‘White Student Union’ started at Georgia State

[Roger Bacon]

The Southern Poverty Law Center labeled an established White Student Union in Maryland has a hate group... lol

http://www.ajc.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/freshman-starts-informal-white-student-union-at-ge/nY887/
‘White Student Union’ started at Georgia State

Freshman Patrick Sharp said he started the club so that students of European and Euro-American descent can celebrate their shared history and culture and discuss issues that affect white people, such as immigration and affirmative action.

Sharp, who is from Birmingham, Ala., enrolled this summer. Six students complained to the university after seeing his fliers around campus, said Doug Covey, vice president for student affairs. Covey said he responded to each by explaining he group is within its right to exist and that speech is protected even if offensive to someone.

[Hugo Chavez]

I love how it's only racist if whites do it... WTF? You can tune to TV anytime of day and find exclusive shit for other races but don't you dare bitch about it.  Any other race or creed, go for it... If you're white, shut your fucking mouth.

Would anybody say anything about a Latino Students Union or Black Student's Union?  No, they already have that kind of shit. If you're white, fuck you... YOU WHITEY, by default are not allowed to do jack shit with each other without being a RACIST!!!!

Oh, you're not a racist you say, too bad dickhead, you're still not allowed to form racist organizations like blacks and Latinos can.  Why?  Because the media and gov says so....

What are they doing by doing this?  Yup... Turning people on all sides that were not racist into racists.  NICE JOB IDIOTS.

[dario73]

When I attended college there was the AHANA organization for asian and hispanic students. The blacks had their own organization.

Why is it wrong for white students to have their own union? It isn't and this is coming from a hispanic.

[Pray_4_War]

They need it now more than ever.  White culture is being exterminated.  In the old days whites held minority groups back.  Now minorities of every kind are making the rules of society and white heterosexual males have a target on their backs.  They better wise up and start standing up for themselves or they are going to get trampled. 

[Al Doggity]

I love how it's only racist if whites do it... WTF? You can tune to TV anytime of day and find exclusive shit for other races but don't you dare bitch about it.  Any other race or creed, go for it... If you're white, shut your fucking mouth.

Would anybody say anything about a Latino Students Union or Black Student's Union?  No, they already have that kind of shit. If you're white, fuck you... YOU WHITEY, by default are not allowed to do jack shit with each other without being a RACIST!!!!

Oh, you're not a racist you say, too bad dickhead, you're still not allowed to form racist organizations like blacks and Latinos can.  Why?  Because the media and gov says so....

What are they doing by doing this?  Yup... Turning people on all sides that were not racist into racists.  NICE JOB IDIOTS.

Western culture is white by default. The "exclusive shit" for minority groups is a result of how exclusionary mainstream society is.

[tonymctones]

Western culture is white by default. The "exclusive shit" for minority groups is a result of how exclusionary mainstream society is.

lmfao what exactly about mainstream society is discriminatory against minorities?

[Al Doggity]

lmfao what exactly about mainstream society is discriminatory against minorities?

I said  exclusionary.

[tonymctones]

I said  exclusionary.

to exclude is to discriminate against those that you exclude...

if you feel that mainstream media excludes minorities, please do explain in what areas and how.

[Al Doggity]

to exclude is to discriminate against those that you exclude...

This is wrong, but it would be pointless to try to explain why to someone who thinks "fundy libtard" is something that makes sense.

if you feel that mainstream media excludes minorities, please do explain in what areas and how.

I've used these examples before, on this forum, but let's start with some popular tv shows:

First, there's "Girls". A show that received a ton of attention the last two years and landed its star and creator a slew of magazine covers and the moniker "Voice of a generation". She also received a fair amount of criticism because the show is filmed and takes place in NY, yet rarely features any minorities, much less has a minority starring or supporting character. When she addressed the criticism, she said she didn't know how to write for black characters.

Matthew Weiner, head writer and executive producer of "Mad Men", might have the same problem. The hit show manages to almost never feature minorities with the exception of  a black, female secretary who pops up a few times a season and has no storyline. It's convenient that she pops up 3 or 4 times a season, as the show is a period piece that takes place during the civil rights movement.

