rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?

[Simple Simon]

Las Vegas said the the same thing. "Just research it." He wouldn't post the evidence, yet he is the one making the claim.

As you said, it usually translates into, "I don't have any good evidence to present."

Can you imagine these people in a court of law?

"What evidence do you have against the accused?"

"Do your own research, its all out there"

[Ropo]

Why do you keep coming back? Can't you read your own stupidity makes no sense? So now you are comparing firecrackers to the demolition of the twin towers? Have you ever seen a skyscraper in your live?

Your tiny mind does not have the intellectual quotient to assimilated the enormousness size that those building had and it was beyond the laws of physic for 15 floors to have the strength to bring down the rest of 95 foors down to it's base in mere SECONDS without resistance. Watch the video again retard.

 

We have proved here there were residue of explosives, you dummy, we seen live testimony of people hearing explosion through the building all the way down to the basement, the science to back up the demolition and we have a  video were we could hear the explosion in the background.

So what else did you need? An official report from our goverment stating there where explosions? The 9/11 commission never tested or look for it for it to begin with. Comes to show you what a liar Ozmo is, had he read the report really, and never bother to explain the omission of it.

The truth is our goverment tried really hard to shut down the investigation as quickly as possible. You wouldn't know since you live in Europe. And they spent less money investigating 9/11 than what the congress spent trying to impeach the prior President for having his dindong such by a whore, those are fact and it shows you how much they really tried to search for the truth.


 You say your country have great education system? Compare to who? Is Finland a world superpower? Is even Europe anymore? Why is it Europe is  getting run down by Muslims while we topple governments in the middle east?

It's really showing the lengh this goverment trolls would keep at it so peple stop reading this thread and finding more facts about that day. But don't you worry, the more you post, the easier it gets to demolish you and keep you OWNED!!!

There is nothing interesting in that video to see, so why don't you stop linking that crap? I have seen these collapses thousands of times, and I know that there isn't any explosions in them, because all the evidence what you should see  is missing. That building was only 62 yards wide, so any fucking amount of explosives more than grams would be clearly visible. Your problem is that you don't know what the real explosions look like, even I have give you lot of examples, and that could mean only one thing: your blind faith overpower all facts, no matter how evident they are. You can scream, you can cry, but you never will be able to prove there were explosives, because there isn't any evidence at all to prove that. That video proves your stupidity, because that is one of the many which proves that even the sound of explosion is missing. You hear only how the building crumble on its way down, but all loud bangs are missing?  I show you a video where were dozens of controlled demolitions, and there can't be any mistakes about the sound of explosives, and the cloud they make. What do you think it will sound when 400 meters high tower collapse WITHOUT any explosions? Look from your video  

Finland isn't a superpower at any means, but at least we have a brains and the government which isn't killing us with any given reason, or just an amusement. Our school system is superior compared to yours, you can ask about it from Michael Moore, who visited here making a movie about it. We don't have metal detectors on our schools, because we don't need them, our children's go there for learning, not to take drugs and kill each others for fun. If you would be living here, that mental illness of yours would be treated with no charge at all, and some day you would be on the same line with the rest of the mankind, not with the apes like you are now  

[SF1900]

Can you imagine these people in a court of law?

"What evidence do you have against the accused?"

"Do your own research, its all out there"

haha, yup!!!

Lawyer: "He clearly murdered the person."
Judge: "Can you present any evidence?"
Lawyer: "UGH, do your own research. Just google it!"

[M4tad0r]

There is nothing interesting in that video to see, so why don't you stop linking that crap? I have seen these collapses thousands of times, and I know that there isn't any explosions in them, because all the evidence what you should see  is missing. That building was only 62 yards wide, so any fucking amount of explosives more than grams would be clearly visible. Your problem is that you don't know what the real explosions look like, even I have give you lot of examples, and that could mean only one thing: your blind faith overpower all facts, no matter how evident they are. You can scream, you can cry, but you never will be able to prove there were explosives, because there isn't any evidence at all to prove that. That video proves your stupidity, because that is one of the many which proves that even the sound of explosion is missing. You hear only how the building crumble on its way down, but all loud bangs are missing?  I show you a video where were dozens of controlled demolitions, and there can't be any mistakes about the sound of explosives, and the cloud they make. What do you think it will sound when 400 meters high tower collapse WITHOUT any explosions? Look from your video  

