Author Topic: Magikusar's daily/weekly musings  (Read 86065 times)

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
national debt from 1940 to present
« Reply #750 on: December 04, 2012, 12:58:53 PM »

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42352
Re: Obama is for the rich
« Reply #751 on: December 04, 2012, 01:27:24 PM »
So are you voting dem?

They are the only ones who wants to cut the military the GOP wants to increase it.

Is there an election in the near future? I thought the next election will be in 2014. Perhaps you meant voted or supports "Dem"???

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42352
Re: How many deaths due to laws tying man to an unwanted baby by selfish girl?
« Reply #752 on: December 04, 2012, 01:33:28 PM »
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/chief_other_girl_uULWUcuM7p4tJb2PLeaITP

The law currently lets women have a child even if the man does not want it.  Often to the selfish financial gain of the girl.

How many deaths and ruined lives are caused by these unnatural laws?

A man should have to sign that he wants the kid.

A man "signs up" for a kid whenever he doesn't wear protection. In most cases, children are a financial expense, not only for the father but also for the mother, even if she gets child support from the father. You'd know how expensive it is to raise a child to adulthood if you had one.

Do not get me wrong; I am not putting all the blame for pregnancy on the man. As best as I know, it takes both a man and a woman to produce offspring. Each party should protect their own interests....IMO.

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Re: How many deaths due to laws tying man to an unwanted baby by selfish girl?
« Reply #753 on: December 04, 2012, 06:58:18 PM »
A man "signs up" for a kid whenever he doesn't wear protection. In most cases, children are a financial expense, not only for the father but also for the mother, even if she gets child support from the father. You'd know how expensive it is to raise a child to adulthood if you had one.

Do not get me wrong; I am not putting all the blame for pregnancy on the man. As best as I know, it takes both a man and a woman to produce offspring. Each party should protect their own interests....IMO.

Q.F.T.

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Re: How many deaths due to laws tying man to an unwanted baby by selfish girl?
« Reply #754 on: December 05, 2012, 06:58:55 PM »
A man "signs up" for a kid whenever he doesn't wear protection. In most cases, children are a financial expense, not only for the father but also for the mother, even if she gets child support from the father. You'd know how expensive it is to raise a child to adulthood if you had one.

Do not get me wrong; I am not putting all the blame for pregnancy on the man. As best as I know, it takes both a man and a woman to produce offspring. Each party should protect their own interests....IMO.

but you are ok with a woman forcing a man to have a kid he does not want?

wow

just wow

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Geithner: take power of debt ceiling from congress and give to president LUNATIC
« Reply #755 on: December 05, 2012, 07:03:03 PM »
http://lewrockwell.com/schiff/schiff189.html

Doing Away With Ceiling Drama
by Peter Schiff

Recently by Peter Schiff: Patriotic Millionaires Unmasked

        
 
    


Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner made news last week by proposing to transfer the Congressional prerogative to raise the debt ceiling to the President. The change would essentially do away with the meaningless debt ceiling debates that have become ritual kabuki in Washington over the past few generations. Most Republicans have dismissed the proposal as a blatant executive power grab that will significantly weaken both the Congress and the minority party. While this is certainly true, Congress will only lose a power that it has never shown the slightest courage to actually use. But in truth, the proposal has the merit of refreshing honesty. By telling U.S. taxpayers, and the world in general, that the U.S. government has no intention of ever balancing its budget or limiting its accumulation of unsustainable debt, then perhaps we can begin to have an honest discussion about our economic future.

Congress has always decided how much money the U.S. government will spend and how it will tax the citizenry to meet those obligations. Geithner's proposal will change none of that. The debt ceiling debates have been simply to authorize the U.S. Treasury to issue debt to cover the ever widening gap between what Congress spends and what it taxes. As a result, these debates have become nothing more than exercises in feigned outrage. If Congress wants to control the debt, let them do so. If they don't care, just continue on the current path. Dropping the pretense is at least more honest. 


The move will also help blunt the ridiculous assertions made by those in favor of lifting the debt ceiling that doing so somehow means that the United States is taking the prudent and moral step of "paying its bills." In a press conference this week, Obama Administration Press Secretary Jay Carney claimed that by raising the ceiling, U.S. creditors will know that our government will meet its obligations. That is taking Orwellian doublethink to new heights of absurdity.