Some have said that maybe the time period and setting is a reasonable explanation as to why "Mad Men" features so few minorities. Yet, another massive AMC hit, "The Walking Dead", takes place in the present- in Atlanta of all places- yet manages to keep its selection of minorities as scant as possible. There is the stalwart Asian character, whose been with the show since the beginning and what seems to be a revolving door of  a maximum of 2 black characters who can be featured in storylines at any given point. Which is actually a recent improvement, as the rotating, disposable black characters weren't really  featured in any storylines until the third season of the show.And this is actually a DEVIATION from the source material. Interestingly enough, this American produced show that takes place in Atlanta included four white British actors in major roles during the last season.

"Game of Thrones" , a show about the magical forces that transpire in non-existent kingdoms on an alternate world, is a show that sticks to "realism" when it comes to race. Outside of a race of swarthy barbarians (none of whom rise to the level of supporting player, even) almost the entire show is cast white. Which,  really, why wouldn't it be?  


So, those are just a few examples. I eagerly await your "rebuttle", which will no doubt start with "lol" and end without making any sense.

[Shockwave]

This is wrong, but it would be pointless to try to explain why to someone who thinks "fundy libtard" is something that makes sense.


I've used these examples before, on this forum, but let's start with some popular tv shows:

First, there's "Girls". A show that received a ton of attention the last two years and landed its star and creator a slew of magazine covers and the moniker "Voice of a generation". She also received a fair amount of criticism because the show is filmed and takes place in NY, yet rarely features any minorities, much less has a minority starring or supporting character. When she addressed the criticism, she said she didn't know how to write for black characters.

Matthew Weiner, head writer and executive producer of "Mad Men", might have the same problem. The hit show manages to almost never feature minorities with the exception of  a black, female secretary who pops up a few times a season and has no storyline. It's convenient that she pops up 3 or 4 times a season, as the show is a period piece that takes place during the civil rights movement.

Some have said that maybe the time period and setting is a reasonable explanation as to why "Mad Men" features so few minorities. Yet, another massive AMC hit, "The Walking Dead", takes place in the present- in Atlanta of all places- yet manages to keep its selection of minorities as scant as possible. There is the stalwart Asian character, whose been with the show since the beginning and what seems to be a revolving door of  a maximum of 2 black characters who can be featured in storylines at any given point. Which is actually a recent improvement, as the rotating, disposable black characters weren't really  featured in any storylines until the third season of the show.And this is actually a DEVIATION from the source material. Interestingly enough, this American produced show that takes place in Atlanta included four white British actors in major roles during the last season.

"Game of Thrones" , a show about the magical forces that transpire in non-existent kingdoms on an alternate world, is a show that sticks to "realism" when it comes to race. Outside of a race of swarthy barbarians (none of whom rise to the level of supporting player, even) almost the entire show is cast white. Which,  really, why wouldn't it be?  


So, those are just a few examples. I eagerly await your "rebuttle", which will no doubt start with "lol" and end without making any sense.

wow. You really showed him. /sarcasm

[Roger Bacon]

First, there's "Girls". A show that received a ton of attention the last two years and landed its star and creator a slew of magazine covers and the moniker "Voice of a generation". She also received a fair amount of criticism because the show is filmed and takes place in NY, yet rarely features any minorities, much less has a minority starring or supporting character. When she addressed the criticism, she said she didn't know how to write for black characters.

Matthew Weiner, head writer and executive producer of "Mad Men", might have the same problem. The hit show manages to almost never feature minorities with the exception of  a black, female secretary who pops up a few times a season and has no storyline. It's convenient that she pops up 3 or 4 times a season, as the show is a period piece that takes place during the civil rights movement.

Some have said that maybe the time period and setting is a reasonable explanation as to why "Mad Men" features so few minorities. Yet, another massive AMC hit, "The Walking Dead", takes place in the present- in Atlanta of all places- yet manages to keep its selection of minorities as scant as possible. There is the stalwart Asian character, whose been with the show since the beginning and what seems to be a revolving door of  a maximum of 2 black characters who can be featured in storylines at any given point. Which is actually a recent improvement, as the rotating, disposable black characters weren't really  featured in any storylines until the third season of the show.And this is actually a DEVIATION from the source material. Interestingly enough, this American produced show that takes place in Atlanta included four white British actors in major roles during the last season.

