Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
July 29, 2014, 12:20:09 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Nasser vs Dillet - better BB'er  (Read 4973 times)
littleguns
Getbig IV
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3819



View Profile
« on: December 15, 2010, 11:46:24 AM »

Aside from record, who's had the better body!


* nasser_el_sonbaty.jpg (51.93 KB, 300x468 - viewed 706 times.)

* paul2.jpg (35.42 KB, 299x451 - viewed 696 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
kiwiol
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 18419


Who is John Galt?


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2010, 11:50:22 AM »

Dillett was a freak, but Nasser by a mile and in fact.
Report to moderator   Logged
Wiggs
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 31364


Child of Y'srael


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2010, 11:54:06 AM »

What kiwi said.
Report to moderator   Logged

7
Parker
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 44372


Autobots, Transform and Roll Out!


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2010, 11:59:06 AM »

Dillett was aesthetically better actually...and he actually had a smaller waist, bigger calves, thighs, arms, chest, delts, traps, and better abs with serratus and intercostals...both had shitty backs...

Dillett was better put together, better taper, Nasser was just big...
Report to moderator   Logged
Meso_z
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 17981



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2010, 12:05:27 PM »

Nassers muscles were more "mature" and more complete than Dillet... Dillet was a freak though.
Report to moderator   Logged
JasonH
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11369



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2010, 12:05:43 PM »

Dillett had better shape, both had abysmal back development, but overall with all things considered I would say Nasser.
Report to moderator   Logged
Big Worm
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3980


Really ? You finished turd my flend? Maricon..


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2010, 12:09:50 PM »

If I have to tell the truth...Nasshole..
Report to moderator   Logged
monstercalves
Getbig IV
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2311


Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2010, 12:18:38 PM »

lol....


dillet is so underrated .....

his back was not weak..... he just could'nt flex and spread his lats equally .......

his lats were very well developed .....lacking detail not size or development or width ....

ive said this before....... if paul could pose as well as darrem charles or flex wheeler or levrone he would have had a totally different career..... and would have won a shitload

nasser was a top bb .....but dillet blows him away imo
Report to moderator   Logged
NarcissisticDeity
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 43708


I dont care what Ronnie says bc hes not a credible


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2010, 12:24:27 PM »

Aside from record, who's had the better body!

Nasser
Report to moderator   Logged
spude
Getbig III
***
Posts: 894



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2010, 12:26:06 PM »

Yeah, its weird..If we start going them through muscle by muscle from head to toe, dillet takes it. But still, nassers muscles look that they actually belong to him, dillet just looks...synthetic, i would say, like a kid with a superhero suit. And most importantly, nassoil doesnt suck as badly as a poser as dillet does...So overall, i give it to nasser
Report to moderator   Logged
King_Raisin
Getbig II
**
Posts: 140

Getbig!


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2010, 12:31:32 PM »

Nasser by far, his '96-'97 shape was probably the best in the world
Report to moderator   Logged
NarcissisticDeity
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 43708


I dont care what Ronnie says bc hes not a credible


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2010, 12:34:58 PM »

lol....


dillet is so underrated .....

his back was not weak..... he just could'nt flex and spread his lats equally .......

his lats were very well developed .....lacking detail not size or development or width ....

ive said this before....... if paul could pose as well as darrem charles or flex wheeler or levrone he would have had a totally different career..... and would have won a shitload

nasser was a top bb .....but dillet blows him away imo

His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.

 look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds


* Scott-1 653.jpg (97.9 KB, 575x390 - viewed 627 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
spude
Getbig III
***
Posts: 894



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 15, 2010, 12:45:05 PM »

His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.

 look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds

Yep, and those sickbig delts with zero separation actually make this pose look even worse, poor brotha... Cry
Report to moderator   Logged
magicuser
Getbig III
***
Posts: 732



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 15, 2010, 12:45:23 PM »

His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.

 look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds

you were checkin the glutes and having lil dreams
Report to moderator   Logged
NarcissisticDeity
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 43708


I dont care what Ronnie says bc hes not a credible


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 15, 2010, 12:54:53 PM »

you were checkin the glutes and having lil dreams

You got me there  Lips sealed
Report to moderator   Logged
NarcissisticDeity
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 43708


I dont care what Ronnie says bc hes not a credible


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 15, 2010, 12:56:10 PM »

Yep, and those sickbig delts with zero separation actually make this pose look even worse, poor brotha... Cry

yeah his delts sucked too  Undecided huge round NO separation of detail it's like he was injecting with oil they have that glossy look like Flex did latter in his career
Report to moderator   Logged
Nirvana
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 4397


Maggot Filled Ass.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: December 15, 2010, 01:36:32 PM »

nasser was more symmetrical and could pose and had a less shitty back than even dillet. 
Report to moderator   Logged

Chew Tobacco.
Victor VonDoom
Getbig IV
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1085


...and Doom shall control the world!


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2010, 01:44:11 PM »

Dillett was a freak, but Nasser by a mile and in fact.

x2
Report to moderator   Logged
cephissus
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4793


Team Free A-Halo, Servant of Lord Jehova God


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 15, 2010, 02:27:07 PM »



lol this pic is unreal.  i'm not going to make any comment on their physiques but I feel many would nominate nasser simply for his personality and looks.

in fact, i believe much of bodybuilding history comes down to personality and good looks, and the need to build heroes of mythical proportions instead of, necessarily, pure analysis of the muscles.
Report to moderator   Logged
YoungBlood
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 6778


Weee!


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 15, 2010, 02:31:45 PM »

His back sucked horribly it was wide and that's it. It lacked depth , detail and thickness , it lacked great separation as well , it was no where near what a 285lb bodybuilder should have for a back.

 look at this picture it says it all , his back looks NO wider , thicker or better than a man who he out-weighs by eighty-fucking-pounds

Do you have the picture that shows Dillet crouching next to Ray, where Dillet's shoulders are bigger than Shawn's head? And follow that up with the above picture where you can see how horrible Paul's back is because he can't pose worth shit!
Report to moderator   Logged
dr.chimps
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 25788


Bunch Commander


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 15, 2010, 02:34:46 PM »

lol this pic is unreal.  i'm not going to make any comment on their physiques but I feel many would nominate nasser simply for his personality and looks.
You mean his movie star good looks, and his irascible charm in being an ungrateful 6-week house guest? 
Report to moderator   Logged
Mr Nobody
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 40420


Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 15, 2010, 02:35:22 PM »

A tie neither had a back, both huge from frontal view.
Report to moderator   Logged
Cableguy
Getbig IV
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1216


To Xfinity and beyond...


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 15, 2010, 02:35:30 PM »

Dillet, bigger freak.

Nasser, better bodybuilder.
Report to moderator   Logged

Noworries for Onlyme
cephissus
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4793


Team Free A-Halo, Servant of Lord Jehova God


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 15, 2010, 02:38:36 PM »

You mean his movie star good looks, and his irascible charm in being an ungrateful 6-week house guest? 

Haha compared to dillet, nasser is more than a movie star.

And as far as personality and overall likability, well... is there a team dillet hanging out somewhere?
Report to moderator   Logged
haider
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11923


Team Batman Squats


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 15, 2010, 02:38:59 PM »

Aside from record, who's had the better body!
Nasser by atleast 3x uncrowned mr olympias
Report to moderator   Logged

follow the arrows
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!