Finland isn't a superpower at any means, but at least we have a brains and the government which isn't killing us with any given reason, or just an amusement. Our school system is superior compared to yours, you can ask about it from Michael Moore, who visited here making a movie about it. We don't have metal detectors on our schools, because we don't need them, our children's go there for learning, not to take drugs and kill each others for fun. If you would be living here, that mental illness of yours would be treated with no charge at all, and some day you would be on the same line with the rest of the mankind, not with the apes like you are now  

USA population 350 million.               Finland population: 5.4 million.   HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH AHAHAHA

Top 50 Colleges & Universities in America for 2016

http://www.thebestcolleges.org/rankings/top-50/

9 Top Ranked Universities in Finland

http://www.mastersportal.eu/ranking-country/9/finland.html

Ropo stop now, or keep been OWNED into oblivion please!!!!

[Ropo]

When you can't argue facts, misdirect the conversation. Bunch a female whiners we got here.

9/11 Debunker Gets His Ass Handed To Him By Richard Gage - 20/07/2009

You mean that asshat, which real architects didn't want to have anything to do with?  His first argument proves he is just an idiot: There was just normal office fires... Excuse me, but what is the normal office fire? How it is measured?? And when 400 meters tall building collapses on 250 meter tall building, it isn't significant at all? Only mentally ill fucking idiot would use arguments like that, while it is evident that it was quite significant. And please, what exactly even could be normal in that situation? Two of the world largest buildings have collapsed, one on top of the WTC 7, which was burning 8 hours before it collapse? Are you mad? Normal office fires...burning straight 8 hours through the building? Why it seem to me that this moron is underestimating the significance of the facts of the matter and just lying? Did I mention facts of the matter? Well, prove there were just normal office fires? In reality, no one have that knowledge, because no one see it, because collapses and dust form the twin towers. How can he say so? Truth doesn't mean anything to these assholes, so he claims it is so, knowing there isn't any evidence at all. And you believe, because of the blind faith. Quite simple, just like you are

[Ropo]

Pentagon is the most secure building in the Country, and only 3 frames from 1 camera is what we have?

C'mon use your head.
Do you really think they'd shy from showing something hit the building after we see so many angles of the towers being hit, and people jumping from
windows? The footage is not out there, because they don't want it known or seen... Plain and simple. Surrounding businesses has their security footage confiscated
immediately after the smoke started rising from the Pentagon.

How exactly it is secured against the passenger jets? Ooh, you don't know? Have a nice day..

What they have in there? Massive amount of gold? Billions of dollars? Are they protecting their typewriters and office crap, staplers?? For real? What would the imaginary evil force be looking from there? What in the reality would be a motivation to attack there, and would give the reason for that massive security? Have you ever think about that?

And name one significant crime scene where police wouldn't confiscated the security footage of the neighbors? Ask any police, it is nothing more than just a basic crime scene protocol.

[Ropo]

Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever !

Surreal my ass, that building was 28 meters high and one of the 400 meters high twin towers fell on it. What it should look like? A pancake? Morons with blind faith are amusing creatures, kind like apes but dumber 

[Ropo]

This^^^.  The whole official story is complete bullshit... I can't believe how many people are just asleep and believe bullshit lies.

It doesn't matter what you can't believe, but what you can prove. 36 pages, and foil hats has provide 0 evidence about the explosions at the twin towers. Outside this thread there is millions of similar threads with all the languages of the world, and still 0 evidence about the explosions. Doesn't that make you think anything? Like...wait a minute, there isn't such thing as invisible, soundless explosions which doesn't even break the windows of the building, while there is enough energy to blow massive steel columns in to pieces? Just as easy as cutting the railroad tracks by peeing 

[M4tad0r]

How exactly it is secured against the passenger jets? Ooh, you don't know? Have a nice day..

