Harley Breite - Appreciation thread

[Ronnie Rep]

Miss Harley. He's good guy.

[sceagacros]

Harley although mildly entertaining was no GH15, now THAT was a character you could love to hate! Long live getbig.....

[Simple Simon]

Several of us told Harley in the beginning not to be so open and that he would get ran off the board, he didn't listen.

I knew what Harley was from day one, I got told to leave him alone via PM, it took everyone else 130 pages of him bigging himself up before people finally turned on him.
Saying he would defend a child murderer but not someone who was accused of cruelty to a dog really sealed his fate

[bigmc]

defence lawyers are educated immoral  scum

they fight so hard to keep their "clients" out of jail because they are cash cows for them

most lawyers will construct a defence for their client under any circumstances

[Conker]

I knew what Harley was from day one, I got told to leave him alone via PM, it took everyone else 130 pages of him bigging himself up before people finally turned on him.
Saying he would defend a child murderer but not someone who was accused of cruelty to a dog really sealed his fate

yeh while you spend your time so constructively sitting triumphantly on getbig chasing people around to troll , racking up 10s of thousands of posts.

that silly fk harley is only off earning 100s of thousands of $ with a great career and probably great life. yeh you really showed him dude. i bet he'd switch places with you in an instant 

[Simple Simon]

yeh while you spend your time so constructively sitting triumphantly on getbig chasing people around to troll , racking up 10s of thousands of posts.

that silly fk harley is only off earning 100s of thousands of $ with a great career and probably great life. yeh you really showed him dude. i bet he'd switch places with you in an instant 

money doesn't buy morals mate.

[illuminati]

yeh while you spend your time so constructively sitting triumphantly on getbig chasing people around to troll , racking up 10s of thousands of posts.

that silly fk harley is only off earning 100s of thousands of $ with a great career and probably great life. yeh you really showed him dude. i bet he'd switch places with you in an instant 

Is your rationale - Hey he's got lots & lots of money he's clearly a good / decent person. ?
That's what you appear to be saying.

[Simple Simon]

Is your rationale - Hey he's got lots & lots of money he's clearly a good / decent person. ?
That's what you appear to be saying.

I don't think conker has morals or money so he wont grasp the point.

[BEEFYHEAVYWEIGHT]

I do. Too bad he was chased away.

[NaturalWonder83]

I do

[SF1900]

No, he was trash.

He said he would not defend an animal abuser, but would defend a child molester.

When he was called out for, he threw a temper tantrum and left.

[calfzilla]

I warned him day one of his posting here he would be ran off the board. He didn't listen.

[illuminati]

No, he was trash.

He said he would not defend an animal abuser, but would defend a child molester.

When he was called out for, he threw a temper tantrum and left.

If that is correct - man's likely a monster himself that's why he would defend child abusers
And not animal abusers -- Best off without him here.

[SF1900]

If that is correct - man's likely a monster himself that's why he would defend child abusers
And not animal abusers -- Best off without him here.

It is true. LOTS of people called him to task for it. His excuse was that everyone deserves a fair trial. But, it was strange that he then would not defend animal abusers because he hated people who abused animals, but would happily defend child molesters.

[Princess L]

It is true. LOTS of people called him to task for it. His excuse was that everyone deserves a fair trial. But, it was strange that he then would not defend animal abusers because he hated people who abused animals, but would happily defend child molesters.

It's all chronicled  in the mega thread.  Start around p.100 or so to see it all.  Certainly better reading than what's currently on the board.

[NelsonMuntz]

I found harley amusing to be honest. Also he is a defence lawyer, they rep all kind of people, from petty crime to monsters, some guilty as day, some not. Not all animal abusers are innocent/guilty, and neither are the alleged predatorsBut the bottom line is defence lawyers and Prosecutors are the exact same job, and their job entails playing a role, the defense lawyers job is to prove innocence, if any and/or make the best deal/outcome for their side, and the prosecutors job is to prove guilt, if and an/do also make the best deal/outcome. for their side

the winner is just the side that proves the most guilt or innocence, nothing more, nothing less.

if you don't believe the role situation I brought up then you should look at how many defence lawyers eventually become prosecutors and the amount of prosecutors who become defence lawyers.

Anyone who has ever been through any kind of legal battle of any kind knows how much of a circus theatre it is. the whole legal syatem is based on the 2 different sides of the argument blowing everything out of proportion and ezagerrating and or taking the facts out of context

so in reality who gives a shit if he was hhonest to say the types of people he would represent versus those who he would not. I don't agree with him in the sense that if he is a defence lawyer his job is not to be the morality police but to defend clients accused of crimes, even if those crimes are repugnant to him.

if you really think about it as well, with both sides being lawyers playing a specific role, as much as it is sickening when a 100% guilty person gets off, then the opposite must be true ie how many in actuality 100% of innocents are railroaded into plea deals or just fucked over as well

I think if anyone here got in trouble, they would want the best defence whether they were innocent or guilty

[Kahn.N.Singh]

I actually liked our expert trial lawyer and BJJ champion with coiffed, silvery locks.

Moreover, as reprehensible as it is, I think I understand why he'd defend a child abuser but not an animal abuser.

[SF1900]

I actually liked our expert trial lawyer and BJJ champion with coiffed, silvery locks.

Moreover, as reprehensible as it is, I think I understand why he'd defend a child abuser but not an animal abuser.

I can't. But, to each their own. That's his right as a defense lawyer.

[BEEFYHEAVYWEIGHT]

I found harley amusing to be honest. Also he is a defence lawyer, they rep all kind of people, from petty crime to monsters, some guilty as day, some not. Not all animal abusers are innocent/guilty, and neither are the alleged predatorsBut the bottom line is defence lawyers and Prosecutors are the exact same job, and their job entails playing a role, the defense lawyers job is to prove innocence, if any and/or make the best deal/outcome for their side, and the prosecutors job is to prove guilt, if and an/do also make the best deal/outcome. for their side

the winner is just the side that proves the most guilt or innocence, nothing more, nothing less.

if you don't believe the role situation I brought up then you should look at how many defence lawyers eventually become prosecutors and the amount of prosecutors who become defence lawyers.

Anyone who has ever been through any kind of legal battle of any kind knows how much of a circus theatre it is. the whole legal syatem is based on the 2 different sides of the argument blowing everything out of proportion and ezagerrating and or taking the facts out of context

so in reality who gives a shit if he was hhonest to say the types of people he would represent versus those who he would not. I don't agree with him in the sense that if he is a defence lawyer his job is not to be the morality police but to defend clients accused of crimes, even if those crimes are repugnant to him.

if you really think about it as well, with both sides being lawyers playing a specific role, as much as it is sickening when a 100% guilty person gets off, then the opposite must be true ie how many in actuality 100% of innocents are railroaded into plea deals or just fucked over as well

I think if anyone here got in trouble, they would want the best defence whether they were innocent or guilty

Well said.

[darkeyes]

not saying he was always correct..but i think in a face to face discussion he would destroy any of the big mouths on here.

[darkeyes]

Well said.

yes spot on

[SuperTed]

Why should anyone miss him? He only contributed to one thread and that was about himself.

[Ronnie Rep]

Yes, Harley was and is a good guy.

[illuminati]

not saying he was always correct..but i think in a face to face discussion he would destroy any of the big mouths on here.

Depending on what the subject matter on some things clearly yes others No.

[darkeyes]

Depending on what the subject matter on some things clearly yes others No.

come on.. he is an educated man. most on here are at most college level if that. He would run rings round anyone on here. easy to mouth off when you got support on a forum but one on one he would win. just my opinion.