1. Bro, you are losing it...... yes you did (ask).. Check^^^^^^
Huh? Are you high? I agreed with you that I asked.
2. They should, cause it's faith that brings them to God
Their faith brings them to believe in something that they cannot explain? Then what good is their belief?
3. Can you explain "what's before time"
The question "what's before time" is meaningless - the very words you use imply a causal relationship that only exists when there is a temporal progression.
"where did matter come from"
There are theories, but to answer your question, no I cannot explain it. But so what? I don't have to
believe in matter - I can see it all around me; I can touch it; I can even smell it. Are you seriously suggesting that the answer "I cannot answer the question X" is irrational?
'If the universe is expanding (time, space and matter) what is it expanding into?
You misunderstand what the term 'expanding' refers to in this context. I don't blame you - it is a difficult concept to understand. We can discuss this topic, but I need to know what level physics have you taken and what are you comfortable with, so I can explain things appropriately.
There is nothing rational about any of this, hence can't be explained in a manner that makes sense.
That's simply not true. You may
believe there's nothing rational in any of this. But, as we've established, beliefs don't carry a whole lot of weight.
The definition of infinite is not rational, neither is the term " an infinite regression" you know the one you like to throw around a lot.
Actually, depending on the context of the use, the definition of infinite can be perfectly rational. For example, there are infinitely many natural numbers. There are also infinitely many real numbers. And, get this, there are more real numbers than there are natural numbers! In mathematical jargon, the natural numbers are countably infinite while the real numbers are uncountably infinite. While concepts such as these can be confusing, they are, I assure you, perfectly rational.
Now, I agree that an infinite regress (please note, it's
regress, not regression - there is a difference) is irrational and I've never once proposed that (or supported a solution that advocates) an infinite regress as a solution to anything. So I'm a little confused as to why you would bring this up as an argument against my position?
4. unless you have the answere's you have no choice but to a agree with me that no explanation for the existense of the universe can be explained in a manner the human brain can grasp, so let's agree to disagree,... I don't think so.
That's a ridiculous assertion. So if we can't explain something
right now it means that it
cannot be explained in a manner than the human brain can grasp? There was a time when lightning couldn't be explained. There was a time when rain couldn't be explained. There was a time when eclipses couldn't be explained. Yet, all those things are now well understood.
You seem to operate under the misconception that it is the job of science to answer
every question. That is wrong. It doesn't have to, and it doesn't
need to.
