I've already shown the proof....THAT MUTLIPLE CULTURES cite a global flood as destroying life on Earth, with a few survivors building a vessels and storing animals on them. That is the statement I made, and I've cited the sources that back them.
And, in true bait-and-switch fashion, you've tried to claim that you asked me about empirical proof about the Flood itself, a claim which I never made.
More waffling and sophistry from MCSWAY. We'll take that as a NO. Here's Wiki's definition of Empirical for you. I've bolded the important bits for you.
"The word empirical denotes information gained by means of observation, experience, or experiment.[1] A central concept in science and the scientific method is that all evidence must be empirical, or empirically based, that is,
dependent on evidence or consequences that are observable by the senses. It is usually differentiated from the philosophic usage of empiricism by the use of the adjective empirical or the adverb empirically. The term refers to
the use of working hypotheses that are testable using observation or experiment. In this sense of the word, scientific statements are subject to and derived from our experiences or observations. Empirical data is data that is produced by experiment or observation."
Fairy tales like Noah and his Ark, Baba Yaga or any of the Greek myths may be entertaining but are about as empirical as pigs flying.