I agree with wolverine. A program is only a part of the picture. It depends on the factors wolverine provides below as well as your recovery ability and lifestyle. Neither Max-OT nor HST would work well for someone with a high stress 55-60 hour week job and family say, unless you kept the volume low in each session.
Poliquin wrote over at t-mag a few years ago that many fail to take into account that training frequency changes over time --- there will be periods where you would do best doing 2 X a week while there might be (albeit for shorter duration) periods where you do 4-5 days per week. The scientific literature has found that working your body 2X a week promotes the most benefit.
Lastly, over at bodybuilding.com, there is an interesting articles called "Strength Deficit" which offers a neat test and formula (very simple) to check if you would beenfit more from a workout with hypotrophy or strength/power emphasis.
In parting, my best advice when evaluating a program is for the all to check out exercise prescription templates they offer. You may not agree with their llow volume training philosophy BUT the templates are constructed well and their information is helpful (plus they have GREAT illustrations and decent descriptions of weight exercises).
PS As for my preference -- HST as it avoids overprescribing exercises and set/rep routines, allowing the trainee to tailor a program to fit his abilities. The only drawback is the trainee may fall into the habit of overdoing some exercises.
