Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: bigkubby on December 06, 2013, 12:22:14 AM
-
PIECE OF SHIT HAS NO DISREGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE!!! PUSSY!!
-
PIECE OF SHIT HAS NO DISREGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE!!! PUSSY!!
Sounds like he really owns your mind
-
Dude is one sad individual. Always sees the negatives of people. Always seems to relish in others misery. Lacks empathy. Also a certified liar...possibly of the pathological type.
-
PIECE OF SHIT HAS NO DISREGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE!!! PUSSY!!
Yes he is low life scum.
-
You guys sound line a bunch of crybabys. just do like me, dont read his posts.
-
Is this because he isn't crying about Paul Walker?
-
PIECE OF SHIT HAS NO DISREGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE!!! PUSSY!!
Stop bitching you big homo. SO what, I don't care about some douchebag actor who promoted reckless driving and died at the hands of a reckless driver. Like I said, I will reserve my sympathy for those who die thanks to fast and furious fanboys emulating their douchebag heroes. If people want to promote dangerous and potentially fatal behaviour as cool and this causes innocent people to be killed. Well fuck those people. I hope he suffered an unimaginablY painful death and his last moments realised that what he had spent his life doing caused countless innocent people to experience the same thing, albeit unnecessarily, all thanks to his promotion of a dangerous activity.
FUCK THAT CUN+ he deserves a Darwin Award
-
Dude is one sad individual. Always sees the negatives of people. Always seems to relish in others misery. Lacks empathy. Also a certified liar...possibly of the pathological type.
Dude is one sad individual. (says the dude who creates threads about being seriously depressed)
Always seems to relish in others misery. (only the misery of those I despise, and coming from a guy who thinks pitbulls mauling children is admirable and nothing to be upset by, your accusation is laughable)
Lacks Empathy (Only for those who are complicit in the suffering of innocent people, generally people who promote dangerous ideologies that cause innocent people to be harmed and killed)
-
Dude is one sad individual. Always sees the negatives of people. Always seems to relish in others misery. Lacks empathy. Also a certified liar...possibly of the pathological type.
too many of those guys on getbig lol
-
He's a good dude. Why all the drama?
-
E - Kul made a bet with OMR. He lost and he claimed he would never post again.
How long did that last?
-
Stop bitching you big homo. SO what, I don't care about some douchebag actor who promoted reckless driving and died at the hands of a reckless driver. Like I said, I will reserve my sympathy for those who die thanks to fast and furious fanboys emulating their douchebag heroes. If people want to promote dangerous and potentially fatal behaviour as cool and this causes innocent people to be killed. Well fuck those people. I hope he suffered an unimaginablY painful death and his last moments realised that what he had spent his life doing caused countless innocent people to experience the same thing, albeit unnecessarily, all thanks to his promotion of a dangerous activity.
FUCK THAT CUN+ he deserves a Darwin Award
I guess you've never seen the show Dukes of Hazzard, the movies Cannonball Run, Smokey and athe Bandit.
-
Stop bitching you big homo. SO what, I don't care about some douchebag actor who promoted reckless driving and died at the hands of a reckless driver. Like I said, I will reserve my sympathy for those who die thanks to fast and furious fanboys emulating their douchebag heroes. If people want to promote dangerous and potentially fatal behaviour as cool and this causes innocent people to be killed. Well fuck those people. I hope he suffered an unimaginablY painful death and his last moments realised that what he had spent his life doing caused countless innocent people to experience the same thing, albeit unnecessarily, all thanks to his promotion of a dangerous activity.
FUCK THAT CUN+ he deserves a Darwin Award
Please lower the dosages
-
Ekul... RAIWAEE.
-
Dude is one sad individual. (says the dude who creates threads about being seriously depressed)
Always seems to relish in others misery. (only the misery of those I despise, and coming from a guy who thinks pitbulls mauling children is admirable and nothing to be upset by, your accusation is laughable)
Lacks Empathy (Only for those who are complicit in the suffering of innocent people, generally people who promote dangerous ideologies that cause innocent people to be harmed and killed)
bro... you need to get out and live a little. .. hauling ass around a sweeping turn and feeling the g firces suck your cheek out of your mouth is fucking amazing.
Y ou seem 5o campaign against anything thats potentially reckless. .... but man, sometimes y9u gotta be et ot there and live on the edge, otherwise youll turn into a sad, bitter, lonely man
-
Dude is one sad individual. Always sees the negatives of people. Always seems to relish in others misery. Lacks empathy. Also a certified liar...possibly of the pathological type.
sounds exactly like you
-
the only thing i have against him is the fact that he writes walls of text in each reply. makes really hard to communicate
-
bro... you need to get out and live a little. .. hauling ass around a sweeping turn and feeling the g firces suck your cheek out of your mouth is fucking amazing.
Y ou seem 5o campaign against anything thats potentially reckless. .... but man, sometimes y9u gotta be et ot there and live on the edge, otherwise youll turn into a sad, bitter, lonely man
Then goto a racetrack and don't expose innocent people to serious injury or death. Imagine a man running your child down while driving at high speed and killing them and then saying chill out bro, I was just getting my fix of gforces, you can appreciate that can't you. As long as it's other people that are the ones being killed by people reckless behaviour that's fine. It's amazing how often people soon change their tune when irt happens to them or their loved ones. I have known people that are now vegetables because of dangerous driving, another one killed her best friend in a car accident while driving recklessly. Her friend died, she survived and was hated by everybody, she narrowly missed a lengthy prison sentence. It's all fun and games into an innocent childs skull is smashed into bloody fragments after colliding with a steel pole at high velocity.
-
I guess you've never seen the show Dukes of Hazzard, the movies Cannonball Run, Smokey and athe Bandit.
Fuck those dickheads too. ANybody who promotes that shit deserves to die in a fiery ball of molten metal and steel. The fact is, most American movies promote irresponsibility of some sort. That's half the reason the world is fucked up. Literally nobody gives a fuck, they just do whatever they want to do and fuck the consequences. SOme psycho shoots up a school he is condemned, some prettyboy is complicit in countless unnecessary deaths through the glorification of reckless driving and gets killed via an act of reckless driving and he is a hero. If it was any other ordinary citizen who was driving like a fuckwit and crashed into a tree and killed themselves you would be cheering. One less imbecile.
And where is the love for the guy driving? Oh, that's right, he wasn't important enough to give a fuck about. AFterall, he didn't star in countless douchebag movies promoting douchebaggery.
-
Then goto a racetrack and don't expose innocent people to serious injury or death. Imagine a man running your child down while driving at high speed and killing them and then saying chill out bro, I was just getting my fix of gforces, you can appreciate that can't you. As long as it's other people that are the ones being killed by people reckless behaviour that's fine. It's amazing how often people soon change their tune when irt happens to them or their loved ones. I have known people that are now vegetables because of dangerous driving, another one killed her best friend in a car accident while driving recklessly. Her friend died, she survived and was hated by everybody, she narrowly missed a lengthy prison sentence. It's all fun and games into an innocent childs skull is smashed into bloody fragments after colliding with a steel pole at high velocity.
Ekul you are the grand champion of "what ifs." He didn't do any of what you are saying, just like every pit bull didn't turn you into a crying blubber... Only one did. RAIWAEE.
-
Ekul you are the grand champion of "what ifs." He didn't do any of what you are saying, just like every pit bull didn't turn you into a crying blubber... Only one did. RAIWAEE.
He promoted reckless driving and this has led to countless people being unnecessarily killed. Your argument is akin to suggesting the Marlboro Man wasn't complicit in the promotion of cigarettes and the countless unnecessary deaths that came from that. At least the Marlboro man had the good sense to become an anti-smoking crusader after developing lung cancer. Had Paul survived, I doubt he would have had the good sense to do the same, after all what's more important, preventing people being killed in road accidents or profiting from the movies that help promote unnecesary carnage in the first place.
This is the thing, people don't like to hold celebrities accountable. There are consequences for your actions, and I find it fitting that a man who promoted reckless driving was killed by someone who embraced the philosophy. Unfortunately, the influence his movies will have will continue to affect young douchebags everywhere and many more will continue dying thanks to fast and furious fanboys.
-
He promoted reckless driving and this has led to countless people being unnecessarily killed. Your argument is akin to suggesting the Marlboro Man wasn't complicit in the promotion of cigarettes and the countless unnecessary deaths that came from that. This is the thing, people don't like to hold celebrities accountable. There are consequences for your actions, and I find it fitting that a man who promoted reckless driving was killed by someone who embraced the philosophy. Unfortunately, the influence his movies will have will continue to affect young douchebags everywhere and many more will continue dying thanks to fast and furious fanboys.
RAIWAEE. Like when Crocodile Dundee (your Aussie hero) beats a guy in a wheel chair up? So is he against handicapped people? Am I gonna go beat the shit out of people in wheel chairs now cause I saw it in a movie?
You really are an idiot lol. Check how many speed related deaths occurred before anyone ever heard of Paul Walker. Lol @ the Marlboro man. Blame the guy in the commercial over the tobacco companies... That's fantastic logic you moron lol.
-
Lets argue about which arguer on irrelevant subjects is more retarded.
-
Lets argue about which arguer on irrelevant subjects is more retarded.
My retarded arguments are much more relevant than many others irrelevant retarded arguments.
Wait...
-
E - Kul made a bet with OMR. He lost and he claimed he would never post again.
How long did that last?
Not long enough, not a man of his word.
-
E-FOOL is a piece of shit closet case who has nothing in this world except the internet. He tries to appear intelligent but most here are unimpressed. Give it time and he will fuck up again and move on.
-
RAIWAEE. Like when Crocodile Dundee (your Aussie hero) beats a guy in a wheel chair up? So is he against handicapped people? Am I gonna go beat the shit out of people in wheel chairs now cause I saw it in a movie?
You really are an idiot lol. Check how many speed related deaths occurred before anyone ever heard of Paul Walker. Lol @ the Marlboro man. Blame the guy in the commercial over the tobacco companies... That's fantastic logic you moron lol.
That's right, tobacco companies spent hundreds of millions on advertising and promoting the Marlboro man because it doesn't work. ::)
Blame is multifaceted, for instance in the case of cigarettes, historically you can't just blame the smoker, they were unaware of the full extent of the risk and this was minimised and denied by the tobacco companies for decades. Couple this with the fact they marketed the product as a fashionable accessory, the smokers can't accept all the blame. Today is different, thanks to those who strongly advocated against the drug.
It's about deception, when you withhold the reality that something is harmful from others, you expose them to risk. And that's unfair. Like a car salesman selling a car he knows has faulty brakes and doesn't tell the purchaser of the car who then goes on to kill himself a week later after the brakes fail. Is the driver of the car responsible for his death or the seller of the car who sold it knowing the brakes were faulty but didn't tell the buyer?
lol at Crocodile Dundee, I haven't actually watched the movie but I heard the guy in the wheelchair was a dick! The scene was illustrating how a man in a wheelchair is still bound to the same social etiquette we all are. That would be a lot different than a movie that promoted as heroes people who say snuck up on people in wheelchairs and pushed them down a stairwell.
And it's about glorification. When Hollywood makes dangerous behaviour that endangers innocent people seem cool they influence young people. They know this. The saddest part is how many douchebags their are out there that buy into the crap. In a decent society, such a movie would be ignored and ridiculed and the actors deemed immature and irrelevant. In a sick culture the movie would be so popular that they could make endless sequels and the actors would be celebrated.
-
↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
This jackass would like you to think he is insighful and intelligent. Why is he broke?
lol insighful. I have never once claimed to be intelligent, let alone try and convince others of that. People can think what they like about me, my job is to be true to myself, say what I think and believe as honestly as possible and that's it. My opinions are mine, I am not trying to win a popularity contest.
-
That's right, tobacco companies spent hundreds of millions on advertising and promoting the Marlboro man because it doesn't work. ::)
Blame is multifaceted, for instance in the case of cigarettes, historically you can't just blame the smoker, they were unaware of the full extent of the risk and this was minimised and denied by the tobacco companies for decades. Couple this with the fact they marketed the product as a fashionable accessory, the smokers can't accept all the blame. Today is different, thanks to those who strongly advocated against the drug.
It's about deception, when you withhold the reality that something is harmful from others, you expose them to risk. And that's unfair. Like a car salesman selling a car he knows has faulty brakes and doesn't tell the purchaser of the car who then goes on to kill himself a week later after the brakes fail. Is the driver of the car responsible for his death or the seller of the car who sold it knowing the brakes were faulty but didn't tell the buyer?
lol at Crocodile Dundee, I haven't actually watched the movie but I heard the guy in the wheelchair was a dick! The scene was illustrating how a man in a wheelchair is still bound to the same social etiquette we all are. That would be a lot different than a movie that promoted as heroes people who say snuck up on people in wheelchairs and pushed them down a stairwell.
And it's about glorification. When Hollywood makes dangerous behaviour that endangers innocent people seem cool they influence young people. They know this. The saddest part is how many douchebags their are out there that buy into the crap. In a decent society, such a movie would be ignored and ridiculed and the actors deemed immature and irrelevant. In a sick culture the movie would be so popular that they could make endless sequels and the actors would be celebrated.
There is not one word correct in this post. The knuckleheads who are trying to mimic what they see in movies are to blame... Period. The smoker is to blame... Period. You are an idiot... Period.
RAIWAEE.
-
Ekul look up third party perspective. If everyone thinks your an idiot, and you insist everyone else is an idiot, then...
Your an idiot.
-
You're the type of salesmen that would sell a car with faulty brakes without telling the buyer and blaming them when he kills himself in a car crash. After all, it wasn't you driving the car. How could the deceiver be to blame right. It's always the fault of the deceived, isn't it.
I would like to suggest that you are to blame for being an imbecile, but obviously it is the result of countless people letting you down. And people aren't trying to mimic what they see in movies, they are being deceived as to the dangerousness of such activity. They aren't given accurate information in which they can make reasonable decisions from. It would be nice to live in the black and white world you live in and unaware of the bigger picture, I know the advertisers and propaganda promoters love people like you. It's your type of thinking that lets so many people get away with irresponsible behaviour that endangers innocent people.
-
Ekul look up third party perspective. If everyone thinks your an idiot, and you insist everyone else is an idiot, then...
Your an idiot.
You mean like Galileo Galilei. I don't care what people think, it has no bearing on reality. I haven't insisted everyone else is an idiot, just those who would give a fuck about a douchebag actor dying in a well deserved high speed car accident in a ball of fiery molten metal. If you give a fuck about some b grade actor when he dies, you are most certainly an Idiot.
-
Talks more than primemuscle but ok I guess.
-
You're the type of salesmen that would sell a car with faulty brakes without telling the buyer and blaming them when he kills himself in a car crash. After all, it wasn't you driving the car. How could the deceiver be to blame right. It's always the fault of the deceived, isn't it.
I would like to suggest that you are to blame for being an imbecile, but obviously it is the result of countless people letting you down. And people aren't trying to mimic what they see in movies, they are being deceived as to the dangerousness of such activity. They aren't given accurate information in which they can make reasonable decisions from. It would be nice to live in the black and white world you live in and unaware of the bigger picture, I know the advertisers and propaganda promoters love people like you. It's your type of thinking that lets so many people get away with irresponsible behaviour that endangers innocent people.
Your butt hurt now... It's ok. You'll be fine if you just stop. RAIWAEE.
-
Your butt hurt now... It's ok. You'll be fine if you just stop. RAIWAEE.
Maybe, I'm nearly as butthurt as those who start threads about those who don't give a flying fuck that some douchebag B Grade actor died in a fiery car crash. Is it too soon to say I am glad he is dead and I am alive and that I outlived the dumb fuck!
-
Ekul look up third party perspective. If everyone thinks you're an idiot, and you insist everyone else is an idiot, then...
You're an idiot.
:)
-
Dude is one sad individual. Always sees the negatives of people. Always seems to relish in others misery. Lacks empathy. Also a certified liar...possibly of the pathological type.
i dnt know wabout liar, but rest i knda agree, his online persona is bit like that.
maybe hes totaly different irl, and just releases steam here, bc cant release semen into women irl?
-
i dnt know wabout liar, but rest i knda agree, his online persona is bit like that.
maybe hes totaly different irl, and just releases steam here, bc cant release semen into women irl?
Lol. Not releasing semen into women would make me sad too. But maybe he prefers releasing semen into men.
-
I can sum up every one if E-Kuls posts that I have read in one sentence-
'I am right and you are wrong'.
-
E - Kul made a bet with OMR. He lost and he claimed he would never post again.
How long did that last?
haha ekul is a bitch :D
-
E-Kul.....why are you not honoring your agreement with OMR?
