Disney and Lucasfilm’s STAR WARS - Rogue One: A STAR WARS Story, which takes place before the events of Star Wars - Episode IV: A New Hope, tells the story of unlikely heroes who have united to steal the plans to the dreaded Death Star.
The cast includes Felicity Jones, Diego Luna, Ben Mendelsohn, Donnie Yen, Jiang Wen, Mads Mikkelsen, Alan Tudyk, Riz Ahmed, and Forest Whitaker. "Rogue One" is directed by Gareth Edwards (Godzilla 2014).
STAR WARS - Rogue One: A STAR WARS Story (Official Thread)
Okay, guys. I decided to create this official thread today because the first teaser has been released.
Moderators, please keep this thread in the G&P forum rather than in the Entertainment Forum.
Note: Please use this thread to put in anything about the first Star Wars Anthology movie. Your comments, pictures, trailers, any other video, and yes, even any and all spoilers and spoiler reports can go in here. Let's keep the GetBig Forums free of repetitive threads. Thanks.
so Gareth Edwards is directing it..... then like his GODZILLA movie this could be one big pile of Galactic SHIT
Maybe we will see Vader grow to Godzilla-esque proportions in this movie!
Stomping down a rebel base or similar.
...AND THOSE BICEP PEAKS...
What is the timeline in years between rogue 1 and new hope?
Maybe we will see Vader grow to Godzilla-esque proportions in this movie!
Stomping down a rebel base or similar.
...AND THOSE BICEP PEAKS...
The teaser shows that we're getting Mon Mothma. By the way, it is the same actress that Lucas hired for Episode III and then stupidly cut out her scenes.
They can be seen on the Episode III DVD.
I'll look for them online.
I'm expecting Bail Organa. Will Jimmy Smits came back and reprise the role?
The rumor is that Palpatine will be back. Ian McDiarmid is still with us and there was a recent article where he expressed interest.
The problem is Tarkin. The great Peter Cushing has been gone for many years.
One of the rumors is that old footage will be used to have a few scenes where he appears in hologram form.
They can then move his mouth with CGI and hire a voice actor that sounds like him.
Following up the awe-inspiring teaser trailer for Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, Lucasfilm has revealed a teaser poster for the film.
The poster is simple but powerful, featuring Rogue One logo and a release month at the bottom, similar to the first poster for Star Wars: The Force Awakens.
A notable addition to this poster is the tagline "A rebellion built on hope" near the top.
Mon Mothma with all due respect, we want some PRIME-Vader and Sidious!!!
Following the release of the Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, further speculation has arisen about the film. Today, Flickering Myth have reported that Spencer Wilding will don the iconic costume of Darth Vader.
For people concerned about the lack of knowledge surrounding this actor, there is no doubt he would fit the bill. He stands at 6 ft 7 inches tall, which is two inches taller than the original don, David Prowse.
According to Flickering Myth, Wilding has been performing lines on set, but he will not be voicing Darth Vader in the final version of the movie. James Earl Jones has agreed to reprise his role as Darth Vader in the upcoming Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.
Spencer Wilding is a film actor who has played a diverse range of creatures and aliens in iconic film and TV franchises. He played a number of aliens in Doctor Who, he has also depicted a White Walker in Game of Thrones. His most notable role was his appearance in the 2014 film Guardians of the Galaxy, in which he played a prison guard he stole Peter Quill's Walkman.
Everybody is wondering who this is. ???Micky mouse. Everybody know he is satanic.
(http://i65.tinypic.com/wlf9tw.jpg)
The figure doesn't walk slow/crippled enough to be Palpatine.
Darth Vader has never been seen wearing a hood.
Who is this? ???
Also, some believe that is a bacta tank in front of the figure. Some believe Snoke may be in that tank.
Everybody is wondering who this is. ???
(http://i65.tinypic.com/wlf9tw.jpg)
The figure doesn't walk slow/crippled enough to be Palpatine.
Darth Vader has never been seen wearing a hood.
Who is this? ???
Also, some believe that is a bacta tank in front of the figure. Some believe Snoke may be in that tank.
Looking forward to Rogue one... :o
Me too. Just the other day I was telling my friends that Disney needs to make yet another girl power movie. I love watching corny female protagonists pretend to be macho.
In all seriousness though, they better put Vader in the m0therfucker.
Darth Vader is definitely in.
It's just going to be a question of how much.
I'd be happy with two or three scenes.
Will be nice if he is played by a bodybuilder.
Disney execs. said it was to dark removed 40% of the movie and made the crew and actors re-shoot it
http://screenrant.com/star-wars-rogue-one-reshoots-rumors/ (http://screenrant.com/star-wars-rogue-one-reshoots-rumors/)
Disney execs. said it was to dark removed 40% of the movie and made the crew and actors re-shoot it
http://screenrant.com/star-wars-rogue-one-reshoots-rumors/ (http://screenrant.com/star-wars-rogue-one-reshoots-rumors/)
The article you posted said the 40% reshoots was likely false, as was the rumor about it being considered too dark.40% would also cost a shitload
40% would also cost a shitload
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story won’t be released for almost seven months, and yet it’s already the talk of fans everywhere. Today, lots of that talk was about a New York Post article saying the film was “in crisis” and needed “expensive reshoots.” A new report now adds some much-needed detail to those claims.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, the reshoots are definitely happening. However, the reason is much more specific. “The move is happening after execs screened the movie and felt it was tonally off with what a ‘classic’ Star Wars movie should feel like,” the article says. “The goal of the reshoots will be to lighten the mood, bring some levity into the story and restore a sense of fun to the adventure.”
In addition, the report says “that while [director Gareth] Edwards’ first cut was a solid showing, it didn’t measure up to the bar set in terms of four-quadrant appeal. ‘Anything less than extraordinary won’t do,’ says a studio insider.”
Deadline also has a report with a similar theme. “According to sources, the first cut was lacking the edge that Force Awakens had, and the story needs to jell. The film’s December 16 release date will not be affected.”
It certainly sounds like, while Rogue One may not exactly be “in crisis,” the Post wasn’t inaccurate in reporting the film has issues. Which it should. If the movie was ready in May, they would’ve scheduled it for summer. It’s being released in December to give the filmmakers time to get it right. A rough cut this early, warts and all, means Edwards is working hard.
