1. A healthy heart, even at 14, shouldn´t stop from drinking this
2. Minors are not responsible for what they do in most cases
3. Parents are responsible for the freedom they give their child
so says Dr Dutch, progressive liberal
She didn't have a healthy heart, though. Some type of congenital defect.
And she's a minor, who had free reign to purchase this at the corner store.
So she's too young to understand the ramifications of her actions, the drink is retailed and marketed directly to kids...seriously, parents can't totally fight every marketer.
I'm not saying outlaw the drinks. Far from it. But should they be so easily purchased? Perhaps you should have to present ID to purchase?
I hate a nanny state. But I wonder sometimes if we need one, what with greedy marketers pushing the envelope further and further to drum up business with a younger target market than ever.
That said, the other side of my brain wrestles with the hypocrisy of my above statement. She could have just as easily killed herself with a few good strong cups of coffee from Dunkin Donuts. So should we outlaw that? Make kids present ID before they buy coffee? How about making kids show ID before they buy peanuts, in case they're allergic...
I'm not sure what my point is here. Just the feckless meanderings of a wandering mind starved for debate.