This coming from Sir NeoSeminole, the board's number 1 Ronnie spooge sucker - sorry, Hulkster, but he got you beat -, who got owned again and again on the truce thread by yours truly, and who is notorious for saying things such as that Ronnie carried more mass at the 2001 ASC than at the 1999 Olympia despite being 10 lbs lighter, that genetics play no roles in muscular definition and that Ronnie's back is better than Dorian's because it is more "3D"
tsk tsk, resorting to lies I see. First, how do you figure I'm the "number 1 Ronnie spooge sucker?" By number of posts? You just made that up b/c you have nothing else to say. Second, where have you owned me? Again, more bullshit from you b/c you have nothing else to say. Third, I never said genetics don't play a role in definition. I said genetics determine where a person carries more (or less) body fat and water. Fourth, I never listed depth as the sole reason for why Ronnie's back is superior to Dorian's. Nice try kiddo, but I have just dismantled your post one by one.
As for you being proven wrong, let's see...
- Ronnie's arms weren't more than 2" bigger than Dorian's
- Ronnie's brachialis are poor
- you denying about lying
- Flex has better taper than Ronnie
- a person can be 4% bf and have no visible definition
- bodybuilders can't get a prescription for steroids through doctors
Ronnie 2003 was a worthless pile of shit. He had no definition in his back, pin forearms, stick calves that were dwarfed by ginormous quads which also dwarfed the entire torso, a gigantic ass that dominate his entire rear view and the worst distended gut in the history of bodybuilding which made Dorian's at the 1997 Olympia look like Zane's at the 1977 Olympia in comparison. How can anyone thnk that hideous monstrosity was even top 10 material, let alone Olympia winner, is completely beyond me.