It is impossible to "pay" one's bills by borrowing more. Taking out new loans to retire existing debt may replace old creditors with newer, larger, creditors, but it can never be described as a real pay down. It's like paying off your Visa card with a Master Card. Paying one's bills requires that outstanding debt be diminished. In direct opposition to Carney's and Geithner's statements, the only way to force the government to actually pay its bills is to not raise the debt ceiling. But a fictitious debt limit is worse because it allows Congress to pretend that its atrocious budgeting decisions are not to blame. 


Both Congress and the President readily admit that without an increase in the debt ceiling, the government will default on its obligations. This is tantamount to an admission that we lack the capacity or political will to actually repay what we have borrowed. Yet despite this, our creditors continue to loan us more money. As existing treasury bonds mature, we not only borrow the money necessary to redeem them, but we borrow it from the very people cashing them in. So it's not really like paying our Visa bill with our MasterCard, it's like paying our Visa with our Visa.

The debt ceiling itself is both an ill-conceived compromise and a relic of past governmental integrity. For its first 128 years as a republic, the United States was able to function without a debt ceiling. This was possible for the simple reason that U.S. government had no central bank and could not borrow beyond its ability to repay through taxation. And since the ability to tax is always limited by taxpayers' assets (and their extreme hostility to those who want to take them), legal gimmicks were not needed to prevent Congress from spending too freely. But the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 gave the Federal Government a potential means to borrow indefinitely by having the new bank buy its debt. Sensing this danger, the original Federal Reserve Act of 1913 prohibited the Fed from buying or holding government debt. 


But just four years later the United States needed a means to raise money quickly to pay for its efforts in the First World War. The government passed an amendment to the charter to allow the Fed to purchase Treasury Bonds. Fearing (correctly) that this would create a mechanism for perpetual debt expansion, conservative lawmakers insisted that the amendment include a "debt ceiling" provision that would cap the amount that the government could borrow.

What these otherwise forward looking politicians somehow failed to grasp was that such a statutory limit was wholly meaningless, as it could be perpetually raised by future legislative action. This is exactly what has happened. The debt ceiling has been raised, with varying degrees of fanfare, every time it has been hit. This renders the law completely meaningless.

Now of course, under the pretense of fiscal responsibility, the President wants to do the most fiscally irresponsible thing imaginable – eliminate the ceiling entirely. He hopes that doing so will send a clear and unequivocal message that America will never default on its debts. However, the message may not resonate the way the President hopes. What our creditors may actually hear is that nothing will stand in the way of America's accumulation of more debt. Such a development may be the shock therapy our creditors need to finally cut us off for good. If that occurs, interest rates in the United States could finally rise to more rational levels. A significant increase in the cost of borrowing will create the mother of all fiscal cliffs. It's too bad that Tim Geithner can't see that one coming.






December 5, 2012

Peter Schiff is president of Euro Pacific Capital and author of The Little Book of Bull Moves in Bear Markets and Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse. His latest book is The Real Crash: America's Coming Bankruptcy, How to Save Yourself and Your Country.

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Obama to tax the internet WOW thanks obama!! thanks DEMS!
« Reply #756 on: December 05, 2012, 07:08:39 PM »
http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/04/online-sales-tax-to-be-added-to-defense-authorization-bill/

This may be the last Christmas of online shopping without paying sales tax.

A proposed online sales tax has been offered as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, much to the ire of opponents.

The Computer and Communications Industry Association, a group that opposes this move, says that an online sales tax will burden small businesses, “some of the most promising candidates for future economic growth.”
Ads by Google
GPS Fleet Tracking
Reduce Fleet Costs, Increase Profit See It Work Now - Free Live Demo!
www.FleetMatics.com/Fleet-Tracking
CrossFit Ero
Call us for our holiday specials. Torrance, CA
www.crossfitero.com

“This proposal, and other online sales tax collection proposals like it, would allow states to penalize the innovative e-commerce business model by targeting small online businesses as convenient sources (and collectors) of revenue,” said CCIA President and CEO Ed Black.

