You're trying too hard to be like me, kiddo, adopting my tags and style. I'm flattered. 
ha ha ha, meltdown.
learn to read, you illiterate moron. I said Ronnie's conditioning at the 01 ASC has never been surpassed. Dorian may be tied with him for best conditioning ever, but a human being cannot drop any more body fat or water without dying than Ronnie's 01 ASC showing.
you keep believing that. Anyone with a brain can see that your argument skills are piss poor. You misinterpret what you read half the time, contradict yourself, don't provide any evidence to support your arguments, and call anyone who disagrees with you a troll. You've deluded yourself into believing the whole world is wrong and you're right.
suuure, just ask Hulkster or anyone else who has followed your arguments from the beginning. You avoid using visual evidence b/c it contradicts your claims. All you do is post outdated quotes and even then, they are easily negated by quotes from credible sources that say the contrary.
what you fail to realize is that Ronnie at 250 lbs is not the same as Dorian at 250 lbs. Ronnie has a narrower waist, smaller joints, and fuller muscle bellies that create the illusion of added size. So while he may be lighter than Dorian by a few lbs, you wouldn't be able to tell just by looking at them on stage. I posted a quote from Dexter Jackson commenting on this, which must have went over your head as usual. 
You're trying too hard to be like me, kiddo, adopting my tags and style. I'm flattered.
Oh boy lol
ha ha ha, meltdown.
You accuse me of something and I correct you and all you're left with is ' meltdown ' a meltdown would including calling someone a ' dirty Mexican ' you know you've been there
learn to read, you illiterate moron. I said Ronnie's conditioning at the 01 ASC has never been surpassed. Dorian may be tied with him for best conditioning ever, but a human being cannot drop any more body fat or water without dying than Ronnie's 01 ASC showing.
lmfao now you're reduced to Dorian may have tied him get out here , you NEVER once claimed Yates was comparable in terms of conditioning to Ronnie and you insisted the people who said so are outright liars and flat out wrong , it was me who said perhaps they did push in terms of conditioning however the difference is Yates could sustain that bone dry & rock hard conditioning at much higher bodyweights so either way you're wrong as usual
you keep believing that. Anyone with a brain can see that your argument skills are piss poor. You misinterpret what you read half the time, contradict yourself, don't provide any evidence to support your arguments, and call anyone who disagrees with you a troll. You've deluded yourself into believing the whole world is wrong and you're right.
you're starting to sound like Hulkster ' anyone '
my argument is sound and you've yet to counter it and I've provided written and visual evidence . my argument is Dorian would beat Ronnie because he's has better density & conditioning , he has better balance & proportion and he's more complete and he's a better technical poser in essence he satisfies the IFBB judging criteria better than Ronnie
Now to start off you didn't even know the Official IFBB judging criteria until I posted it , how the fuck are you going to comment on how Ronnie is going to win if you don't even know what the judges look for? that my dim witted little friend is called evidence
I proved my point about Dorian having better conditioning & density
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold,
he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink. I’m now not sure that Ronnie at 245 pounds would beat Dorian at 269 pounds. At a bigger bodyweight I think Ronnie would look soft next to an in-shape rock-hard Dorian.
On the subject of conditioning, no-one did it better than Dorian. He achieved a hardness and dryness (without losing fullness) that nobody has ever matched. In the flesh he looked even harder than he did in photos. It was like a statue made of granite was standing in front of you.Dorian Yates his conditioning directly compared to Ronnie
I probably have a bit better balance and better conditioning on the day of the contest Dorian is an IFBB judge I think he would know who is better conditioned and lets kill two bird with one stone and better balanced
another occasion Yates comments specifically on his conditioning compared to Ronnie
4. A lot of people say that you are the only pro bodybuilder that could go head to head with Ronnie Coleman. Like him, you were the only other to be able to gain so much mass in one year. What are your thoughts on this?
A. I get asked that question all the time, and I can’t really give an answer. I have actually beaten Ronnie, but then he wasn’t at the stage he is now. He is probably carrying more muscle than I did, but I feel I had better conditioning than him.
see a pattern here?
