Author Topic: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?  (Read 23637 times)

Jack T. Cross

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4098
  • Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #175 on: December 18, 2012, 06:32:31 PM »
Trade names- Colt is AR-15, Bushmaster's Tradename is XM-15. AR-15 has become like Kleenex, it's more or less a common trade name, internally they're the same.

Now Sear design is what separates the miltary versions from the civilan versions, full auto vs. Semi auto.

You nailed it.


Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #176 on: December 18, 2012, 06:35:06 PM »
This is basically an AR-15






The rest of it is just add on to make it look Mean or slick, or badass whatever your taste is at the time



Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #177 on: December 18, 2012, 06:36:48 PM »
This

 


Plus BLING  your bling of the week







Jack T. Cross

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4098
  • Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #178 on: December 18, 2012, 06:37:52 PM »
Option Bravo.

It's really a cosmetic thing, some people classify all military looking rifles as "assault weapons" regardless of the actual implications of that word. There is no real difference between a .223 hunting rifle and a .223 Ar-15 aside from cosmetics.

So this is what these pinheads are talking about banning.

Jack T. Cross

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4098
  • Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #179 on: December 18, 2012, 06:47:16 PM »
This

 


Plus BLING  your bling of the week








Looks fucking BAD ASS, no doubt about it.

Heywood

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1396
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #180 on: December 18, 2012, 06:54:34 PM »
gun porn......

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #181 on: December 18, 2012, 06:56:22 PM »
gun porn......
Indeed.
I particularly like this one.


Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #182 on: December 18, 2012, 07:01:04 PM »
Loved to get a TONY MONTANA SCARFACE M16 Lookalike AR15 with Granade Launcher (Flare launcher cus Granade launcher isnt allowed for civilians)





 



orion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1782
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #183 on: December 18, 2012, 08:03:04 PM »
Im still skeptical of the every-evolving story. Originally the AR was locked in the car, he was let into the school (sounds more likely than the new story) and he shot the kids with a glock and a sig. This was accepted for several days.

Then all the sudden the narrative changed and he used the AR and blasted his way past the new security system (a door that you have to be buzzed by, probably metal with shatterproof glas) and layed everyone out with the AR. Next thing you know, AWB ban bill being introduced (which they've been wanting to do for a while).

I'm not one to be highly skeptical of reporters... but seriously, wtf.

He went through the glass that was beside the door.  Lot of conflicting reports early on.  Fog of war. I guess.

orion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1782
Re: private guard at school should be armed, no more gunman vs unarmed mass
« Reply #184 on: December 18, 2012, 08:05:46 PM »
well sure, they'll get discharged and then immediately go join Xe/Academi services or whatever firm gets the contracts and earn 5 or 600 amercican tax dollars a day doing it  :-\  

Well, if there was armed security present maybe things would be different, maybe.   lol complaining about tax dollars, what's your kids life worth?

cart@@n

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #185 on: December 18, 2012, 08:57:52 PM »

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #186 on: December 18, 2012, 09:02:20 PM »
schools spend millions.  every classroom has tens of thousands in computer gear.  most schools in FL now have a $40k "smart board" in their rooms.  

There are staff members, assistants, supervisors, 'specialists' and a few people at every school that just bounce around looking busy.

High schools and middls schools already have a cop on campus, and it is VERY rare that we have any school shootings any more.  Elementary schools don't seem to have these student resource officers- and they should.  Yes, the need is greater in high school, where kids fight and they're bigger/stronger than the teacher, etc, and kids might bring guns to school.

But elementary schools - maybe 30 of them per county - need one cop per campus.  Send home one of the assistants trying to look busy, and get a cop there.  He can walk around all day, chat with people, learn about problems, diffuse situations.  When some ass-hat comes shooting thru the door at 10:30 AM, the cop would have had a nice gun battle up front, long before it got to a classroom.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #187 on: December 19, 2012, 04:16:55 AM »


This is an interesting example.  When confronted with a scary surprise, her first instinct is to ATTACK the snowman.  I know it's a silly comparison, but you can see if this was a bad guy jumping out of the snowman suit with a gun, she's already going to have fists hitting him, grabbing gun.  She is ready to fck him up - while the others assume sort of freeze up, standing fetal position kind of reaction.  I contend she probably has had some sort of self-defense training.  Fists go into perfect defensize position - no way - perfect attack position - in order to protect herself.  It'd be awesome if everyone in society reacted like this.  School shooters would have every person EAGER to get that gun and ruin their day.  So maybe just self-defense training with hands from young age would benefit society?

Less ideal reactions:



tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #188 on: December 19, 2012, 07:11:22 AM »
Option Bravo.

It's really a cosmetic thing, some people classify all military looking rifles as "assault weapons" regardless of the actual implications of that word. There is no real difference between a .223 hunting rifle and a .223 Ar-15 aside from cosmetics.

Exactly... NO difference.

Hence my statement... That there was no assault rifle used during this shooting AT ALL.

It just LOOKS like one.