The Marketplace Fairness Act, and its House counterpart the Marketplace Equity Act, seek to clarify, and arguably overturn, a 1992 Supreme Court ruling that requires retailers to have a physical presence in a state in order to collect sales tax on goods.

“Severing the relationship between taxation and physical presence would be a fundamental transformation in how we consider taxes,” Black continued. “Such a significant step deserves more extensive consideration than attachment to the unrelated Defense Authorization bill.”

Still, a recent poll indicates that the majority of Americans support the idea, describing an online sales tax as “common sense”. They also feel that a tax for online purchases would encourage people to buy local and keep tax dollars in their community.

“Local retailers invest in their communities and play a significant role in the overall quality of life in the places we call home,” said Betsy Laird, senior vice president of global public policy for the  International Council of Shopping Centers.
Ads by Google
Justice at Guantanamo
Act now: Stop Congress from blocking Obama’s Guantanamo reform
www.gitmojustice.com/obama
Enter Dog Photo Sweeps
Enter The Dog Chow® Sweepstakes For A Chance To Win Free Dog Chow®!
Facebook.com/DogChow

Collecting the tax across state lines however poses as a challenge for small businesses that sell their goods in multiple states.

“It is not the job of small businesses to collect taxes to provide tax revenue relief for state and local governments outside their jurisdiction,” Black said, suggesting that an online tax would protect existing businesses at the expense of consumers and growth.

Some Republicans are on board, with Wyoming Sen. Mike Enzi as “the most overlooked tax loophole.”

“We are optimistic that once the Marketplace Fairness Act is brought for a vote, it will have enough support to pass,” said Illinois Democratic Sen. Richard Durbin’s spokeswoman, Christina Mulka.

Both Sens. Durbin and Enzi have offered the bill as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act.

“Sen. Durbin is focused on working with his colleagues to try to get a vote on the bill before the end of this year, whether as a stand-alone bill or part of a larger piece of legislation,” Mulka said. “They are keeping all options on the table at this point.”

 Follow Betsi on Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/04/online-sales-tax-to-be-added-to-defense-authorization-bill/#ixzz2EEn7pqgB


magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Holy sh-- N korea rocket can reach los angeles?? ready in 7 days?? WTFFF
« Reply #758 on: December 05, 2012, 07:29:23 PM »

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
'2016' made more money than other 15 oscar nominees combined BIAS
« Reply #759 on: December 05, 2012, 07:32:37 PM »
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/2016-oscar-snub-has-filmmakers-397855

Gerald Molen, who produced the Academy Award-winning 'Schindler's List,' said the box-office success of the anti-Obama documentary proves the film was a hit: "The action confirms my opinion that the bias against anything from a conservative point of view is dead on arrival in Hollywood."

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42352
Re: How many deaths due to laws tying man to an unwanted baby by selfish girl?
« Reply #760 on: December 05, 2012, 07:52:20 PM »
but you are ok with a woman forcing a man to have a kid he does not want?

wow

just wow

Explain for me how a woman can force a man to have a kid he does not want. Did you mean to say that in some cases women can expect and actually get child support for the kid the man helped produce? Men cannot "have" kids, that is physically not possible.

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Santorum: Obama has automatic cuts and tax hikes deal he likes
« Reply #761 on: December 05, 2012, 07:55:29 PM »
Rik Santorum said Obama won't budge from automatic deal.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/fiscal-cliff-budget-deadline/2012/12/05/id/466524

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Re: How many deaths due to laws tying man to an unwanted baby by selfish girl?
« Reply #762 on: December 05, 2012, 08:01:06 PM »
Explain for me how a woman can force a man to have a kid he does not want. Did you mean to say that in some cases women can expect and actually get child support for the kid the man helped produce? Men cannot "have" kids, that is physically not possible.

A woman chooses to get pregnant.

I think a man should have to sign something that he wants the kid.  The man owns his sperm.

Letting women simply carry the unwanted preg to baby status then ask for $$ from taxpayer or man when neither wanted the kid she selfishly had is silly.

