OBAMA DESTROYING THE HATERS YET AGAIN...UE rate now at 4.7%,..AMAZING!!!

[iwantmass]

You really can't see anything beyond "4.8%" can you? You're really that blind. Not being condescending. I'm serious.

He is a liar and a racist and has a very low iq.  Not only that, he only views things in black and white. 

[andreisdaman]

You really can't see anything beyond "4.8%" can you? You're really that blind. Not being condescending. I'm serious.

what is there to see, nitwit?.....you certainly didn't see beyond it when it was 10% did you?

[Coach is Back!]

what is there to see, nitwit?.....you certainly didn't see beyond it when it was 10% did you?

Yes, when he had it at 10% I saw 16-18% you delusional fuck. What part of 665000 NOT LOOKING FOR WORK are you NOT comprehending? Holy shit, are you really a professor at a university? Geezuz.

[iwantmass]

Yes, when he had it at 10% I saw 16-18% you delusional fuck. What part of 665000 NOT LOOKING FOR WORK are you NOT comprehending? Holy shit, are you really a professor at a university? Geezuz.

You better respect his 15k posts.  He has been treated like the village idiot on here since 2006.  Not only that, he has been crying racism to cover his short comings for years.  He is serious business.  Oh yeah, he really did vote for a white guy once too...

[240 is Back]

Yes, when he had it at 10% I saw 16-18% you delusional fuck. What part of 665000 NOT LOOKING FOR WORK are you NOT comprehending? Holy shit, are you really a professor at a university? Geezuz.

I have no problem with you swearing, but you're taking the Lord's name in vain here. 

[Coach is Back!]

I have no problem with you swearing, but you're taking the Lord's name in vain here. 

1. "Jesus" "Geezuz"

2. Since when did liberals care about the Lords name or the Lord for that matter?

[240 is Back]

1. "Jesus" "Geezuz"

2. Since when did liberals care about the Lords name or the Lord for that matter?

You have no problem calling another man a communist and now questioning his religion.  Let them stack up, Coach. 

I take the Commandments very seriously.  Changing the spelling doesn't take away from the fact you're abusing a Sacred Name.

[Coach is Back!]

You have no problem calling another man a communist and now questioning his religion.  Let them stack up, Coach. 

I take the Commandments very seriously.  Changing the spelling doesn't take away from the fact you're abusing a Sacred Name.

You support liberalism. You can't have it both ways.

[240 is Back]

You support liberalism. You can't have it both ways.

I'm not sure what "support liberalism" means.  You voted for Bill Clinton, but I'd never say you (or any Clinton voter) didn't take the Lord seriously.  Coach, did you "support liberalism" when you voted Clinton? 

Are you saying one cannot be a liberal and be religious at the same time?

[Coach is Back!]

I'm not sure what "support liberalism" means.  You voted for Bill Clinton, but I'd never say you (or any Clinton voter) didn't take the Lord seriously.  Coach, did you "support liberalism" when you voted Clinton? 

Are you saying one cannot be a liberal and be religious at the same time?

Funny, when ever you get backed into a corner you bring up shit from 25 years ago that has absolutely no relevance to today. Besides, I don't recall ever saying I voted for him. Can you find that. As a matter of fact i was in no shape nor did I even care about voting.

[TuHolmes]

Funny, when ever you get backed into a corner you bring up shit from 25 years ago that has absolutely no relevance to today. Besides, I don't recall ever saying I voted for him. Can you find that. As a matter of fact i was in no shape nor did I even care about voting.

Do you actually vote at all?

How many elections have you voted in over the past 20 years coach?

I'd bet 8 or less. My grand belief is probably 4.

[240 is Back]

Besides, I don't recall ever saying I voted for him. Can you find that. 

Right. 

.......says the guy who voted for Clinton in '92....The ultimate liar.

Wasn't even into politics then. He just talked a good game and like an idiot, I fell for it.

  probably because most of these "conservatives" voted for her husband

Oh for fucks sake give it a rest. You can't base shit on something from 23 years ago unless it was constant. Again, one of these days we're going to have a debate, face to face over a beer (or 10) without google I front of you.

[Coach is Back!]

Right. 

And I said I voted for him where?

[Coach is Back!]

Do you actually vote at all?

How many elections have you voted in over the past 20 years coach?

I'd bet 8 or less. My grand belief is probably 4.

At least the last 18 years in the same place.

[240 is Back]

And I said I voted for him where?

now you "don't remember"?    Really?

Are you seriously telling us you don't remember voting in 1992?

[240 is Back]

And I said I voted for him where?

Many of us who have been here for years remember the stories.

If I recall correctly, you got religious right after voting Clinton in 1992, got saved in 97, and hate liberals badly because you used to be one and live that lifestyle, so you understand how evil they truly are.

Which part of that is inaccurate?

[chaos]

Many of us who have been here for years remember the stories.

If I recall correctly, you got religious right after voting Clinton in 1992, got saved in 97, and hate liberals badly because you used to be one and live that lifestyle, so you understand how evil they truly are.

Which part of that is inaccurate?

Might want to look into a restraining order Coach, this is next level creepy right here.

[240 is Back]

Might want to look into a restraining order Coach, this is next level creepy right here.

i can't remember what i had for lunch, but i remember obscure random shit from 30 years ago.

me and coach have been battling on getbig since 2004 or 2005 probably.  when someone you've chatted with for years talks about getting saved, you remember it.   I vividly remember getting saved when I was a kid, at summer religious camp, after 'flippin thru Philippians" movie, and I was probably 4th or 5th grade at the time.  I remember every word of it "if you get saved and your brother doesn't, you may go to heaven and he would not".  impactful stuff, I still remember it vividly, literally, 25 years later. 

[whork]

He is a liar and a racist and has a very low iq.  Not only that, he only views things in black and white.  

If that is the case you to should be friends.

You are a lying cunt with a low iq.

Dont know about racist.

[iwantmass]

If that is the case you to should be friends.

You are a lying girl with a low iq.

Dont know about racist.

Well, we can all see that you took the high road there.  

Someone is entering meltdown territory 

[whork]

Well, we can all see that you took the high road there.  

Someone is entering meltdown territory 

The high road is long gone.

Besides i didnt call you racist so ..

[iwantmass]

The high road is long gone.

Besides i didnt call you racist so ..

You shouldn't take me making you look stupid so personally.  I'm sure others have made you look stupid many times before.  It's due to happen again.  I also make many others on here look stupid, not just you.  Next time, try debating someone like andre that is more easily beaten in matches of wit.  You just picked a fight you couldn't win, no biggie.

[whork]

You shouldn't take me making you look stupid so personally.  I'm sure others have made you look stupid many times before.  It's due to happen again.  I also make many others on here look stupid, not just you.  Next time, try debating someone like andre that is more easily beaten in matches of wit.  You just picked a fight you couldn't win, no biggie.

You have an inflated view of yourself.

You are persistent but your post's only consist of attacking the data and/or messenger.

This is very effective in the short run however it quickly becomes dull and its very clear you dont have anything to bring to the discussion besides an opinion.

[iwantmass]

You have an inflated view of yourself.

You are persistent but your post's only consist of attacking the data and/or messenger.

This is very effective in the short run however it quickly becomes dull and its very clear you dont have anything to bring to the discussion besides an opinion.

You haven't provided any data for me to attack, so I just attack your stupidity.  It is all you give me to attack....

[whork]

You haven't provided any data for me to attack, so I just attack your stupidity.  It is all you give me to attack....

I have provided 2 sources of data you have provided zero.

Now be a good boy and provide some data for your claims.