|
Johnny Falcon
|
 |
« on: November 14, 2012, 07:59:10 AM » |
|
im doing a squat workout with 135 im getting good depth but i find a hole lot less friction on knees if i dont do all the way up.. this tennds to get a good pump along the back glutes and legs. ive always had great quads but nothing showing on hams, im also a shitty jumper aswell
I got 29 reps rest paused, probably coulda done more but im trying out another poundcake recipe i have in the oven (eggless)
|
A-FREE-CAN
|
|
|
|
Johnny Falcon
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2012, 08:02:14 AM » |
|
squats=stauqs
stalks=legs
stalks are also good for stalking fine assed hoes
|
A-FREE-CAN
|
|
|
|
Purge_WTF
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2012, 08:33:04 AM » |
|
I read that you take the stress off of the muscles and put it onto the joints when you straighten your legs/arms during he rep. Stands to reason.
|
Psalm 23.
|
|
|
|
Jadeveon Clowney
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2012, 08:34:30 AM » |
|
im doing a squat workout with 135 im getting good depth but i find a hole lot less friction on knees if i dont do all the way up.. this tennds to get a good pump along the back glutes and legs. ive always had great quads but nothing showing on hams, im also a shitty jumper aswell
I got 29 reps rest paused, probably coulda done more but im trying out another poundcake recipe i have in the oven (eggless)
why are you not working?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tito24
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2012, 08:35:42 AM » |
|
all the way on her knees 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jadeveon Clowney
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2012, 08:40:45 AM » |
|
baking and squatting = nwt orking
nwt orking = not working!
|
|
|
|
|
|
da_vinci
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2012, 09:24:57 AM » |
|
all the way on her knees  Geez.. Is there more of her?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chiro Flex
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2012, 09:29:01 AM » |
|
I've always felt the last 1/8th of the movement is not really necessary for squats. Its all hip flexors at that point. The negative portion where your ass is in the hole is the sweet spot. Same goes for DB flyes, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
anabolichalo
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2012, 09:31:46 AM » |
|
if you care about your back stay away from squats
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chiro Flex
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2012, 09:32:57 AM » |
|
if you care about your back, do squats properly.
Fixed to correct retarded bro-logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
anabolichalo
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2012, 09:33:57 AM » |
|
Fixed to correct retarded bro-logic.
ok 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donny
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2012, 09:34:38 AM » |
|
I've always felt the last 1/8th of the movement is not really necessary for squats. Its all hip flexors at that point. The negative portion where your ass is in the hole is the sweet spot. Same goes for DB flyes, etc.
I find parallel is best with squats but i have also got good results from partial squats. Db flyes....i agree but i like to bring the Bells together and squeeze and i am sure it helps. Coming up and stopping just before lockout is brutal(squats).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tapeworm
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2012, 09:36:55 AM » |
|
Geez.. Is there more of her?
Google jr hs naked.
|
|
|
|
|
magikusar
Time Out
Getbig IV

Posts: 2837
Team Ayn Rand
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2012, 09:38:05 AM » |
|
im doing a squat workout with 135 im getting good depth but i find a hole lot less friction on knees if i dont do all the way up.. this tennds to get a good pump along the back glutes and legs. ive always had great quads but nothing showing on hams, im also a shitty jumper aswell
I got 29 reps rest paused, probably coulda done more but im trying out another poundcake recipe i have in the oven (eggless)
do bodyweight squats but try touching knuckles behind or at heels at bottom part of combat conditioning course by soem bald guy my legs didnt let me walk for 4 days after 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chiro Flex
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2012, 09:38:15 AM » |
|
ok  Prove me wrong with some scientific literature if you feel strongly enough, I'd love to hear another view than what they teach us in grad school in the USA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
anabolichalo
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2012, 10:52:24 AM » |
|
Prove me wrong with some scientific literature if you feel strongly enough, I'd love to hear another view than what they teach us in grad school in the USA.
