rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?

[Colossus_1986]

Its as if the "killing" of Bin Laden was the final cherry on top of the FUCK YOU sundae they fed to the public...

The biggest joke of all, and people in America ate it up like a mindless elderly person being spoon-fed tapioca pudding.

[M4tad0r]

22 total so far,  

"Why are 22 members of Navy SEAL Team 6 dead shortly after their unit killed Osama bin Laden?"

http://www.truthandaction.org/michael-savage-seal-team-6-assassinated-executed/

[M4tad0r]

Remember:

Loose lips sink ships!!!!!

[chaos]

What guise? You don't believe the witness testimonies, that's fine. Your prerogative to do so.
Then you have video evidence of of cleanup crews pulling molten steel out of the wreckage.
Almost every part of the towers is pulverized and steel beams are cut at angles. Firefighters
and first responders (over 100 have gone on record) saying there were MULTIPLE secondary explosions.
Nano-termite found in the rubble, Debris and human remains ejected up to 600 feet away from the
towers although it's supposed to be a "collapse". (downward). Squibbs bursting out of windows, temperatures
that were insanely hot that burned under rubble for over 3 months.

There are just so many factors that point to a controlled demolition, and when I show you videos
of people within the towers testifying that there was suspicious noises, sounds etc, on restricted
floors, which coincides with many if not all of the previously mentioned points, you start babbling
nonsense about Bigfoot, aliens etc... is that supposed to make it seem as if the arguments presented
are not credible? Sure...  

How many credible witnesses have seen bigfoot? Ufos? Space aliens?

[OzmO]

WTC 7 is a textbook controlled demolition.  It fell at free fall speed into its own footprint.  How was it reported on the news to have collapsed 25 minutes before it actually did?  Because the news was scripted, and it was a planned controlled demo.  The news fucked up and reported it too early.  How can anyone watch this video of the collapse and not come to the conclusion it was a controlled demo?

completely wrong.

[OzmO]

Well Perhaps You As A Highly Skilled 6th Grader could help explain how to
Properly use the Quote Feature. -- That Would Be Good.

No, figure it out yourself.

And it would also Help You No End as You are clearly Struggling To Read My Post.
A Few Years More at School Should Help that for You.

Nope you misread my post.  Wrong again.

As I don't know How your Defence System Worked on that fateful Day or indeed Now
Maybe You Would Be So Kind As To Explain Just How Well The Defence System Worked
That Day In Not Preventing The Crash Into The Pentagon.

You don't know how the defense system worked, but you feel qualified enough to say:

Thank Fcuk it wasn't Russia or China launching a Stealth Attack on America That Day
Chances are you'd be speaking another language now.

Which is an ignorant statement.

To Someone uneducated on Your Marvellous Defence System.
I Still Say It Didn't Work - As No Planes Were Stopped & Nothing Was defended.

I know exactly how it worked that day and why they were able to do what they did.

but you said this:

I've read countless books, nobody told me to, I did it on my own..  Why can't you?  Instead you say fuck off.  Childlike response.  Everyone should be researching this because this event is the reason why we are still fighting wars today.  I've listed off a few books I have read, why don't you read them?  

So you read countless books on 9/11 and you don't know how or why our defense system failed?

Sounds like you are lying about reading books  in the first place or the books you read are for 6th graders.

You are full of shit

[OzmO]

I will say it again

You CT'ers are cowards.

10 characteristics of conspiracy theorists
A useful guide by Donna Ferentes

1. Arrogance. They are always fact-seekers, questioners, people who are trying to discover the truth: sceptics are always "sheep", patsies for Messrs Bush and Blair etc.

2. Relentlessness. They will always go on and on about a conspiracy no matter how little evidence they have to go on or how much of what they have is simply discredited. (Moreover, as per 1. above, even if you listen to them ninety-eight times, the ninety-ninth time, when you say "no thanks", you'll be called a "sheep" again.) Additionally, they have no capacity for precis whatsoever. They go on and on at enormous length.

3. Inability to answer questions. For people who loudly advertise their determination to the principle of questioning everything, they're pretty poor at answering direct questions from sceptics about the claims that they make.

4. Fondness for certain stock phrases. These include Cicero's "cui bono?" (of which it can be said that Cicero understood the importance of having evidence to back it up) and Conan Doyle's "once we have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however unlikely, must be the truth". What these phrases have in common is that they are attempts to absolve themselves from any responsibility to produce positive, hard evidence themselves: you simply "eliminate the impossible" (i.e. say the official account can't stand scrutiny) which means that the wild allegation of your choice, based on "cui bono?" (which is always the government) is therefore the truth.

5. Inability to employ or understand Occam's Razor. Aided by the principle in 4. above, conspiracy theorists never notice that the small inconsistencies in the accounts which they reject are dwarfed by the enormous, gaping holes in logic, likelihood and evidence in any alternative account.

6. Inability to tell good evidence from bad. Conspiracy theorists have no place for peer-review, for scientific knowledge, for the respectability of sources. The fact that a claim has been made by anybody, anywhere, is enough for them to reproduce it and demand that the questions it raises be answered, as if intellectual enquiry were a matter of responding to every rumour. While they do this, of course, they will claim to have "open minds" and abuse the sceptics for apparently lacking same.

7. Inability to withdraw. It's a rare day indeed when a conspiracy theorist admits that a claim they have made has turned out to be without foundation, whether it be the overall claim itself or any of the evidence produced to support it. Moreover they have a liking (see 3. above) for the technique of avoiding discussion of their claims by "swamping" - piling on a whole lot more material rather than respond to the objections sceptics make to the previous lot.