These days, just about every big movie schedules reshoots in the post-production schedule to make tweaks and changes. Some reports say The Force Awakens did reshoots mere weeks before release. Because of that, many believed the Post report was erroneously mixing standard reshoots up with something grander. Now, with this Hollywood Reporter story, it’s certain that’s not the case. If the tone of Edwards’ film didn’t match what Star Wars is all about, that most likely means there’s a problem that needs fixing. And now they can fix it.
Then again, one of the most exciting things about Rogue One was the possibility of a film that didn’t feel like a cookie-cutter Star Wars movie. Audiences want a sense of adventure, sure, but something darker and different could also be welcome. However, as the Hollywood Reporter source points out “This takes place just before A New Hope and leads up to the 10 minutes before that classic films begins. You have to match the tone.”
No matter what the case, it’s certain Rogue One will be better because of these reshoots. The movie isn’t the movie until it’s released.
Word got out earlier this week that four weeks of reshoots were scheduled for the upcoming film Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. While reshoots are extremely common for films, the reports also suggested that Disney executives were less than pleased with the film and had ordered the reshoots in order to change the tone of the film to something more along the lines of The Force Awakens (Rogue One is believed to have a grittier tone that previous Star Wars movies and has been described as a "war movie").
Today, Entertainment Weekly's Anthony Breznican did some digging to uncover what exactly is going on with the Rogue One reshoots. While official sources won't comment on rumors, Breznican's unofficial sources shed some interesting light on the rumors and should reassure fans who were concerned by the reports.
First off, the sources confirmed that these reshoots were planned before principle photography on the film even began. They also denied the reports that up to 40% of the film needed to be reshot. The source told EW, "If we were rewriting the movie and reshooting 40 percent of movie, we would not be finishing in August." Breznican also confirms that Christopher McQuarrie, one of the film's screenwriters, is not going to be supervising or collaborating with director Gareth Edwards on the reshoots (McQuarrie himself aggressively denied the rumors earlier today).
However, Breznican reports that Edwards will be joined by Tony Gilroy (Michael Clayton, The Bourne Legacy) for the reshoots. Gilroy apparently wrote new material for the reshoots and will direct second unit. An EW source describes the new material as having "everything to do with clarity and character development and all take place [as inserts] within scenes we’ve already shot".
This is very similar to what was done for reshoots on The Force Awakens. Director JJ Abrams spoke about this process on a recent episode of The Nerdist Podcast where he explained, "we shot nearly ten minutes of the movie (at Bad Robot Studios) and it was getting moments, getting shots, getting pieces, that were missing from the scenes when were shooting them", adding that, "it was about these incredible, critical, intimate moments".
As for the report that Disney Executives were unhappy with the tone of Rogue One, and ordered that it be shifted to be more like the tone of The Force Awakens, the sources deny these as well. According to one EW source, "The movie is very different than [The Force Awakens], and that’s intentional. It’s a war film." That quote should be very comforting for fans (myself included) who were concerned about a shift away from the "war movie" style to something that was trying to mimic The Force Awakens.
And finally, one of the sources hinted that Lucasfilm had something big in store for Star Wars Celebration Europe this July in London. A Rogue One panel with Edwards, producer Kathleen Kennedy, and "special guests" is slated to kick off the convention and the source described the expected reaction as, "People will go insane".
After a week of crazy rumors, over reactions, and conjecture, it's nice to have the reshoots clarified as best as possible. It sounds as though everything is proceeding as planned and there isn't any reason for fans to be concerned. It sounds like Celebration will also go along way to convince people who are still on the fence to get excited for this movie.
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story hits theaters on December 16th and stars Felicity Jones, Forest Whittaker, Donnie Yen, and Diego Luna.
The last thing we need is another girl power movie. Ridiculous.Doesn't matter, Darth Vader will kill all of them (the whole Rogue One-Team) eventually.
This is looking cool. 8)
Edwards seems to be liked and disliked in equal measure.
I liked Godzilla.
I am excited for this.
Star Wars in 2016: White males need not apply
Sorry about the links.
There must be a problem here at GB.
Yeah, Vader also showed up at the end of the teaser they showed at Star Wars Celebration in London.
There is now a decent bootleg at Vimeo.
https://vimeo.com/177892782 (https://vimeo.com/177892782)
I wish they would release this one officially as well, but they probably won't.
This looks really JEWY.
Where are the white people? Only white person is the chick.
Star Wars fans will get another look at Leia’s adoptive father, Bail Organa, in Rogue One. Jimmy Smits, who made his franchise debut in Star Wars: Episode II — Attack of the Clones, sheepishly confirmed his minor involvement in the upcoming Star Wars standalone story. CBS’s The Talk presented Smits with a screenshot from the Rogue One sizzle reel that debuted at last month’s Star Wars Celebration in London. Hosts asked if the man who resembled Smits in fact was him. He first resisted with a few denials before conceding. “People got nothing better to do!” he joked. “There’s stuff going on in the world!”
When pressed for specifics, Smits played coy before revealing a little more. “Can you say the word, ‘cameo?’” he smiled. “Can you say the words, ‘small part?’”
Bail Organa has limited screen time in Episode II and III but steps up at the end of the latter to adopt one of Padmé Amidala’s twins — Leia Skywalker. (Luke was taken by Obi-Wan Kenobi to live with Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru on Tatooine.) Rogue One is set well after the events of Revenge of the Sith and close to the beginning of Episode IV — A New Hope, tracking the team that steals the plans to the Empire’s Death Star. Smits’ casting has not been announced by Disney; the studio declined to comment. Smits’ reps did not immediately respond to EW’s request for comment.
Rogue One opens Dec. 16.
This looks really JEWY.
Where are the white people? Only white person is the chick.
While I agree with every word you posted, JJ Abrams has nothing to do with this movie.
This is Gareth Edwards.
Abrams is done now. Just the one movie. He has nothing to do with VIII or IX, or any of the Anthology films.
Oh yeah, that's right. I didn't mean to imply Abrams was the driving force behind this movement, just that he was a big douchebag who is firmly a part of it.