Are you not a man of your word? ???
-
E-Kul.....why are you not honoring your agreement with OMR?
Are you not a man of your word? ???
Ekul is not even man enough to leave getbig after losing, he is not going to honor anything, he is shameless
-
Fuck.
I actually agree with Ekul on most of this shit.
I been riding a sport bikes since I was 21 and while I did some crazy shit up in the mountain roads or stunting wheelies and shit in abandoned parking lots I get so fucking pissed when on a riding board someone post about a dude dying and everyone starts crying like bitches about how good of a guy he was but won't acknowledge what an asshole we was for doing 90+ mph around a corner on a major street or was doing stand up wheelies at 70mps + on the interstate putting countless families in danger.
Imagine if one of these assholes lost control and you have 500lbs of metal slamming into your car when your wife and kids in it.
What really sucks is you don't have to be rich to go to the track here in the NW. In Portland (at least 7yrs ago when I lived down there), provided you taped up all glass, turn signals etc..and have full leather gear (which most should own anyway) you can go to a track day for like $100. Just bring some cans of gas.
-
E-kul said he would never come back, he went back on his word. He is not wanted.
-
Ekul, you're melting horribly in this thread. Put down the laptop and hit the gym brother.
-
E-kul said he would never come back, he went back on his word. He is not wanted.
ASSMED where you been? Ekul is right about you animals... No wonder you want him gone.
RAIWAEE = Right about Islam wrong about everything else.
Oh yeah and Mohammed was a pedophile.
-
ASSMED where you been? Ekul is right about you animals... No wonder you want him gone.
RAIWAEE = Right about Islam wrong about everything else.
Oh yeah and Mohammed was a pedophile.
Oh hi, I heard you slept with e-kul and made babies. Did they turn out as ugly as you two?
-
Oh hi, I heard you slept with e-kul and made babies. Did they turn out as ugly as you two?
Man this may be one of the lamest posts in get big history.
Mohammed fucked goats!!!
See that's how you irritate someone.
-
E left for a bit and came back....big deal. Come on, nobody leaves permanently. Dude has strong opinions and often times those views are completely opposed to mine, but I don't hate the guy for it. Emotions run high in threads and people say things without a great deal of tact at times (myself included).
I don't want him run off though.
-
E left for a bit and came back....big deal. Come on, nobody leaves permanently. Dude has strong opinions and often times those views are completely opposed to mine, but I don't hate the guy for it. Emotions run high in threads and people say things without a great deal of tact at times (myself included).
I don't want him run off though.
Either do I.
-
E-FOOL is a piece of shit closet case who has nothing in this world except the internet. He tries to appear intelligent but most here are unimpressed. Give it time and he will fuck up again and move on.
Oh, the irony. ::)
-
I can sum up every one if E-Kuls posts that I have read in one sentence-
'I am right and you are wrong'.
You are right ;D
-
E-Kul.....why are you not honoring your agreement with OMR?
Are you not a man of your word? ???
OMR and I came to a gentleman's agreement.
-
it would have been horrible if walker and rodas killed innocent people driving like that in public
-
E-kul said he would never come back, he went back on his word. He is not wanted.
You had to steal my thunder didn't you as_hamed. Can't stand the thought of me being the most hated man in a thread can you. You have to just come along and get all the hatred directed towards you.
-
it would have been horrible if walker and rodas killed innocent people driving like that in public
That would still be lost on the moronic masses, who still would have heaped praise on the mighty and powerful rich white celebrity. Unfortunately, many innocents do get seriously injured and killed because of the glorification of reckless driving portrayed in his moronic films. Has anybody even watched these fast and furious movies, they are literally instruction manuals on how to be an A grade douchebag. They are like a getbiggers bible in movie format. No wonder so many getbiggers are melting down over his death.
-
Ekul is good for GetBig.
-
it would have been horrible if walker and rodas killed innocent people driving like that in public
Totally agree and their driving was a total scumbag move...These two have loads of cash and already have off course places to drive the way they want. Makes no sense and shows lack of control. If they were in their early 20's it would be easier to understand. These dudes were much older.
-
Fuck those dickheads too. ANybody who promotes that shit deserves to die in a fiery ball of molten metal and steel. The fact is, most American movies promote irresponsibility of some sort. That's half the reason the world is fucked up. Literally nobody gives a fuck, they just do whatever they want to do and fuck the consequences. SOme psycho shoots up a school he is condemned, some prettyboy is complicit in countless unnecessary deaths through the glorification of reckless driving and gets killed via an act of reckless driving and he is a hero. If it was any other ordinary citizen who was driving like a fuckwit and crashed into a tree and killed themselves you would be cheering. One less imbecile.
And where is the love for the guy driving? Oh, that's right, he wasn't important enough to give a fuck about. AFterall, he didn't star in countless douchebag movies promoting douchebaggery.
You are one sad and bitter excuse for human being. If all everyone did was worry about the possible negative ramifications, everyone would wind up sitting in their house with their doors locked crying in the corner.
youre the kind of overly reactive bitter individual that would have everyone around you living a life of complete and utter worthlessness, not allowed to do shit because someone might get hurt. All that does js breed people like yourself..
bitter and angry at the world because you cant move on from someone else/thing that wronged you, never really living, condemned to a life of anget and self imposed misery, trying to bring others down with you because you cant handle that bad shit happened to you really for no rhyme or reason...
bad shit happens to innocent/good people. Thats life. Innocents have acvidents. Sometimes bad people dont. There is no justice, no rhyme, no reason. the answer isnt to try and force people that do reckless or stupid shit to live like you want.... you need to move on and get over yourself and the shit that happened to you and accept that dumb shit happens, and dont get your panties twisted everytime someone is not afraid to actualky get out and enjoy their lives, even if it puts others at risk.
/uberman
-
Dude is one sad individual. Always sees the negatives of people. Always seems to relish in others misery. Lacks empathy. Also a certified liar...possibly of the pathological type.
prepare to be destroyed by e kull , shizzo
-
E left for a bit and came back....big deal. Come on, nobody leaves permanently. Dude has strong opinions and often times those views are completely opposed to mine, but I don't hate the guy for it. Emotions run high in threads and people say things without a great deal of tact at times (myself included).
I don't want him run off though.
that's not the point, he was man enough to accept the terms then he broke them and of course OMR will be OK with him coming back, he is a stand up guy but he should honor his own words of leaving, if not then he should not have agreed to the terms.
It is manning up, I made a bet here and lost and left for the required time frame and paid out 150 dollars out of my pocket to another getbigger, did I have to? NO but I did, its called integrity and class, e-kul has non.
-
While many do not agree with E-Kul's views, I feel that he is not a bad person and typically can provide entertaining material that brings about a different angle to the forum.
As for me, I have no qualms if he returns. I am very open to forgiving others and forgetting. Truthfully, I can't hold hatred or anger towards anyone for too long.
GetBig is what it is due to the various unique personalities that make up this forum. All of you bring something special which makes up the fabric of GetBig.
Even if E-Kul is opinionated, he has a right to his personal views. At least he isn't flooding the forum with SPAM, redundant threads or material that garners attention from the legal authorities (We've had members tracked by the DEA - That's serious business guy).
E-kul is E-kul..
"1"
-
prepare to be destroyed by e kull , shizzo
Hahaha.....I love you guys. You get an angle, and you stick with it ;D
-
While many do not agree with E-Kul's views, I feel that he is not a bad person and typically can provide entertaining material that brings about a different angle to the forum.
As for me, I have no qualms if he returns. I am very open to forgiving others and forgetting. Truthfully, I can't hold hatred or anger towards anyone for too long.
GetBig is what it is due to the various unique personalities that make up this forum. All of you bring something special which makes up the fabric of GetBig.
Even if E-Kul is opinionated, he has a right to his personal views. At least he isn't flooding the forum with SPAM, redundant threads or material that garners attention from the legal authorities (We've had members tracked by the DEA - That's serious business guy).
E-kul is E-kul..
"1"
OMG! I am sad. Onemorerep never gave me such a vote of confidence. I thought we shared a passion for the post?
-
OMG! I am sad. Onemorerep never gave me such a vote of confidence. I thought we shared a passion for the post?
bro he helped you be let back, that should be more then enough after the harsh words you threw at him. ;)
-
You are one sad and bitter excuse for human being. If all everyone did was worry about the possible negative ramifications, everyone would wind up sitting in their house with their doors locked crying in the corner.
youre the kind of overly reactive bitter individual that would have everyone around you living a life of complete and utter worthlessness, not allowed to do shit because someone might get hurt. All that does js breed people like yourself..
bitter and angry at the world because you cant move on from someone else/thing that wronged you, never really living, condemned to a life of anget and self imposed misery, trying to bring others down with you because you cant handle that bad shit happened to you really for no rhyme or reason...
bad shit happens to innocent/good people. Thats life. Innocents have acvidents. Sometimes bad people dont. There is no justice, no rhyme, no reason. the answer isnt to try and force people that do reckless or stupid shit to live like you want.... you need to move on and get over yourself and the shit that happened to you and accept that dumb shit happens, and dont get your panties twisted everytime someone is not afraid to actualky get out and enjoy their lives, even if it puts others at risk.
/uberman
Fortunately for me, while your ridiculousness is in the majority here at Getbig, in the real world, decent people actually care about not putting other people at risk. If you live your life based on the principle you win/others lose you will continue to be a despised figure. Intelligent people look for win/win scenarios. So, responsible people who want to drive at excessive speed and in a dangerous manner, find a race course to do it and take the necessary precautions to prevent injury to themselves and to other people. That way it is a win for them and a win for innocent people who don't want to die a violent death due to other peoples thrill seeking behaviour.
The sad thing is, it isn't just mine and my loved ones lives such irresponsible people put at risk, it is yours too. But, a growing trend I notice amongst people is a complete disregard for their own self preservation. They are more concerned about the right to act in self destructive ways and expose other people to harm or death, even if it means it may indeed be themselves who are killed by others who also adopt such a philosophy. By advocating the way you do, you show a profound disregard for your own life, a sign of chronic low self esteem. Just because you are prepared to die at the hands of an irresponsible imbecile, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Some of us are content in our non thrill seeking lifestyles, respecting the rights and concerns of others and the lure of living a long healthy life.
If everyone believed as you did, that worrying about the negative outcome our actions may have on others as unimportant, society would descend into anarchy. The whole time innocent people are being seriously injured and killed by such people, yes, society will be angst ridden and doomed. I don't believe this way because I am altruistic, it is in my best interest too. Respecting the rights of others improves my chances of them respecting mine. If like you, you refuse to respect other peoples Universal Human Right to safety and security, it is unlikely they will be concerned about yours.
Using your logic, you have the right to act in a dangerous manner and kill someone and that is acceptable based on your so called right to have some fun. I can just imagine the spiel you would give to the Judge now "In all fairness your honour, I think you are just being a bitter twisted reactive individual who has never lived. You are the type to have everyone around you living a life of complete and utter worthlessness by insisting that people can't be reckless and expose innocent people to unnecessary actuarial risk. Your honour, I think you should just get over the fact imbeciles kill innocent people for thrills, and acknowledge my right to act anyway I please because to do otherwise would be a boring existence." HHMM, I am just wondering how such a defense would go?
-
bro he helped you be let back, that should be more then enough after the harsh words you threw at him. ;)
I would like to hear from my uncle One before I respond further.
-
OMG! I am sad. Onemorerep never gave me such a vote of confidence. I thought we shared a passion for the post?
I was the one that told Ron to ease up on your TO sentence.
Like I said, I have no qualms with people. It takes a lot to make me angry (too old for petty shit like that).
Variety is the spice of life. Not everyone likes me here and I am cool with that. Likewise, most veteran posters have a few detractors that never see eye to eye with them and that's perfectly fine. It's our differences that allow for great conversation and humor.
"1"
-
Fortunately for me, while your ridiculousness is in the majority here at Getbig, in the real world, decent people actually care about not putting other people at risk. If you live your life based on the principle you win/others lose you will continue to be a despised figure. Intelligent people look for win/win scenarios. So, responsible people who want to drive at excessive speed and in a dangerous manner, find a race course to do it and take the necessary precautions to prevent injury to themselves and to other people. That way it is a win for them and a win for innocent people who don't want to die a violent death due to other peoples thrill seeking behaviour.
The sad thing is, it isn't just mine and my loved ones lives such irresponsible people put at risk, it is yours too. But, a growing trend I notice amongst people is a complete disregard for their own self preservation. They are more concerned about the right to act in self destructive ways and expose other people to harm or death, even if it means it may indeed be themselves who are killed by others who also adopt such a philosophy. Just because you are prepared to die at the hands of an irresponsible imbecile, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Some of us are content in our non thrill seeking lifestyles, respecting the rights and concerns of others and the lure of living a long healthy life.
If everyone believed as you did, that worrying about the negative outcome our actions may have on others as unimportant, society would descend into anarchy. The whole time innocent people are being seriously injured and killed by such people, yes, society will be angst ridden and doomed. I don't believe this way because I am altruistic, it is in my best interest too. Respecting the rights of others improves my chances of them respecting mine. If like you, you refuse to respect other peoples Universal Human Right to safety and security, it is unlikely they will be concerned about yours.
Using your logic, you have the right to act in a dangerous manner and kill someone and that is acceptable based on your so called right to have some fun. I can just imagine the spiel you would give to the Judge now "In all fairness your honour, I think you are just being a bitter twisted reactive individual who has never lived. You are the type to have everyone around you living a life of complete and utter worthlessness by insisting that people can't be reckless and expose innocent people to unnecessary actuarial risk. Your honour, I think you should just get over the fact imbeciles kill innocent people for thrills, and acknowledge my right to act anyway I please because to do otherwise would be a boring existence." HHMM, I am just wondering how such a defense would go?
-
What's your point?
-
What's your point?
Irony alert ::)
-
Irony alert ::)
Imbecile alert. Do you even understand the meaning of the word 'irony'. Obviously not.
Irony is promoting pitbullls as misunderstood and safe pets like Darla Napora did via her membership of the BADRAP organization only to be killed by her own pitbull. Irony is the Marlboro man dying of lung cancer. Irony is douchebag actors glorifying reckless driving and being killed by one. Need I go on...
-
I was the one that told Ron to ease up on your TO sentence.
Like I said, I have no qualms with people. It takes a lot to make me angry (too old for petty shit like that).
Variety is the spice of life. Not everyone likes me here and I am cool with that. Likewise, most veteran posters have a few detractors that never see eye to eye with them and that's perfectly fine. It's our differences that allow for great conversation and humor.
"1"
You had me at hello silly. You will always be my favorite poster, Colton Ford.
-
I was the one that told Ron to ease up on your TO sentence.
Like I said, I have no qualms with people. It takes a lot to make me angry (too old for petty shit like that).
Variety is the spice of life. Not everyone likes me here and I am cool with that. Likewise, most veteran posters have a few detractors that never see eye to eye with them and that's perfectly fine. It's our differences that allow for great conversation and humor.
"1"
there you go shizzo, OMR is full of class
-
there you go shizzo, OMR is full of class
Indeed. I deserved two weeks.
-
What's your point?
So you rarely leave your house, this automatically makes me feel bad for you and understand where all the hate is coming from, hmmm ok.
I hope you are not living alone,... you sound bitter and angry, some other tragic/unpleasant events happened in life?
Maybe time for a change?
-
Imbecile alert. Do you even understand the meaning of the word 'irony'. Obviously not.
I know what irony means you dolt , how ironic you're asking someone ' what's your point ' ::) when you never make a point and go on long diatribes.
-
;D
I know what irony means you dolt , how ironic you're asking someone ' what's your point ' ::) when you never make a point and go on long diatribes.
;D
BOOOOOOOOOOOOM
-
I know what irony means you dolt , how ironic you're asking someone ' what's your point ' ::) when you never make a point and go on long diatribes.
Ridiculous, never make a point. My point is always extremely overt and the long diatribes necessary to explain such concepts to imbeciles.
In this instance, my point is, people who promote reckless and dangerous behaviour endangering innocent others deserves contempt and scorn and not praise and worship. Those who support such people deserve the same contempt.
-
Ekul crushing people in this thread.
-
So you rarely leave your house, this automatically makes me feel bad for you and understand where all the hate is coming from, hmmm ok.
I hope you are not living alone,... you sound bitter and angry, some other tragic/unpleasant events happened in life?
Maybe time for a change?
The post is over two years old (NarcissisticDeity has hard on for me and collects all my posts to strengthen his wank-bank collection), and yes at the time I rarely left the house after several extremely stressful events in my life. As for today, I regularly get outdoors and enjoy walking and hiking as I once did.