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Club for growth head Chocola warns: Republicans who raise taxes will be replaced
« Reply #763 on: December 05, 2012, 08:03:14 PM »
Club for Growth's Chocola: Obama Has 'Perverted Sense of Fairness'

 Wednesday, 05 Dec 2012 06:51 PM

 By Jim Meyers and Kathleen Walter
Share:
 
 
 
 More . . .
A    A   |
    Email Us   |
    Print   |
    Forward Article


 
in
Share
 
 Club for Growth President Chris Chocola tells Newsmax that President Obama has a “perverted sense of fairness” when it comes to negotiations on the fiscal cliff, and may in fact want to drive the nation over that cliff.

 Chocola is also critical of House Speaker John Boehner’s fiscal cliff proposal, saying it increases the tax burden without spurring economic growth.

Story continues below video.



 And he warns that many people will be “very upset” if Republicans vote for tax increases and those lawmakers could face a primary challenge as a result.

 Club for Growth is a fiscally conservative political organization that supports a low-tax and limited-government agenda. Chocola became president of the group in 2009. Before that he served two terms as a U.S. congressman from Indiana.

 President Obama insists on raising taxes on wealthier Americans, but now says he is willing to consider cuts to entitlement programs. In an exclusive interview with Newsmax TV on Wednesday, Chocola was asked if he believes Obama really wants to compromise or is intent on taking the country over the fiscal cliff of tax hikes and mandatory spending cuts.

 “The president has a perverted sense of fairness. He wants to raise taxes on the top 2 percent or those earning over $250,000 even though the math doesn’t work,” he says.
 “If we do what the president wants us to do, we’d solve less than 8 percent of our annual deficit.

 “I’m not convinced that the president doesn’t want to go off the cliff. If he’s wedded to the political point of raising taxes just to say he did, he’s not living up to his responsibility to address the debt and the deficit.

 “I hope someone in Washington does and I hope it’s the Republicans that stand firm and not compromise to the point where they’re just simply engaging in a political act rather than a policy position that actually starts to get us down the road to fiscal sanity.”

 Speaker Boehner has put forth a fiscal cliff proposal that raises $800 billion in new revenue by closing loopholes and deductions but would not raise tax rates on top earners. The plan has come under fire from not just the White House but also some conservatives. Chocola disapproves of the plan as well.

 “From what I understand from the Boehner plan, it’s not pro-growth,” he says.

 “At the Club for Growth, we tend to judge things on whether it’s pro-growth or not. We’re fine with additional revenue that is derived from economic growth. If you had true pro-growth tax reform, the economy would grow and that would result in more revenue and that would be fine.

 “But Boehner’s proposal so far doesn’t have the pro-growth element of reducing marginal tax rates. It simply closes deductions, loopholes, credits, and that alone is anti-growth.
 You’re simply increasing the tax burden on Americans without any offset that would spur economic growth.

 “So I don’t think that his current proposal is something conservatives should support. But I hope there is a way the president and Congress can find to look at the problem as it exists and start to attack our debt and deficit.”

 Chocola was asked if his group would oppose any Republican who signs on to a deal that raises taxes.

 “Every race that we look at, we have to have a better alternative,” he responds.

 “If we challenge an incumbent, we want to make sure we’re for a stronger challenger and that [candidate] would be better at supporting a pro-growth agenda more consistently and more enthusiastically.

 “The reality is that if Republicans vote for tax increases, if they compromise on a solution that does nothing really to solve the fiscal challenges our country faces, then the Club for Growth’s going to be the least of their worries. A lot of Republicans, a lot of conservatives are going to be very disappointed in that. It will probably inspire people to run against those types of Republicans that aren’t willing to stand for the principles that Republicans are supposed to stand for.

 “We’ll look at those types of races but it’s going to be a lot more than the Club for Growth that they need to worry about because a lot of people will be very upset.”

 President Obama in a speech on Wednesday stressed the need to raise the debt ceiling, and [Treasury Secretary] Tim Geithner recently stated that debt ceiling powers should be taken away from Congress.

 Chocola comments: “I’m very worried if [Congress loses] those powers. It’s the responsibility of Congress and I don’t see any scenario in which Congress should give up that power.

