look up the laws enacted by the states I mentioned in 2013. I don't have time to sit here and write out all the laws, but they basically included banning/mandatory registration of arbitrarily-designated 'scary-looking rifles', the banning of any magazine holding more than 7 rounds (effectively making 90+% of all standard-issue, standard size magazines illegal and all the regular citizens who owned them felons if they didn't get rid of them, effectively making the vast majority of modern, popular guns unusable), NY gov Cuomo publically stated there was 'no place in new York for those who own semi-auto rifles' ,Colorado enacted similar magazine limits and gun-registrations which led the the recall of several state legislators, California, Illinois, and many other states are always trying to make nonsensical laws that while technically still allow people to buy some guns, make things so ridiculous that theres almost no point, such as making you keep them inside the house, and if transporting to your car or in your car it must be totally separate from any bullets and be in a specifically-required locked box, some places even say 'you can have___guns are home but even in the house they must be disassembled and locked up, shit like this that makes it so onerous and pointless to even have a gun in the first place, Oregon recently enacted a Universal Registration meaning that even private transactions between individuals is government regulated..the dems rah-rah'ed this as a success on 'gun safety' of course, but it did absolutely to stop the recent Oregon shooter Nut.
None of this stuff has any effect whatsoever on crime or actual criminals, the sole purpose is to harass regular American gun owners so much that they will eventually just give up on it.
notice the recent rebranding of 'Gun Control' to 'Gun Safety'. that is all you hear now, from Dem politicians and in every article. it is a completet, top-down REBRANDING the same exact way 'Global Warming' became 'Climate Change', they couldn't sell their fact-less BS no matter how hard they tried so they have to completely re-brand it
California's magazine capacity is 10, so is New York. Colorado's is 15. Not sure why you stated "7 rounds" In which state is it 7 rounds?
What Cumo said, doesn't mean much in this discussion because i am asking what exactly has been set into law. I am sure we could dig up all sorts of stuff of what people say, but until laws are passed it don't me jack.
What California and other states are
"always trying to make" is also moot in this discussion because we are talking about laws that have been passed and there will always be a group of peeps against all guns who will try and always pass stupid laws in most states. Except prolly Montana, Wyoming, Kansas, etc.
In my mind, keeping ammo and guns separated when traveling with them is not unreasonable and doesn't support your "laws that make it so only rich people can have guns" argument.
Regarding your "sole purpose" argument. This is gun regulation. Some of it seems ok. If you have a loaded gun in your house and have children you are an idiot. It should be illegal. If you don't have kids and want a loaded gun in your house how are the police going to know if they don't enough probable cause to search your house with a warrant? This seems like something that doesn't need to get all up in arms about.
It seems like you are buying into right wing propaganda here. You are off on magazine limits and don't seem to realize that 42 states don't have magazine limits.
I am pro 2nd amendment. Always will be. But i don't see anything too out of line happening. Maybe i am wrong. But what i do see is a lot of fear propaganda when it comes to gun control.