I don't consider myself bitter, angry yes, or I would describe it more as outraged. Personally, I think the fact more people aren't outraged by the current climate the world finds itself in is remarkable. I believe people are too busy using psychological defenses to minimise and deny the reality of the world around the, because they feel powerless to do anything about it. People are too afraid to express their outrage for fear of being outcast. Personally, the freedom that comes from expressing oneself openly and honestly far outweighs any benefit from being accepted by the moronic masses. If the mainstream start agreeing with me, then I will know I have gone wrong somewhere,
-
Ekul crushing people in this thread.
Lol!!! Mr. Nobody trying to push E-kul to the brink.
-
ND is 100% on the money with his parallel. you think all dogs should be banned, because you don't agree with dog ownership. lol
everyone has the right to live life the way A-Fool thinks they should.
some solid logic there.
time you about realised something, sunshine- what you 'believe' doesn't magically turn into 'fact' the harder you try to shove your opinion down someone elses throat. your little lump of coal isn't about to be compressed into a diamond anytime soon.
paul walker died in a tragic manner. to say he deserved it for promoting reckless driving thru his movies is as ignorant as me saying you deserved to get attacked by dogs for wanting to see them all banned.
fuck you're such an idiot.
lol keep us all enthraled with your .02 cents, sparky.
-
Ekul crushing people in this thread.
Not really, when you write a full page to everyone's one liners, brother you are getting destroyed. ;)
-
Ridiculous, never make a point. My point is always extremely overt and the long diatribes necessary to explain such concepts to imbeciles.
In this instance, my point is, people who promote reckless and dangerous before endangering innocent others deserves contempt and scorn and not praise and worship. Those who support such people deserves the same contempt.
LMAO Mr Pseudo Getbig intellectual , yes you're such a scary intellect ::)
Your problem is you're way to emotional and you see everything in black & white and that's not the case in life you would know this if you participated in it.
-
LMAO Mr Pseudo Getbig intellectual , yes you're such a scary intellect ::)
Your problem is you're way to emotional and you see everything in black & white and that's not the case in life you would know this if you participated in it.
some intellect. read that fucking butchery of the English language you quoted that he shitted out of his mouth.
guys wants to be the next Dawkins but can't even master sentence structure or string together a legible thought.
-
The post is over two years old (NarcissisticDeity has hard on for me and collects all my posts to strengthen his wank-bank collection), and yes at the time I rarely left the house after several extremely stressful events in my life. As for today, I regularly get outdoors and enjoy walking and hiking as I once did.
I don't consider myself bitter, angry yes, or I would describe it more as outraged. Personally, I think the fact more people aren't outraged by the current climate the world finds itself in is remarkable. I believe people are too busy using psychological defenses to minimise and deny the reality of the world around the, because they feel powerless to do anything about it. People are too afraid to express their outrage for fear of being outcast. Personally, the freedom that comes from expressing oneself openly and honestly far outweighs any benefit from being accepted by the moronic masses. If the mainstream start agreeing with me, then I will know I have gone wrong somewhere,
I could care less about you , don't think you're special I have posts from everyone ;)
You honestly need to look inward at yourself , you think you have it all figured out and you don't. You should seek therapy honestly.
-
Lots of subtle ass kissing in this thread. :-\
-
Lots of subtle ass kissing in this thread. :-\
opinions can be often mistaken for ass-kissing, just cause you agree with someone or compliment them does not always = ass kissing.
-
some intellect. read that fucking butchery of the English language you quoted that he shitted out of his mouth.
guys wants to be the next Dawkins but can't even master sentence structure.
Yeah he fancies himself some pseudo-intellectual , he thinks his cut copy paste posts make him appear intelligent they don't. He's already made up his mind so he doesn't feel a need to make his case and he doesn't entertain anyone else's point of view , he's exactly like the fundamentalists he rails about and he's to blind to see it.
-
opinions can be often mistaken for ass-kissing, just cause you agree with someone or compliment them does not always = ass kissing.
Yes.
However there is still lots of ass kissing going on.
-
ND is 100% on the money with his parallel. you think all dogs should be banned, because you don't agree with dog ownership. lol
everyone has the right to live life the way A-Fool thinks they should.
some solid logic there.
time you about realised something, sunshine- what you 'believe' doesn't magically turn into 'fact' the harder you try to shove your opinion down someone elses throat. your little lump of coal isn't about to be compressed into a diamond anytime soon.
paul walker died in a tragic manner. to say he deserved it for promoting reckless driving thru his movies is as ignorant as me saying you deserved to get attacked by dogs for wanting to see them all banned.
fuck you're such an idiot.
lol keep us all enthraled with your .02 cents, sparky.
For starters, I have never ever indicated that all dogs should be banned. The one consistent thing about your posts is that you always distort what others have said. It makes communication near impossible. And to suggest that pitbull attack victims deserve to be attacked because they believe the breed should be banned or regulated is the most absurd suggestion I have ever heard. It's the equivalent of suggesting a citizen should be murdered for supporting homicide laws. Or that victims of drunk drivers deserve to be injured or killed by drunk drivers because they support drink driving laws. Or those that have been stolen from deserve to be because they believe in private property.
Like I said, this peculiar form of ridiculousness is the norm here at Getbig, but in the real world,there are many more with opinions like mine, opinions that have led to pitbulls being regulated all around the world. Where I live we even have anti hoon laws, laws to protect innocent people from the type of reckless driving Paul Walker promoted. And Paul Walker didn't die from an accident. Accidents happen when you take all the relevant precautions and bad shit still happens. Paul walker died from an act of recklessness that he himself promoted, it was no accident, but the inevitable consequence of repeated reckless behaviour. Paul Walker died from a form of negligence, a form of which he himself endorsed.
-
For starters, I have never ever indicated that all dogs should be banned. The one consistent thing about your posts is that you alwupays distort what others have said. It makes communication near impossible. And to suggest that pitbull attack victims deserve to be attacked because they believe the breed should be banned or regulated is the most absurd suggestion I have ever heard. It's the equivalent of suggesting a citizen should be murdered for supporting homicide laws. Or that victims of drunk drivers deserve to be injured or killed by drunk drivers because they support drink driving laws. Or those that have been stolen from deserve to be because they believe in private property.
Like I said, this peculiar form of ridiculousness is the norm here at Getbig, but in the real world,there are many more with opinions like mine, opinions that have led to pitbulls being regulated all around the world. Where I live we even have anti hoon laws, laws to protect innocent people from the type of reckless driving Paul Walker promoted. And Paul Walker didn't die from an accident. Accidents happen when you take all the relevant precautions and bad shit still happens. Paul walker died from an act of recklessness that he himself promoted, it was no accident, but the inevitable consequence of repeated reckless behaviour. Paul Walker died from a form of negligence, a form of which he himself endorsed.
Paul Walker was a PASSENGER in the car. He was not at fault. PASSENGER.
-
Yeah he fancies himself some pseudo-intellectual , he thinks his cut copy paste posts make him appear intelligent they don't. He's already made up his mind so he doesn't feel a need to make his case and he doesn't entertain anyone else's point of view , he's exactly like the fundamentalists he rails about and he's to blind to see it.
I have never claimed to be an intellectual, this is a label often given to me by other Getbiggers. I am interested as to what you think I am copying and pasting. And yes, I think with certain issues a fundamentalist approach is necessary. Nobody considers the forbidding of murdering someone else as fundamentalist principle, but it is. Tell me, do you take a fundamentalist approcah to pedophilia, or do you listen to the like of groups like NAMBLA who advocate for their right to molest children.
I don't apologise for my views, it is based on an appreciation of my own sense of self preservation and the Universal Human Right that should be afforded every citizen to safety and security. If other people believe their right to seek thrills trump that right, then I will fairly tell them to go fuck themselves.
-
Fortunately for me, while your ridiculousness is in the majority here at Getbig, in the real world, decent people actually care about not putting other people at risk. If you live your life based on the principle you win/others lose you will continue to be a despised figure. Intelligent people look for win/win scenarios. So, responsible people who want to drive at excessive speed and in a dangerous manner, find a race course to do it and take the necessary precautions to prevent injury to themselves and to other people. That way it is a win for them and a win for innocent people who don't want to die a violent death due to other peoples thrill seeking behaviour.
The sad thing is, it isn't just mine and my loved ones lives such irresponsible people put at risk, it is yours too. But, a growing trend I notice amongst people is a complete disregard for their own self preservation. They are more concerned about the right to act in self destructive ways and expose other people to harm or death, even if it means it may indeed be themselves who are killed by others who also adopt such a philosophy. By advocating the way you do, you show a profound disregard for your own life, a sign of chronic low self esteem. Just because you are prepared to die at the hands of an irresponsible imbecile, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Some of us are content in our non thrill seeking lifestyles, respecting the rights and concerns of others and the lure of living a long healthy life.
If everyone believed as you did, that worrying about the negative outcome our actions may have on others as unimportant, society would descend into anarchy. The whole time innocent people are being seriously injured and killed by such people, yes, society will be angst ridden and doomed. I don't believe this way because I am altruistic, it is in my best interest too. Respecting the rights of others improves my chances of them respecting mine. If like you, you refuse to respect other peoples Universal Human Right to safety and security, it is unlikely they will be concerned about yours.
Using your logic, you have the right to act in a dangerous manner and kill someone and that is acceptable based on your so called right to have some fun. I can just imagine the spiel you would give to the Judge now "In all fairness your honour, I think you are just being a bitter twisted reactive individual who has never lived. You are the type to have everyone around you living a life of complete and utter worthlessness by insisting that people can't be reckless and expose innocent people to unnecessary actuarial risk. Your honour, I think you should just get over the fact imbeciles kill innocent people for thrills, and acknowledge my right to act anyway I please because to do otherwise would be a boring existence." HHMM, I am just wondering how such a defense would go?
Newsflash - there is no such thing as a human right to safety and security.
The sooner you accept this the sooner you will accept that life doesnt work the way you think it should and no one is bound by your backwards ass, quasi-dictatorial logic.
-
Paul Walker was a PASSENGER in the car. He was not at fault. PASSENGER.
So what! He got in the car knowing the driver was a revhead hoon. The car he was killed in was never technically designed for the road, it is a fine tuned, finicky piece of racing machinery. Do you think Paul said, now listen buddy, drive carefully and obey the speed limits. Paul himself has admitted to driving in excess of 300 km/h on public roads. When a friend offers to take you 'for a spin' in his overpowered Porsche Carrera GT, do you think the passenger doesn't know what that means. If Paul Walker was an advocate for driving safely and responsibly, and didn't have a history of reckless driving himself or the promotion of it in his movies, then yes, it would be a tragedy that some reckless driver would endanger someone who so obviously was against the practise of driving in such a manner, but that's not the case. Paul was a victim of his own disregard for road safety.
-
For starters, I have never ever indicated that all dogs should be banned. The one consistent thing about your posts is that you always distort what others have said. It makes communication near impossible. And to suggest that pitbull attack victims deserve to be attacked because they believe the breed should be banned or regulated is the most absurd suggestion I have ever heard. It's the equivalent of suggesting a citizen should be murdered for supporting homicide laws. Or that victims of drunk drivers deserve to be injured or killed by drunk drivers because they support drink driving laws. Or those that have been stolen from deserve to be because they believe in private property.
Like I said, this peculiar form of ridiculousness is the norm here at Getbig, but in the real world,there are many more with opinions like mine, opinions that have led to pitbulls being regulated all around the world. Where I live we even have anti hoon laws, laws to protect innocent people from the type of reckless driving Paul Walker promoted. And Paul Walker didn't die from an accident. Accidents happen when you take all the relevant precautions and bad shit still happens. Paul walker died from an act of recklessness that he himself promoted, it was no accident, but the inevitable consequence of repeated reckless behaviour. Paul Walker died from a form of negligence, a form of which he himself endorsed.
it is you who distorts what other have said- you just did it by saying I always distort what others say. that is your distortion and mistruth. don't go throwing stones/ glass houses sunshine.
secondly you take, twist and manipulate the words of others ever so slightly in order to suit your own ends. that is what makes communication impossible.
I don't even think you are intelligent enough to do it purposefully. to do it purposefully would simply require an intelligence you do not own. you accidentally do it because your not intelligent.
in your case then its more being an accidental idiot than a purposeful manipulator.
you just don't have the intelligence to be the latter, but do have the experience to be the former.
congrats on that.
-
For starters, I have never ever indicated that all dogs should be banned. The one consistent thing about your posts is that you always distort what others have said. It makes communication near impossible. And to suggest that pitbull attack victims deserve to be attacked because they believe the breed should be banned or regulated is the most absurd suggestion I have ever heard. It's the equivalent of suggesting a citizen should be murdered for supporting homicide laws. Or that victims of drunk drivers deserve to be injured or killed by drunk drivers because they support drink driving laws. Or those that have been stolen from deserve to be because they believe in private property.
Like I said, this peculiar form of ridiculousness is the norm here at Getbig, but in the real world,there are many more with opinions like mine, opinions that have led to pitbulls being regulated all around the world. Where I live we even have anti hoon laws, laws to protect innocent people from the type of reckless driving Paul Walker promoted. And Paul Walker didn't die from an accident. Accidents happen when you take all the relevant precautions and bad shit still happens. Paul walker died from an act of recklessness that he himself promoted, it was no accident, but the inevitable consequence of repeated reckless behaviour. Paul Walker died from a form of negligence, a form of which he himself endorsed.
Fortunately for me, while your ridiculousness is in the majority here at Getbig, in the real world, decent people actually care about not putting other people at risk. If you live your life based on the principle you win/others lose you will continue to be a despised figure. Intelligent people look for win/win scenarios. So, responsible people who want to drive at excessive speed and in a dangerous manner, find a race course to do it and take the necessary precautions to prevent injury to themselves and to other people. That way it is a win for them and a win for innocent people who don't want to die a violent death due to other peoples thrill seeking behaviour.
The sad thing is, it isn't just mine and my loved ones lives such irresponsible people put at risk, it is yours too. But, a growing trend I notice amongst people is a complete disregard for their own self preservation. They are more concerned about the right to act in self destructive ways and expose other people to harm or death, even if it means it may indeed be themselves who are killed by others who also adopt such a philosophy. By advocating the way you do, you show a profound disregard for your own life, a sign of chronic low self esteem. Just because you are prepared to die at the hands of an irresponsible imbecile, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Some of us are content in our non thrill seeking lifestyles, respecting the rights and concerns of others and the lure of living a long healthy life.
If everyone believed as you did, that worrying about the negative outcome our actions may have on others as unimportant, society would descend into anarchy. The whole time innocent people are being seriously injured and killed by such people, yes, society will be angst ridden and doomed. I don't believe this way because I am altruistic, it is in my best interest too. Respecting the rights of others improves my chances of them respecting mine. If like you, you refuse to respect other peoples Universal Human Right to safety and security, it is unlikely they will be concerned about yours.
Using your logic, you have the right to act in a dangerous manner and kill someone and that is acceptable based on your so called right to have some fun. I can just imagine the spiel you would give to the Judge now "In all fairness your honour, I think you are just being a bitter twisted reactive individual who has never lived. You are the type to have everyone around you living a life of complete and utter worthlessness by insisting that people can't be reckless and expose innocent people to unnecessary actuarial risk. Your honour, I think you should just get over the fact imbeciles kill innocent people for thrills, and acknowledge my right to act anyway I please because to do otherwise would be a boring existence." HHMM, I am just wondering how such a defense would go?
Quote from: E-Kul on Today at 05:47:04 PM
Fortunately for me, while your ridiculousness is in the majority here at Getbig, in the real world, decent people actually care about not putting other people at risk. If you live your life based on the principle you win/others lose you will continue to be a despised figure. Intelligent people look for win/win scenarios. So, responsible people who want to drive at excessive speed and in a dangerous manner, find a race course to do it and take the necessary precautions to prevent injury to themselves and to other people. That way it is a win for them and a win for innocent people who don't want to die a violent death due to other peoples thrill seeking behaviour.
The sad thing is, it isn't just mine and my loved ones lives such irresponsible people put at risk, it is yours too. But, a growing trend I notice amongst people is a complete disregard for their own self preservation. They are more concerned about the right to act in self destructive ways and expose other people to harm or death, even if it means it may indeed be themselves who are killed by others who also adopt such a philosophy. By advocating the way you do, you show a profound disregard for your own life, a sign of chronic low self esteem. Just because you are prepared to die at the hands of an irresponsible imbecile, doesn't mean the rest of us are. Some of us are content in our non thrill seeking lifestyles, respecting the rights and concerns of others and the lure of living a long healthy life.