"Game of Thrones" , a show about the magical forces that transpire in non-existent kingdoms on an alternate world, is a show that sticks to "realism" when it comes to race. Outside of a race of swarthy barbarians (none of whom rise to the level of supporting player, even) almost the entire show is cast white. Which,  really, why wouldn't it be?  


So, those are just a few examples. I eagerly await your "rebuttle", which will no doubt start with "lol" and end without making any sense.

Are you crazy? haha...

[Al Doggity]

wow. You really showed him. /sarcasm

But I did, though 

Feel free to elaborate. I'm guessing you're in the "four examples don't prove anything" camp?

[Archer77]

Networks produce content that sells.  If shows with more blacks or black centric attracted viewers and thus more advertising, the airways would be filled with them.  You only have to look at the music industry to prove this is true. Rap music by black entertainers sells therefore record companies release a ton of it. 

This is the distinction between traditionally white owned networks and black centric entertainment networks like BET.  BET is intentionally racially exclusionary while the other is not exclusionary because their main goal is profit not race.  Also, privately owned television networks and film studios shouldn't be obligated to be fair.  They are in the business of making money, not soothing hurt feelings or fighting for social justice.

[tonymctones]

wow, albert first your argue that obamacare isnt bad for the economy and now this....

[Al Doggity]

Networks produce content that sells.  If shows with more blacks or black centric attracted viewers and thus more advertising, the airways would be filled with them.  You only have to look at the music industry to prove this is true. Rap music by black entertainers sells therefore record companies release a ton of it.  

So, in other words, mainstream media is white by default  

[Pray_4_War]

So, those are just a few examples. I eagerly await your "rebuttle", which will no doubt start with "lol" and end without making any sense.

Blacks are roughly 13% of the population in the USA.  Since you are using television shows as the basis of your argument you might be interested to know that they are actually over-represented there.

[tonymctones]

This is wrong, but it would be pointless to try to explain why to someone who thinks "fundy libtard" is something that makes sense.


I've used these examples before, on this forum, but let's start with some popular tv shows:

First, there's "Girls". A show that received a ton of attention the last two years and landed its star and creator a slew of magazine covers and the moniker "Voice of a generation". She also received a fair amount of criticism because the show is filmed and takes place in NY, yet rarely features any minorities, much less has a minority starring or supporting character. When she addressed the criticism, she said she didn't know how to write for black characters.

Matthew Weiner, head writer and executive producer of "Mad Men", might have the same problem. The hit show manages to almost never feature minorities with the exception of  a black, female secretary who pops up a few times a season and has no storyline. It's convenient that she pops up 3 or 4 times a season, as the show is a period piece that takes place during the civil rights movement.

Some have said that maybe the time period and setting is a reasonable explanation as to why "Mad Men" features so few minorities. Yet, another massive AMC hit, "The Walking Dead", takes place in the present- in Atlanta of all places- yet manages to keep its selection of minorities as scant as possible. There is the stalwart Asian character, whose been with the show since the beginning and what seems to be a revolving door of  a maximum of 2 black characters who can be featured in storylines at any given point. Which is actually a recent improvement, as the rotating, disposable black characters weren't really  featured in any storylines until the third season of the show.And this is actually a DEVIATION from the source material. Interestingly enough, this American produced show that takes place in Atlanta included four white British actors in major roles during the last season.

"Game of Thrones" , a show about the magical forces that transpire in non-existent kingdoms on an alternate world, is a show that sticks to "realism" when it comes to race. Outside of a race of swarthy barbarians (none of whom rise to the level of supporting player, even) almost the entire show is cast white. Which,  really, why wouldn't it be?  


So, those are just a few examples. I eagerly await your "rebuttle", which will no doubt start with "lol" and end without making any sense.

ever stop to think that the majority of ppl who subscribe to cable and other movie channels are guess what? WHITE???

they arent excluding blacks or minorities on the basis or race you moron they are giving the CUSTOMERS what they want.