Fuck Disney. I'm glad to see some new Star Wars movies but I'm really sick of Disney's SJW bullshit. Would now be surprised if the make Elsa a fucking lesbian in Frozen 2.
This looks really JEWY.
Where are the white people? Only white person is the chick.
looks absolutely shit.
anybody getting excited over that film/trailer is a moron stuck with a mind of a 7 year old.
looks absolutely shit.
anybody getting excited over that film/trailer is a moron stuck with a mind of a 7 year old.
looks absolutely shit.
anybody getting excited over that film/trailer is a moron stuck with a mind of a 7 year old.
Should make a LOT of money though. Millennials will eat this shit up. They're much more rabid about SW movies that the previous generation was. Sci-fi nerds were made fun of when I was a kid, today they are in vogue, like homos. I was a big fan of the originals, but the blatant political correctness and girl power has become ridiculous.
and the story is the same shit all over again - the bad guys has a super weapon. the rebels has to destroy that super weapon. ::)
this was the exact same shit back in 1977.
yes looks like every minority under the sun is in it.
and the story is the same shit all over again - the bad guys has a super weapon. the rebels has to destroy that super weapon. ::)
this was the exact same shit back in 1977.
The Story is about that same shit back in 77, when the rebels managed to steal the blueprints to the Death-Star, sometime in the timeline between Ep 3 and 4.Vader had tore a few muscles but was still winning. More like a 95 or 96 yates.
It's that same Death-Star, not a new one.
Back when Darth Vader was in his prime. aka 1996 Kevin Levrone.
Hi Captain Kirk.
"we dont have a script for the new star wars! what should we do?"
"just let it take place during the same time period as the first movie, then we can do the same thing all over again!"
"genius!"
you gotta be a total moron to accept that shit.
Why is Disney forcing the female hero in all of it's fucking movies?
Your looking more stupid with every post..
You need to quit while your ahead ::)
you love everything star wars because youre still a kid. you even react to posts like a little hurt child. you have some growing up to do son you cant go through life watching the deathstar beeing shot down every movie you see.
I can see why Ford wanted to die in the film.
Ha! Now that's funny.
Somebody at the studio needs to kill this ill-conceived "Young Han Solo" movie.
If they insist on doing stand alone Star Wars movies they should do an Obi-Wan movie starring Ewan McGregor.
and conor mcgregor.
I will go see it when it comes out.
Last trailer looked great. Ignore the haters.
what was great about it? you cant say.
what was great about it? you cant say.
liked the last one,,,so han solo's and princess leia son died?when the planet blew up I guess,,
that's what I thought cause they said he needs to complete his training into full 'evil'.didn't see him in trailer.
NO General Hux saved him
that's what I thought cause they said he needs to complete his training into full 'evil'.didn't see him in trailer.
looks absolutely shit.
anybody getting excited over that film/trailer is a moron stuck with a mind of a 7 year old.
that's what I thought cause they said he needs to complete his training into full 'evil'.didn't see him in trailer.
you didnt see ANYONE from the force awakens in the trailer for Rogue One.....this movie is not VIII it's a stand alone film that takes place right before a new hope......it will end with princess leia receiveing the Death Star plans from the cast of this movie. VIII comes out Dec 2017ohhh...
The possibility that we get to see a prime, full-on sith Vader lightsabering, forcing chocking, force jumping and force throwing people around like ragdolls is super nerdgasmic!
My question is whether or not it is currently considered canon that Vader can't use force lightning? I believe that idea arose from EU material that isn't canon anymore.
ohhh...
ohhh...
We will see Darth Vader in his PRIME!!! :o :o :o
If they can do this, they can definitely give us a video that shows Ronnie 98 vs Dorian 93 to scale.
Vader focused on a different skillpath, he was focusing more on the Telekinetic Perks, like Force Choke etc.
Vader also put more points in the Melee-tree than Darth Sidious.
Sidious on the other hand specialized the Lightning-build.
Originally (spoiler), it was said that Vader would brutally maim, dismember and even decapitate the whole Rogue One-team (everyone killed by Vader) in one way or another, (early interview) but apparently they have done a more mellow version.
Hopefully we will at least see one or two dismemberments.
you love everything star wars because youre still a kid. you even react to posts like a little hurt child. you have some growing up to do son you cant go through life watching the deathstar beeing shot down every movie you see.
Do we have any explanation on why they felt in necessary to add an afro to Forest Whitaker?
(http://im.ziffdavisinternational.com/t/ign_ap/news/s/star-wars-/star-wars-rogue-ones-forest-whitaker-on-saw-gerreras-similar_uxxx.640.jpg)
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/08/12/06/37243A7C00000578-3735606-First_impressions_The_clip_begins_with_her_meeting_with_Forest_W-m-133_1470981144812.jpg)
The possibility that we get to see a prime, full-on sith Vader lightsabering, forcing chocking, force jumping and force throwing people around like ragdolls is super nerdgasmic!
My question is whether or not it is currently considered canon that Vader can't use force lightning? I believe that idea arose from EU material that isn't canon anymore.
I think there are big time jumps in the movie.
This could be an earlier or later scene.
There are three different actresses playing Jyn Erso at different ages.
Maybe she knows him most of her life.
Just saw this. 8)
Forest Whitaker told Entertainment Weekly’s Anthony Breznican that we’ll see Saw Gerrera with both looks (shaved and with re-grown hair).
http://www.ew.com/article/2016/08/11/rogue-one-forest-whitaker-saw-gerrera (http://www.ew.com/article/2016/08/11/rogue-one-forest-whitaker-saw-gerrera)
Pablo Hidalgo reaffirmed Forest’s words at a Star Wars panel in August that we’ll see Saw with both looks in the movie.
Also, there are toys of the character coming with both looks.
Well I guess that's that. ;D
It's funny that everything but his hair looks exactly the same though.
Well, even in the futuristic world of Star Wars, you can't fix lazy-eye.
Then again, why would an ancient warror such as Saw Gerrera care about such matters, it's enough that he has cybernetic limbs replacing his old ones.