If everyone believed as you did, that worrying about the negative outcome our actions may have on others as unimportant, society would descend into anarchy. The whole time innocent people are being seriously injured and killed by such people, yes, society will be angst ridden and doomed. I don't believe this way because I am altruistic, it is in my best interest too. Respecting the rights of others improves my chances of them respecting mine. If like you, you refuse to respect other peoples Universal Human Right to safety and security, it is unlikely they will be concerned about yours.
Using your logic, you have the right to act in a dangerous manner and kill someone and that is acceptable based on your so called right to have some fun. I can just imagine the spiel you would give to the Judge now "In all fairness your honour, I think you are just being a bitter twisted reactive individual who has never lived. You are the type to have everyone around you living a life of complete and utter worthlessness by insisting that people can't be reckless and expose innocent people to unnecessary actuarial risk. Your honour, I think you should just get over the fact imbeciles kill innocent people for thrills, and acknowledge my right to act anyway I please because to do otherwise would be a boring existence." HHMM, I am just wondering how such a defense would go?
LMAO @ ''NOBODY claiming e-kul is owning anyone when he is writing a book in the process. loloollolllool :D
-
I have never claimed to be an intellectual, this is a label often given to me by other Getbiggers. I am interested as to what you think I am copying and pasting. And yes, I think with certain issues a fundamentalist approach is necessary. Nobody considers the forbidding of murdering someone else as fundamentalist principle, but it is. Tell me, do you take a fundamentalist approcah to pedophilia, or do you listen to the like of groups like NAMBLA who advocate for their right to molest children.
I don't apologise for my views, it is based on an appreciation of my own sense of self preservation and the Universal Human Right that should be afforded every citizen to safety and security. If other people believe their right to seek thrills trump that right, then I will fairly tell them to go fuck themselves.
I have never claimed to be an intellectual, this is a label often given to me by other Getbiggers.
My point is always extremely overt and the long diatribes necessary to explain such concepts to imbeciles.
Sure you don't ::)
I am interested as to what you think I am copying and pasting.
stats I've seen you use them from erroneous sources especially when talking about firearms.
Tell me, do you take a fundamentalist approcah to pedophilia, or do you listen to the like of groups like NAMBLA who advocate for their right to molest children.
This is ridiculous to the point of being offensive. Not even worthy of a cognitive response. And what's your ' fundamentalist ' approach towards this? bitching on Getbig? you're really setting the world on fire with your activism ::)
I don't apologise for my views, it is based on an appreciation of my own sense of self preservation and the Universal Human Right that should be afforded every citizen to safety and security. If other people believe their right to seek thrills trump that right, then I will fairly tell them to go fuck themselves.
Obvious you don't. And the irony of this statement self preservation and the Universal Human Right that should be afforded every citizen to safety and security when you would deny people the ability to own firearms , your hypocrisy knows no bounds. and please don't bother trying to defend your position we all know what it is.
-
E-Kul constantly owns himself. :-\
-
Ekul is good for GetBig.
You're reaching with this one. :-\
-
So what! He got in the car knowing the driver was a revhead hoon. The car he was killed in was never technically designed for the road, it is a fine tuned, finicky piece of racing machinery. Do you think Paul said, now listen buddy, drive carefully and obey the speed limits. Paul himself has admitted to driving in excess of 300 km/h on public roads. When a friend offers to take you 'for a spin' in his overpowered Porsche Carrera GT, do you think the passenger doesn't know what that means. If Paul Walker was an advocate for driving safely and responsibly, and didn't have a history of reckless driving himself or the promotion of it in his movies, then yes, it would be a tragedy that some reckless driver would endanger someone who so obviously was against the practise of driving in such a manner, but that's not the case. Paul was a victim of his own disregard for road safety.
Paul probably would have driven the same way as his friend. That is not the point. Paul was not driving that Porsche. He was not speeding. He had no control over his fate on that day..
A passenger dying because of a reckless driver is a tragedy. It does not matter that he was famous.
-
He promoted reckless driving and this has led to countless people being unnecessarily killed. Your argument is akin to suggesting the Marlboro Man wasn't complicit in the promotion of cigarettes and the countless unnecessary deaths that came from that. At least the Marlboro man had the good sense to become an anti-smoking crusader after developing lung cancer. Had Paul survived, I doubt he would have had the good sense to do the same, after all what's more important, preventing people being killed in road accidents or profiting from the movies that help promote unnecesary carnage in the first place.
This is the thing, people don't like to hold celebrities accountable. There are consequences for your actions, and I find it fitting that a man who promoted reckless driving was killed by someone who embraced the philosophy. Unfortunately, the influence his movies will have will continue to affect young douchebags everywhere and many more will continue dying thanks to fast and furious fanboys.
He didn't promote reckless driving. He was a car enthusiast who promoted tuning cars, the whole car culture, tracking, etc....
The movies are just that... He's an actor like all of Hollywood
If people can't get past that and emulating what's on tv and can't diff from real life that's your own fault and you're an idiot to begin with
All u do is blame! Bet your stance is the same on assault rifles/guns, violent video games... ::)
-
Paul probably would have driven the same way as his friend. That is not the point. Paul was not driving that Porsche. He was not speeding. He had no control over his fate on that day..
A passenger dying because of a reckless driver is a tragedy. It does not matter that he was famous.
according to E-Kul then paul walker deserved to die for being at the wrong place at the wrong time. SO WHAT he was in the passenger seat.
just like E-Kul deserved to get mauled by pitbulls, disfigured and emotionally scarred for being at the wrong place at the wrong time.
sounds logical to me.
-
So what! He got in the car knowing the driver was a revhead hoon. The car he was killed in was never technically designed for the road, it is a fine tuned, finicky piece of racing machinery. Do you think Paul said, now listen buddy, drive carefully and obey the speed limits. Paul himself has admitted to driving in excess of 300 km/h on public roads. When a friend offers to take you 'for a spin' in his overpowered Porsche Carrera GT, do you think the passenger doesn't know what that means. If Paul Walker was an advocate for driving safely and responsibly, and didn't have a history of reckless driving himself or the promotion of it in his movies, then yes, it would be a tragedy that some reckless driver would endanger someone who so obviously was against the practise of driving in such a manner, but that's not the case. Paul was a victim of his own disregard for road safety.
The car he was killed in was never technically designed for the road, it is a fine tuned, finicky piece of racing machinery.
This is exactly where you go wrong. This is just a blatant lie and this is where you always go wrong by trying to supplement lies in your argument to prove you're right. , the car was absolutely designed for the road , it has road tires designed to last thousands of miles when races tires designed to last a couple of hundred. It was designed to use regular petrol and not race fuel , it was designed with a road going suspension which is soft , much softer than a race car , for bumps , pot holes and transitions , I could continue but there is no point
These auto makers know these cars never going to be used to their full potential and the stats are for bragging rights. These cars would be left for dead on a race track compared to a real race car. They are very capable in the right hands and the driver was capable , you don't know what caused the accident you're working on assumptions but you're bending the facts to meet you already presupposed conclusion and this is why people can't take you seriously.
-
E-KUL just needs some Heme-Iron in his life
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/69/Haem-B-3D-vdW.png/578px-Haem-B-3D-vdW.png)
-
Newsflash - there is no such thing as a human right to safety and security.
The sooner you accept this the sooner you will accept that life doesnt work the way you think it should and no one is bound by your backwards ass, quasi-dictatorial logic.
Oh Brother, their is such a thing as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights with countless references to safety and security of the individual. Try reading it, because nowhere in that document does it say an individual should have the right to endanger other people's lives for thrills. Thank God society is based on the way I think and not on the average Getbiggers backward ass dictatorial logic. If it was there would be no rules and utter chaos. I often wonder how such individuals go with authority, when pulled over for a traffic violation, does such a person call the police officer a quasi dictator enforcing backward ass logic and the sooner the policemen accepts that rules don't apply to them the better off they will be. Getbiggers, shheesssh!
-
This is exactly where you go wrong. This is just a blatant lie and this is where you always go wrong by trying to supplement lies in your argument to prove you're right. , the car was absolutely designed for the road , it has road tires designed to last thousands of miles when races tires designed to last a couple of hundred. It was designed to use regular petrol and not race fuel , it was designed with a road going suspension which is soft , much softer than a race car , for bumps , pot holes and transitions , I could continue but there is no point
These auto makers know these cars never going to be used to their full potential and the stats are for bragging rights. These cars would be left for dead on a race track compared to a real race car. They are very capable in the right hands and the driver was capable , you don't know what caused the accident you're working on assumptions but you're bending the facts to meet you already presupposed conclusion and this is why people can't take you seriously.
just like when he said 'hitler never personally killed a jew!'
you cannot take his posts seriously. he scatters then with bullshit under the guise of it being fact.
that's why I don't debate him. I just call him an idiot as you just can't debate stupid.
-
Oh Brother, their is such a thing as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights with countless references to safety and security of the individual. Try reading it, because nowhere in that document does it say an individual should have the right to endanger other people's lives for thrills. Thank God society is based on the way I think and not on the average Getbiggers backward ass dictatorial logic. If it was there would be no rules and utter chaos. I often wonder how such individuals go with authority, when pulled over for a traffic violation, does such a person call the police officer a quasi dictator enforcing backward ass logic and the sooner the policemen accepts that rules don't apply to them the better off they will be. Getbiggers, shheesssh!
We are homosapiens. Mammals in its purest form. We all make mistakes in our lives. The problem is that we do not see in hindsight.
You like to judge in absolutes. You are just a scared loser living a hate-filled existence.
You may have opinions, but they are almost never right.
-
This is exactly where you go wrong. This is just a blatant lie and this is where you always go wrong by trying to supplement lies in your argument to prove you're right. , the car was absolutely designed for the road , it has road tires designed to last thousands of miles when races tires designed to last a couple of hundred. It was designed to use regular petrol and not race fuel , it was designed with a road going suspension which is soft , much softer than a race car , for bumps , pot holes and transitions , I could continue but there is no point
These auto makers know these cars never going to be used to their full potential and the stats are for bragging rights. These cars would be left for dead on a race track compared to a real race car. They are very capable in the right hands and the driver was capable , you don't know what caused the accident you're working on assumptions but you're bending the facts to meet you already presupposed conclusion and this is why people can't take you seriously.
Personally, the point is moot, I don't care if it was a beat up Volkswagen combi van. The issue is hoon driving and blatant disregard for the rues of the road. And we do know what was involved, excessive speed. It has been reported and acknowledged by the authorities. Even the dumbest of imbeciles could tell from the state of the vehicle that speed was involved Treating people as if they are stupid when circumstances are obvious doesn't help your cause. Suggesting two known hoon drivers took a drive to nowhere in a high powered sports car only to drive around the block at 45mph is incredulous. if you didn't treat people with such disdain, maybe I could take you seriously.
-
Oh Brother, their is such a thing as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights with countless references to safety and security of the individual. Try reading it, because nowhere in that document does it say an individual should have the right to endanger other people's lives for thrills. Thank God society is based on the way I think and not on the average Getbiggers backward ass dictatorial logic. If it was there would be no rules and utter chaos. I often wonder how such individuals go with authority, when pulled over for a traffic violation, does such a person call the police officer a quasi dictator enforcing backward ass logic and the sooner the policemen accepts that rules don't apply to them the better off they will be. Getbiggers, shheesssh!
Yes and you would deny a 5'0" tall woman who weighs 100lbs the right to carry a firearm to protect herself against someone 6'5" and 250lbs because YOU have an irrational fear of firearms. Or how about people in wheelchairs ?
Thank ' God ' that I live in a society where we have a Constitution that acknowledges the right to protection. But alas we have morons like you here trying to revert to the caveman says when biggest strongest wins
-
Personally, the point is moot, I don't care if it was a beat up Volkswagen combi van. The issue is hoon driving and blatant disregard for the rues of the road. And we do know what was involved, excessive speed. It has been reported and acknowledged by the authorities. Even the dumbest of imbeciles could tell from the state of the vehicle that speed was involved Treating people as if they are stupid when circumstances are obvious doesn't help your cause. Suggesting two known hoon drivers took a drive to nowhere in a high powered sports car only to drive around the block at 45mph is incredulous. if you didn't treat people with such disdain, maybe I could take you seriously.
how the fuck can that point be moot- you brought it up. it was your point. now your saying its moot? what kind of logic is that? it's only now a moot point cause you've been made to look the fool for saying it. lol
some intellect you are.
watching you fumble around is great fun.
keep going, sparky. I can go on busting you up all day.
-
E-kul grasping at straws in this thread.
-
We are homosapiens. Mammals in its purest form. We all make mistakes in our life. The problem is that we do not see in hindsight.
You like to judge in absolutes. You are just a scared loser living a hate-filled existence.
You may have opinions, but they are almost never right.
We don't need to see in hindsight to recognise danger. All it takes is rational thinking and a healthy dose of self preservation. You don't need to be a clairvoyant to know driving at excessive speed in a high powered sports car could kill you. We all make mistakes in life, the key is not to make mistakes that take your life.
I like to judge based on what's fair. Reckless individuals do scare me, as there recklessness could quite easily take my own life, and to me to take anothers life because someone chose to act recklessly is a hateful thing to do.
My opinions validity is confirmed by the laws of the land, it is obvious by the fact the majority don't support the childish ideas put forward by the average getbigger is proof enough for me. If this was two random teenagers who killed themselves in such an act of reckless driving you would be condemning them rightly as the douchebags they are. But as typical sheep you are drinking the lets worship the rich celebrity kool aid and the media have told you how you should feel and think about it and like the good little sheep that you are, you follow right along.
-
Personally, the point is moot, I don't care if it was a beat up Volkswagen combi van. The issue is hoon driving and blatant disregard for the rues of the road. And we do know what was involved, excessive speed. It has been reported and acknowledged by the authorities. Even the dumbest of imbeciles could tell from the state of the vehicle that speed was involved Treating people as if they are stupid when circumstances are obvious doesn't help your cause. Suggesting two known hoon drivers took a drive to nowhere in a high powered sports car only to drive around the block at 45mph is incredulous. if you didn't treat people with such disdain, maybe I could take you seriously.
Personally, the point is moot
It's a moot point , yet you attempted to pass it off as part of your proof. ::) No it was a blatant lie you just got caught in. And there you go , instead of making your case you go on the offensive with ad hominem attacks , thanks for proving me correct once again.
I'm sure speed was a factor , it may not be the only factor you're presupposing it was. It may be a mechanical failure and not a driver error. You're working backwards to fill in the blanks to me your already predetermined conclusion. Driving fast on public roads is bad ::)
Driving fast on public roads can be done safely , but driving like an asshole on a freeway full of people just trying to get from point A to point B is irresponsible and dangerous. YOU DO NOT know the events that precipitated the accident.
I will gather many more fatalities are credited to texting/cell phone use on public roads than any people just driving like lunatics , but you get one example of a high profile case and get on your soap box screaming ' SEE , SEE , SEE I said so ' ::)
And you don't always have to drive like an asshole to die in a car , low speed accidents can kill just as well. But you latched on to this because you don't care about saving lives as much as you care about proving you're right. You wait for opportunities to say ' I said so '
-
Oh Brother, their is such a thing as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights with countless references to safety and security of the individual. Try reading it, because nowhere in that document does it say an individual should have the right to endanger other people's lives for thrills. Thank God society is based on the way I think and not on the average Getbiggers backward ass dictatorial logic. If it was there would be no rules and utter chaos. I often wonder how such individuals go with authority, when pulled over for a traffic violation, does such a person call the police officer a quasi dictator enforcing backward ass logic and the sooner the policemen accepts that rules don't apply to them the better off they will be. Getbiggers, shheesssh!
oh brother, im sure a bear is going to stop from mauling you when you point out that hes violating your right to safety and security.
Its one thing for society to declare basic human rights that we should try and uphold, like the right to the pursuit of happiness... but no one can guarantee you the right to safety or security.
Its wishful thinking at its worst.... much like the silly notion that violence never solves anything. /Raczack
-
What I'd really like to see is kul vs uberman. The perfect storm.
-
What I'd really like to see is kul vs uberman. The perfect storm.
I'd rather see Paul Walker on Getbig and E-Kul in the car
-
Yes and you would deny a 5'0" tall woman who weighs 100lbs the right to carry a firearm to protect herself against someone 6'5" and 250lbs because YOU have an irrational fear of firearms. Or how about people in wheelchairs ?