 “We have to get responsible behavior in return for any increase in the debt ceiling. President Obama very much dislikes having to negotiate with Congress on anything, especially the debt ceiling. We have to get to a point where we don’t have to raise the debt ceiling anymore — in fact, we start to pay off our debt. And the only way you do that is through a pro-growth approach.

 “The thing that’s going to kill is our unfunded liabilities. We have over $80 trillion of unfunded liabilities, primarily in things like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. And it doesn’t seem that the president or the administration is all that serious about trying to tackle these things. He’s done nothing serious to do that.

 “So we’ve got a lot of challenges and it’s all very concerning because there doesn’t seem to be the political will to do the hard things. And really this fiscal cliff is a little bit of a bump in the road when you consider the bigger problems that we face with entitlements, and any solution to the fiscal cliff that does not start to address our entitlement problems and put reforms in place, then it’s really a very shortsighted approach and does nothing to solve the bigger problems that we all face.”

 In his exclusive Newsmax interview, Chocola also says it’s a “big mistake” for Speaker Boehner to remove several conservatives from committee seats — although their removal could prove to be “good news” in the end.

 And he explains why the Club for Growth does not support the Republican who plans to run in 2014 for the seat held by Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Club-for-Growth-Chocola-fiscal-cliff/2012/12/05/id/466660#ixzz2EF0fgPPl
 Important: Do You Still Support Obamacare? Vote Here Now!

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
tea party 2.0 when obama drives off fiscal cliff --norqist AWESOME cant wait
« Reply #764 on: December 05, 2012, 08:09:01 PM »
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/norquist-obama-tea-party/2012/12/04/id/466463

Norquist to Newsmax: Obama Taxing and Spending Will Resurrect Tea Party

 Tuesday, 04 Dec 2012 06:58 PM

 By Jim Meyers and Kathleen Walter
Share:
 
 
 
 More . . .
A    A   |
    Email Us   |
    Print   |
    Forward Article


 
0
in
Share
 
 Low-tax crusader Grover Norquist tells Newsmax that President Obama’s willingness to allow the country to go over the fiscal cliff could lead to a tea party resurrection.

 “Four years ago, Obama misunderstood his mandate. He said everybody’s voted for me and then he turned around and spent $800-plus billion on stimulus spending and then more money and more money and you had a tea party reaction and he lost the House of Representatives and went from 70 percent support to below 50.

 “Now we have a situation where the president gets re-elected by a smaller margin, then turns around and says well, everybody’s made me king so you have to do what I want, except in addition to spending too much money, which he did four years ago, he’s now going to have a trillion dollars in tax increases for healthcare. He wants $1.5 trillion on other tax increases.

 “And now we have this situation where Obama wants to have a series of regulations showering down on the American people, EPA and OSHA and others, which are very, very expensive and they’re all unpleasant surprises for small businesses.

 “The regulations, the taxes and the spending will generate tea party 2.0, much stronger than tea party 1.0 because it’s going to be deeper. It’s not just spending. It’s spending, taxes and regulations.”


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/norquist-obama-tea-party/2012/12/04/id/466463#ixzz2EF2JYzfc
 Important: Do You Still Support Obamacare? Vote Here Now!

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Obama care introduces Value Added Tax or VAT on medical devices
« Reply #765 on: December 05, 2012, 08:11:07 PM »
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/05/us-usa-tax-irs-idUSBRE8B41GW20121205

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/05/us-usa-tax-irs-idUSBRE8B41GW20121205

Reuters) - The U.S. Internal Revenue Service on Wednesday released final rules for a new tax on medical devices, products ranging from surgical sutures to knee replacement implants, that starts next year as part of President Barack Obama's 2010 healthcare law.

The 2.3-percent tax must be paid, effective after December 31, by device-makers on their gross sales. The tax is expected to raise $29 billion in government revenues through 2022

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42352
Re: How many deaths due to laws tying man to an unwanted baby by selfish girl?
« Reply #766 on: December 05, 2012, 08:21:59 PM »
A woman chooses to get pregnant.

I think a man should have to sign something that he wants the kid.  The man owns his sperm.

