with them and said I would sue them over the contract, so he said do what you gotta do, that since you want to do that, I won't send you any money for anything.



What is with your missing special DVD tapes?

I made a personal DVD video will getting ready for the New York show last year. I had the original at my home because it wasn't edited yet. Gamma-O wanted to use a clip of it to put on their screens for the 2006 Arnold Classic, so I sent them the tape. They utilized it, and used a clip, and they were supposed to send it back to me, but because they are pissed off on me because of the lawsuit, they are not sending it back. And that is my only copy.



But isn't there an ad stating that you have a contract with Gamma-O? Do you have a contract or not?

They are lying. Why would he even say I don't know. My lawyer has been working on putting this lawsuit together and he probably just found out I was serious about it. He is going to get sued via federal court because he is located in New York and I am located in California. Everything is in the works. My lawyer takes care of it.  I try not to bother with it at the moment. I have written off the money. But every day, my image is still on their website, which is a blatant violation - they are stealing my image. They say they don't have a contract with me anymore, yet my image is there on their website. These New York guys convinced some investors to give them money, and they are pissing it all away. I can say a lot about their products, their lab tests and what is going on, but it will all come out at the end. This sounds like they are jumping the gun, and covering their ass.



Ok, enough of this. How are you doing now?

Fine. Financially, I have not relied on bodybuilding to make a living. I have my own business, and I do well. I currently am not pursuing another contract at the moment, but I am open to talking to companies about it. I know that with how things turned out to be earlier this year that I won't be able to get the right price at the moment. I have had many covers in the last three years, perhaps more than only a handful of bodybuilders. But at the moment, everybody wants to put a price on my placings, which is fair, but the same people that talk shit right now know that if I bring myself into the right conditioning with my next shows, then I won't be beat.



So what happened at the 2006 Ironman, Arnold, San Francisco shows?

You have to look at the last three years. I did the USA's, I didn't win the overall, lost the overall to Richard Jones. Took that year, and fixed my body. Did the USA's again the following year, lost the overall to Mark Dugdale. I went straight from there to the Nationals. Basically, I had a few weeks off before I started to diet for the Nationals, worked with Chris Aceto, and won the Nationals in late November. From there, I took about a month off, then started dieting again because I was competing the following May. I was doing show after show after show, and my first pro show, I took 6th place at the New York Pro. I just was starting to show my potential and my ability. But the problem was that my body was getting to the point that I was just broken down. I decided after that to take care of family matters, so I didn't train heavy for five months after that. I let my body heal completely. After that, I started 12 weeks out from the Ironman Pro, and had to go from 235 pounds to about 265 pounds for the show. I just wasn't able to get my body ready to do these shows. That's all it was. Was it foolish? Maybe so, but I am still one of the younger competitors competing in the pros. It is all relevant to things right now.  I realize that if you want to be in the top, if you want to be Mr. Olympia, you are going to have to have a lot of sacrifices. You need to do things right, you need to stay healthy. The fact is, I will be ready next time. I am 285 pounds right now, and am not going to compete until next May. I am the biggest I have ever been at the moment, and will continue to grow. But I guarantee that when I show up, it will be a different Chris Cook. First, I will be rested, and second, I will do everything I gotta do to win those shows.


So what type of Chris Cook will be see next year?

My objective is to be on stage at around 260-265 pounds in the same conditioning or better because I will be more mature, and better than I was at Nationals!

UK Gold

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Riding on the Getbig wind
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #143 on: June 23, 2006, 02:55:40 AM »
Well well. My posts about 'gamma o' being a scam run keep on getting deleted. But now Chris himself has detailed the nature of 'gamma o'. What a bunch of lying, duplicitous, mendacious, imbecilic fools. I hope Chris' lawyers ruin them and they end up in the gutter.

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25838
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #144 on: June 23, 2006, 03:18:44 AM »
Astounding how egotistical you are Vince.


I came on in Oct 2002.  That's not being egotistical.  That's just the honest truth.  Ask anyone
A

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16662
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #145 on: June 23, 2006, 05:31:54 AM »
I can say a lot about their products, their lab tests and what is going on, but it will all come out at the end.
Hahaha no shit!

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #146 on: June 23, 2006, 05:37:10 AM »
I can not afford to pay someone while they are learning.


but you would have been happy to get rich off of his efforts right?  Sometimes we need to take the bad with the good.  Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater

irejistirred4deena

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 162
  • Getbig!
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #147 on: June 23, 2006, 06:04:15 AM »
you guys are right.  i have seen Ronnie REALLY fat but still huge.  Chris made a bad decision and he rectified it by refunding the promoter even though he told the guy ahead of time he was in bad shape.


My mistake on the guest posing bit.  Classy move on Chris's part to refund the money.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #148 on: June 23, 2006, 06:44:14 AM »
I guarantee that when I show up, it will be a different Chris Cook.

Good interview.  Chris Cook seems like a humble, sincere guy.

However, he did commit a "party foul" by using that cliche phrase above. 

Gamma-O, respond, brother!  Set the record straight.

puredrive

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 121
  • Getbig!
Re: Gamma-O doing great without Cook
« Reply #149 on: June 23, 2006, 07:07:16 AM »
well, at least chris is so honest and forthright that knowing the products were crap (as he indicated about knowing their lab tests) that he was willing to continue to defraud all of us and convince us they were the best thing ever and the reason he was in top shape. so long as they paid his contract. wonderful. so everyone is mad that chris isnt getting paid, yet it is ok for him to blatantly lie to all of us and have us buy a product based on his recommendation? yeah, i get the whole endorsement deal. but if you have ethics as chris portrays himself to have, then dont accept any money from a company that is using your fans, your body, and your trust from others to profit. since he didnt need the money, as he so flatly put it. he has his own business anyway. so if you dont need the money chris, then why just continue with the lie. forget not getting paid. why didnt you, if you didnt need the money, just say, " you know, my fans and my friends deserve better than that. they dont deserve to be lied to by me. i dont want and wont accept your offer"

but no, everyone would rather that he lie because he is a pro bodybuilder and they arent held to any standards at all.