Thank ' God ' that I live in a society where we have a Constitution that acknowledges the right to protection. But alas we have morons like you here trying to revert to the caveman says when biggest strongest wins
Based on your ridiculous logic, the 6'5 250 pound unarmed man now has a right to arm himself with superior fire power to the women who is now armed is a greater threat to him than he was initially to her. Who protects the unarmed man who is now at a disadvantage to the armed woman.
The irony of your statement is you ridiculing your own theory by suggesting that I am advocating for reverting to the caveman says when biggest strongest wins. That is your argument when you suggest arming your fragile female, to make her the biggest and the strongest opposed to an unarmed man.
Your argument is this
1) strong people have an advantage over weak people
2) therefore weak people can carry weapons that reverse the roles now making the strong weak, and the weak strong.
3) Therefore the strong that are now weak also have the same right afforded the weak as per the second statement
4) The once strong but now weak people can carry weapons that reverse the roles now making the strong weak, and the weak strong.
This will lead to an infinite escalation of the weakest seeking superior firepower until they become the strongest, which can never happen because using your logic the weaker person is always entitled to find a way to become the stronger person. , an absurd situation. You will never reach a state of equality in terms of ability to protect oneself. Sometimes power just needs to be respected, just as a human being wouldn't pull the tail of a lion knowing the lion has superior power. It's not a matter of finding a way to protect yourself from the lion after you pull his tail, it's a matter of not pulling the lions tail in the first place. Trying to dominate a superior force isn't always the best form of protection, it's like trying to take on lightning rather than simply protecting yourself from it.
-
I'd rather see Paul Walker on Getbig and E-Kul in the car
+1 If only E-fool was in that car, would have done humanity a great favour. Paul Walker will be missed :(
Paul was young and a good guy. E-fool is over 40 and a loser on the internet, totally uncool.
-
I'd rather see Paul Walker on Getbig and E-Kul in the car
Heyoooooooo
-
+1 If only as_hamed was in that car, would have done humanity a great favour. Paul Walker will be missed by douchebags everywhere :(
Paul was E-kuls age and is now dead. E-kul without the trappings of wealth and success still managed to outlive the dumb cun+
:o
-
hey e-fool how's life been treatin ya, i thought you were too humiliated and made your leave, why the comeback e-fool?
-
Based on your ridiculous logic, the 6'5 250 pound unarmed man now has a right to arm himself with superior fire power to the women who is now armed is a greater threat to him than he was initially to her. Who protects the unarmed man who is now at a disadvantage to the armed woman.
The irony of your statement is you ridiculing your own theory by suggesting that I am advocating for reverting to the caveman says when biggest strongest wins. That is your argument when you suggest arming your fragile female, to make her the biggest and the strongest opposed to an unarmed man.
Your argument is this
1) strong people have an advantage over weak people
2) therefore weak people can carry weapons that reverse the roles now making the strong weak, and the weak strong.
3) Therefore the strong that are now weak also have the same right afforded the weak as per the second statement
4) The once strong but now weak people can carry weapons that reverse the roles now making the strong weak, and the weak strong.
This will lead to an infinite escalation of the weakest seeking superior firepower until they become the strongest, which can never happen because using your logic the weaker person is always entitled to find a way to become the stronger person. , an absurd situation. You will never reach a state of equality in terms of ability to protect oneself. Sometimes power just needs to be respected, just as a human being wouldn't pull the tail of a lion knowing the lion has superior power. It's not a matter of finding a way to protect yourself from the lion after you pull his tail, it's a matter of not pulling the lions tail in the first place. Trying to dominate a superior force isn't always the best form of protection, it's like trying to take on lightning rather than simply protecting yourself from it.
Just lolz :D
The entire part you missed is...................... ........................ .......? Protection from bigger stronger people who are intent on preying on the weaker ones who can't defend themselves otherwise.
Guns work that's why we fight wars with them ;) in your nonsense Utopia no one is allowed guns and people who are intend on preying on weaker people have carte blanche to do so. ::)
Jesus you can't think past your own prejudices , you're blind to any other point of view and will just type utter nonsense to back it up. I was almost not going to respond to this that's how dumb it was. :-\ you're already just blatantly lying and attacking anyone who calls you on it.
These are exactly the same reasons I don't debate fundamentalists Christians , I smile and write them off as being to forgone over the edge to conversate with.
-
hey e-fool how's life been treatin ya, i thought you were too humiliated and made your leave, why the comeback e-fool?
Life's good, probably not enough Muslims being killed for my liking, but other than that, life is pretty good. It is perfect weather where I am, I have access to plenty of good food, clean water, a comfortable house, and a great car, a devoted partner and all the money and free time I have ever wanted. SO I can't complain too much. I am just debating with my partner whether or not to go see Bon Jovi Concert tonight as we have free tickets.
Internet forum correspondence doesn't humiliate me. I came back because I can.
Anyway, thanks for asking as-hamed.
-
Life's good, probably not enough Muslims being killed for my liking, but other than that, life is pretty good. It is perfect whether where I am, I have access to plenty of good food, clean water, a comfortable house, and a great car, a devoted partner and all the money and free time I have ever wanted. SO I can't complain too much. I am just debating with my partner whether or not to go see Bon Jovi Concert tonight as we have free tickets.
Internet forum correspondence doesn't humiliate me. I comeback because I can.
Anyway, thanks for asking as-hamed.
On one hand you bitch and moan about people being killed, and then you turn around and say that not enough muslims are getting killed.
you have issues dude... not the least of that you literally have no idea what youre talking about and youre opinions all seem to be at odds with each other.
Youre almost laughable at how hypocritical you are and completely lacking any sort of self awareness
-
Just lolz :D
The entire part you missed is...................... ........................ .......? Protection from bigger stronger people who are intent on preying on the weaker ones who can't defend themselves otherwise.
Guns work that's why we fight wars with them ;) in your nonsense Utopia no one is allowed guns and people who are intend on preying on weaker people have carte blanche to do so. ::)
Jesus you can't think past your own prejudices , you're blind to any other point of view and will just type utter nonsense to back it up. I was almost not going to respond to this that's how dumb it was. :-\ you're already just blatantly lying and attacking anyone who calls you on it.
These are exactly the same reasons I don't debate fundamentalists Christians , I smile and write them off as being to forgone over the edge to conversate with.
I didn't think you could grasp the logic. Actually guns in war stopped working and that's why heavier artillery was needed. And the reason guns stopped working is because of your ridiculous logic. Once a weaker force arms itself, the once strong but now overpowered force then realises it's only option is to arm itself more heavily to once again see the power advantage shifted their way. This is how we ended up in a world threatened by Nuclear weapons.
I think a big part of the problem is you have some superman fantasy, where the good guys are more powerful than the bad guys, and superman always wins. That if the oppressed force can only find a way to dominate the superior force then the once oppressed will use their new found power for good. yeah right! Your logic dictates that the weaker force (which you assume is kindly for some reason) has the right to use any force necessary to dominate the stronger force (which you assume is evil). Once the kindly and now more powerful force has eliminated the once more dominant and evil force, peace will reign. Oh Brother !
Has it ever occured to you that the weaker force may be a greater evil (IRAN) than say the evil dominant force and preventing them from securing a superior or equal force is a good thing. The flaw in your logic is the assumption that their is a weaker innocent party, rather than the reality that there is only a lesser of two evils.
-
Shockwave melting in this thread.
-
On one hand you bitch and moan about people being killed, and then you turn around and say that not enough muslims are getting killed.
you have issues dude... not the least of that you literally have no idea what youre talking about and youre opinions all seem to be at odds with each other.
Youre almost laughable at how hypocritical you are and completely lacking any sort of self awareness
Are muslims people? Do you mean that large group of illiterate goat fuckers who oppress women and terrorise the western world and have delayed humanities progress.
I have no objection of people dying who were complicit in innocent people being unnecessarily harmed or killed. Muslims and the ideology they practise would definitely fit this description.
-
Are muslims people? Do you mean that large group of illiterate goat fuckers who oppress women and terrorise the western world and have delayed humanities progress.
I have no objection of people dying who were complicit in innocent people being unnecessarily harmed or killed. Muslims and the ideology they practise would definitely fit this description.
not that I particularly give a fuck about muslims, but your ability to justify any belief, no matter how much it flies in the face of your other opinions, is impressive.
Id say that some of your beliefs are actually noble if I thoufht for one second that you actually gave a shit about any of the people that you pretend to care about protecting... but you dont. With yoi its clearly about you pushing your beliefs on others because you "know whats best", and if everyone just thought like you did, everyone would be ok and the world would be such a great place.
-
not that I particularly give a fuck about muslims, but your ability to justify any belief, no matter how much it flies in the face of your other opinions, is impressive.
Id say that some of your beliefs are actually noble if I thoufht for one second that you actually gave a shit about any of the people that you pretend to care about protecting... but you dont. With yoi its clearly about you pushing your beliefs on others because you "know whats best", and if everyone just thought like you did, everyone would be ok and the world would be such a great place.
You are right, I don't give a flying fuck about the vast majority of people. I am as selfish as the nest person, and humbly admit it. I simply base my opinions on my keen sense of self preservation. Would I like to be t-boned while driving my car, killing me, by some fast and furious fanboy emulating his heroes. NO. Would I like to be maimed and mauled by someone else's poor choice of pet. NO. Would I like to die from someone elses passive smoke. NO ! I could go on but I am sure you get the point, if other people also don't wish to be harmed or killed by other people recklessness, then my opinion could be construed as altruistic. If other people are happy to be killed by other peoples selfishness or recklessness and value their lives so little, there is little my point of view will do to help them.
-
You are right, I don't give a flying fuck about the vast majority of people. I am as selfish as the nest person, and humbly admit it. I simply base my opinions on my keen sense of self preservation. Would I like to be t-boned while driving my car, killing me, by some fast and furious fanboy emulating his heroes. NO. Would I like to be maimed and mauled by someone else's poor choice of pet. NO. Would I like to die from someone elses passive smoke. NO ! I could go on but I am sure you get the point, if other people also don't wish to be harmed or killed by other people recklessness, then my opinion could be construed as altruistic. If other people are happy to be killed by other peoples selfishness or recklessness and value their lives so little, there is little my point of view will do to help them.
well... at least this is some honesty.
Personally, I dont worry about such thinga because of it happens, it happens and rrally there is not a damn thing I can do to change it.
The behavior of others is out of my control, all I can do is worry about myself. .. I dont put the responsibility of my safety on others... I do whatd needed to keep myself in a position of where im in control of my destiny... instead of worrying about the guy droving 120 I simply try and keep aware so that I can dodge him when the time comes. Instead of worrying about the psycho with the gun I try and keep vigilant and aware of my surroundings.... you need to worry more about yourself and less about the actions of those around you. You cant contril how others choose to live their lives.... the only thing YOU can do is to entrust your safety to yoursf and yourself alone... that way youre bot pointinf the dinger at everyone else and constantly blaming something/someone for all your problems.
-
PIECE OF SHIT HAS NO DISREGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE!!! PUSSY!!
You're an obese homosexual Mexican, so what you!
-
You are right, I don't give a flying fuck about the vast majority of people. I am as selfish as the nest person, and humbly admit it. I simply base my opinions on my keen sense of self preservation. Would I like to be t-boned while driving my car, killing me, by some fast and furious fanboy emulating his heroes. NO. Would I like to be maimed and mauled by someone else's poor choice of pet. NO. Would I like to die from someone elses passive smoke. NO ! I could go on but I am sure you get the point, if other people also don't wish to be harmed or killed by other people recklessness, then my opinion could be construed as altruistic. If other people are happy to be killed by other peoples selfishness or recklessness and value their lives so little, there is little my point of view will do to help them.
I didn't think you could grasp the logic. Actually guns in war stopped working and that's why heavier artillery was needed. And the reason guns stopped working is because of your ridiculous logic. Once a weaker force arms itself, the once strong but now overpowered force then realises it's only option is to arm itself more heavily to once again see the power advantage shifted their way. This is how we ended up in a world threatened by Nuclear weapons.
I think a big part of the problem is you have some superman fantasy, where the good guys are more powerful than the bad guys, and superman always wins. That if the oppressed force can only find a way to dominate the superior force then the once oppressed will use their new found power for good. yeah right! Your logic dictates that the weaker force (which you assume is kindly for some reason) has the right to use any force necessary to dominate the stronger force (which you assume is evil). Once the kindly and now more powerful force has eliminated the once more dominant and evil force, peace will reign. Oh Brother !
Has it ever occured to you that the weaker force may be a greater evil (IRAN) than say the evil dominant force and preventing them from securing a superior or equal force is a good thing. The flaw in your logic is the assumption that their is a weaker innocent party, rather than the reality that there is only a lesser of two evils.
Life's good, probably not enough Muslims being killed for my liking, but other than that, life is pretty good. It is perfect weather where I am, I have access to plenty of good food, clean water, a comfortable house, and a great car, a devoted partner and all the money and free time I have ever wanted. SO I can't complain too much. I am just debating with my partner whether or not to go see Bon Jovi Concert tonight as we have free tickets.
Internet forum correspondence doesn't humiliate me. I came back because I can.
Anyway, thanks for asking as-hamed.
Based on your ridiculous logic, the 6'5 250 pound unarmed man now has a right to arm himself with superior fire power to the women who is now armed is a greater threat to him than he was initially to her. Who protects the unarmed man who is now at a disadvantage to the armed woman.
The irony of your statement is you ridiculing your own theory by suggesting that I am advocating for reverting to the caveman says when biggest strongest wins. That is your argument when you suggest arming your fragile female, to make her the biggest and the strongest opposed to an unarmed man.
Your argument is this
1) strong people have an advantage over weak people
2) therefore weak people can carry weapons that reverse the roles now making the strong weak, and the weak strong.
3) Therefore the strong that are now weak also have the same right afforded the weak as per the second statement
4) The once strong but now weak people can carry weapons that reverse the roles now making the strong weak, and the weak strong.
This will lead to an infinite escalation of the weakest seeking superior firepower until they become the strongest, which can never happen because using your logic the weaker person is always entitled to find a way to become the stronger person. , an absurd situation. You will never reach a state of equality in terms of ability to protect oneself. Sometimes power just needs to be respected, just as a human being wouldn't pull the tail of a lion knowing the lion has superior power. It's not a matter of finding a way to protect yourself from the lion after you pull his tail, it's a matter of not pulling the lions tail in the first place. Trying to dominate a superior force isn't always the best form of protection, it's like trying to take on lightning rather than simply protecting yourself from it.
lmao, another chapter to e-kul's book :D
-
Are muslims people? Do you mean that large group of illiterate goat fuckers who oppress women and terrorise the western world and have delayed humanities progress.
I have no objection of people dying who were complicit in innocent people being unnecessarily harmed or killed. Muslims and the ideology they practise would definitely fit this description.
your bias towards all muslims only goes to show the breadth of your stupidity and ignorance.
ismaili, a branch of Shia Muslim, are very progressive, in some ways probably even more so than you culturally speaking. women are the landholders, and one of the main tenants is to educate your daughter over your son if you have two children and only the funds to educate one.
yet you call them 'illiterate goat fuckers who oppress women'.
you sir, are not only a bigot, but an uneducated, small minded fool.
and if I may, just a fucking stupid person in general.
-
well... at least this is some honesty.
Personally, I dont worry about such thinga because of it happens, it happens and rrally there is not a damn thing I can do to change it.
The behavior of others is out of my control, all I can do is worry about myself. .. I dont put the responsibility of my safety on others... I do whatd needed to keep myself in a position of where im in control of my destiny... instead of worrying about the guy droving 120 I simply try and keep aware so that I can dodge him when the time comes. Instead of worrying about the psycho with the gun I try and keep vigilant and aware of my surroundings.... you need to worry more about yourself and less about the actions of those around you. You cant contril how others choose to live their lives.... the only thing YOU can do is to entrust your safety to yoursf and yourself alone... that way youre bot pointinf the dinger at everyone else and constantly blaming something/someone for all your problems.
Accepted, the behavior of others is out of my control, and like anybody, I take reasonable precautions to protect myself. I drive as defensively as I can, and I respect the rules of the road. While I am out and about, I don't spend my time worrying about how their reckless behaviour of others can harm me, but I am aware of it. I believe I have pretty reasonable situational awareness. I think your perspective is one of someone who hasn't experienced huge losses from the reckless behaviours of others, so it has a detached blase feel to it. Almost as if you are convinced bad shit couldn't really happen to you so why worry about it. I could be wrong though.
I don't point the finger at everyone else, just those responsible. It may come as a shock to you, but quite often peoples problems are the fault of others, it's that simple. If a child is hit by a drunk driver while crossing the road legally goes on to lose their legs, one can fairly say her problems are the fault of someone else, and she rightly can blame them and speak out about their feelings on the matter and lobby for some type of protection from such an accident occuring to her again.
