Tbombz is there really a difference in the quality of powders when it comes to ugl vs hg? One guy uses 1000mg sustanon brewed in his basement and another guy uses a gram of normas, same results? Gh15 says differently, I know you have said differently after trying some Zafas out and saying you regret not using human grade all along. I always thought all that matters is the amount of hormone in the blood no?
yeah all that matters is the amount of hormone in the blood.
what i was saying is that the powders most people get are not 100% hormone, and thus the gear is underdosed.
for example, a human grde company buys 1 kilo of raw test cyp powder and mixes it with roughly 4,000 cc's of oil. they would have 4,000 cc's of 250mg test cyp. now take a ug lab who buys 1 kilo of roids and mixes it with 4,000 cc's of oil. if their powder wa legit they would also ave 250mg/ml... but the powder they get is usually like, at best, 80% pure. so they are loooking at 200mg/ml.
depends on your source. ive gotten completely bunk powder before, and some pretty good stuff. the deca im using now works pretty good but i know its not 100% potency. like i said earlier i think it was probably only about 50% or so, by how 6cc's per week is feeling.
Personally I'd simply run nothing if all I had was deca but to each his own.
As far as no test = lean/cut/dry as possible, competitively speaking most who pull all test before a show get beat by goes who don't...not always but the majority. There is absolutely no reason, zero, none at all why one cannot be as dry and lean as possible with test and if he is he'll also be fuller.
you would rather lose muscle, feel like shit, put on fat, lose strength... rather than continue gaining muscle, continue staying lean, continue gaining strength, have great joints, and why?? because of some stupid ass internet bro science bullshit that makes you think every cycle needs test? dudes in the 60,70, 80's never ran test. go tell arnold and serge nubret they shouldnt have run a cycle without test.