Star Wars was never meant to be futuristic. Ever notice how they dress in WW2 uniforms, Tatooine they dress like old asians. It's supposed to reflect current time in a distant universe.
Star Wars was never meant to be futuristic. Ever notice how they dress in WW2 uniforms, Tatooine they dress like old asians. It's supposed to reflect current time in a distant universe.
Supposedly, they will use CGI to make him look even more like Peter Cushing since this film takes place just before Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope.
Darth Vader looks pretty good but his helmet is not sitting right. The mask needs to be pushed back because the neck is hanging way out over the chest.
(http://www.thefandom.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/rogue-one-vader-702x336.jpg)
This is how it's supposed to look.
(http://www.elpais.com.co/elpais/sites/default/files/13_3.jpg)
(http://www.starwarshelmets.com/septoct05/ANH_VADER_SCREENCAP_2.jpg)
Yes, he looked very mean/menacing here... the way he's suppose to. I often wondered why Lucas did not pay closer attention to detail to the 3rd prequel mask. It looked very different from the way it did in the original.
I was 11 years old in 1977. When I first saw Vader appear on the captured rebel ship, I knew this movie was going to be something special.
(http://illusion.scene360.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/star-wars-09.jpg)
Yes, he looked very mean/menacing here... the way he's suppose to. I often wondered why Lucas did not pay closer attention to detail to the 3rd prequel mask. It looked very different from the way it did in the original.
Link to the 3rd prequel mask of Peace?
(https://loopit.in/photo/Xt_MtMoH5rY:hq/default.jpg)
They sculpted 1 half of this mask and them scanned it. Reversed the data and then combined the two halves to create one symmetrical helmet.
It was a horrible idea for many reasons but the bottom line is that they ended up with a shitty looking brain bucket. Then they stuck skinny ass Hayden Christensen in the suit.
I man, look at his tiny little phaggoty hands. Total shit-show.
(http://thecelebritycafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Screen-Shot-2016-01-28-at-12.08.37-PM-1200x545_c.png)
(http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b345/RoCKo_1975/DarthVaderANH-HD2.jpg)
Great shot. The contrast of the white rebel ship corridor and black helmet/costume makes it impressive... most impressive.
Giorgio Lukakis wasn't pulling any punches when depicting Good VS Evil!
For all of those who look forward to see Vader again (as I do), here comes a major spoiler:
Vader is getting his ass kicked by Jyn in the movie. Yes, you heard right. Lord Vader gets his ass whooped by her big time during a fight. How is that even possible? Well, he isn't very much used to his new prosthetic limbs yet, so that's how the writers try to justify this crap. The person in the bacta tank is also Vader/Anakin, recovering from his injuries, which are the reason for getting new prosthetics.
The Star Wars franchise is doomed... :'(
I'm sorry, dude. Absolutely nothing you said is true.
Not used to his prosthetic limbs?
At this point, he has had them for almost twenty years. This movie takes place just before A New Hope.
He has been cyborg for a long, long time.
Also, Jyn does nothing to him.
By the way, people saying (and complaining) that he will be in the film for like ten minutes are correct.
However, the complaining makes no sense.
Why? Simple.
He was in A New Hope for only ten to eleven minutes. The exact time escapes me, but it is truth.
Hmm, are you sure about me not being correct? I mean dead-sure? You heard otherwise? Serious question.
I am used to Vader and his story. I know how, when and why he got his (original) cyborg limbs. From what I have heard, he has to get some of his limbs replaced in the Rogue One movie because of new serious injuries. I heard it from - in my perception - a very reliable source. I hope the source is wrong though, because I don't want to see Vader getting his ass kicked by Jyn.
Still, I don't hang my hopes too high.
I also heard that Vader will have not much actual screen time.
Okay, maybe I expressed myself incorrectly.
Darth Vader gets his original prosthetic limbs at the end of ROTS. We all know that.
What I wanted to say is that he has to get some of his original prosthetics replaced due to heavy injuries and damages, which occured briefly before the time of Rogue One or probably even during it. His new prosthetics cause quite some serious problems for Vader and that's why he can't beat Jyn in a fight/battle.
If he confronts Jyn with his original prosthetics, which he is already very much used to since his "creation" at the end of ROTS, he would most likely beat Jyn easily and the writers of Rogue One could never get away with Jyn beating up Vader's ass. With Vader being not used to newly attached prosthestics, the writers seemed to have found a solution to this problem.
I don't like this solution. And I don't like the whole idea of Vader losing a fight against Jyn. But I myself would actually bet some money on Vader clearly losing the fight against Jyn. Sad, but true. :'(
Did any of you Star Wars whiz-kids ever see a SW scene in which a left footed sneaker was used as a 'stand-in' for a space ship in the remote background?
Or is that simply an old-wives tale?
Did any of you Star Wars whiz-kids ever see a SW scene in which a left footed sneaker was used as a 'stand-in' for a space ship in the remote background?
And ... Go see HACKSAW RIDGE.
Hmm, are you sure about me not being correct? I mean dead-sure? You heard otherwise? Serious question.
I also heard that Vader will have not much actual screen time.
Did any of you Star Wars whiz-kids ever see a SW scene in which a left footed sneaker was used as a 'stand-in' for a space ship in the remote background?
Or is that simply an old-wives tale?
Are any of you GetBiggers knowledgeable about Alan Ladd's son's involvement in the first production of SW? There are ome interesting stories behind getting that first one on the screen.
Yes, I am positive. Vader is not injured in this film.
The strong rumors are about ten minutes total time.
But remember, if you add up his total screen time in A New Hope, it is somewhere between ten and twelve minutes total.
DAMN!!! You guys know this STAR WARS stuff pretty damn well.
All I can recall is the very first scene in the very first episode where the very first spaceship passes overhead for the very first time!
It appeared limitless and the whole theater seemed mesmerized!
And I should know more because I was on the set where they filmed some of the major battle scenes, but that overhead shot of that spaceship impressed me the most for some unknown reason.
Did any of you Star Wars whiz-kids ever see a SW scene in which a left footed sneaker was used as a 'stand-in' for a space ship in the remote background?
Or is that simply an old-wives tale?
OH yea! I saw a preview of the next episode and was totally un-impressed.
