Even the best writers have to list their resources. When I write and submit an article, I'm required to list my references and sources. (No, I'm not comparing myself to the best writers)
When I quote someone else, I provide either a link or a reference, and I've done this on most of my posts; however, posting links to the same thing fifty times, because you keep copy-pasting articles about the same topic seems counterproductive, especially when your posts are culled from some kind of echo chamber and consist of widely discredited information that a simple Google search can debunk.
Tell me, which references and sources would I "list" in support of my own words? They stand on their own merit. When I reference outside sources, I link them - prodigiously. Perhaps you are complaining because I did not provide links to the
multiple silly birther posts and
threads of yours, I guess. Or some of the
numerous brutal smackdowns you received?
It wouldn't help anyways. We both know that no matter how I quote my posts and reference my sources, nothing that I say gets through to you. You have the intellectual capacity of a rock - and not the rolling kind either. You do not see reality, you do not care to rationally examine facts and you regurgitate whatever others stuff, prechewed and predigested, into your mouth.
So don't act all smart and sassy to me, because I'll slap you back so hard that you and your single brain cell will think you're back at the three hour coach training seminar you attended back in 1973.