What they have in there? Massive amount of gold? Billions of dollars? Are they protecting their typewriters and office crap, staplers?? For real? What would the imaginary evil force be looking from there? What in the reality would be a motivation to attack there, and would give the reason for that massive security? Have you ever think about that?

And name one significant crime scene where police wouldn't confiscated the security footage of the neighbors? Ask any police, it is nothing more than just a basic crime scene protocol.

Which to date have not been released, keep at it imbecile. You getting somewhere.

 the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

http://www.foia.gov/how-to.html

This is not Finland you moron.

[M4tad0r]

How exactly it is secured against the passenger jets? Ooh, you don't know? Have a nice day..

What they have in there? Massive amount of gold? Billions of dollars? Are they protecting their typewriters and office crap, staplers?? For real? What would the imaginary evil force be looking from there? What in the reality would be a motivation to attack there, and would give the reason for that massive security? Have you ever think about that?

And name one significant crime scene where police wouldn't confiscated the security footage of the neighbors? Ask any police, it is nothing more than just a basic crime scene protocol.

From Illuminate:

I'll give you that your are Good with the cut-n-paste etc with your answers.

What am I Afraid Of -- A Few Things Actually.
Though Certainly NOT YOU.

Is All You Can Do Is Resort To Imbecile Name Calling.
That is a Clue To A Very Educated & Intelligent Man...NOT.

I Have Said Already I Don't Know How The American Defense System Worked Back Then or in fact now.

The Simple Fact That 2 planes Hit The Twin Towers. ( Granted that would of Been very tough to prevent )
And 2 others -- 1, Brought down by the passengers, & The other Smashes into The Pentagon, Which they Clearly had enough time to track it's flight path & Try to communicate With.

I think Most Sane Rational Thinking People Would Say Was A Faliure Of A Defense System.
The Clue Is In The Words 'DEFENCE SYSTEMS'  
Hmm Let The Plane Smash into One of The Most Important Buildings In America & Do Fcuk All About.
Great Defense System.  Roll Eyes


Now Go Away --
Pls Feel Free to Call Me all the Childish Names You want.
And Show yourself up for what you are Some More.  Wink

[M4tad0r]

Surreal my ass, that building was 28 meters high and one of the 400 meters high twin towers fell on it. What it should look like? A pancake? Morons with blind faith are amusing creatures, kind like apes but dumber 

You imbecile, the point is WTC6 stood while missing half of it, while building 7 across the street imploded in seconds. The other buildings around building 7, nothing. And all 3 buildings were lease by Larry Silverstein, who 6 weeks prior had taken insurance against terrorist attacks, but according to you: Coincidence!!!

Building 7:

[Simple Simon]

You imbecile, the point is WTC6 stood while missing half of it, while building 7 across the street imploded in seconds. The other buildings around building 7, nothing. And all 3 buildings were lease by Larry Silverstein, who 6 weeks prior had taken insurance against terrorist attacks, but according to you: Coincidence!!!

Building 7:

You are aware explosives explode, not implode?

[M4tad0r]

You are aware explosives explode, not implode?

Thank you, excuse my ignorance. 

[OzmO]

I'll give you that your are Good with the cut-n-paste etc with your answers.

What am I Afraid Of -- A Few Things Actually.
Though Certainly NOT YOU.

Is All You Can Do Is Resort To Imbecile Name Calling.
That is a Clue To A Very Educated & Intelligent Man...NOT.

I Have Said Already I Don't Know How The American Defense System Worked Back Then or in fact now.

The Simple Fact That 2 planes Hit The Twin Towers. ( Granted that would of Been very tough to prevent )
And 2 others -- 1, Brought down by the passengers, & The other Smashes into The Pentagon, Which they Clearly had enough time to track it's flight path & Try to communicate With.

I think Most Sane Rational Thinking People Would Say Was A Faliure Of A Defense System.
The Clue Is In The Words 'DEFENCE SYSTEMS'  
Hmm Let The Plane Smash into One of The Most Important Buildings In America & Do Fcuk All About.
Great Defense System. 


