1. "allegedly" . . . forget juries for a moment . . . you know he did. I don't understand why you're being intentionally naive about this.
2. he can plead ignorance about his parents' actions . . . if i were an NCAA lawyer, i would look into Bush's relationship w Michaels. I'm sure Michaels will be willing to cooperate at this point.
1. I'm not being naive. I just haven't read enough about the facts to say definitively that he received improper benefits. He very well may have, but I'll wait till something a little more reliable than yahoo.com provides information.
I do believe players, agents, boosters, etc. cheat all the time.
2. They can look into his actions, but I doubt there is a smoking gun. Plus they already let Jarrett off the hook. No question he received a direct benefit from Leinart's father (paying most of Jarrett's rent):
"In June, the NCAA revoked Jarrett's eligibility because he paid only $650 a month toward the $3,866-a-month rent on the apartment. Leinart had also paid $650, and his father paid the rest. The NCAA reinstated Jarrett a few weeks ago, but he must pay about $5,000 to charity over the course of his eligibility."
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-jarrett24aug24,0,4147147.story?coll=la-home-sports