Again, that's why I've asked these clucking Palin critics here, to break it down here. Show exactly what the qualifications for president are and why Palin supposedly falls short vs. Obama.
For all their yakking, Blacken, Lurker, Straw Man, et. al. can't seem to muster that effort. Is YouTube out of videos, or are their thought-processes on vacation (it is MLK day, after all)?
WTF do you keep harping on about some list for? What list? What qualifications? Where is the standard?
The reason no one has responded to your lame ass is because your entire question is just nonsense.
You are throwing a blanket generalization out there as if it were cut and dried while doing nothing but revealing yourself to be quite stupid for assuming there is a concrete answer to an abstract question.
But since you asked why Obama is a better candidate to hold the POTUS, then I will give you REASONS why, since there is no established list of QUALIFICATIONS that you keep crying about as though they exist.
1 - I don't think anyone has to worry about Obama quitting in the middle of his term.
2 - I don't think anyone has to worry about Obama leaving a meeting with Putin or Kim in a burst of tears because "they were not nice to him".
3 - I don't think Obama believes in witches.
4 - Speaking gaffes are one thing, thinking gaffes are something else all together.
5 - I don't think Obama believes rape victims should pay for their own exam kit.
6 - I don't think Obama views the world from the outlook of the 1890's
7 - I don't think Obama has a reputation for blaming people for his own fuck ups and messes that he finds himself in based on his own sole actions or words
Want to continue along with the same bullshit you have been screeching about like it was actually relevant?