And the movie I did see after that Prevue was THE ARRIVAL which STUNK!
Are any of you GetBiggers knowledgeable about Alan Ladd's son's involvement in the first production of SW? There are ome interesting stories behind getting that first one on the screen.
And ... Go see HACKSAW RIDGE.
Alan Ladd was a very tiny man, you know. I believe it when they said his leading ladies sometimes had to walk in a trench next to him to keep him from being dwarfed by them.
Darth Vader was originally a Hebrew.
Alan Ladd's SON helped with SW; not Alan Ladd.
Didn't they already do the whole "rebellious girl that lost her parents at a young age" thing in The Force Awakens?
Disney doesn't seem to have a problem with doing the same thing over and over.
Here's a new picture of the Rogue One Darth Vader. It's not as good as I'd hoped but not as bad as I'd feared.
(http://media.cleveland.com/ent_impact_home/photo/rogue-one-a-star-wars-story-7beec930534ee1d8.jpg)
I was also wondering...If Han Solo in the new movie will have a small head? Will Obi have white or grey hair?
I'm over this female lead in Star Wars but I'd at least watch it if the bitch was believable and not some 90 pound skinny british bitch.
I'm over this female lead in Star Wars but I'd at least watch it if the bitch was believable and not some 90 pound skinny british bitch.
I'm over this female lead in Star Wars but I'd at least watch it if the bitch was believable and not some 90 pound skinny british bitch.
(http://www.ew.com/sites/default/files/styles/tout_image_612x380/public/i/2016/03/11/ghostbusters.jpg?itok=6NJAkwhm)
At least that big ass hebrew chick would be more believable in a fight and win than the skinny british chick they chose. I can see this hebrette going toe to toe with Chewbacca, winning then raping his furry ass.
At least that big ass hebrew chick would be more believable in a fight and win than the skinny british chick they chose. I can see this hebrette going toe to toe with Chewbacca, winning then raping his furry ass.
Darth Vader was originally a Hebrew.
What? I thought it WAS Chewbacca?
kwon if chebacca got fisted in his furry ass from this hebrew chick would you still look at chewbacca the same way.
Chewbacca and the other wookies were originally hebrews. Then one day the white devil smuggler Han Solo enslaved the black chewbacca via a life debt.
thanks for clearing that up for me chewbacca and ronnie coleman do sound almost alike you cant understand a thing they say
Well if you don't speak hebrew you won't understand them.
I speak bastard (is there any other kind of hebroe chile) Weebeeze. 'n' sheit. The Sith, being negroidal in origin, were originally the original nebroes and took from their hairy female captives, the Wookie Nookie and from this unholy union sprang forth the Sheboons who then spread not only their legs across the galaxy, but also the Farce™.
The new Star Wars is a PC Farce.
The more and more we learn about this movie the less jazzed about it I am because I no longer believe Vader will have much direct contact with the rebels. He'll just be a figurehead on a star destroyer or the death star and may force choke someone under his command. No prime Vader of legend lightsabering rebels or force throwing around rebels like ragdolls. Just 7-8 minutes worth of scenes with Vader doing little to nothing on the bridge of a starship with James Earl Jones voice overs.
Hope I'm wrong and Vader runs roughshod on some rebel scum!!
I went for "Eh... I guess I'll see it." to "Cool. Walkers on the beach!" back to "Eh!" again.
yamcha would you like it if ronnie coleman is in the movie
There is only room for one bodybuilding Sith Lord.:)
(http://images1.browardpalmbeach.com/imager/u/745xauto/7369585/feature1-1-0d52b7597d5fb274.jpg)
(https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/t31.0-8/15272077_1334085886643009_7869689839999647169_o.jpg)
MUSIC BY -- Michael Giacchino
ORIGINAL STAR WARS MUSIC -- John Williams
JYN ERSO -- Felicity Jones
YOUNG JYN -- Beau Gadson
YOUNGER JYN -- Dolly Gadson
GALEN ERSO -- Mads Mikkelsen
LYRA ERSO -- Valene Kane
CASSIAN -- Diego Luna
K-2SO -- Alan Tudyk
CHIRRUT -- Donnie Yen
BAZE -- Jiang Wen
SAW -- Forest Whitaker
MON MOTHMA -- Genevieve O'Reilly
BAIL ORGANA -- Jimmy Smits
PRICESS LEIA -- Ingvild Deila... with Special Thanks to Carrie Fisher
DARTH VADER (VOICE) -- James Earl Jones
DARTH VADER -- Spencer Wilding & Daniel Naprous
KRENNIC -- Ben Mendelsohn
GOVERNOR TARKIN -- Guy Henry...with Special Thanks to Peter Cushing
GENERAL DODONNA -- Ian McElhinney (Ser Barristan!)
C3PO -- Anthony Daniels
2TUBES -- Aidan Cook
There were several more generals and senators listed, but no actors of note.
From a TV spot.
The first official sighting of Wilhuff Tarkin. :o 8)
(http://i.imgur.com/OM5nvow.png)
... Again, female is the main character.
Short review: Wasn't that great. Regular action movie. But the final Vader scene was worth the 2 hours. Seeing Tarkin was cool too.
I'd go again to just see that last Vader scene.
What techniques did Vader use?
Is the main whore just as annoying in the movie as she is in the trailer?
Yes. French fag is gay too
Great stand alone movie. I enjoyed it and it transitions perfectly into "A New Hope".
turns out most getbiggers are mentally 12 years old and still into star wars haha oh brother
As opposed to being a pretend figure named "ratherbebig" on a bodybuilding message board?
im not pretending anything, youre the one that pay money to see aliens and space ships
turns out most getbiggers are mentally 12 years old and still into star wars haha oh brother
any benefit seeing this in the theater or just wait for download/dvd/vhs/beta/laserdisk ?
You're entirely welcome to stay the fuck out of the thread.
If the 15 bucks has serious consequences for you, no.
But this one is pretty visually stunning, plus not getting exposed to spoilers.
Money is not the issue. Sitting with a bunch of random strangers who whisper and check their phones is.
Money is not the issue. Sitting with a bunch of random strangers who whisper and check their phones is.