I disagree with you in that individuals don't have any influence over others and how they live their lives. The whole advertising industry is based on the premise this is achievable. Let's take for instance the car industry in it's infancy, cars were notoriously dangerous and many people died horrible violent deaths. That pattern continued unabated until Ralph Nader came along and questioned whether or not cars could be made safer. He lobbied for changes to be made to the way automobiles were made and demanded they be made safer. He was hated by the car industry and they even tried to set him up to publicly shame him which didn't work because he was a squeaky clean do-gooder. The car industry argued that affordable vehicles couldn't be made safely and resisted any changes to their industry. Anyway,long story short, after much resistance Ralph nader won and the car makers found a way to actually profit from making cars safer. So, thanks to him, and the pain he felt after some of his friends died in horrible motor vehicle accidents we are all safer in modern cars. Ralph could have adopted your attitude and just fought hard to avoid being another statistic while driving a dangerous vehicle, or he could have done what he did.
One needs to protect oneself the best they can, but they also need to speak up about issues that continue to unnecessarily endanger them. If you want to know why people don't speak up, investigate what happened to Ralph Nader when he did, or Julian Assange, or Edward Snowden. Hell, its dangerous business being outspoken. Do you think if getbig was a physical meeting place that I would have survived this long without being beaten to death. Most men don't speak out because they are scared, and so they should be. But being scared isn't a good reason to remain silent while injustice prevails.
-
your bias towards all muslims only goes to show the breadth of your stupidity and ignorance.
ismaili, a branch of Shia Muslim, are very progressive, in some ways probably even more so than you culturally speaking. women are the landholders, and one of the main tenants is to educate your daughter over your son if you have two children and only the funds to educate one.
yet you call them 'illiterate goat fuckers who oppress women'.
you sir, are not only a bigot, but an uneducated, small minded fool.
and if I may, just a fucking stupid person in general.
::) You are right, it isn't right of me to call Muslims 'illiterate goat fuckers who oppress women', some of them are literate, so I stand corrected.
-
we reap what we sow.
-
So I see Assmed's complaining has had a bunch of my posts removed yet again. You mods are starting to piss me off with this shit for real. How about I complain to Ron about Assmed's anti-Jewish rhetoric that you douche nozzels never remove? Stop removing my posts that are based in fact or are my opinion. That's not your job to make that one asshole happy because he disagrees.
Fucking pussys.
-
So I see Assmed's complaining has had a bunch of my posts removed yet again. You mods are starting to piss me off with this shit for real. How about I complain to Ron about Assmed's anti-Jewish rhetoric that you douche nozzels never remove? Stop removing my posts that are based in fact or are my opinion. That's not your job to make that one asshole happy because he disagrees.
Fucking pussys.
Yet, Ahmed can call for the extermination of millions of people simply because they are homosexual. Hes advocating Nazi levels of genocide.
-
Accepted, the behavior of If you want to know why people don't speak up, investigate what happened to Ralph Nader when he did, or Julian Assange, or Edward Snowden. Hell, its dangerous business being outspoken. Do you think if getbig was a physical meeting place that I would have survived this long without being beaten to death. Most men don't speak out because they are scared, and so they should be. But being scared isn't a good reason to remain silent while injustice prevails.
hahaha now your comparing yourself to Julian Assange?!
Julian Assange was targeted for 'speaking out' becuase he divulged information sensitive to the security of the US. you get targeted for speaking out cause your a bumbling ignorant bigot who rubs people the wrong way.
if GB was a physical meeting place you'd get knocked out for being a tool, not because your some kind of martyr who's being punished for speaking the truth.
nice try tho.
-
Two questions:
What is Ekul to be outted for?
What the fuck is this thread now about?
-
we reap what we sow.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=508435.0;attach=544648;image)
You do know Mohammad despised dogs, especially black ones and Muslims are forbidden from owning dogs as pets.(only under special circumstances are Muslims allowed to own a dog). Islam on the whole views dogs as impure.
So No, Muslims aren't likely to own a pitbull. But plenty of other types of douchebags do.
-
Two questions:
What is Ekul to be outted for?
What the fuck is this thread now about?
Mexicans are impulsive people.
-
Who the fuck is E-Kul?
-
Mexicans are impulsive people.
;D That must be why they are always drowning, jumping in a river, trying to save little Migelitto when they can't swim themselves.
-
Who the fuck is E-Kul?
someone who would gladly kill 90% of the human race without even thinking twice, and I believe him too, without a doubt a complete paranoid psychopath, who lacks total empathy and should be locked away and throw away the key before he hurts anyone. :-\
-
E-Kul is the type of guy that will argue that the sky is not blue. And when faced with overwhelming evidence (just walking outside and seeing the sky is blue) he will deny that it is blue, and say everyone else is wrong.
-
E-Kul is the type of guy that will argue that the sky is not blue. And when faced with overwhelming evidence (just walking outside and seeing the sky is blue) he will deny that it is blue, and say everyone else is wrong.
The dude sounds like a douchebag! ;D everyone knows the sky is blue, except of course when it's red.
-
someone who would gladly kill 90% of the human race without even thinking twice, and I believe him too, without a doubt a complete paranoid psychopath, who lacks total empathy and should be locked away and throw away the key before he hurts anyone. :-\
This would be a good thing when you consider the fact that this world is OVERPOPULATED.
Too bad that most religious people pay more attention to the Bible than hard statistics..
(http://www.susps.org/images/worldpopgr.gif)
-
This would be a good thing when you consider the fact that this world is OVERPOPULATED.
Too bad that most religious people pay more attention to the Bible than hard statistics..
(http://www.susps.org/images/worldpopgr.gif)
If you think this is a good idea, prove it, start with yourself ;)
-
If you think this is a good idea, prove it, start with yourself ;)
My contribution is that I stay child-free and spread the message, what you?
-
This would be a good thing when you consider the fact that this world is OVERPOPULATED.
Too bad that most religious people pay more attention to the Bible than hard statistics..
You best be careful, 'Onetimehard is quite protective of the worlds 7 billion people" He likes the world just as it is, with the abundant resources owned by the very few and tens of thousands each day starving to death. He looks forward to the future when the resources are stretched to the limit and once first world countries are long gone and are at war over the necessities of life such as water. He would prefer 21 billion people all at war over limited resources than to find a way to effectively deal with the current population crisis.
-
You best be careful, 'Onetimehard is quite protective of the worlds 7 billion people" He likes the world just as it is, with the abundant resources owned by the very few and tens of thousands each day starving to death.
No one likes the world the way it is but no one thinks the solution is to kill billions of people. WOW what logic, lets kill people because we do not like the way the world turn, fucken coo cooo
-
No one likes the world the way it is but no one thinks the solution is to kill billions of people. WOW what logic, lets kill people because we do not like the way the world turn, fucken coo cooo
E-Kul dropping the logic bombs, and OTH cant handle it. ;D ;D :) :) ;) ;) :D :D
-
No one likes the world the way it is but no one thinks the solution is to kill billions of people. WOW what logic, lets kill people because we do not like the way the world turn, fucken coo cooo
Good a solution as any! ;D
-
My contribution is that I stay child-free and spread the message, what you?
OK well that is a lot better then killing people.
-
Good a solution as any! ;D
would you include the killing of babies and 1 year olds and 2 year olds ?
-
OK well that is a lot better then killing people.
Yeah, but the idea will never take off. Women's need to reproduce is way too strong. Women don't give a fuck about such things as population crises, they just want to cater to their maternal instincts. I think statistically today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men. To get that kind of difference, you had to have something like, throughout the entire history of the human race, maybe 80% of women but only 40% of men reproducing. Men opting out doesn't help, other men just father more children to more women.
-
E-Kul dropping the logic bombs, and OTH cant handle it. ;D ;D :) :) ;) ;) :D :D
No I can not handle it, you are 100% right, I can not handle the thought of you and e-kul thinking it is alright to kill babies and 1 year olds and 2 year olds, in fact I would probably punch you in the face if you came up to me and told me it was alright to kill babies and 1 year olds and 2 year olds. ;)
That is how much I can not handle that, you are right on the money with your post.
-
would you include the killing of babies and 1 year olds and 2 year olds ?
Well, you could hardly kill 90% of the worlds population without killing a few babies now could you. You want to make an omelette, you have to crack a few eggs. ;D
-
No I can not handle it, you are 100% right, I can not handle the thought of you and e-kul thinking it is alright to kill babies and 1 year olds and 2 year olds, in fact I would probably punch you in the face if you came up to me and told me it was alright to kill babies and 1 year olds and 2 year olds. ;)
That is how much I can not handle that, you are right on the money with your post.
So killing 3 and 4 year olds is OK then? :o
-
Well, you could hardly kill 90% of the worlds population without killing a few babies now could you. You want to make an omelette, you have to crack a few eggs. ;D
answer the fucken question properly, would you kill babies and 1 year olds and 2 year olds? yes or no?
-
No I can not handle it, you are 100% right, I can not handle the thought of you and e-kul thinking it is alright to kill babies and 1 year olds and 2 year olds, in fact I would probably punch you in the face if you came up to me and told me it was alright to kill babies and 1 year olds and 2 year olds. ;)
That is how much I can not handle that, you are right on the money with your post.
Sure, you'd punch me in the face, tough guy. :o :o
-
No one likes the world the way it is
Correct, the naive ones excluded.
but no one thinks the solution is to kill billions of people.
Do you really believe this, or is it what you want to believe?
WOW what logic, lets kill people because we do not like the way the world turn, fucken coo cooo
a) Most problems on this planet are caused by humans, so more humans means more problems.
b) Most human beings can't control their reproductive wish.
If this isn't logic, then enlighten us with your LOGIC* arguments.
* Rational ones, so no Bible stuff.
-
So killing 3 and 4 year olds is OK then? :o
stop splitting hairs, I thought it was logical to not continue with 3 year olds, and 4 year old etc, what the fuck to you think EINSTEIN, GOD YOU ARE DUMB, not all of have the time to write a page per post like you do.
-
answer the fucken question properly, would you kill babies and 1 year olds and 2 year olds? yes or no?
Well first we would have to determine if they were genetically viable, obviously if they were your children, they probably wouldn't pass the necessary requirements, so unfortunately the 10% would have to kill them. But don't worry, you wouldn't make it either, they would kill you too. See it wouldn't be so bad afterall.
-
Sure, you'd punch me in the face, tough guy. :o :o
ya why not, I would to anyone that has the balls to say to me they would kill children, :P
-
ya why not, I would to anyone that has the balls to say to me they would kill children, :P
I never said that. I just stated he was a logical guy.
He is logical in regard to religion.
He's insane in every other single way.
-
ya why not, I would to anyone that has the balls to say to me they would kill children, :P
So Killing men and women is OK? Is there any special reason that you are so fond of children?
-
I never said that. I just stated he was a logical guy.
He is logical in regard to religious.
He's insane in every other single way.
yup, he belongs in a nut house
-
You best be careful, 'Onetimehard is quite protective of the worlds 7 billion people" He likes the world just as it is, with the abundant resources owned by the very few and tens of thousands each day starving to death. He looks forward to the future when the resources are stretched to the limit and once first world countries are long gone and are at war over the necessities of life such as water. He would prefer 21 billion people all at war over limited resources than to find a way to effectively deal with the current population crisis.
Hahaha.....I lol'd. Even though all you do is ramble on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on.
Here you go though....OTH didn't say any of this shit......you take everything out of context and stretch people's words. OTH does this as well but not nearly to the extent you do it.
I would say "I have a pimple" and you would turn that into "Bikinislut has severe acne". Cuz that's how you roll.
-
So Killing men and women is OK? Is there any special reason we are unaware of that you are so fond of children?
Killing men and women is not OK but from the option of killing men and woman or children, killing men and women would be the lesser of 2 evils.
-
Killing men and women is not OK but from the option of killing men and woman or children, killing men and women would be the lesser of 2 evils.
Explain why.
And what is the lesser of two evils....killing women? Or men?
-
yup, he belongs in a nut house
Those are two of the main problems that I have with religious people, they like judging others and have piss-poor debating skills.
-
Explain why.
And what is the lesser of two evils....killing women? Or men?
2 options, 1 killing adults, 2 killing children
option 1 would be the lesser of 2 evils.
-
yup, he belongs in a nut house
“It is sometimes an appropriate response to reality to go insane.”
― Philip K. Dick
Men have called me mad; but the question is not yet settled, whether madness is or is not the loftiest intelligence– whether much that is glorious– whether all that is profound– does not spring from disease of thought– from moods of mind exalted at the expense of the general intellect.”
― Edgar Allan Poe, Complete Tales and Poems
"In a mad world, only the mad are sane.”
― Akira Kurosawa
-
2 options, 1 killing adults, 2 killing children
option 1 would be the lesser of 2 evils.
But can you explain why.
Trust me...I'm just going where E-Kul is about to go.
-
But can you explain why.
Trust me...I'm just going where E-Kul is about to go.
really? you think if some guy pinches a man in the face it is the same as the same guy punching a 2 year old in the face, really? you think a man killing another adult is the same as the same man killing a 2 year old.?
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
-
But can you explain why.
Trust me...I'm just going where E-Kul is about to go.
Where am I about to go? In all reality I am just having fun with Onetimehard. We all know the hierarchy of value assigned human beings, children first, girls 1, boys 2, then comes women and then men and then old men. There is good biological reason for that, women only have one womb and pregnancy and childbirth take quite some time, to create many children you need many wombs but only one swinging dick. Wombs>Cocks
-
really? you think if some guy pinches a man in the face it is the same as the same guy punching a 2 year old in the face, really? you think a man killing another adult is the same as the same man killing a 2 year old.?
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
What if its Goodrum and Queen Vissy pinch someone in the face? Personally, I would not mind Queen Vissy pinching my face. :-\ :-\ :-X :-X
-
really? you think if some guy pinches a man in the face it is the same as the same guy punching a 2 year old in the face, really? you think a man killing another adult is the same as the same man killing a 2 year old.?
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
Please stop asking questions as an 'answer'
-
Where am I about to go? In all reality I am just having fun with Onetimehard. We all know the hierarchy of value assigned human beings, children first, girls 1, boys 2, then comes women and then men and then old men. There is good biological reason for that, woman only have one womb and pregnancy and childbirth take quite some time, to create many children you need many wombs but only one swinging dick.
actually you do get it, good on you ;) really happy you understand that concept but what I am really puzzled by is why Bikini slut doesn't or is she trolling ???
-
really? you think if some guy pinches a man in the face it is the same as the same guy punching a 2 year old in the face, really? you think a man killing another adult is the same as the same man killing a 2 year old.?
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
You are exactly like E-Kul. You just can't see it.
Did I say that? Really? Really? Really?
Obviously not. I just asked you a question and you assumed/figured there was some other purpose behind the question.
The two of you arguing with each other is hilarious. May as well go talk to yourselves in a mirror gentlemen.
-
What if its Goodrum and Queen Vissy pinch someone in the face? Personally, I would not mind Queen Vissy pinching my face. :-\ :-\ :-X :-X
;DPlease stop asking questions as an 'answer'
I will do what I want thank you :)
-
Please stop asking questions as an 'answer'
It's because he has no "answer". :-\
-
You are exactly like E-Kul. You just can't see it.
Did I say that? Really? Really? Really?
Obviously not. I just asked you a question and you assumed/figured there was some other purpose behind the question.
The two of you arguing with each other is hilarious. May as well go talk to yourselves in a mirror gentlemen.
it sounds like you are back tracking here because e-kul did not reply in the manner you inticipated hence you were left alone in your concept of adults being = to children, IMO ;)
-
;DI will do what I want thank you :)
If you're satisfied with your piss-poor debating skills, then fair enough :)
-
You are exactly like E-Kul. You just can't see it.
Did I say that? Really? Really? Really?
Obviously not. I just asked you a question and you assumed/figured there was some other purpose behind the question.
The two of you arguing with each other is hilarious. May as well go talk to yourselves in a mirror gentlemen.
What's E-Kul like?
-
If you're satisfied with your piss-poor debating skills, then fair enough :)
:P
-
What's E-Kul like?
Who would you rather date, Vince Goodrum or Queen Vissy?
You have absolutely no choice. You have to choose one.
-
Who would you rather date, Vince Goodrum or Queen Vissy?
You have absolutely no choice. You have to choose one.
and they both have dogs ;D
-
and they both have dogs ;D
I just looked at Queen Vissys Facebook and I am very concerned. It doesnt say he is in a relationship with Vince Goodrum. I wonder why this is. :-\ :-\
Did they break up.
