Lunatic kills 12 at 'Dark Knight Rises' screening in Colorado

[NarcissisticDeity]

Not only that, but you dont stake your life on trying to guess his assumptions, you automatically assume the worst in that situation and react accordingly.

Exactly , let's just hope for the best  I hope these people don't have families that rely on them for protection.

[Raymondo]

How do I know what the robber's intentions were?  how do you know what they weren't? and I already answered the question, someone running at you with a mask on firing a gun in your direction doesn't care if you live

we can speculate all day on what their intentions were but the law allows people who feel in danger for their lives to stop the threat and that's what he did.

But we're not talking about speculation here, are we?

You asserted with almighty certainy that the gun SAVED HIS LIFE.

Backpedalling, wanker?

[NarcissisticDeity]

But we're not talking about speculation here, are we?

You asserted with almighty certainy that the gun SAVED HIS LIFE.

Backpedalling, wanker?

Was he also firing an ' automatic assault rifle ' ? 

and it did people were firing at him and if he didn't fire back he would be dead. We know they were firing at him cased closed , you can't argue that. here's a hint when people are firing a gun at you they don't care if you live of die. 

[dr.chimps]

But we're not talking about speculation here, are we?

You asserted with almighty certainy that the gun SAVED HIS LIFE.

Backpedalling, wanker?

Wasting your time. Americans have long ago accepted these kinds of events as the price they are willing to pay for the availability of firearms. It was, after all, a country formed and shaped by revolution.    

[Shockwave]

I wasn't even criticising the owner's choice to fire back. Just ND's (must stand for Delusional Nutsack only backwards) ability to judge criminal intentions

HTH

Ah. Fair enough.

[Raymondo]

Was he also firing an ' automatic assault rifle ' ?  

and it did people were firing at him and if he didn't fire back he would be dead. We know they were firing at him cased closed , you can't argue that. here's a hint when people are firing a gun at you they don't care if you live of die.  

For all you know the kid could have been shooting at a door. The video doesn't show.

Keep clinging to your guns, old man. Must be a convenient source of virility for you 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Wasting your time. Americans have long ago accepted these kinds of events as the price they are willing to pay for the availability of firearms. It was, after all, a country formed and shaped by revolution.    

These event's aren't acceptable and would happen regardless if firearms weren't available to anyone at any time.

[Raymondo]

here's a hint when people are firing a gun at you they don't care if you live of die.  

Well knock me down with a feather.

Care to explain to me what makes you qualified to make such a statement?

Have you ever been in a "situation"?

I thought you've only "fired at paper".

[NarcissisticDeity]

For all you know the kid could have been shooting at a door. The video doesn't show.

Keep clinging to your guns, old man. Must be a convenient source of virility for you 

For all you know he could have been shooting at a human. The video doesn't show that. how about we comment on what we do know. They all had guns and started a home invasion with firing into a home ,  that's grounds to protect yourself.

We can talk hypotheticals all day , what if he was shooting at a door and a child was standing behind it? let's talk about what happened they invaded his home and he stopped it via firearms , you can't argue that

[NarcissisticDeity]

Well knock me down with a feather.

Care to explain to me what makes you qualified to make such a statement?

Have you ever been in a "situation"?

I thought you've only "fired at paper".

LMFAO they law states that , dummy. If you feel in fear for your life and the life of others you have the right to use lethal force. A man invading your home firing at gun into it is textbook example of the legal right to use lethal force.

[CAPTAIN INSANO]

[Raymondo]

For all you know he could have been shooting at a human. The video doesn't show that. how about we comment on what we do know. They all had guns and started a home invasion with firing into a home ,  that's grounds to protect yourself.

We can talk hypotheticals all day , what if he was shooting at a door and a child was standing behind it? let's talk about what happened they invaded his home and he stopped it via firearms , you can't argue that

But I wasn't contesting the owner's right to defend himself, you moron- haven't I already said this?

What I was contesting is your certainty as to those people's intentions- because you created an interpretation of what you think "happened" and manipulated it to assert that the owner's gun saved his life.

Stay on point or shut up, you fossil.

[Raymondo]

LMFAO they law states that , dummy. If you feel in fear for your life and the life of others you have the right to use lethal force. A man invading your home firing at gun into it is textbook example of the legal right to use lethal force.

LOLOL you must be getting really desperate, your replies are getting more and more irrelevant. Ignoratio elenchi galore!

Have you ever been shot at? Does paper fire back?

What the fuck could you possibly know about what goes on in a real gunfight?

[NarcissisticDeity]

But I wasn't contesting the owner's right to defend himself, you moron- haven't I already said this?

What I was contesting is your certainty as to those people's intentions- because you manipulated an interpretation of what you think "happened" to assert that that the owner's gun saved his life.