Letting women simply carry the unwanted preg to baby status then ask for $$ from taxpayer or man when neither wanted the kid she selfishly had is silly.

A woman cannot get pregnant without sperm, either from a donor who deposited it in a test tube or from a donor who deposits it in her vagina during sex with her.

What are you suggesting here? Are you suggesting there be a pregnancy termination squad that goes about terminating pregnancies in women when the men who fathered the child doesn't want it? Tell me how you think this would play out.

BTW, how many unwanted babies have you fathered? Are you paying the freight for these kids?

There is nothing you can say that will convince me or most other rational people that women have all the responsibility in a pregnancy whether it is wanted or not.

Incidentally, there are many men who actually want children. Obviously, you aren't one of them; which might be a good thing.  ;D

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Re: How many deaths due to laws tying man to an unwanted baby by selfish girl?
« Reply #767 on: December 05, 2012, 08:29:42 PM »
A woman cannot get pregnant without sperm, either from a donor who deposited it in a test tube or from a donor who deposits it in her vagina during sex with her.

What are you suggesting here? Are you suggesting there be a pregnancy termination squad that goes about terminating pregnancies in women when the men who fathered the child doesn't want it? Tell me how you think this would play out.

BTW, how many unwanted babies have you fathered? Are you paying the freight for these kids?

There is nothing you can say that will convince me or most other rational people that women have all the responsibility in a pregnancy whether it is wanted or not.

Incidentally, there are many men who actually want children. Obviously, you aren't one of them; which might be a good thing.  ;D

Please re read my points and answer them.

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
can privately owned automated factories produce all the worlds goods?
« Reply #768 on: December 05, 2012, 08:41:31 PM »
is this impossible

I dont think so.

I find it interesting that more of production is not automated.

Housing for sure should be factory created now with production line and interchangable parts.

Henry ford was realy more awesome the more I study his stuff, along with deming who said refine the process dont focus on emplyee mistakes to move to 0 defects.

Just amazing what would happen if these things were spread.

What are the counterforces to such progress??

politics
unions
corps who want houses to remain expensive
individuals who want houses to remain expensive
etc

Why would be treat a desktop computer like a store of value to ever go up in price as it ages....

seems silly yet we do that for houses

how many wars would be avoided if the energy put into mass prodcing housing so everyone happy and not crammed agaisnt one another???

food for thought getbig

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42352
Re: How many deaths due to laws tying man to an unwanted baby by selfish girl?
« Reply #769 on: December 05, 2012, 08:54:36 PM »

I think a man should have to sign something that he wants the kid.  The man owns his sperm.


When a man intends to give up that sperm he owns by depositing it in a woman's vagina, the woman should refuse his gift until he signs something legally binding saying he will help raise any resulting children. This answers what I think is your only point.

Incidentally, a woman "owns" her egg, which is nothing more than just an egg until the man's sperm fertilizes it.

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Re: can privately owned automated factories produce all the worlds goods?
« Reply #770 on: December 05, 2012, 08:56:33 PM »
Imagine for example if 30million unemplyed now were all hired to work at producing mass produced housing.

WOW 600,000 people in each state producing mass produced housing

madcap amount of productivity




magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
If democrats are smarter, why can't we see Obama's admissions docs?
« Reply #771 on: December 05, 2012, 09:04:00 PM »
LOL

nuked another dem idea back into stone age

damn I deserve free beer for this one


magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
do japan and china allow USA to have factories there? for sale there?
« Reply #772 on: December 05, 2012, 09:20:21 PM »
anyone know?

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Re: Magikusar's daily/weekly musings
« Reply #773 on: December 05, 2012, 09:30:50 PM »
I think sterilize all women at 12.

Then b4 baby must have man sign.

simple

Primemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42352
Re: Magikusar's daily/weekly musings
« Reply #774 on: December 05, 2012, 11:29:25 PM »
I think sterilize all women at 12.

Then b4 baby must have man sign.

simple

You are sinking into that all too familiar hole where you are no longer able to have lucid thoughts.

Here's the thing. If you sterilize all girls before they've become fertile, they can't get pregnant even if the man signs his name in blood or semen.

Simply stupid.