Peter Mcgough
"These words should not be taken lightly, because no bodybuilder has ever been as hard and dry as the man who won six Sandows."This my idiot of a friend is evidence that suggests Dorian's density & dryness are better than Ronnies
Lee Priest
HOW DO YOU FEEL DORIAN WOULD FAIR AGAINST RONNIE COLEMAN NOW?
I think Dorian at his best (1993) would easily beat Ronnie. Dorian might not be as symmetrical as Ronnie, but all over he was more complete and in better condition at his best.more complete and once again better conditioning , and whats this nonsense I don't know how to form an argument? and back it up? oh and btw I always maintained Yates had better conditioning than Ronnie before I EVER posted ANY of these quotes the best part is I confirmed it after the fact , there were a few on balance & proportion in there but I could post more but whats the sense? the point is proven ( yet again )
So I already explained via pictures & videos in my own words Yates has better conditioning & density ( which I explained to you while they both fall under the umbrella they are judged as separate entities and proven using the IFBB judging criteria which lists them separately on more than once occasion ) and I've proven this specific to the argument compared to Ronnie Coleman using and IFBB judge ( you just don't get better than that ) I proven my point he has better balance & proportion ( hey another thing I taught you that balance & proportion are NOT the same thing but separate entities , you being the ignorant fuck you are thought they were the same , Yates shut you up on that one as well as Bev Francis ) whats left? Yates is more complete? thats obvious I'm not sure if anyone is in disagreement with that just like Yates being a better technical poser so whats left? muscular bulk depending on the year Yates has the clear cut advantage as well , especially compared to Ronnie at his best ( not 2003
) 2001 Arnold Classic
So in closing this is my argument , this is the evidence for my argument ( along with many pics & videos ) it works within the confines of the IFBB criteria and this is exactly why I think Dorian at his best would beat Ronnie at his !! my argument is sound and you , Hulkster and any other fan-boy can't counter it and the part that makes you a troll is you just type nonsense to the contrary despite it being flat out wrong , again you're projecting your weak abilities on me and feel you would have better luck elsewhere and I could care less on debating religion with you you bore me .
suuure, just ask Hulkster or anyone else who has followed your arguments from the beginning. You avoid using visual evidence b/c it contradicts your claims. All you do is post outdated quotes and even then, they are easily negated by quotes from credible sources that say the contrary.
lmfao ask Hulkster ? he's almost a bigger idiot than you , wait maybe he's bigger , either way its very close , from the beginning I posted MORE pictures than ANY of you thats lie number 1 , I don't post in the truce thread because I won lol whats the sense? and any picture I posted you people see what you want anyway you had Hulkster the moron claiming Ronnie had more detailed calves than Dorian I mean seriously you people live beyond the grace of this God . and not one single quote I posted just on this topic related to the best back is outdated in fact they're all post retirement for Yates and in fact most of the quotes I post are specific to the debate of who is better Ronnie or Dorian , so thats lie number 2 for you ! oh and BTW the Ronnie quote admitting he would have NEVER beaten Yates is like 2 months old , so much for outdated quotes lmfao walk away kid because the hammer is dropping on your head
what you fail to realize is that Ronnie at 250 lbs is not the same as Dorian at 250 lbs. Ronnie has a narrower waist, smaller joints, and fuller muscle bellies that create the illusion of added size. So while he may be lighter than Dorian by a few lbs, you wouldn't be able to tell just by looking at them on stage. I posted a quote from Dexter Jackson commenting on this, which must have went over your head as usual.
I never failed to realize that , again Neo probe to outright lying when you have nothing , in fact I commented on Ronnie's width being an illusion specifically because of a narrow waist & hips , while Ronnie may appear big , Dorian is bigger and harder & drier , Dorian at 269 pounds would make a 244 pound Ronnie look petite
so in closing you have NOTHING as usual , you haven't proven anything at all you were owned not once but twice by your own hero which ended the truce thread , you did a great job of avoiding the topic at hand which is who has the better back , lets stick to that topic which I will completely
own you on again
now Yates has a better back because.................
.............