Stay on point or shut up, you fossil.

And I told you about the certainty of their intentions using the legal definition. You don't know what their intentions were either but assumed they may have been just shooting at a door  assuming that they might not have been really shooting at a human  you're a hypocrite and not a very bright one at that

A group of thugs start off a home invasion by firing into a guy's home they guy returns fire and stops the home invasion but we're wrong in claiming the firearm saved his life LMFAO what school of logic did you attend?

kid go away

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOLOL you must be getting really desperate, your replies are getting more and more irrelevant. Ignoratio elenchi galore!

Have you ever been shot at? Does paper fire back?

What the fuck could you possibly know about what goes on in a real gunfight?

Irrelevant? hypocrite wanna bring up Dorian and Ronnie again?  or your ad hominem attacks in every post? like I said you're boring and not very bright

[Raymondo]

And I told you about the certainty of their intentions using the legal definition. You don't know what their intentions were either but assumed they may have been just shooting at a door   assuming that they might not have been really shooting at a human   you're a hypocrite and not a very bright one at that

I haven't been assuming shit, gramps- you started this, remember?

A group of thugs start off a home invasion by firing into a guy's home they guy returns fire and stops the home invasion but we're wrong in claiming the firearm saved his life LMFAO what school of logic did you attend?

Haha nice inversion- except that's not all there was into it, was it?

Again, how do you know these guys were shooting to kill? You keep evading this in every possible way.

You don't know, you just made it up. Because it serves your purpose. Because you own a gun. And you just have to be right on this 

Haha, wanker.

[Raymondo]

Irrelevant? hypocrite wanna bring up Dorian and Ronnie again?  or your ad hominem attacks in every post? like I said you're boring and not very bright

Nothing wrong with ad-hominem. Some people just ask for it. Schmoes will get it from me in every way.

Again, ND.

Have you ever been in a firefight?

Do paper targets shoot back?

[The True Adonis]

Nothing wrong with ad-hominem. Some people just ask for it. Schmoes will get it from me in every way.

Again, ND.

Have you ever been in a firefight?

Do paper targets shoot back?

Why should someone have to be involved in a gunfight before he or she can decide the proper course of action to take with a firearm?  

Doesn`t really make any logical sense.  

[The True Adonis]

I wasn't even criticising the owner's choice to fire back. Just ND's (must stand for Delusional Nutsack only backwards) ability to judge criminal intentions

HTH

In NC, you don`t have to wait for someone to commit a crime on your property before you blast them.  If you merely THINK they are going to commit a felony, (about to break into your house, car or outbuildings or fight you), you have full rights to shoot them.  Its called the Castle Doctrine here.

[Raymondo]

Why should someone have to be involved in a gunfight before he or she can decide the proper course of action to take with a firearm?  

Doesn`t really make any logical sense.  

I wrote that in response to ND's quote:

"here's a hint when people are firing a gun at you they don't care if you live of die.  "

I assume a person qualified to make such a statement about what people mean to do when firing guns in general directions, must at least have some real world gun fight experience... no?

Or maybe you cunts have been watching too many John Wayne movies

[The True Adonis]

In NC, this also extends to your workplace.  You can shoot anyone about to commit a felony at your workplace as well.

[The True Adonis]

I wrote that in response to ND's quote:

"here's a hint when people are firing a gun at you they don't care if you live of die.  "

I assume a person qualified to make such a statement about what people mean to do when firing guns in general directions, must at least have some real world gun fight experience... no?

Or maybe you cunts have been watching too many John Wayne movies

Your point?

[Raymondo]

In NC, this also extends to your workplace.  You can shoot anyone about to commit a felony at your workplace as well.

Oh yeah? Sofuckingwhat? Could there be any States that take a different view?

[Raymondo]

Your point?

That you should have stayed in school longer.
Assuming you went there in the first place.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I haven't been assuming shit, gramps- you started this, remember?

Haha nice inversion- except that's not all there was into it, was it?

Again, how do you know these guys were shooting to kill? You keep evading this in every possible way.

You just don't know, you made it up. Because it served your purpose. Because you own a gun. And you just have to be right on this

Haha, wanker.

I haven't been assuming shit, gramps- you started this, remember?

Sure you have when you assumed they might just be shooting at a door  or assumed we don't know their intentions.

Again, how do you know these guys were shooting to kill? You keep evading this in every possible way.

I don't have to know , and again how do you know they weren't? and it doesn't matter either way because the law allows you do defend yourself in this type of situation , the LAW assumes anyone running at you firing a gun is an imminent threat , so you're fuck either way. 

You just don't know, you made it up. Because it served your purpose. Because you own a gun. And you just have to be right on this

Wrong see above , legally anyone invading your home firing a weapon is assumed a threat. regardless of what their ' true intentions ' might be