As opposed to being a pretend figure named "ratherbebig" on a bodybuilding message board?
You're entirely welcome to stay the fuck out of the thread.
Saw it today in IMAX 3D.
Pretty damn good. IMO, it was much better than the Force Awakens.
The CGI Tarken was good, but he looked like CGI at certain angles. Leia was better and looked more real to me.
The Vader scenes towards the end were very well done and the highlight of the movie. The mask and costume was perfect.
Good that they had the nads to kill off everyone by movie's end. Goodness knows that piece of shit The Force Awakens would've been infinitely better if all the annoying-ass main characters would've gotten killed off by the end of that movie.
The Bacta Tank scene was very weak.....just shades. Way too little dramatic for his short screen time.
Again just an mediocre film which is all promotion....still better than the last one
Saw it today in IMAX 3D.
Pretty damn good. IMO, it was much better than the Force Awakens.
The CGI Tarken was good, but he looked like CGI at certain angles. Leia was better and looked more real to me.
The Vader scenes towards the end were very well done and the highlight of the movie. The mask and costume was perfect.
Rogue One has no comic relief either. Darker is better. From what I understand, the original movie was too dark and portions of it had to be re-shot. Some of the things in the trailers were not in the final cut.
Probably unnecessary, I agree. Besides that I thought Vader had just enough screen time and his scenes were well done. I think it captured more Vader fear factor than the other movies.
I'm seeing it again this week to catch some things I may have missed.
Saw it. Pretty game, could have done without the lame cheerleader speech from the main chick to amp up the dirty harden soldiers. Nothing I want more to amp me up after decades of war is some little twat trying to tell me what to do.
The Vader seen was awesome, needed more. Tarkan looked good, the eyes give it away though. Leah was laughable.
SPoiler:
What I don't get is why use the Death Star on that planet at the end. Now the entire Empire Archives are destroyed. Plans for everything blown up. How do they ever make anything again based on old plans? Obviously Vader knew that a flaw must have been made in the Death Star so why didn't he research it more?
What's the time frame on the Death Star getting blown up after the plans were given though? Couple weeks? Days?
This occurs before luke even trains with Ben and R2 gets the plans uploaded and lost on tattooine. So there's ample time. At least it answers the 30 year joke about why make a deaths star with such a flaw. Doesn't explain why they didn't fix it the second time.
Rogue One has no comic relief either. Darker is better. From what I understand, the original movie was too dark and portions of it had to be re-shot. Some of the things in the trailers were not in the final cut.
Star Wars: See How Tarkin Came to Life in Rogue One Special on Nightline
When fans went to see Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, many were surprised - some downright shocked, some maybe a bit put off - to see Grand Moff Tarkin up on their screen, looking like actor Peter Cushing - now deceased - hadn't aged a day since 1977. That was thanks to the visual effects wizardry of Industrial Light and Magic, actor Guy Henry, and the Cushing family estate.
Now the secrets of that effect will be revealed on a special episode of ABC's Nightline airing tonight, January 4, 2017. The process is broken down into three primary steps in the teaser video for the episode.
The video starts with original photography of Henry, acting in full costume with some special motion capture headgear on; that's so when they use his voice and cadence with the digital face of Cushing, they match up perfectly. From there, ILM digitally removed the head gear, as well as Henry's hair, creating a digital version of his face. From there it's the morphing into a digital Peter Cushing, who delivers the final performance on screen.
It's a revolutionary technology, and one that had fans split. Some thought it worked perfectly, or at least well enough that they hardly (if at all) noticed there was a digital actor on screen. Some were more sensitive to it and got pulled out of the film. Still, it at least demonstrates where things are going and ILM's technical prowess continues to improve. When visiting and touring the ILM facilities, they told Comicbook.com about more than one technology that didn't exist, "So we invented it," and quite nonchalantly.
http://comicbook.com/starwars/2017/01/04/star-wars-see-how-tarkin-came-to-life-in-rogue-one-special-on-ni/
It was cool, but there was something odd about it. The technology is still not perfected yet.
I completely agree with this. I was still blown away, but CGI on Tarkin and Leia (although fantastic) was still "off" (best I can put it). The one thing people can recognize every facet about is people and perfecting all the slight mannerisms, skin imperfections, muscle movements, etc....is extremely challenging. How these folks do what they did blows my mind, but yes it isn't "perfect" yet......may never be when it comes to a CGI human on screen.
I completely agree with this. I was still blown away, but CGI on Tarkin and Leia (although fantastic) was still "off" (best I can put it). The one thing people can recognize every facet about is people and perfecting all the slight mannerisms, skin imperfections, muscle movements, etc....is extremely challenging. How these folks do what they did blows my mind, but yes it isn't "perfect" yet......may never be when it comes to a CGI human on screen.
The brief note I saw on it was that the CGI was layered over a real actor, to avoid what's called "dead eye effect" or something of that nature.
I thought Tarkin looked better than Leia, but I know opinions vary on that. I wasn't convince Tarkin was CGI at first, just thought it was more of the "digital look" to the movie.
Either way, it's pretty awesome.
The biggest giveaway are the eyes. The emotion seems lost. Just dead eyes. Like Carrie Underwood. The Leia was awful though but looks like they didn't spend as much time perfecting it.
I hope I never have to see 'Finn' again on a screen, he is such a bitch character. Actually I'd like to see him get cut in half by a lightsaber. An over dramatic white knighting little bitch. I was happy to see Rey refer to him as a friend when he clearly wants a piece of that.
Rey was a decent character though, and better than the female lead in R1 I thought. Usually I hate female leads portraying atypical behaviour and 'girl power' but the actress did a good job and played her role confidently. Would definitely hit.Rey is taking the training seriously and getting quite decent glutes for Ep 8.
I saw it last week, it was pretty good and I immediately watched the force awakens the next day to compare it to. The force awakens was garbage, even worse than any of the prequels were (I like the prequels for the most part though, unlike most).
I hope I never have to see 'Finn' again on a screen, he is such a bitch character. Actually I'd like to see him get cut in half by a lightsaber. An over dramatic white knighting little bitch. I was happy to see Rey refer to him as a friend when he clearly wants a piece of that.
