Again I have to say: I know that in all posing rounds all criteria is assesed.
I was just mentioning ONE aspect of the criteria Shawn had an advantage on: posing. Dorian best met most of the criteria, which is why he won fairly. But again, he didn't dominate.
As far as why I think Shawn had better posing: I always say Dorian as a bad poser, he seemed as he was about to step on his own feet and stumble everytime he transitioned to a back pose from a front pose or viceversa.
Shawn is also regarded as one of the best posers in bodybuilding, I never read about anyone saying that about Dorian.
For the 10th time, I never said Shawn should've won the 95 Olympia. 
I can see Dorian dwarfing Shawn because of his massively wide back, but when the rest of the bodyparts are taken into consideration.....
If you use Nasser to compare to Dorian, there is even less "dwarfing". Which proves that Dorian won, but not crushing everyone.
Shawn had short legs compared to Dorian, but his legs were not short for his height and torso length. Lee Priest is an example of short legs with a long torso.
Shawn's calves were high inserted, but Dorian had incomplete quads. His legs weren't perfectly balanced and proportionate either.
Again I have to say: I know that in all posing rounds all criteria is assesed.
I was just mentioning ONE aspect of the criteria Shawn had an advantage on: posing. Dorian best met most of the criteria, which is why he won fairly. But again, he didn't dominate.
As far as why I think Shawn had better posing: I always say Dorian as a bad poser, he seemed as he was about to step on his own feet and stumble everytime he transitioned to a back pose from a front pose or viceversa.
You absolutely did NOT know all the criteria is assessed nonsense . and again how times did Shawn beat Dorian in any posing rounds? NONE ever wonder why? because all rounds are physique rounds , so you think Shawn is a better poser? that means Dorian didn't dominate? when Shawn losing both the posing rounds to Dorian and in fact is in fourth place that means Dorian dominated him in grand fashion it's not close under any circumstances
You're proving yourself just another ignorant guy who doesn't get Dorian's physique and prefers more pretty ones , and make assumptions based just on that . Dorian was an outstanding poser and if you ever actually watched him you'd know this , is he in the same breathe of a poser as Lee Labrada? NO however Dorian poses to his physiques strengths , posing to slow and sultry music and doing lots of twists and turns wouldn't ever work with his physique
Dorian was a great poser for that reason and the fact he mastered the mandatory poses , he never looked like he was stumbling that's more delusional on your behalf , he always posed to his physiques best advantage , he always held his poses for the right amount of time , he transitioned well from pose-to-pose and and always presented an air of confidence and professionalism
Shawn is also regarded as one of the best posers in bodybuilding, I never read about anyone saying that about Dorian.
Shawn was a very good poser he always displayed his physique to it's best advantage however that doesn't mean shit in the context of the entire judging criteria , especially when you're down on the rest of the criteria , again Shawn never beat Dorian in ANY posing rounds , ever wonder why?
For the 10th time, I never said Shawn should've won the 95 Olympia.
I can see Dorian dwarfing Shawn because of his massively wide back, but when the rest of the bodyparts are taken into consideration.....
If you use Nasser to compare to Dorian, there is even less "dwarfing". Which proves that Dorian won, but not crushing everyone.
AGAIN I never claimed YOU claimed Shawn should the whole contest , however YOU did claim Shawn wins the pose and you're be dead wrong again. please pay attention , Shawn doesn't beat Dorian in ANY pose in 1995 when all things are considered
Dorian dwarfed Shawn NO contest it's not open for discussion and anything to the contrary wont be entertained just laughed at , and Nasser was compared to Dorian and he was heavier than Yates and yet you'd never know it , Nasser didn't dwarf Yates despite this fact and when all things are considered he dominated the entire contest , again to deny his dominance in 1995 is to deny it in 1993 , there was no contest and anyone who disagree has an ignorant agenda.
Shawn had short legs compared to Dorian, but his legs were not short for his height and torso length. Lee Priest is an example of short legs with a long torso.
Shawn's calves were high inserted, but Dorian had incomplete quads. His legs weren't perfectly balanced and proportionate either.
Shawn has short legs compared to his contemporaries and Dorian was one of them and his legs are short for his torso ( which is long ) , same with Nasser and Levrone , however I digress because if everyone has short legs than it's not a flaw , but he was directly compared to someone who doesn't ( Dorian ) so it's a flaw in the judges eyes. incomplete quads? 1995 his quad was torn but not incomplete , and his legs were absolutely more balanced than Shawns , no question about it ! is Yates' perfect? NO better than Shawns? absolutely
Lets entertain Shawn has a clear advantage in quads over Dorian , this means what? he wins the pose? is Shawn carrying more muscular bulk than Dorian in this pose? NO does he have better conditioning? for the sake of argument lets say it's equal , does he have better density? NO , density and muscular bulk are highly desirable to the judges , one thing to be 205lbs and dense and a whole other to be 260lbs and hard as nails , does he beat Dorian in balance & proportion? NO does he beat Dorian in posing & presentation? NO ( recall all rounds are physique rounds ) he doesn't beat Dorian in this pose , he isn't even close to Dorian in this pose , he's way behind in fact