plenty of people who squat with PERFECT form manage to one day get major back injury with even a light weight using perfect form
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chiro Flex
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2012, 11:01:04 AM » |
|
plenty of people who squat with PERFECT form manage to one day get major back injury with even a light weight using perfect form
"Plenty of people" who have never touched a weight in their life manage to develop chronic low back pain and associated pathologies as well. Everyone who drinks water, also eventually dies. There is nothing biomechanically compromising to your spinal erectors by going through flexion/extension under an appropriate load. Your body was designed for it. In fact, as an almost graduate with a doctorate in my field, I'm entirely convinced that squatting and dead lifting with proper form would alleviate many, many symptoms of chronic lower back pain and would help to further stabilize the spinal column. Like I said, please correct me if you have literature suggesting otherwise. This "squats are dangerous" nonsense is crazy talk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
anabolichalo
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2012, 11:08:59 AM » |
|
"Plenty of people" who have never touched a weight in their life manage to develop chronic low back pain and associated pathologies as well.
Everyone who drinks water, also eventually dies.
There is nothing biomechanically compromising to your spinal erectors by going through flexion/extension under an appropriate load. Your body was designed for it. In fact, as an almost graduate with a doctorate in my field, I'm entirely convinced that squatting and dead lifting with proper form would alleviate many, many symptoms of chronic lower back pain and would help to further stabilize the spinal column. Like I said, please correct me if you have literature suggesting otherwise. This "squats are dangerous" nonsense is crazy talk.
believe what you want i dont give 2 shits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chiro Flex
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2012, 11:16:24 AM » |
|
believe what you want
i dont give 2 shits
Last point brother... So many of the spinal dysfunction issues we see can be correlated directly to improper muscular balance (weak glutes, hams, erectors, abdominal muscles). It makes sense that strengthening these through the proper movements would eliminate many of the issues we see and restore proper function to these joints. Also, you need to cut out heme-iron from your diet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
anabolichalo
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2012, 11:22:28 AM » |
|
Last point brother...
So many of the spinal dysfunction issues we see can be correlated directly to improper muscular balance (weak glutes, hams, erectors, abdominal muscles). It makes sense that strengthening these through the proper movements would eliminate many of the issues we see and restore proper function to these joints.
Also, you need to cut out heme-iron from your diet.
squats and deadlifts actually cause this imbalance so that makes sense no amount of crunches is going to make up for the massive imbalance in force couples these moves generate anyway to win olympia you only need big arms
|
|
|
|
|
|
_bruce_
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: November 14, 2012, 11:34:37 AM » |
|
"Plenty of people" who have never touched a weight in their life manage to develop chronic low back pain and associated pathologies as well.
Everyone who drinks water, also eventually dies.
There is nothing biomechanically compromising to your spinal erectors by going through flexion/extension under an appropriate load. Your body was designed for it. In fact, as an almost graduate with a doctorate in my field, I'm entirely convinced that squatting and dead lifting with proper form would alleviate many, many symptoms of chronic lower back pain and would help to further stabilize the spinal column. Like I said, please correct me if you have literature suggesting otherwise. This "squats are dangerous" nonsense is crazy talk.

|
[
|
|
|
|
a_ahmed
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: November 14, 2012, 11:36:19 AM » |
|
ATG squats = full movement = winning
|
|
|
|
|
|
anabolichalo
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: November 14, 2012, 11:45:14 AM » |
|
ATG squats = full movement = winning
most people over 5'8" or so are not built for it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chiro Flex
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: November 14, 2012, 12:03:28 PM » |
|
squats and deadlifts actually cause this imbalance so that makes sense
no amount of crunches is going to make up for the massive imbalance in force couples these moves generate
anyway to win olympia you only need big arms
False bro
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chiro Flex
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: November 14, 2012, 12:05:50 PM » |
|
ATG squats = full movement = winning
Yes, this.
|
|
|
|
|
|