With all the security cameras they have today... why is there no videos of Adam Lanza entering the school grounds or the school itself?
Imagine how many security cameras are surrounding the pentagon. There is only ONE video that is about 5-7 frames and you cannot clearly see what hitting the pentagon. It certainly does not look like a 757. I want to see ALL the video footage.
"Imagine how many security cameras are surrounding the pentagon?". You use the right words, because just like foil hat morons, you really have to imagine those cameras, because truth about them is little bit different than foil hat morons has pointed out. There is plenty of imaginary security cameras rounding pentagon, but only few real ones. This is how it works: On the area where pentagon is, there is banks, service stations, schools, shops, bars etc. which all have security cameras, so the number of cameras is high. Sadly, none of these is pointing to pentagon, so if you wear a tight foil hat, you may say that there is many cameras but no footage about the plane crash. At the pentagon itself, there isn't so many cameras filming sky and aero planes, they are filming entrance, doors and so on.
"why is there no videos of Adam Lanza entering the school grounds?" Question to make isn't that. It is this: Why there isn't any, not even the smallest bit of evidence, not even the bacteria size evidence that shooter would be any body else than Adam Lanza? Any doubt you may have about the case is based on to emotional feelings, not on any kind of facts or evidence. Furthermore, these isn't even your own feelings, but feelings of some drooling idiot. Some foil hat moron said, that "this doesn't seem right" and there you go. You start to build mountain of doubts on this sentence, never asking any evidence even to prove that it doesn't seem right.
In Kennedy assassination, there was something like 53 concrete evidence pointing towards guilty of Oswald, and not even one pointing any other direction. In Sandy Hook massacre there is like 1859 concrete evidence pointing towards Adam Lanza, and not even one pointing any other direction. History of criminology know cases where has been 1-3 evidence pointing towards innocent, so that is possible. But 53 or over 1000? Can you even understand how impossible it is?
So what are the evidences against Adam Lanza? Well, first of all, they found him on the middle of the splatter of his own brains, his gun in his hand and with his fingerprints all over the place. In the gun, in the shells, in the cartridges, in the doors which he opened, in the car which he drove there etc. etc. There is no doubt what so ever that he was the one who load those magazines and used those guns, because there isn't any fucking fingerprint of any one else but his and his mothers. And the bitch who gave birth to this moron, she has the alibi because she was killed earlier.
And how about the survivors, which there is plenty? They have seen what they saw, and heard what they heard, so there is dozens of witnesses, all pointing towards this autistic piece of crap, who had a history of mental problems. So where do you need those security tapes? To prove that there was security tapes, so you have more than 1859 evidence towards guilty of Adam Lanza, and still zero evidence pointing some other direction?
Or are you trying to point out, that there was group of invisible perpetrators, who scatter all the evidence all over the place, shot Adams brains to the roof, and fade away without leaving even one shred of evidence that they have been there. I would like to see how you prove that