If their main customer base was black they would show more blacks, this isnt exclusionary based on race although I can understand how a simpleton who is looking for racism at every corner would jump to that conclusion.

yet another swing and a miss

[tonymctones]

Blacks are roughly 13% of the population in the USA.  Since you are using television shows as the basis of your argument you might be interested to know that they are actually over-represented there.

hahah YOU FUCKING QUIT MAKING LOGICAL POINTS RACIST PRICK!!!!!!

[Archer77]

So, in other words, mainstream media is white by default  

Yes, it is but that wasn't my point.

[Irongrip400]

Networks produce content that sells.  If shows with more blacks or black centric attracted viewers and thus more advertising, the airways would be filled with them.  You only have to look at the music industry to prove this is true. Rap music by black entertainers sells therefore record companies release a ton of it. 

This is the distinction between traditionally white owned networks and black centric entertainment networks like BET.  BET is intentionally racially exclusionary while the other is not exclusionary because their main goal is profit not race.  Also, privately owned television networks and film studios shouldn't be obligated to be fair.  They are in the business of making money, not soothing hurt feelings or fighting for social justice.

Couldn't have said it better myself. Until these capitalist pigs are ousted, this is what we are left with.

[Archer77]

Blacks are roughly 13% of the population in the USA.  Since you are using television shows as the basis of your argument you might be interested to know that they are actually over-represented there.

Goes to show that most people can not conceive what being fair really means.  It's not fifty-fifty.

[Kahn.N.Singh]

The White Student Union should perform a semantic inversion of the C-word in order to agitate its conventional meaning as used by blacks. In other words, in order to diminish the nefarious connotations of the C-word, whites should appropriate the word 'cracker,' with all its encoded anti-white inflammatory meaning, and embrace their own use of the derivate term 'cracka,' with a very distinct semantic value.
      Instead of connoting such former negative associations as, among other terms and phrases, 'slave master,' 'white devil,' and 'peckerwood,' the term 'cracka' can be newly encoded by whites with a description such as 'member of the group that gave the modern world its most awesome intellectual and cultural advances, not to mention fair eyes, silky, long-flowing hair, and Doctor Who.'
      If armed with the proper socio-cultural keys of semiotic interpretation, in-group members, i.e, wonderful white people, can execute a revolutionary semantic inversion of the C-word from its not-so-wonderful black-encoded meaning that can serve to instill in-group feelings of rightful dignity and pride, while the continued use of the C-word by out-group members, i.e., non-white stinkards, would be abysmally insensitive, inappropriate, and outlawed.

[tonymctones]

"The Walking Dead", takes place in the present- in Atlanta of all places- yet manages to keep its selection of minorities as scant as possible. There is the stalwart Asian character, whose been with the show since the beginning and what seems to be a revolving door of  a maximum of 2 black characters who can be featured in storylines at any given point. Which is actually a recent improvement, as the rotating, disposable black characters weren't really  featured in any storylines until the third season of the show.And this is actually a DEVIATION from the source material. Interestingly enough, this American produced show that takes place in Atlanta included four white British actors in major roles during the last season.

PS the walking dead doesnt take place in atlanta, it spent a few episodes of the first season in atlanta. Dont even take into account that the majority of characters where from the SUBURBS of Atlanta and only went to the city b/c they heard there was a safe zone with medical treatment in atlanta.

dont take into account that the main character was actually saved by two blacks, that there is a black, asian, 3 indian and a hispanic character in the first season you seem to want to bitch about.

 

[tonymctones]

Goes to show that most people can not conceive what being fair really means.  It's not fifty-fifty.

goes to show you most ppl who cry racism dont actually recognize racism when its in their face.

I bet albert believes the zimmerman case was about race as well

[Archer77]

PS the walking dead doesnt take place in atlanta, it spent a few episodes of the first season in atlanta. Dont even take into account that the majority of characters where from the SUBURBS of Atlanta and only went to the city b/c they heard there was a safe zone with medical treatment in atlanta.

dont take into account that the main character was actually saved by two blacks, that there is a black, asian, 3 indian and a hispanic character in the first season you seem to want to bitch about.

 

And you might argue that minorities in urban centers would be the first to go because of the high population density.    Again, none of this matters because the writers are under no obligation to include minority characters if they don't want to.