-
I just looked at Queen Vissys Facebook and I am very concerned. It doesnt say he is in a relationship with Vince Goodrum. I wonder why this is. :-\ :-\
Did they break up.
Yes...I thought they broke it off a couple of years ago.
-
Making jokes about two queers is a nice tactic to avoid a painful subject..
-
Yes...I thought they broke it off a couple of years ago.
WHAT?!?!?! :o :o :o Then why does Goodrum get so pissed when Fitness Frenzy posts pics of Queen Vissy? I guess they have remained friends over the years. That's nice. But seriously, I thought they were still dating. I wonder who dumped who. I have a feeling Vissy dumped Goodrum. Vissy was probably mortified after Goodrum stepped on a bodybuilding stage looking like a sack of shit.
-
Making jokes about two queers is a nice tactic to avoid a painful subject..
:D
-
WHAT?!?!?! :o :o :o Then why does Goodrum get so pissed when Fitness Frenzy posts pics of Queen Vissy? I guess they have remained friends over the years. That's nice. But seriously, I thought they were still dating. I wonder who dumped who. I have a feeling Vissy dumped Goodrum. Vissy was probably mortified after Goodrum stepped on a bodybuilding stage looking like a sack of shit.
I could be wrong....but I remember Goodrum saying they were done.
Vissy probably got tired of Goodrums pathological lying.
-
Making jokes about two queers is a nice tactic to avoid a painful subject..
Just trying to divert E-Kul's rants. :) :)
E-Kul makes good points at times, but after 7+ pages of E-Kul, you sort of want to poke your eyes out with knives. E-Kul is the type of guy that you can take in small doses. He's the guy at the BBQ who you purposely avoid by pretending to go and talk to someone else. I have used this tactic before. Then again, I bet E-Kul is the kind of guy that doesnt get the hint and will follow the person around until they acknowledge him.
-
and they both have dogs ;D
I don't mind dogs, admittedly owning one doesn't appeal to me. I am a cat person. My Mum has rescued dogs her whole life and I had them around me my entire childhood, some of my friends have them. I have been around pretty much all types of dogs including higher risk breeds like dobermans and rottweilers etc. I just would never trust a pitbull, that's just me.
As for choosing between Vince Goodrum or Queen Vissy, I don't even know who Queen Vissy is. And Vince seems harmless enough. To tell the truth, I don't pay much attention to the name of the people posting, I am often just responding to the post and not the personality behind it. of course their are a few exceptions where I have come to remember certain getbiggers by frequent confrontation, but if their was a quiz on getbiggers likes and dislikes etc I would fail miserably as I rarely link the name to the post.
-
and they both have dogs ;D
LOL!! ;D ;D
-
I could be wrong....but I remember Goodrum saying they were done.
Vissy probably got tired of Goodrums pathological lying.
Damn, Im actually a little disappointed. :-X :-X :( :( I thought they were going strong. I wonder if Goodrum is dating anyone now. :-X :-\
-
Just trying to divert E-Kul's rants. :) :)
E-Kul makes good points at times, but after 7+ pages of E-Kul, you sort of want to poke your eyes out with knives. E-Kul is the type of guy that you can take in small doses. He's the guy at the BBQ who you purposely avoid by pretending to go and talk to someone else.
That's true, I am happy to be left alone though, but the thing is I never seek an audience out, I always seem to attract one though. The sensitive types soon learn why it is I am too be avoided. Many people aren't used to someone who will speak so bluntly and be comfortable being so blatantly politically incorrect. As for following people until they acknowledge me, that's not my style, I actually prefer to be left alone and mind my own business at social functions. I am content to just be. I try to avoid social functions when I can, I understand the utility they serve as a social lubricant, I just find them a waste of time. I would rather read a book.
-
That's true, I am happy to be left alone though, but the thing is I never seek an audience out, I always seem to attract one though. The sensitive types soon learn why it is I am too be avoided. Many people aren't used to someone who will speak so bluntly and be comfortable being so blatantly politically incorrect.
Why did you decide to return to posting when you adamantly insisted you would follow through on OMR's ridiculous ultimatum?
-
Why did you decide to return to posting when you adamantly insisted you would follow through on OMR's ridiculous ultimatum?
Well, like you said OMR offered a ridiculous ultimatum, and I had already been considering taking a break from Getbig for some time. The internet can become a problem for me at times, neglecting other areas of my life. For me the OMR situation was just a good opportunity to take that break (I actually had some important personal issues to take care of that required my full attention). Before I left, he PM'ed me and said it was all just a misunderstanding at that he didn't want me to leave and then when I came back he PM'ed me again and we are all good. No Hard feelings.
-
Just trying to divert E-Kul's rants. :) :)
E-Kul makes good points at times, but after 7+ pages of E-Kul, you sort of want to poke your eyes out with knives. E-Kul is the type of guy that you can take in small doses. He's the guy at the BBQ who you purposely avoid by pretending to go and talk to someone else. I have used this tactic before. Then again, I bet E-Kul is the kind of guy that doesnt get the hint and will follow the person around until they acknowledge him.
First off, I'm not saying that I agree with all his opinions, but that goes for everyone(!). In some sense, he's like Uberman; he likes to discuss controversial things. I believe there's no need to read ALL postings of an individual. With the right attention it's not that hard understand someone in a sense.
-
Well, like you said OMR offered a ridiculous ultimatum, and I had already been considering taking a break from Getbig for some time. The internet can become a problem for me at times, neglecting other areas of my life. For me the OMR situation was just a good opportunity to take that break (I actually had some important personal issues to take care of that required my full attention). Before I left, he PM'ed me and said it was all just a misunderstanding at that he didn't want me to leave and then when I came back he PM'ed me again and we are all good. No Hard feelings.
Ridiculous indeed.
Fair enough. Your candor and openness is much appreciated.
This is one of your rare "non rant" posts. Refreshing.
-
First off, I'm not saying that I agree with all his opinions, but that goes for everyone(!). In some sense, he's like Uberman; he likes to discuss controversial things. I believe there's no need to follow read postings of an individual. With the right attention it's not that hard understand someone in a sense.
Yes, he is sort of like Uberman. I think he is not as bad as Uberman. I can deal with E-Kul better than I can with Uberman.
E-Kul and Uberman are not original thinkers. The last free thinker is Wiggs. A true original thinker in every sense of the word.
-
Yes, he is sort of like Uberman. I think he is not as bad as Uberman. I can deal with E-Kul better than I can with Uberman.
E-Kul and Uberman are not original thinkers. The last free thinker is Wiggs. A true original thinker in every sense of the word.
And I see absolutely the opposite of what you do within Wiggs. Nothing original about him. He tries to hard to be like Falcon. And he does it only for the sake of attention. Nothing more.
-
And I see absolutely the opposite of what you do within Wiggs. Nothing original about him. He tries to hard to be like Falcon. And he does it only for the sake of attention. Nothing more.
Put your sarcasm detector on. ;) ;)
-
Guy's a shut-in with mental issues. He needs Getbig. What are ya gonna do?
-
Put your sarcasm detector on. ;) ;)
Went right over my head. :-\
-
Ridiculous indeed.
Fair enough. Your candor and openness is much appreciated.
This is one of your rare "non rant" posts. Refreshing.
Well, I don't believe I would rant so much if I was just allowed to have an opinion without being attacked from 42 different directions. Like the Paul Walker thing, it is the flavor of the month to pretend he was your best friend and he was humanitarian of the century and that given an opportunity even the most heterosexual of grown men would have sucked him off, because he was just that nice of a guy. I simply don't give a fuck he died in a car crash, I always thought he was a douchebag the first time I watched a fast and furious movie. Even back then I believed the movies were a flagrant glorification of dangerous driving and could only be bad for the road toll. But rather, than people going, that's cool dude, I liked him but your entitled to dislike him and just moving on. I get people outraged, melting down and starting threads about how evil I am, and how I should care about actors I thought were douchebags dying in fiery car crashes.
-
Yes, he is sort of like Uberman. I think he is not as bad as Uberman. I can deal with E-Kul better than I can with Uberman.
E-Kul and Uberman are not original thinkers. The last free thinker is Wiggs. A true original thinker in every sense of the word.
What makes Uberman a 'bad' person?
'Original' is relative; we're all influencing each other, so there's a good reason why philosophers, scientists and other 'thinkers' prefer seclusion.
Regarding WIGGS, I hope you're joking. He may sound like someone with a mind of his own, but to me he sounds brainwashed by other religious nuthats. I believe he's experiencing a serious identity crisis and is full of fears, nevertheless a good man, I hope he finds peace.
-
Guy's a shut-in with mental issues. He needs Getbig. What are ya gonna do?
says the guy with 3 times as many posts as me :o
-
Glad to see E-cu nt back, when you take the time to read his long boring posts a lot of what he says makes sense especiallyhis views on filthy muslims.
-
What makes Uberman a 'bad' person?
'Original' is relative; we're all influencing each other, so there's a good reason why philosophers, scientists and other 'thinkers' prefer seclusion.
Regarding WIGGS, I hope you're joking. He may sound like someone with a mind of his own, but to me he sounds brainwashed by other religious nuthats. I believe he's experiencing a serious identity crisis and is full of fears, nevertheless a good man, I hope he finds peace.
When I meant "bad" I meant "bad" as in not as annoying. I dont think EKul or Uberman are bad people, just annoying.
-
Yes E-Kul...but when you rant along with others like Groink and OTH.....you decide to insult people. Just rant...don't insult people or their opinions.
We all do it from time to time but certain members on here do nothing but.
-
Glad to see E-cu nt back, when you take the time to read his long boring posts a lot of what he says makes sense especiallyhis views on filthy muslims.
ROFL
And it's amazing, you can be the biggest CUN+ that walked the face of the earth and espouse the most evil and radical ideas, but as long as you hate on muslims, someone will always have your back here at getbig.
-
When I meant "bad" I meant "bad" as in not as annoying. I dont think EKul or Uberman are bad people, just annoying.
Do you realize that most politicians find the debated subjects, like -tada!- overpopulation 'annoying' as well, and that they avoid these subjects as much as possible, for the simple fact that it might cost them future votes?
-
Do you realize that most politicians find the debated subjects, like -tada!- overpopulation 'annoying' as well, and that they avoid these subjects as much as possible, for the simple fact that it might cost them future votes?
No, I did not.
I meant they are annoying in general. Its not one particular topics. Its their overall demeanor.
-
Ridiculous, never make a point. My point is always extremely overt and the long diatribes necessary to explain such concepts to imbeciles.
In this instance, my point is, people who promote reckless and dangerous behaviour endangering innocent others deserves contempt and scorn and not praise and worship. Those who support such people deserve the same contempt.
yes bitch i get it justlike your half sand mother gets in her throat!!! but you dont talk trash about the disceased!!! when you ass away ill be sure to shit on your grave you piece of shit!!
-
yes bitch i get it justlike your half sand mother gets in her throat!!! but you dont talk trash about the disceased!!! when you ass away ill be sure to shit on your grave you piece of shit!!
Mexicans are impulsive people.
-
-
Yes E-Kul...but when you rant along with others like Groink and OTH.....you decide to insult people. Just rant...don't insult people or their opinions.
We all do it from time to time but certain members on here do nothing but.
I disagree, I rarely insult people. I'm not saying I don't do it, but I always try to stay on point and argue my position. If you follow any of the threads I am in, I constantly get personal insults and attacks, constantly. Their is a difference between insulting someone and expressing a point of view others find offensive. It is fashionable these days to be politically correct, which essentially is a form of dishonesty used under the pretense of not offending anyone, especially minorities. The problem with political correctness is that it is a tool for squashing political dissent, it is quite oppressive when you examine it. It's just that I value honesty more than I do other people feelings, which if you ask me is the way it should be. If I think and feel a certain way, I simply express it. The intent isn't to offend, it's for me to be genuine, to be true to myself.
Prior to feminism coming along, this is the way men used to be, men spoke honestly and openly and yes, they occasionally fought about their ideas and opinions. But feminism has turned men into sensitive sallies, the type who would get emotional if you didn't mourn some douchebag actor because the feminist media tells you too. It's just that a lot of my observations about life contain harsh criticisms, and some people can't take criticism. They equate criticism with being insulted. If people were to take everybodies unique sensitivities into account, we would all be mutes. The fact is you are bound to offend someone, even when trying not to, so with that in mind, it makes perfect sense to me to just say what I think. That seems the most genuine approach.
-
yes bitch i get it justlike your half sand mother gets in her throat!!! but you dont talk trash about the disceased!!! when you ass away ill be sure to shit on your grave you piece of shit!!
I never talk trash about the disceased, show me one time I have talked trash about the disceased.
-
I never talk trash about the disceased, show me one time I have talked trash about the disceased.
I'm not one to correct poor grammar and spelling but since you insisted on italicizing it......... ::)
DECEASED.
-
Well first we would have to determine if they were genetically viable, obviously if they were your children, they probably wouldn't pass the necessary requirements, so unfortunately the 10% would have to kill them. But don't worry, you wouldn't make it either, they would kill you too. See it wouldn't be so bad afterall.
lol you are afraid of pitbulls and think they all should be exterminated because they cause a couple of deaths per year/country but here you are sounding like a nazi and want to kill children and adults...fuck you are a hypocryth. You should be happy and be a pro pbull if you think they are so dangerous.
Lol
-
your bashing a dead person because you have a shitty opinion , its the fucktards that have no leadership and cant make their own decisions you should blame ::) fuck you and your partners daughter hows that? oh wait i didnt know her so i can talk shit all i want , your fucking lame dude keep your bitch ass negativity off this board and get a life!!! nothing good comes out of that trap of yours judging somebody like you personally know them ::)
-
I'm not one to correct poor grammar and spelling but since you insisted on italicizing it......... ::)
DECEASED.
When I read his post I couldn't help but envisage bigfoot, strolling along in an ape like manner. Does "not speaking ill of the dead" apply to dictators and child killers, or is there some flexibility to this tradition. Where I come from, if a man was a douchebag in life, he was a douchebag in death also.
-
I never talk trash about the disceased, show me one time I have talked trash about the disceased.
Haha...Okay...I just realized WHY you italicized it. :P
I really have to start reading every post. :-\
I take my previous post back.
Haha......way to go bikinislut. ::)
-
I could be wrong....but I remember Goodrum saying they were done.
Vissy probably got tired of Goodrums pathological lying.
im pretty sure it wasnt more than 6 months or so ago he called vissy his husband
-
When I read his post I couldn't help but envisage bigfoot, strolling along in an ape like manner. Does "not speaking ill of the dead" apply to dictators and child killers, or is there some flexibility to this tradition. Where I come from, if a man was a douchebag in life, he was a douchebag in death also.
Oh brother. ::)
Where exactly do you come from?
Haha....I can't stop giggling at this fucking thread now. I need fucking sleep but the giggles are leading me to stay awake.
-
lol you are afraid of pitbulls and think they all should be exterminated because they cause a couple of deaths per year/country but here you are sounding like a nazi and want to kill children and adults...fuck you are a hypocryth. You should be happy and be a pro pbull if you think they are so dangerous.
Lol
Mensa is a pitbull trainer.
-
im pretty sure it wasnt more than 6 months or so ago he called vissy his husband
Could be.
Or maybe he called him his ex husband.
Vince lies a lot so we are both probably correct.
-
Could be.
Or maybe he called him his ex husband.
Vince lies a lot so we are both probably correct.
lol you are probably right.
-
lol you are afraid of pitbulls and think they all should be exterminated because they cause a couple of deaths per year/country but here you are sounding like a nazi and want to kill children and adults...fuck you are a hypocryth. You should be happy and be a pro pbull if you think they are so dangerous.
Lol
Actually pitbulls are currently being exterminated at nearly a million a year. And who can you thank for making the pitbull the most destroyed breed on the planet. Those who claim to love them. With friends like that the pitbulls needn't worry about having enemies. And yes, I think grandfathering the breed out of existence is a humane option, for both the breed and the inevitable innocent victims maimed, mauled and killed by them.
Meanwhile, because the humane community has demonstrated a profound unwillingness to recognize, accept, and respond to the need for some sort of strong breed-specific regulation to deal with pit bulls, the insurance industry is doing the regulating instead, by means which include refusing to insure new shelters which accept and place pit bulls. That means a mandatory death sentence for most pitbulls, regardless of why they come to shelters.
