|
FitnessFrenzy
|
 |
« Reply #2225 on: December 23, 2012, 03:35:57 PM » |
|
this is hillarious  cant stop laughing merry christmas, buddy.  |
|
|
|
|
deceiver
Getbig IV
Gender: 
Posts: 1685
onetimehard appreciation team
|
|
« Reply #2226 on: December 23, 2012, 04:32:51 PM » |
|
I abused for 16 weeks on less than a grm combined on everything. I do go on small doses for longer periods. When I come off, I don't lose much. Right now I'm using GH for the first time in my life (3iu day) and 1/2cc prop per week. It's perfect for me. Sorry if I got a little bent. I might have misunderstood your intention.
With all due respect, what the fuck is this whole "gram combined of everything" about? I mean, very concept of combining dosages in miligrams of various drugs is fucking idiotic. I came across this "idea" for the first time on american boards and unlike most of the knowledge you could get from here it doesnt make any sense at all. Same goes for "cc". It's volume of oil, nothing more. I've seen all kinds of different concentrations ranging from 25mg per ml to 150mg per ml, so saying "I take 1cc ew" gives no information whatsoever. |
|
|
|
|
|
njflex
|
|
« Reply #2227 on: December 23, 2012, 06:21:55 PM » |
|
great pics all last few here,,,like galieneko only few left here who could post at any time current shape rest are resting on past laurels,,,other posters who give there opinions pro or con its there choice not to post one,,,but if u o post pic should be current or at least few yrs anything 5 or more yrs is kinda what's the point if u aren't near that build/look...
|
$
|
|
|
|
BILL ANVIL
|
|
« Reply #2228 on: December 23, 2012, 07:16:55 PM » |
|
faawwk, meso is thick. BUILT. thats real muscle, not inflated with ped's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mesmorph78
|
|
« Reply #2229 on: December 23, 2012, 07:27:02 PM » |
|
thanks bro
thats 11 years of heavy lifting
|
choice is an illusion
|
|
|
Lobstah
Getbig II
Gender: 
Posts: 222
|
|
« Reply #2230 on: December 23, 2012, 09:17:29 PM » |
|
really good legs... ill ever have that calf development .. blackman calves Sigh. Me too. I have that Dennis-Wolf-deformed look to my stupid calves. |
|
|
|
|
|
mesmorph78
|
|
« Reply #2231 on: December 23, 2012, 09:35:09 PM » |
|
Sigh. Me too. I have that Dennis-Wolf-deformed look to my stupid calves.
So it go sista... Better for sprinting |
choice is an illusion
|
|
|
|
Go 4 It
|
|
« Reply #2232 on: December 23, 2012, 10:43:22 PM » |
|
After prejudging from my competition..
|
4
|
|
|
|
TrueBB93
|
|
« Reply #2233 on: December 23, 2012, 10:48:16 PM » |
|
After prejudging from my competition..
looking good man, but whats with the sad face lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
arce1988
|
|
« Reply #2234 on: December 23, 2012, 11:40:07 PM » |
|
I have tried almost every PED now I just use Test Enan 250mg per week I would use SHGH 365 if it were not so costly in this economy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jadeveon Clowney
|
|
« Reply #2235 on: December 24, 2012, 12:13:04 AM » |
|
I have tried almost every PED now I just use Test Enan 250mg per week
maybe now it's time to try every recreational drug? |
|
|
|
|
|
Chiro Flex
|
|
« Reply #2236 on: December 24, 2012, 01:33:48 AM » |
|
I have tried almost every PED now I just use Test Enan 250mg per week I would use SHGH 365 if it were not so costly in this economy
PED |
|
|
|
|
NO ABSENCE OF MUSCLE
Time Out
Getbig II
Posts: 206
|
|
« Reply #2237 on: December 24, 2012, 01:45:48 AM » |
|
PED
you must be the most boring and predictable poster in the history of getbig....you are such a waste of space....time to move on to MD you thong sniffer |
|
|
|
|
|
njflex
|
|
« Reply #2238 on: December 24, 2012, 06:15:47 AM » |
|
After prejudging from my competition..
look great good job ,,right build for men's physique.... |
$
|
|
|
|
mesmorph78
|
|
« Reply #2239 on: December 24, 2012, 06:36:36 AM » |
|
After prejudging from my competition..
