Author Topic: Dorian Yates 1992 guest posing, absolutely unbelievable. (Read 51727 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #25 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:49:29 PM »

Quote from: tbombz on April 20, 2009, 04:44:15 PM

im not sure what you mean with the first part

however i do not think ronnie and dorian are in the same league in these two videos. side by side ronnie would easily win, in my opinion. what weight do you think dorian is, compared to ronnies '247' ? as you know bb'ers tend to greatly over exaggerate their weight.

I agree that Ronnie could beat Dorian but under NO circumstances would it be easy not by a long shot . Dorian in that vid might be high 250s because he's very lean still , the advantages Dorian has is size , balance & proportion , density & conditioning ( although Ronnie 2001 may have came close enough to that conditioning ) and he's a better poser , all Yates

CastIron · « **Reply #26 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:49:53 PM »

A short video about Yates.

SweetMuscles · « **Reply #27 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:51:51 PM »

The best ever. I love the fact he took the white man genetics and trained like a crazy man and used his seriously underrated brain to create the fantastic monstrosity that was a granite hard Doz!!

I see Hulkhomo has arrived so expect to see the same bullshit pics and posts now for the next 6 pages. Hulksters arrival with dick in hand and Ronnie hardrive full o pics = end of thread for normal people.

Hulkster · « **Reply #28 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:55:48 PM »

ND, you do realize that the '247 pounds' that you constantly belittle looks like this right?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #29 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:57:33 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 20, 2009, 04:55:48 PM

ND, you do realize that the '247 pounds' that you constantly belittle looks like this right?

Constantly belittle? moron did you miss the part where I said he looks AMAZING? of course you did , stop projecting your bullshit on to me . I just said Ronnie could beat Dorian and 2001 he looked amazing , stop trolling on here you jerk off

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #30 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:58:25 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 20, 2009, 04:48:49 PM

same old dorian..

piss poor arms.

piss poor quads.

wide waist.

great back and calves.

same old story.

the arms clasped mm is the funniest thing I have ever seen- he flexes his arms and quads and nothing happens lol

they are so poor at that point they dont even 'pop'

and you nuthuggers are orgasming over this? why? his back looks hard and cut. the rest of him is hohum.

hell - look at how poor the side chest is!

sorry. but you are sad if you think that a man with arms and quads that bad is 'complete' LOL

honestly.

just because it is a new video does not mean it is any sort of standard.

ps I will refrain from posting shot of Ronnie that crush that.

but if you want I will.

92 dorian was no Ronnie Coleman at his peak..

meltdown everytime a new Yates vid surfaces you have an obligatory meltdown

SweetMuscles · « **Reply #31 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:59:02 PM »

You know, ND doesn't dump a shitload of Doz pics in any and every Coleman-related thread. Why don't you just fuck off instead of stalking the guy around Getbig and trying to ignite this old bullshit?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #32 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:00:19 PM »

Quote from: SweetMuscles on April 20, 2009, 04:59:02 PM

You know, ND doesn't dump a shitload of Doz pics in any and every Coleman-related thread. Why don't you just fuck off instead of stalking the guy around Getbig and trying to ignite this old bullshit?

QFT ! he's a high-jacker and a troll nothing more.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #33 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:05:10 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on April 20, 2009, 01:31:15 AM

No one has ever had this complete of a physique. Best ever. Be sure to watch in HD. Clearly the best back ever too.

Dorian is epic. However, his best ever was 3 weeks out from the 95' Olympia when he was just as symmetrical and dry as in this video, but carrying 20 lbs more of muscle. Now that is the physique that will take another 20 years to be matched...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #34 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:07:38 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on April 20, 2009, 05:05:10 PM

Dorian is epic. However, his best ever was 3 weeks out from the 95' Olympia when he was just as symmetrical and dry as in this video, but carrying 20 lbs more of muscle. Now that is the physique that will take another 20 years to be matched...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

283 pounds even Coleman 2003 couldn't come near this in ANY level

England_1 · « **Reply #35 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:11:35 PM »

Dorian's back here in unbelievable. So fucking thick everywhere. Mind boggling thickness and development

Hulkster · « **Reply #36 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:11:42 PM »

Quote

You know, ND doesn't dump a shitload of Doz pics in any and every Coleman-related thread

are you new?

you obviously don't pay attention to ND posts if you type that bullshit..

all I did was properly point out that the 'measely 247 pounds' that ND loves to belittle crushes this 1992 presentation of dorian..as was being discussed before I even opened up this thread. moron.