Now Go Away --
Pls Feel Free to Call Me all the Childish Names You want.
And Show yourself up for what you are Some More.  

I am not going away.   Maybe you should smarten up.  Its not my fault you can't handle your own ignorance what its revealed to you.

You don't know how the defense system worked back then BUT you know enough to suggest they should have stopped it?

The above is very indicative of CT'ers in general.

 

[OzmO]

Do I have to post the picture of plane debris in front of the pentagon again?






but I need to use my head right? it was clearly planted.  

According to CT'ers there was no plane debris.

Those must have been photo-shopped on brought in by "them"

lots of debris in this shot.

looks like they are picking it up as quickly as possible..... OR ARE THEY PLANTING IT?!?!?!?!?!?!?! I'M OWNING MYSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

Yeah they are dressed in black they must be "them"

[OzmO]

And here is another icing in the pancake theory.
See section 8.
NIST’s findings DO NOT support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers
http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtctowers.cfm

Even though NIST tried to peddle this  very early on.. but the collapse times render the law for the conservation of momentum null and void on 9-11, they had to come up with something else..
A NEW - never seen before and never to be seen again - fire induced progressive collapse - which means nothing if they can't prove it with science-math-physics.
The only thing progressive about the collapsed buildings was; each other floor was progressively blown out to allow the entire building to fall through what should have been the path of greatest resistance.

You need explosives to bring down any steel- concrete structure. A plane impact can not achieve this. Even tank shells can not do the job. That's why planes bomb cities with high explosives. If aliminum shells filled with jet fuel was sufficient than there wouldn't be any need for high explosives inside missiles and bombs...

Ozmo in the OWNED zone, once again.

You haven't owned shit youtube monkey.  You still haven't dealt with this.  Now you jumping again to another issue because you are a scared little boy who won't address his failures.

Once you address these failures I will show you haw wrong and idiotic you are with your latest run and jump.

Man the fuck up bitch.

When you can't argue facts, misdirect the conversation. Bunch a female whiners we got here.

9/11 Debunker Gets His Ass Handed To Him By Richard Gage - 20/07/2009

That's what you have been doing this whole time.  You get exposed and you run like a coward.

Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

You are a fraud and a coward.  Man up or shut up.

The Failures of the youtube monkey known as M4tad0r who is floating down the river of denial, fantasy, tinfoil hattery.

I am sure chaos and Ropo can cite many more.  But here are 3 from the last few pages of this thread:

9/11: Bush Admits “Explosives” Used At World Trade Center (Video)

Start watching at 0:37 seconds for a in your face revelation from non other than our own president. How you like them apples now?

All of you goverment shill defenders are OWNED!!!

Bush in a press conference talking about intel gathered from Khalid and doesn't mention WTC at all, and obviously misreads his speech.  But this is hailed by the youtube monkey as  "Bush Admits “Explosives” Used At World Trade Center"


He wants the CT to be real so bad, he ignore his intelligence, reading comprehension, and common sense.  

He doesn't even bother to read the transcript.

________________________ ________________________ ___________________

19 goat shepherds defeated a  multi-billion dollar defense system, masterminded by a terrorist hidden in cave of a 3rd world country, and 3 steel skyscrapers came down due to fuel and office fire. The offical truffer report on 9/11!!!

Here he builds on his fantasy starting with "19 goat shepherds" when many of these Terrorists when 10 of the 19 either graduated from College or attended college.  Not too many goat shepherds typically have college education in things like civil law and avionics.

Its really sad to see a person having to outright lie to make a point about a tinfoil hat fantasy.
________________________ ________________________ ___________________

This one shows his level of desperation to make his fantasy real:

In the aftermath there have been studies done on the WTC's and what happened that day.  Its also a very common discussion engineering schools at one point or another.

Other than a few thousand mostly crack pot engineers which represent far less than 1% of the of educated people in the world who know BS pseudoscience, and legitimate engineering science, no one has pointed out with peer reviewed assertions based on hard evidence, not flawed logic, or BS rhetoric, that its was a demolition.  

