Lets comment on what happened kid NOT what might of happened , we KNOW what happened and your imaginary scenario did NOT. NO innocent people were hurt just two degenerates assholes.
Again stick the ' hypothetical ' up your ass. lets talk facts. Facts are two thugs shot in custody no innocent people hurt. You don't like facts which is why you're clinging to what could have happened 
You're taking a risk by NOT doing anything but seeing you're a victim you'll do that. I won't.
Way to speak for me jackass , NO I don't think pulling out a gun solves everything , what it does do is evens the odds , I now have a fuck-of-a-better chance at living that just hoping they're in a good mood and wont kill me. Pulling out a gun increases my odds of living and not being a victim and it's a fuck of a lot better than bending over like you
His did didn't it? no victims , no innocent people hurt , two degenerates in jail all's well that ends well.
The risk of innocent people getting hurt were already through the roof when two morons walked in with a baseball bat and a gun. Your victim mentality keeps wanting to shift the blame do the innocent guy with the gun. They put everyone at risk NOT him. And again stupid you're more than willing to play the chances on they wont hurt anyone as long as they get what they want , but balk at the idea of someone taking a chance on killing them before they kill you because something might go wrong
He didn't make it worse what he did do is make it better , we know this for a FACT fuck what could have happened we know what did happen.
Nothing to do with balls it has everything to do with NOT being a victim , NOT taking chances and NOT want to be robbed. It's not bravado it's not wanting to take a chance ( like you ) with my life.
Alright, I think our discussion basically boils down to this:
My argument:Assuming that most robbery victims who don't put up a fight don't get shot or lethally injured are better off just accepting that they're about to lose their wallet, cell phone etcetc. If you don't put up a fight, you'll have a good chance of escaping relatively unharmed from the ordeal. Forcing the attacker to fight or flee will most likely result in someone getting seriously hurt or die.
My argument is also assuming that what
really matters is your own life and the well being of victims in the vicinity.
Your argument:Everyone should have use their right to defend themselves at any time, even though that might start a gunfight. Victims are very likely to die if they don't fight back. Because the attacker initiated hostility any additional risk added by the victim is irrelevant. The victim will improve his chances of surviving
enormously by fighting back. The attacker/robber almost always loses such a conflict.
Your argument also assumes that fighting back means you're not a bitch.
Lets just accept that we view this from entirely different perspectives.
