To discredit Dorian based on the same 10 Hulkster-selected pics is ridiculous. Seemingly everyone who ever saw him in person agrees that he was the thickest, most complete and best conditioned competitor of his era. Were some of his wins controversial? Of course, just like 01 and 02 were for Ronnie, 1980 was for Arnold, and 07 was for Jay.
I attended the Mr. O from 02-06. In 02, Ronnie was pushed by a small-legged Kevin to the limit. Ronnie did not stand out that year in person and was lucky to win. 03 and 04 were no contest because Ronnie was SO much bigger than everyone else, he was truly unbelievable. Hulkster loves to argue that Dorian shouldn't have won after his bicep was torn. What about Ronnie's 05 win with an atrophied left lat, tricep and quad?
To argue that Ronnie was a better bodybuilder than Dorian is fine. The sport is subjective and different criteria appeal to different people. Ronnie was a great Mr. Olympia and probably the freakiest bodybuilder ever. However, to deny that it would be close between a peak Dorian and a peak Ronnie is complete nonsense. Was 94 close? Yes, Dorian was off and Shawn nailed it; however, Dorian's condition was only slightly worse Shawn's best ever (that is how good Dorian was) and he absolutely dwarfed him.
Unless, of course, you have an unhealthy obsession with Dorian such that you have dedicated the majority of time in your life to posting the most unflattering pics as proof of your bullshit. Honestly, I have never, ever heard of or witnessed someone so obsessed with a bodybuilder. Hulkster, you are getting more and more pathetic with each post; with each unrelated thread that you hijack; and each post that contains the same 10 Dorian pics you have been posting for YEARS now. Yes, YEARS. Dorian clearly owns Hulkster's mind!