Good build |
choice is an illusion
|
|
|
Lobstah
Getbig II
Gender:
Posts: 222
|
|
« Reply #2240 on: December 24, 2012, 12:08:40 PM » |
|
So it go sista... Better for sprinting AGREED |
|
|
|
|
|
mesmorph78
|
|
« Reply #2241 on: December 24, 2012, 12:14:46 PM » |
|
AGREED
looking good... and yeah we def have the same kinda calves |
choice is an illusion
|
|
|
|
wild willie
|
|
« Reply #2242 on: December 24, 2012, 02:27:07 PM » |
|
You clowns who bitch about drugs are hilarious. lol. If you don't want to compete bodybuilding then don't take the shit, if you compete and don't use, be prepared to get laughed off the stage. What is "drug abuse"? how much do you actually think I was taking and what? Don't make accusations you're not prepared to back.
[/quote X2.... Excellent post!! |
|
|
|
|
|
Primemuscle
|
|
« Reply #2243 on: December 24, 2012, 02:50:47 PM » |
|
ok, calves are bit soso, but the legs and ass make up for it all the way  full hetero  It is so interesting that it is common on this board for people (men) posting bodybuilding related assessments and observations about other men to use a sexual qualifier. In this case "full hetero" and often the term "no homo" as if that clears them of any innuendo of possibly being gay. Why does it not go without saying that when someone who is interested in the technicalities of bodybuilding, usually for comparative personal reasons, is not posting a homosexual come-on? Personally, it seems more "homo" than "hetero" to think others would take the posts anything more than it is on face value. Do gay men generally converse about other men's calf, quad and glute development in such a manner? |
|
|
|
|
Lobstah
Getbig II
Gender:
Posts: 222
|
|
« Reply #2244 on: December 24, 2012, 03:02:05 PM » |
|
ok, calves are bit soso, but the legs and ass make up for it all the way full hetero I am flattered and we are in lurrrve, but c'mon Gale, you know those calves are way more pathetic than "so-so" haha. |
|
|
|
|
|
SF1900
|
|
« Reply #2245 on: December 24, 2012, 03:11:30 PM » |
|
It is so interesting that it is common on this board for people (men) posting bodybuilding related assessments and observations about other men to use a sexual qualifier. In this case "full hetero" and often the term "no homo" as if that clears them of any innuendo of possibly being gay. Why does it not go without saying that when someone who is interested in the technicalities of bodybuilding, usually for comparative personal reasons, is not posting a homosexual come-on?
Personally, it seems more "homo" than "hetero" to think others would take the posts anything more than it is on face value. Do gay men generally converse about other men's calf, quad and glute development in such a manner?
Holy shit, will you seriously shut the fuck up for once? I thought Vince Goodrum was an annoying poster. But you are in a league of your own. |
|
|
|
|
|
Primemuscle
|
|
« Reply #2246 on: December 24, 2012, 03:15:10 PM » |
|
Holy shit, will you seriously shut the fuck up for once? I thought Vince Goodrum was an annoying poster. But you are in a league of your own.
- Happy to oblige. Oh, and not by shutting up, but by continuing to annoy you. |
|
|
|
|
|
SF1900
|
|
« Reply #2247 on: December 24, 2012, 03:20:55 PM » |
|
- Happy to oblige. Oh, and not by shutting up, but by continuing to annoy you. Every single one of your posts is of a serious nature. You try to be some giant intellectual on here, by questioning, and posting your idiotic responses. People write "no homo" or "full hetero" (as gelenicko did) because its Getbig lingo. No fucking shit writing "no homo" doesn't mean someone is or is not gay. But thank you for questioning this, because we would have all been so lost. I seriously thought that typing "no homo" actually disqualified anyone from being gay  In your attempt to be intellectual, you actually come off sounding like an idiot, when 99% of the board knows that writing "no homo" is GB lingo, and not to be taken seriously. |
|
|
|
|
|
polychronopolous
|
|
« Reply #2248 on: December 24, 2012, 03:22:16 PM » |
|
It is so interesting that it is common on this board for people (men) posting bodybuilding related assessments and observations about other men to use a sexual qualifier. In this case "full hetero" and often the term "no homo" as if that clears them of any innuendo of possibly being gay. Why does it not go without saying that when someone who is interested in the technicalities of bodybuilding, usually for comparative personal reasons, is not posting a homosexual come-on?
Personally, it seems more "homo" than "hetero" to think others would take the posts anything more than it is on face value. Do gay men generally converse about other men's calf, quad and glute development in such a manner?
Prime, I think this is more of a generational gap type thing. While I am sure you never hear long time friends of yours use it, the phrase "no homo" is used in everyday language by 20 and 30 somethings all over this country. Not necessarily just on this board. Just trying to help ya out brotha, you know I am one of your biggest fans. (No homo) |
|
|
|
|
|
arce1988
|
|
« Reply #2249 on: December 24, 2012, 03:39:11 PM » |
|
Synthetic Human Growth Hormone
|
|
|
|
|
|