Archer77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14174
  • Team Shizzo
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #189 on: December 19, 2012, 07:37:47 AM »
Reasonable gun control is not the problem.  People who want to ban guns outright are sadly misguided.  A gun ban will not work in the United States. Gun ownership is part of our culture and the guns are already out there. Banning stuff doesn't work.  You need only look at alcohol and drug prohibition to see that.  Besides, target shooting is a lot of fun and very challenging. 
A

magikusar

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2830
  • Team Ayn Rand
Progressives, Guns, and the Assault on Truth
« Reply #190 on: December 21, 2012, 02:26:17 PM »
http://lewrockwell.com/anderson/anderson352.html

Progressives smell blood in the wake of the tragic Sandy Hook school shooting in Connecticut and their coordinated assaults, while not actually making Americans any safer, nonetheless are going to see positive results for the anti-gun lobby. Not surprisingly, the New York Times, which is full of what Daniel Okrent once called "bien-pesant" journalists, has been leading a full-scale charge, demonizing any gun owner who does not carry a weapon as part of his or her employment as being a murderer or enabler of shooting little children.

A lot of writers, such as Robert Higgs and Will Grigg, have dealt with the utter hypocrisy of President Barack Obama decrying the killing of American school children while at the same time ordering drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and elsewhere in which little children are killed. However, since Obama has been declared by at least some of his supporters as "our lord and savior," one would suppose that The Great And Holy One is beyond any criticism, and especially criticism from the "bien-pesant" journalists that rule our media.

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25774
  • Dog sees 🐿️
Re: Progressives, Guns, and the Assault on Truth
« Reply #191 on: December 21, 2012, 02:28:14 PM »
what's the jews views on gun ownership?

typically jews don't have guns and they aren't white trashish

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Progressives, Guns, and the Assault on Truth
« Reply #192 on: December 21, 2012, 03:03:17 PM »
what's the jews views on gun ownership?

typically jews don't have guns and they aren't white trashish
Jews have a lot of guns and Jews like guns.  They wished they had them in Germany.  I hope this helps.

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20489
  • Biscuit
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #193 on: December 21, 2012, 03:06:31 PM »


This is an interesting example.  When confronted with a scary surprise, her first instinct is to ATTACK the snowman.  I know it's a silly comparison, but you can see if this was a bad guy jumping out of the snowman suit with a gun, she's already going to have fists hitting him, grabbing gun.  She is ready to fck him up - while the others assume sort of freeze up, standing fetal position kind of reaction.  I contend she probably has had some sort of self-defense training.  Fists go into perfect defensize position - no way - perfect attack position - in order to protect herself.  It'd be awesome if everyone in society reacted like this.  School shooters would have every person EAGER to get that gun and ruin their day.  So maybe just self-defense training with hands from young age would benefit society?

Less ideal reactions:
;D ;D ;D ;D
a

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: Progressives, Guns, and the Assault on Truth
« Reply #194 on: December 21, 2012, 03:15:04 PM »
what's the jews views on gun ownership?

typically jews don't have guns and they aren't white trashish




Before hitler





















After Hitler













Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39220
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #195 on: December 21, 2012, 03:18:35 PM »
446 school age children shot in Chicago . . .
 The Tea Party Commander ^ | December 20, 2012 | none listed

Posted on Friday, December 21, 2012 3:24:17 PM by RetiredArmy

446 school age children shot in Chicago so far this year with strongest gun laws in country – media silent



The cesspool known as Chicago probably has the toughest gun laws in the country, yet despite all the shootings, murders, and bloodshed, you never hear a peep about this from the corrupt state run media. In Chicago, there have been 446 school age children shot in leftist utopia run by Rahm Emanuel and that produced Obama, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, etc. 62 school aged children have actually been killed by crazed nuts in Chicago so far this year with almost two weeks to go. So why isn’t this news worthy? Is it because it would embarrass those anti second amendment nuts who brag about Chicago’s tough gun laws? Is it because most of the kids who were shot and killed were minorities? Or is it because the corrupt media doesn’t want to show Chicago in a bad light? Amazingly, no Obama crocodile tears either.



For those of you too dense to get the point of this post, it’s to make the point about gun laws. No matter how tough the gun laws are, the crazed, nut jobs will find a way to get them and if they so chose, use them. No draconian law can stop this, no matter how well intentioned the law is, or if it’s just about leftists grabbing power from citizens and taking away their constitutional rights.



THE LIST OF MURDERED SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN 2012

 18 YEARS OLD- 15



17 YEARS OLD- 16



16 YEARS OLD- 16



15 YEARS OLD- 6



14 YEARS OLD- 4



13 YEARS OLD- 2



12 YEARS OLD- 1



7 YEARS OLD- 1



6 YEARS OLD- 1



446 School Age Children Shot in Chicago so Far This Year THE LIST OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN SHOT IN 2012



18 year old- 110



17 year old- 99



16 year old- 89



15 year old- 62



14 year old- 39



13 year old- 21



12 year old- 10



11 year old- 2



10 year old- 3



9 year old- 1



7 year old- 3



6 year old- 2



5 year old- 1



4 year old- 1



3 year old- 1



1 year old- 2

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57343
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #196 on: December 21, 2012, 04:47:25 PM »
We get it, banning guns in Shitcago has made it one of the safest states in the US.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: CT Shooting - Gun Control - Support or not?
« Reply #197 on: December 21, 2012, 04:54:01 PM »
We get it, banning guns in Shitcago has made it one of the safest states in the US.

This.

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Automatic Weapons....Ban them?
« Reply #198 on: December 21, 2012, 04:55:21 PM »
Idiot.  You think banning guns is going to work?    Lol.   

Scoped in bolt action .308 can be just as deadly. 

It works.

That's why USA = stupid

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 78754
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Automatic Weapons....Ban them?
« Reply #199 on: December 21, 2012, 04:58:35 PM »
It works.

That's why USA = stupid

What works in other countries will not work in the USA , Americans are violent.