Not a problem. Coach's original post is about how angry he is that Obama reversed a ban for aid (money, food, medicine etc.) that Bush has imposed on any aid relief group that does not agree up front that they will not perform abortions. They literally cannot even provide information on abortion under any circumstances.
Do you think its right to not fund non-profit groups that might also perform abortions or even counsel young women about abortion in addition to feeding starving children, curing them of diseases etc?
To be honest i never read all the original post i just commented on abortion before this escalated. I dont know nor understand much about US politics.
Ok this is my opinion and i am not god or anything like that. Ill try to answer as best i can since you have been patiant etc with me.
I do think we should fund the organisations and also stop abortions and not actively fund abortion groups.
HOWEVER, in places where we have no control or say or influence, e.g africa where abortions may be carried out in dirty alleys or makeshift houses (this happens) with crude unsanitary implements coathangers(this happens ) and where they will always contine then at least they should be performed at the very m,inimum in clean hospiutals funded by the same organisations that are providing the food shelter immunisations etc. If they are going to be done at least should be done safely with the benefit of helping the others.
I do agree that information should be provided and there are care homes set up by e.g catholic church where women opt out of abortion and have the child before giving it up for adoption. In a clean safehouse run by nurses and nuns e.g They should also try to educate as much as possible
Once the child has been aborted there is no bringing it back
I am sure i have left stuff out. Does this make sense. Its a huge issue with so many variables etc...hard to decide