As for a couple of deaths per year, this year in the US pitbulls have killed 23 people, last year they killed 22 and the year before that they killed 23. The recent study "Mortality, Mauling, and Maiming by Vicious Dogs 2011" concluded that that 1 person is killed by a pit bull every 14 days, a person loses a body part to a pit bull attack every 5.4 days, 2 persons are injured by pit bulls each day, and 1.5 pit bulls are shot to death each day. To date pitbulls have killed more people than all other breeds combined, and there are over 400 breeds of dog, the majority of which have never killed anybody. So yeah, I make no apologies for my stance!
-
What is this thread even about? Endless ramblings and fighting.
E-Kul owns minds on here.
-
Well, I don't believe I would rant so much if I was just allowed to have an opinion without being attacked from 42 different directions. Like the Paul Walker thing, it is the flavor of the month to pretend he was your best friend and he was humanitarian of the century and that given an opportunity even the most heterosexual of grown men would have sucked him off, because he was just that nice of a guy. I simply don't give a fuck he died in a car crash, I always thought he was a douchebag the first time I watched a fast and furious movie. Even back then I believed the movies were a flagrant glorification of dangerous driving and could only be bad for the road toll. But rather, than people going, that's cool dude, I liked him but your entitled to dislike him and just moving on. I get people outraged, melting down and starting threads about how evil I am, and how I should care about actors I thought were douchebags dying in fiery car crashes.
Yes but u were wishing he died painfully which u have some serious problems right there, what if it was your son, your dad , your brother. what would your thoughts be then? Guarantee u be singing a diff tone
U assume things just as much as the next person? Why? Your answer is cause he's a celebrity ::) why's he a douchebag? Cause he's an actor that glorifies "racing""reckless driving" blah blah blah haha. Why? Cause he doesn't fit your agenda of a "human being?"
I'm sure u don't like any movies then cause a lot glorify crime, drug dealings, etc..
-
What is this thread even about? Endless ramblings and fighting.
E-Kul owns minds on here.
What's pathetic is he's a 40 yr old man. Just hope he doesn't have kids
Who knows but from his postings he comes across bitter, angry , just negative
As far as Paul walker , I've met the guy yrs back at a car event and he showed nothing but class, and we chatted a while about tracking cars/set ups, just a reg dude , no cameras, was there like the rest of the enthusiasts
So my opinion on a "celebrity" is based on my encounter not some BS assumption from a 40 yr old man in Australia
-
Actually pitbulls are currently being exterminated at nearly a million a year. And who can you thank for making the pitbull the most destroyed breed on the planet. Those who claim to love them. With friends like that the pitbulls needn't worry about having enemies. And yes, I think grandfathering the breed out of existence is a humane option, for both the breed and the inevitable innocent victims maimed, mauled and killed by them.
Meanwhile, because the humane community has demonstrated a profound unwillingness to recognize, accept, and respond to the need for some sort of strong breed-specific regulation to deal with pit bulls, the insurance industry is doing the regulating instead, by means which include refusing to insure new shelters which accept and place pit bulls. That means a mandatory death sentence for most pitbulls, regardless of why they come to shelters.
As for a couple of deaths per year, this year in the US pitbulls have killed 23 people, last year they killed 22 and the year before that they killed 23. The recent study "Mortality, Mauling, and Maiming by Vicious Dogs 2011" concluded that that 1 person is killed by a pit bull every 14 days, a person loses a body part to a pit bull attack every 5.4 days, 2 persons are injured by pit bulls each day, and 1.5 pit bulls are shot to death each day. To date pitbulls have killed more people than all other breeds combined, and there are over 400 breeds of dog, the majority of which have never killed anybody. So yeah, I make no apologies for my stance!
lol once again e kul miss the point with the post and start ramble about other things
-
lol once again e kul miss the point with the post and start ramble about other things
Ha ha yes. I saw a rabbit today with no glasses on he knew where he was going.
-
Ha ha yes. I saw a rabbit today with no glasses on he knew where he was going.
Straight into a boiling pot?
-
Straight into a boiling pot?
8)
-
Ha ha yes. I saw a rabbit today with no glasses on he knew where he was going.
:D lollerekulishomocopter
-
:D lollerekulishomocopter
Please contact Musclecenter for english translation.
-
A few things to note about this thread:
1. I thought this was supposed to be an outing thread, and so far it's far from it. WTF, where's the outing?
2. EKUL is a great poster, and he's owning the shit out of some minds in this thread.
3. EKUL is one of the best at hijacking a thread and taking it in a completely different direction.
EKUL, my offer still stands, if you ever come to the US, I want to take you hunting. I really think you'd dig it. It could be a therapeutic release of sorts. :D
-
Any of you guys ever watch Bravo TV's Shahs of Sunset? Talk about an unbelievable cast of racists mother fukcers. They are Iranian GGews who are totally disgusted by any race other than their own.
-
Not one positive post has came out of that turd smugglers mouth , just his own negative opinions!!! That is all!!
-
Not one positive post has came out of that turd smugglers mouth , just his own negative opinions!!! That is all!!
Texas needs better border control...
-
Not one positive post has came out of that turd smugglers mouth , just his own negative opinions!!! That is all!!
Why do his posts have to be positive? For every protagonist, there has to be an antagonist. He brings much needed comedy in my book, and he's owning the shit out of you right now. I thought you were going to out him? ???
-
Why do his posts have to be positive? For every protagonist, there has to be an antagonist. He brings much needed comedy in my book, and he's owning the shit out of you right now. I thought you were going to out him? ???
X2.
-
But let's face it, it's not that hard to own a Mexican queer.
-
Why do his posts have to be positive? For every protagonist, there has to be an antagonist. He brings much needed comedy in my book, and he's owning the shit out of you right now. I thought you were going to out him? ???
I do not understand? when you spend hours and hours in front of a keyboard and write a whole page per response you are the one being owned, not the other way around, you are spending time and effort like ekul does and waste your entire day while the others laugh away, how is this owning someone when you are wasting your life away in front of the keyboard around the clock, enlighten me.
-
Yes but u were wishing he died painfully which u have some serious problems right there, what if it was your son, your dad , your brother. what would your thoughts be then? Guarantee u be singing a diff tone
U assume things just as much as the next person? Why? Your answer is cause he's a celebrity ::) why's he a douchebag? Cause he's an actor that glorifies "racing""reckless driving" blah blah blah haha. Why? Cause he doesn't fit your agenda of a "human being?"
I'm sure u don't like any movies then cause a lot glorify crime, drug dealings, etc..
You obviously don't know me. I have a brother who was a reckless driver and glorifies hoon behaviour. He has lost his license and doesn't seem to want to apply for it again. But if he did die in a fiery car crash while driving recklessly I would feel zero sympathy for the idiot. I tell him straight to his face he is a fuckwit for endorsing hooliganism, he thinks the issue is funny. I am grateful he is no longer on the road, as he is a danger to others. I noticed Paul Walkers dad admitted that his last conversation with his son was a warning to stop indulging in risk taking behaviour. But his dad was obviously a pussy, in my family we call it like it is, and I have two brothers and two sisters, if one of them does stupid shit, like endorse dangerous behaviour we tell each other straight up, disown each other if need be. None of this gay unconditional love bullshit, we will love you even if you're a serial killer crap.
And there is a difference between a movie being about drugs, or street racing or crime and the blatant glorification of something. A lot of movies about drugs and crime offer a more realistic depiction of the negative outcome attached to such lifestyles. Any movie that blatantly glorifies behaviour that endangers innocent people is in my book irresponsible and dangerous. My issue in part is the public's response to the actor, they blatantly disregard his irresponsible glorification of reckless driving and worship him like he is a god. That is a sign of a sick culture.
-
You obviously don't know me. I have a brother who was a reckless driver and glorifies hoon behaviour. He has lost his license and doesn't seem to want to apply for it again. But if he did die in a fiery car crash while driving recklessly I would feel zero sympathy for the idiot. I noticed Paul Walkers dad admitted that his last conversation with his son was a warning to stop indulging in risk taking behaviour. But his dad was obviously a pussy, in my family we call it like it is, and I have two brothers and two sisters, if one of them does stupid shit, like endorse dangerous behaviour we tell each other straight up, disown each other if need be. None of this gay unconditional love bullshit, we will love you even if you're a serial killer crap.
And there is a difference between a movie being about drugs and crime and the blatant glorification of something. A lot of movies about drugs and crime offer a more realistic depiction of the negative outcome attached to such lifestyles. Any movie that glorifies behaviour that endangers innocent people is in my book irresponsible and dangerous. My issue in part is the public's response to the actor, they blatantly disregard his irresponsible glorification of reckless driving and worship him like he is a god.
Meltdown.
-
I do not understand? when you spend hours and hours in front of a keyboard and write a whole page per response you are the one being owned, not the other way around, you are spending time and effort like ekul does and waste your entire day while the others laugh away, how is this owning someone when you are wasting your life away in front of the keyboard around the clock, enlighten me.
I think it's real simple. When people start creating threads about outing you, it's obvious that you're owning some minds. Ekul is so deep in Kubby's mind. Plus, maybe Ekul works from home, and spends all day surfing the web. :D
-
I think it's real simple. When people start creating threads about outing you, it's obvious that you're owning some minds. Ekul is so deep in Kubby's mind. Plus, maybe Ekul works from home, and spends all day surfing the web. :D
ok I get what you are saying, sure he is getting attention, ya he is popular but so was Harold Camping and that does not mean he is owning people, thousands of threads were started about Herold relentlessly around the clock on 10 000 sites or more, he didn't own anyone but himself.
-
ok I get what you are saying, sure he is getting attention, ya he is popular but so was Harold Camping and that does not mean he is owning people, thousands of threads were started about Herold relentlessly around the clock on 10 000 sites or more, he didn't own anyone but himself.
To tell the truth, the whole concept of 'owning' someone online seems absurd to me. I have no intention of 'owning' anyone,. Trying to 'own' someone seems to me a childish concept. To quote the bible: "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me." I simply stand up for myself and for what I believe, as should anybody. If people disagree with me and feel a need to start a thread about me or hate on me or whatever, that's good, they are standing up for what they believe in.
Although like anybody, I find confrontation unsettling, I fully appreciate the fact it is a major catalyst for growth and learning. If everybody just agreed with me and pissed in my pocket, I would stagnate. When people offer up challenging arguments it makes me look at my own point of view, and I can either change my stance or deepen my understanding of my own view and argue even more effectively for what I believe in. Either way, my knowledge deepens. To quote the bible 'iron sharpens iron'
-
To tell the truth, the whole concept of 'owning' someone online seems absurd to me. I have no intention of 'owning' anyone,. Trying to 'own' someone seems to me a childish concept. To quote the bible: "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me." I simply stand up for myself and for what I believe, as should anybody. If people disagree with me and feel a need to start a thread about me or hate on me or whatever, that's good, they are standing up for what they believe in.
Although like anybody, I find confrontation unsettling, I fully appreciate the fact it is a major catalyst for growth and learning. If everybody just agreed with me and pissed in my pocket, I would stagnate. When people offer up challenging arguments it makes me look at my own point of view, and I can either change my stance or deepen my understanding of my own view and argue even more effectively for what I believe in. Either way, my knowledge deepens. To quote the bible 'iron sharpens iron'
1st Corinthians Chapter 13;11 8)
-
Ekul
shizzo81
same level
-
Ekul
shizzo81
same level
you are right
of course but
why did your
husband leave
your ass for
another
man
you weren't
getting the job
done in bed
or was it
because of
your stinky box
-
you are right
of course but
why did your
husband leave
your ass for
another
man
you weren't
getting the job
done in bed
or was it
because of
your stinky box
Calm down Alex. This easily could be Chaos.
-
Internet Tough Guy
you are also
on shizzo81
bottom level
-
Ekul
shizzo81
same level
Brutal apples n' oranges, sis
-
Internet Tough Guy
you are also
on shizzo81
bottom level
if you stayed
on the bottom
your husband
would not have
left your fat ass
for another man
another lonely
holiday season
for you and your
seven cats
-
I think it's real simple. When people start creating threads about outing you, it's obvious that you're owning some minds. Ekul is so deep in Kubby's mind. Plus, maybe Ekul works from home, and spends all day surfing the web. :D
nope sorry i have a job a wife and kids and a normal life , the only thing in my mind is coming home to a hot meal,and a piece of ass for dessert. Try some you may have a different outlook instead of riding ekuls dick. Im not trying to own anyone but what ekul say is just another white mans opinion.
-
nope sorry i have a job a wife and kids and a normal life , the only thing in my mind is coming home to a hot meal,and a piece of ass for dessert. Try some you may have a different outlook instead of riding ekuls dick. Im not trying to own anyone but what ekul say is just another white mans opinion.
You started a thread about outing E-Kul. You going to out him or what? This thread is a huge letdown. :-[
-
You started a thread about outing E-Kul. You going to out him or what? This thread is a huge letdown. :-[
E Kul has outed himself throughout the thread.
-
E Kul has outed himself throughout the thread.
Wrong. E-kul is a pitbull. Kind of ironic.
-
E Kul the master manipulator.
-
You started a thread about outing E-Kul. You going to out him or what? This thread is a huge letdown. :-[
after your done smoking his pipe!!
-
E Kul is like the villain in movies at the end when u think hes dead he comes back , and the audience feels helpless.
-
E Kul is like the villain in movies at the end when u think hes dead he comes back , and the audience feels helpless.
;D
-
The post is over two years old (NarcissisticDeity has hard on for me and collects all my posts to strengthen his wank-bank collection), and yes at the time I rarely left the house after several extremely stressful events in my life. As for today, I regularly get outdoors and enjoy walking and hiking as I once did.
I don't consider myself bitter, angry yes, or I would describe it more as outraged. Personally, I think the fact more people aren't outraged by the current climate the world finds itself in is remarkable. I believe people are too busy using psychological defenses to minimise and deny the reality of the world around the, because they feel powerless to do anything about it. People are too afraid to express their outrage for fear of being outcast. Personally, the freedom that comes from expressing oneself openly and honestly far outweighs any benefit from being accepted by the moronic masses. If the mainstream start agreeing with me, then I will know I have gone wrong somewhere,
Gotcha, that's good then - you sound good too here.
-
;D
and your the sperm that got wiped off
-
Why do his posts have to be positive? For every protagonist, there has to be an antagonist. He brings much needed comedy in my book, and he's owning the shit out of you right now. I thought you were going to out him? ???
I haven't got a strong overview of the contents of E-kul's posts, but I have not read something by him that has deeply offended me.
-
What do you mean outed? Like kicked off the board, aka censorism?
No, we need free speech and all sorts of posters here to keep us all guessing.
8)
-
After ekuls latest muslim/donkey photoshop he can say wtf he wants i cant hate on a Dude that did that masterpiece
-
Paul Walker was a PASSENGER in the car. He was not at fault. PASSENGER.
Did you not die in a car crash earlier this year? Did a youth not drive into your car while emulating the fast and furious?
I would have thought you would have a less sympathetic view of Paul Walker under the circumstances.
-
Did you not die in a car crash earlier this year? Did a youth not drive into your car while emulating the fast and furious?
I would have thought you would have a less sympathetic view of Paul Walker under the circumstances.
I would have called Walker a moron if he was the one driving. The moron was the driver. You play with death when you go 90+ in a 45mph residential area.
-
I would have called Walker a moron if he was the one driving. The moron was the driver. You play with death when you go 90+ in a 45mph residential area.
I would not let the driver go 90mph in a residential area with me as a passenger. I would have more consideration for innocent bystanders.
He was an accessory to his own death. Thankfully his dumb chum and him didn't kill anyone else.
-
I would not let the driver go 90mph in a residential area with me as a passenger. I would have more consideration for innocent bystanders.
He was an accessory to his own death. Thankfully his dumb chum and him didn't kill anyone else.
There is only so much you can do as the passenger. Maybe Paul was telling him to slow the fuck down? He certainly can't grab the wheel.
It's like a group of drunk friends in the car. If they get pulled over, it will be the driver getting arrested.
The driver makes the choice.
-
A-Fool is an angry ignorant biggoted man.
i couldnt imagine going thru life like that. i guess thats kinda punsihment for being the aforementioned.
-
Died on the toilet at 42 ingesting pain killers around the clock after slaying many hoes.
-
Died on the toilet at 42 ingesting pain killers around the clock after slaying many hoes.
Thank you, haven't heard him for awhile.
~RIP King~
-
After ekuls latest muslim/donkey photoshop he can say wtf he wants i cant hate on a Dude that did that masterpiece
Precis
Snubben kan ju photosoppa
-
What do you mean outed? Like kicked off the board, aka censorism?
No, we need free speech and all sorts of posters here to keep us all guessing.
8)
I think by outed, he means posting up pics of E-Kul, so ironmeister can start photoshopping them. :D