|
littleguns
|
 |
« on: December 15, 2010, 10:46:24 AM » |
|
Aside from record, who's had the better body!
|
|
|
|
|
|
kiwiol
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2010, 10:50:22 AM » |
|
Dillett was a freak, but Nasser by a mile and in fact.
|
|
|
|
|
Wiggs
Getbig V
Gender: 
Posts: 38514
Child of Y'srael
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2010, 10:54:06 AM » |
|
What kiwi said.
|
7
|
|
|
|
Parker
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2010, 10:59:06 AM » |
|
Dillett was aesthetically better actually...and he actually had a smaller waist, bigger calves, thighs, arms, chest, delts, traps, and better abs with serratus and intercostals...both had shitty backs...
Dillett was better put together, better taper, Nasser was just big...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meso_z
|
|
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2010, 11:05:27 AM » |
|
Nassers muscles were more "mature" and more complete than Dillet... Dillet was a freak though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JasonH
|
|
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2010, 11:05:43 AM » |
|
Dillett had better shape, both had abysmal back development, but overall with all things considered I would say Nasser.
|
|
|
|
|
Big Worm
Getbig IV
Posts: 3979
Really ? You finished turd my flend? Maricon..
|
|
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2010, 11:09:50 AM » |
|
If I have to tell the truth...Nasshole..
|
|
|
|
|
monstercalves
Getbig IV
Gender:
Posts: 2310
Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
|
|
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2010, 11:18:38 AM » |
|
lol....
dillet is so underrated .....
his back was not weak..... he just could'nt flex and spread his lats equally .......
his lats were very well developed .....lacking detail not size or development or width ....
ive said this before....... if paul could pose as well as darrem charles or flex wheeler or levrone he would have had a totally different career..... and would have won a shitload
nasser was a top bb .....but dillet blows him away imo
|
|
|
|
|
NarcissisticDeity
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 65252
Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
|
|
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2010, 11:24:27 AM » |
|
Aside from record, who's had the better body!
Nasser |
|
|
|
|
|
spude
|
|
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2010, 11:26:06 AM » |
|
Yeah, its weird..If we start going them through muscle by muscle from head to toe, dillet takes it. But still, nassers muscles look that they actually belong to him, dillet just looks...synthetic, i would say, like a kid with a superhero suit. And most importantly, nassoil doesnt suck as badly as a poser as dillet does...So overall, i give it to nasser
|
|
|
|
|
King_Raisin
Getbig II
Posts: 140
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2010, 11:31:32 AM » |
|
Nasser by far, his '96-'97 shape was probably the best in the world
|
|
|
|
|
NarcissisticDeity
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 65252
Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
|
|
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2010, 11:34:58 AM » |
|
lol....
dillet is so underrated .....
his back was not weak..... he just could'nt flex and spread his lats equally .......
his lats were very well developed .....lacking detail not size or development or width ....
ive said this before....... if paul could pose as well as darrem charles or flex wheeler or levrone he would have had a totally different career..... and would have won a shitload
nasser was a top bb .....but dillet blows him away imo
His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back. look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds |
|
|
|
|
|
spude
|
|
« Reply #12 on: December 15, 2010, 11:45:05 AM » |
|
His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.
look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds
Yep, and those sickbig delts with zero separation actually make this pose look even worse, poor brotha...  |
|
|
|
|
|
magicuser
|
|
« Reply #13 on: December 15, 2010, 11:45:23 AM » |
|
His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.
look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds
you were checkin the glutes and having lil dreams |
|
|
|
|
NarcissisticDeity
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 65252
Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
|
|
« Reply #14 on: December 15, 2010, 11:54:53 AM » |
|
you were checkin the glutes and having lil dreams
You got me there  |
|
|
|
|
NarcissisticDeity
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 65252
Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
|
|
« Reply #15 on: December 15, 2010, 11:56:10 AM » |
|
Yep, and those sickbig delts with zero separation actually make this pose look even worse, poor brotha... yeah his delts sucked too  huge round NO separation of detail it's like he was injecting with oil they have that glossy look like Flex did latter in his career |
|
|
|
|
|
Nirvana
|
|
« Reply #16 on: December 15, 2010, 12:36:32 PM » |
|
nasser was more symmetrical and could pose and had a less shitty back than even dillet.
|
|
|
|
|
Victor VonDoom
Getbig IV
Gender:
Posts: 1421
...and Doom shall control the world!
|
|
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2010, 12:44:11 PM » |
|
Dillett was a freak, but Nasser by a mile and in fact.
x2 |
|
|
|
|
|
cephissus
|
|
« Reply #18 on: December 15, 2010, 01:27:07 PM » |
|
 lol this pic is unreal. i'm not going to make any comment on their physiques but I feel many would nominate nasser simply for his personality and looks. in fact, i believe much of bodybuilding history comes down to personality and good looks, and the need to build heroes of mythical proportions instead of, necessarily, pure analysis of the muscles. |
|
|
|
|
|
YoungBlood
|
|
« Reply #19 on: December 15, 2010, 01:31:45 PM » |
|
His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.
look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds
Do you have the picture that shows Dillet crouching next to Ray, where Dillet's shoulders are bigger than Shawn's head? And follow that up with the above picture where you can see how horrible Paul's back is because he can't pose worth shit! |
|
|
|
|
|
dr.chimps
|
|
« Reply #20 on: December 15, 2010, 01:34:46 PM » |
|
lol this pic is unreal. i'm not going to make any comment on their physiques but I feel many would nominate nasser simply for his personality and looks.
You mean his movie star good looks, and his irascible charm in being an ungrateful 6-week house guest? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Nobody
|
|
« Reply #21 on: December 15, 2010, 01:35:22 PM » |
|
A tie neither had a back, both huge from frontal view.
|
|
|
|
|
Cableguy
Getbig IV
Gender:
Posts: 1663
Cableguy no longer...
|
|
« Reply #22 on: December 15, 2010, 01:35:30 PM » |
|
Dillet, bigger freak.
Nasser, better bodybuilder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cephissus
|
|
« Reply #23 on: December 15, 2010, 01:38:36 PM » |
|
You mean his movie star good looks, and his irascible charm in being an ungrateful 6-week house guest?
Haha compared to dillet, nasser is more than a movie star. And as far as personality and overall likability, well... is there a team dillet hanging out somewhere? |
|
|
|
|
haider
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 11983
Team Batman Squats
|
|
« Reply #24 on: December 15, 2010, 01:38:59 PM » |
|
Aside from record, who's had the better body!
Nasser by atleast 3x uncrowned mr olympias |
follow the arrows
|
|
|
|