Rey was a decent character though, and better than the female lead in R1 I thought. Usually I hate female leads portraying atypical behaviour and 'girl power' but the actress did a good job and played her role confidently. Would definitely hit. The male characters were pathetic though, with Han Solo even being killed off and bad guy looking like a high school nerd sans pimples. Seriously the guy was an ashton kutcher looking fella with dick lips. No homo.
The male leads in both films are shite, in fact I can't remember any of their names except the two in TFA. Actually, the characters in general were garbage; how do I know this? Because I can't fucking remember them even a week later.
I did however love the action scenes, the special effects were excellent. The plot was pretty good in R1 as well, despite a highly forgettable cast. I'd give it a 6/10 overall. I also like that a shit ton of the 'good guys' died, actually all of them pretty much. Thank god, I cant stand the stereotypical and unrealistic path movies take with this good and evil bullshit.
IF directors and writers actually gave a shit about developing meaningful characters rather than displaying aural and visual feasts in high definition, then MAYBE Hollywood would have a chance of returning to it's former glory.
I saw it last week, it was pretty good and I immediately watched the force awakens the next day to compare it to. The force awakens was garbage, even worse than any of the prequels were (I like the prequels for the most part though, unlike most).
I hope I never have to see 'Finn' again on a screen, he is such a bitch character. Actually I'd like to see him get cut in half by a lightsaber. An over dramatic white knighting little bitch. I was happy to see Rey refer to him as a friend when he clearly wants a piece of that.
Rey was a decent character though, and better than the female lead in R1 I thought. Usually I hate female leads portraying atypical behaviour and 'girl power' but the actress did a good job and played her role confidently. Would definitely hit. The male characters were pathetic though, with Han Solo even being killed off and bad guy looking like a high school nerd sans pimples. Seriously the guy was an ashton kutcher looking fella with dick lips. No homo.
The male leads in both films are shite, in fact I can't remember any of their names except the two in TFA. Actually, the characters in general were garbage; how do I know this? Because I can't fucking remember them even a week later.
I did however love the action scenes, the special effects were excellent. The plot was pretty good in R1 as well, despite a highly forgettable cast. I'd give it a 6/10 overall. I also like that a shit ton of the 'good guys' died, actually all of them pretty much. Thank god, I cant stand the stereotypical and unrealistic path movies take with this good and evil bullshit.
IF directors and writers actually gave a shit about developing meaningful characters rather than displaying aural and visual feasts in high definition, then MAYBE Hollywood would have a chance of returning to it's former glory.
bump
rogue one was a huge waste of time, i turned it off after 1,5 hours
what a shitty worthless franchise star wars is.
even darth vader couldnt save it, he looked like he lost size and height, clearly off the sauce.
but he looks same size as the other dude in the first scene of the movie
he only looks bigger when theyre not close up
mask look lame like its a parody
also technically nothing happend to star wars, nothing looks better than in the late 70's? how can nothing improve in 40 years?
This movie sucked nuts. Fucking hated it. Ill conceived, poorly executed, boring, corny.
Cast full of talent-less nobodies. I rooted for the Empire the whole time.
This movie sucked nuts. Fucking hated it. Ill conceived, poorly executed, boring, corny.
Cast full of talent-less nobodies. I rooted for the Empire the whole time.
bump
rogue one was a huge waste of time, i turned it off after 1,5 hours
what a shitty worthless franchise star wars is.
even darth vader couldnt save it, he looked like he lost size and height, clearly off the sauce.
Ha ha, very Getbig. ;D
Not sure how serious. I hated the idea of this film and swore never to see it...and then I saw. It was REALLY good. :o
After many years of loving Star Wars, I'm starting to root for the Empire too. Rogue One was not too bad but again not enough real models and too much GC. Digital faces of the dead actors didn't seem right, therefore thay should have done a different type of scenario..maybe different actors, all in all same shit all over again with slightly better effects, storyline but underdeveloped characters. Lucas was right when he wanted to do TV show style approach. Then you have the time to build characters and tension.
Liked Rogue One a lot...thought it was very well done. Death Star destruction was epic. Blending between prequels, Clone Wars and original trilogy was excellent.
Darth Vader's added scene at the end was amazing! He wasn't the Vader of the past here....he was sooooooo much better!
Would love a stand alone Vader movie with a younger Vader hunting down remaining Jedi across the galaxy.
Tarkin and Leia effects were amazing....not perfect of course but amazing. Anyone critical of these effects needs to also produce a solution to improve them. Further, throwing money at isn't a solution because the studio has ample resources that could've been utilized.
Technology is improving constantly, im certain we will see CGI:d faces that actually look real in 2020+
completely agree
And when i say real i mean that nobody will even notice they're CGI. Nobody! :D
Carry Fisher didn't even realize that was not her in Rogue One, she thought it was pulled from her filming of A New Hope
Darth Vader's added scene at the end was amazing! He wasn't the Vader of the past here....he was sooooooo much better!
Would love a stand alone Vader movie with a younger Vader hunting down remaining Jedi across the galaxy.
YES! YES! YES!
OK, hear me out, because most people would react to this with an instant "no."
But I'm think a buddy road trip movie staring Vader and Bobba Fett. Obviously not much dialogue from Vader. You would need a third charterer the audience could connect with. The purpose of the film would be to convince the audience that the Empire is the side to root for.
YES! YES! YES!
OK, hear me out, because most people would react to this with an instant "no."
But I'm think a buddy road trip movie staring Vader and Bobba Fett. Obviously not much dialogue from Vader. You would need a third charterer the audience could connect with. The purpose of the film would be to convince the audience that the Empire is the side to root for.
That isn't dumb at all.... that's the perfect vehicle for the Fettman!
OK, hear me out, because most people would react to this with an instant "no."
But I'm think a buddy road trip movie staring Vader and Bobba Fett.
YES! YES! YES!
OK, hear me out, because most people would react to this with an instant "no."
But I'm think a buddy road trip movie staring Vader and Bobba Fett. Obviously not much dialogue from Vader. You would need a third charterer the audience could connect with. The purpose of the film would be to convince the audience that the Empire is the side to root for.