CastIron · « **Reply #37 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:13:05 PM »

Quote from: SweetMuscles on April 20, 2009, 04:59:02 PM

You know, ND doesn't dump a shitload of Doz pics in any and every Coleman-related thread. Why don't you just fuck off instead of stalking the guy around Getbig and trying to ignite this old bullshit?

You hit the nail on the head.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #38 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:14:16 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 20, 2009, 05:11:42 PM

are you new?

you obviously don't pay attention to ND posts if you type that bullshit..

all I did was properly point out that the 'measely 247 pounds' that ND loves to belittle crushes this 1992 presentation of dorian..as was being discussed before I even opened up this thread. moron.

My ass kid I don't flood every single Ronnie thread with the same pictures that bullshit . and again moron I said he looked amazing in 2001 how is that belittling him? answer the question . pointing out he' ' small ' is belittling him

get out of this thread you high-jacker stop spamming every Yates thread will your fan-boy delusions

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #39 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:15:34 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on April 20, 2009, 05:11:35 PM

Dorian's back here in unbelievable. So fucking thick everywhere. Mind boggling thickness and development

That whole shot is outstanding from head to toe , nothing is missing. textbook back double biceps shot.

SweetMuscles · « **Reply #40 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:16:33 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 20, 2009, 05:11:42 PM

are you new?

you obviously don't pay attention to ND posts if you type that bullshit..

all I did was properly point out that the 'measely 247 pounds' that ND loves to belittle crushes this 1992 presentation of dorian..as was being discussed before I even opened up this thread. moron.

No one fucking cares. If you have a beef with him, or something he said, then start a new thread. Stop ruining every other bodybuilding thread. There's very little bodybuilding stuff on the site as it is, you fuck it up with your constant pics of Ronnie in every fucking thread. It's not even like you're funny; you post the same pics and type exactly the same arguments.

I will bow out of an argument with you now as I know what you're like when you devote your copious amounts of freetime to cyber warrioring and posting the same shit over and over. I can't win against a dude in a wheelchair with a 1TB hardrive of Coleman nudes

Hulkster · « **Reply #41 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:17:29 PM »

meltdown

SweetMuscles · « **Reply #42 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:39:23 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 20, 2009, 05:17:29 PM

meltdown

Yep, satisfied ?

BayGBM · « **Reply #43 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:47:15 PM »

Doz rules!

Hulkster · « **Reply #44 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:47:33 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 20, 2009, 05:15:34 PM

That whole shot is outstanding from head to toe , nothing is missing. textbook back double biceps shot.

wrong. his glutes/hams are missing. arms could be better.

great back as always.

CastIron · « **Reply #45 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:53:55 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 20, 2009, 05:47:33 PM

wrong. his glutes/hams are missing. arms could be better.

great back as always.

Hulkster when are you going to give up you Ronnie Coleman fetish and change your avatar to this?

SweetMuscles · « **Reply #46 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:55:27 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 20, 2009, 05:47:33 PM

wrong. his glutes/hams are missing. arms could be better.

great back as always.

No wonder you're so angry and disappointed bro

CastIron · « **Reply #47 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:56:06 PM »

Quote from: SweetMuscles on April 20, 2009, 05:55:27 PM

No wonder you're so angry and disappointed bro

tbombz · « **Reply #48 on:** April 20, 2009, 05:58:01 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 20, 2009, 05:07:38 PM

283 pounds even Coleman 2003 couldn't come near this in ANY level

2004 wwas colemans biggest year and he had more muscle than that, albeit he was holding a ton of water.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #49 on:** April 20, 2009, 06:05:36 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 20, 2009, 05:47:33 PM

wrong. his glutes/hams are missing. arms could be better.

great back as always.

his ARMS biceps/triceps and forearms all look great this particular show his biceps even looks aswesome . his glutes

and go learn what the fuck hamstrings are before you say they're missing seriously . again in terms of balance & proportion , density & dryness , size , completeness it's textbook