competition not seen neither before or since, how does that constitute overrated?
because he looks like this at his best:

and beat guys that look like this:

thats why.
Look I am not saying that dorian never deserved to be Mr. O. But with arms, legs, blocky taper and chest like that, I would say that the guy was overrated at the very least.
any fool should be able to see the quality differences in the shots I just posted.
and no, that is not a bad shot of dorian. It is at his very best all time pre-tear shape, the 1993 Mr. O.
Size was too much in vouge during his reign. That much should be very, very obvious.
I am not "bashing dorian" I am simply calling them as I see them: his taper, arms, chest and quads were not up to the standard of his calves, lats and back.
its that simple.
Everyone has flaws.
But having flaws as huge as quads chest and your arms, well, thats a bit much to brush off. It makes you seem overrated. Plain and simple.