Or a movie with Darth Vader as a terrifying and powerful villain leading a part of the Imperial Fleet where he hunts down fleeing Jedi across the galaxy.
The movie could have more of a horror atmosphere.
Or a movie with Darth Vader as a terrifying and powerful villain leading a part of the Imperial Fleet where he hunts down fleeing Jedi across the galaxy.
The movie could have more of a horror atmosphere.
I love this idea too...that was essentially the end of Rogue One....the creeping blackness followed by glow of red lightsaber followed immediately by panic and violence. That was the Vader everyone wanted to see and would LOVE to see again!!
Yeah, id watch 2 hours of Darth Himmler slaughtering rebels!
banging big booty Twi'leks too
Darth Vader's added scene at the end was amazing! He wasn't the Vader of the past here....he was sooooooo much better!
Which is exactly why I didn't like it. He was too spry and too flashy with his swordplay.
I don't think that level of mobility was appropriate for a man of his age, with all his injuries and robotic limbs.
Which is exactly why I didn't like it. He was too spry and too flashy with his swordplay.
I don't think that level of mobility was appropriate for a man of his age, with all his injuries and robotic limbs.
Your lack of understanding of The Force is your weakness.
I love this idea too...that was essentially the end of Rogue One....the creeping blackness followed by glow of red lightsaber followed immediately by panic and violence. That was the Vader everyone wanted to see and would LOVE to see again!!
Yet in 'A New Hope' story line, which follows immediately after Rogue One, Vader is considerably less aggressive, less angry, less menacing. The blood thirsty Vader you see slicing and dicing the Rebels at the end of Rogue One is a nothing like the softy you see battling Obi-Wan Kenobe in A New Hope. By comparison, Vader is a pussy cat in A New Hope.
Yet in 'A New Hope' story line, which follows immediately after Rogue One, Vader is considerably less aggressive, less angry, less menacing. The blood thirsty Vader you see slicing and dicing the Rebels at the end of Rogue One is a nothing like the softy you see battling Obi-Wan Kenobe in A New Hope. By comparison, Vader is a pussy cat in A New Hope.
Which is exactly why I didn't like it. He was too spry and too flashy with his swordplay.
I don't think that level of mobility was appropriate for a man of his age, with all his injuries and robotic limbs.
you guys liking the film doesnt say much. you'd like anything star wars. anything super hero. any toys. any video games. any candy.
well basically youre a child. still.
even your responses are that of a child "what did you think?" "AWESOME!!!"
jesus. this bodybuilding thing starts to make sense now, youre still trying to be the hulk.
you are trapped with the mind of a 7 year old :(
all.
SW and Superhero material command audiences of all ages today from toddlers to seniors.....sorry you're wrong.
Yet in 'A New Hope' story line, which follows immediately after Rogue One, Vader is considerably less aggressive, less angry, less menacing. The blood thirsty Vader you see slicing and dicing the Rebels at the end of Rogue One is a nothing like the softy you see battling Obi-Wan Kenobe in A New Hope. By comparison, Vader is a pussy cat in A New Hope.
you guys liking the film doesnt say much. you'd like anything star wars. anything super hero. any toys. any video games. any candy.
well basically youre a child. still.
even your responses are that of a child "what did you think?" "AWESOME!!!"
jesus. this bodybuilding thing starts to make sense now, youre still trying to be the hulk.
you are trapped with the mind of a 7 year old :(
you post on a message board under a new title called "ratherbebig".......your opinion is invalid
but im right in everything i say
Couldn't be more incorrect.
when have i ever been wrong?
they need to use the ab wheel on their ass to get it down to manageble size
i get all my meals delivered!
thanks rich piana!
still in better shape than most getbiggers
whats the point posting that 6-7 year old video? dont getit
i consider any chat window open as cheating on getbig and i dont care if its your wife or not.
etc etc
Your lack of understanding of The Force is your weakness.
Your faith in Disney is yours.
(https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/1/17981/5001593-image+%281%29.jpg)
The two movies under Disney have been better than the previous three.......although I didn't hate III.
Yet in 'A New Hope' story line, which follows immediately after Rogue One, Vader is considerably less aggressive, less angry, less menacing. The blood thirsty Vader you see slicing and dicing the Rebels at the end of Rogue One is a nothing like the softy you see battling Obi-Wan Kenobe in A New Hope. By comparison, Vader is a pussy cat in A New Hope.
(http://i.magaimg.net/img/a4a.png)
yes because the grown ups are mentally as kids.
there's tons of movies that are better picks to go see at the cinema than rogue one.
(http://i.magaimg.net/img/a4a.png)
Its a disney princess movie, just like snow white, cinderella, .... ect....
Look, Rogue One had it's issues. Definitely had some SJW themes and a little too much GRL power. But it was an extremely exciting film. Especially towards the end. Worth checking out. ;)
Its a disney princess movie, just like snow white, cinderella, .... ect....
So you don't like Star Wars LOL. And? Go watch whatever you want and quit attempting to troll a thread for SW fans.
I care nothing about the fact you think I'm mentally ill....I've heard that stuff for years LOL.
if they added a few scenes from first star wars and return of the jedi to empire strikes back we've probably get a perfect movie
Exactly. They know all of the male Star Wars fans will pay to watch no matter what so why bother marketing to them? They instead switch focus to the other half of the population to get them to go. Now little Suzie wants to see it and that means Mom and Dad and little kwon all have to go. 4 tickets sold, probably some toys in the future and disney just milked a few hundred out of a family on welfare.
Fandango has announced that Rogue One: A Star Wars Story will be returning to theaters later this August in anticipation of the upcoming Disney+ series, Andor. This screening will take place on Friday, August 26 in theaters across the country. Andor will be released on Disney+ on September 21, with Diego Luna reprising his Rogue One role. This release window is smart not only for its proximity to Andor's premiere, but also the lack of competition at the box office that weekend.
https://collider.com/rogue-one-returning-to-theaters-diego-luna-felicity-jones/?utm_source=CL-FB-P&utm_medium=Social-Distribution&fbclid=IwAR0e38CbQtNOz7-MutcwtAiZ8TwyBzXlZCf8H6Ddt_lR58Q7tX3syqMuqNI