Where? Please give some links to such claims.

Here is a link:

http://engineering.stanford.edu/news/stanford-engineers-study-911-lessons-how-help-buildings-withstand-threats

So where is the study and discussion explaining the the collapse of the twin towers?

Can't understand he's own links.

HAHAHAHAHAHA   Ozmo

Still OWNED!!!!

M4tad0r doesn't think a discussion about how the WTC's failed preceded a study and discussion about how to make buildings safer from terrorist attacks from 9/11?

What kind of stupid is this man?

[OzmO]

The plane simply could not have been flown the way the official story says it was.

Again, completely not true.

Maybe you are a youtube monkey too and influenced like a herd of sheep by youtube vids.

[OzmO]

Pigeons are smarter than truffers.

[viking1]

[M4tad0r]

Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out!

&feature=youtu.be

[M4tad0r]

You haven't owned shit youtube monkey.  You still haven't dealt with this.  Now you jumping again to another issue because you are a scared little boy who won't address his failures.

Once you address these failures I will show you haw wrong and idiotic you are with your latest run and jump.

Man the fuck up bitch.

That's what you have been doing this whole time.  You get exposed and you run like a coward.

Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

You are a fraud and a coward.  Man up or shut up.

The Failures of the youtube monkey known as M4tad0r who is floating down the river of denial, fantasy, tinfoil hattery.

I am sure chaos and Ropo can cite many more.  But here are 3 from the last few pages of this thread:

Bush in a press conference talking about intel gathered from Khalid and doesn't mention WTC at all, and obviously misreads his speech.  But this is hailed by the youtube monkey as  "Bush Admits “Explosives” Used At World Trade Center"


He wants the CT to be real so bad, he ignore his intelligence, reading comprehension, and common sense.  

He doesn't even bother to read the transcript.

________________________ ________________________ ___________________

Here he builds on his fantasy starting with "19 goat shepherds" when many of these Terrorists when 10 of the 19 either graduated from College or attended college.  Not too many goat shepherds typically have college education in things like civil law and avionics.

Its really sad to see a person having to outright lie to make a point about a tinfoil hat fantasy.
________________________ ________________________ ___________________

This one shows his level of desperation to make his fantasy real:

Here is a link:
 

M4tad0r doesn't think a discussion about how the WTC's failed preceded a study and discussion about how to make buildings safer from terrorist attacks from 9/11?

What kind of stupid is this man?

Ozmo in the OWNED Zone, has not debunked anything, nor has presented anything here, Facts.

Gets trolled, but too stupid to understand it, Facts.

Comes here and proclaims there are discussion and studies at colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11 which can not provide any proof or links, and he gives a link not related to what he posts but too stupid to understand it, Fatcs.

Ozmo "The legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101

That's what you have been doing this whole time.  You get exposed and you run like a coward.

You are a fraud and a coward.  Man up or shut up.

[M4tad0r]

Hey youtube boy,

We have been over this before on the thread where you were owned and debunked and then you ran away. 

If you want me to read your retort.  Don't use all caps.

Now to the one part i did read:
I don't need to give you links, or better yet, a youtube video of it.  just use you head.  Why wouldn't that be a question someone would ask in a structural engineering class?  I know it common because i have read discussions on FB that people were having about it.

Are you telling me students wouldn't ask a question like that for fear of "the evil government" sneaking into their dorms at night a killing them or the professor?

[The Abdominal Snoman]

[lilhawk1]

Where were the 2 humongous engines?  Since when does a jet fuselage penetrate 4 rings of the pentagon?  If there is no debris from the plane and it just evaporated, how did it penetrate 4 rings of the Pentagon?  Impossible..  Cruise missile with a penetrating warhead.  The hole in the Pentagon starts at the base, on the ground... How did the plane get that low without the engines hitting the ground?  Physically impossible.  The engines would have hit the ground causing the plane to crash before it reached the Pentagon's outer wall.  This all assuming the plane could maneuver that low at that speed, which again was physically impossible.  This is shit any 6th grader knows.  My God wake up people...

[lilhawk1]