8. Leaping to conclusions. Conspiracy theorists are very keen indeed to declare the "official" account totally discredited without having remotely enough cause so to do. Of course this enables them to wheel on the Conan Doyle quote as in 4. above. Small inconsistencies in the account of an event, small unanswered questions, small problems in timing of differences in procedure from previous events of the same kind are all more than adequate to declare the "official" account clearly and definitively discredited. It goes without saying that it is not necessary to prove that these inconsistencies are either relevant, or that they even definitely exist.

9. Using previous conspiracies as evidence to support their claims. This argument invokes scandals like the Birmingham Six, the Bologna station bombings, the Zinoviev letter and so on in order to try and demonstrate that their conspiracy theory should be accorded some weight (because it's “happened before”.) They do not pause to reflect that the conspiracies they are touting are almost always far more unlikely and complicated than the real-life conspiracies with which they make comparison, or that the fact that something might potentially happen does not, in and of itself, make it anything other than extremely unlikely.

10. It's always a conspiracy. And it is, isn't it? No sooner has the body been discovered, the bomb gone off, than the same people are producing the same old stuff, demanding that there are questions which need to be answered, at the same unbearable length. Because the most important thing about these people is that they are people entirely lacking in discrimination. They cannot tell a good theory from a bad one, they cannot tell good evidence from bad evidence and they cannot tell a good source from a bad one. And for that reason, they always come up with the same answer when they ask the same question.

[M4tad0r]

completely wrong.

OZMO "the american" full of rubbish, "legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101 who now claims been debunking 9/11 CT's for 9 years.   HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHHAHAHAA

Man up and shut da fuck up!!!

All you been doing is getting:

[Yamcha]

Did you know cat dicks are barbed and they destroy the inside of the female kitten's pussy?

[M4tad0r]

Did you know cat dicks are barbed and they destroy the inside of the female kitten's pussy?

No I did not, thank you for clearing it up. 

[OzmO]

OZMO "the american" full of rubbish, "legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101 who now claims been debunking 9/11 CT's for 9 years.   HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHHAHAHAA

Man up and shut da fuck up!!!

All you been doing is getting:

These are things YOU claimed and they have been shown to be WRONG:

Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

[Yamcha]

No I did not, thank you for clearing it up. 

Kinda like a missile projectile into the side of the pentagon

[M4tad0r]

completely wrong.

 "It's a rare day indeed when a conspiracy theorist admits that a claim they have made has turned out to be without foundation" Tell that to the 9/11 commision you retard, lol.

Steel beam skyscraper implodes into it's own footprint in 7 seconds due to office fire, and the model that replicated such event took 7 years to cook, and to this day  Nist have turn down all Foia's to have it peer reviewed.

Classic case of Government dick rider's logic 101

Ozmo all you bee doing is getting:

[M4tad0r]

Kinda like a missile projectile into the side of the pentagon

Yes like the missile, thanks for clearing that up too. But...

What ever happened to the engines?

And the black box?

Thank you in advance.

[M4tad0r]

These are things YOU claimed and they have been shown to be WRONG:

Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: Doesn't present any studies, facts or links of professors at places like MIT, Northwestern and Purdue universities discussing on why WTC's failed on 9/11.

OZMO "the american" full of rubbish, "legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101 who now claims been debunking 9/11 CT's for 9 years.   

[OzmO]

"It's a rare day indeed when a conspiracy theorist admits that a claim they have made has turned out to be without foundation" Tell that to the 9/11 commision you retard, lol.

Steel been skyscraper implodes into it's own footprint in 7 seconds due to office fire, and the model that replicated such event took 7 years to cook, and to this day  Nist have turn down all Foia's to have it peer reviewed.

Classic case of Government dick rider's logic 101

Ozmo all you bee doing is getting:

wrong again!

[OzmO]

Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: Doesn't present any studies, facts or links of professors at places like MIT, Northwestern and Purdue universities discussing on why WTC's failed on 9/11.

OZMO "the american" full of rubbish, "legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101 who now claims been debunking 9/11 CT's for 9 years.   

These are things YOU claimed and they have been shown to be WRONG:

Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

[Ropo]

Which to date have not been released, keep at it imbecile. You getting somewhere.

 the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

http://www.foia.gov/how-to.html

This is not Finland you moron.

So you want to see all confiscated security recordings just to see that there isn't anything in them? People buying gas at the gas station, people buying tobacco at the tobacco shop etc.? Why? Have they release all the security recordings from all other crimes, like school shootings, movie theater shooting, mass murders what you have there every other day etc.? Nope, they publish only what has something in it related to that crime. As I say, just a normal protocol, no matter how you try to falsify it.

[Ropo]

From Illuminate:

I'll give you that your are Good with the cut-n-paste etc with your answers.

What am I Afraid Of -- A Few Things Actually.
Though Certainly NOT YOU.

Is All You Can Do Is Resort To Imbecile Name Calling.
That is a Clue To A Very Educated & Intelligent Man...NOT.

I Have Said Already I Don't Know How The American Defense System Worked Back Then or in fact now.

The Simple Fact That 2 planes Hit The Twin Towers. ( Granted that would of Been very tough to prevent )
And 2 others -- 1, Brought down by the passengers, & The other Smashes into The Pentagon, Which they Clearly had enough time to track it's flight path & Try to communicate With.

I think Most Sane Rational Thinking People Would Say Was A Faliure Of A Defense System.
The Clue Is In The Words 'DEFENCE SYSTEMS'  
Hmm Let The Plane Smash into One of The Most Important Buildings In America & Do Fcuk All About.
Great Defense System.  Roll Eyes


Now Go Away --
Pls Feel Free to Call Me all the Childish Names You want.
And Show yourself up for what you are Some More.  Wink

I call you names because you are insult of the intelligence of the humankind, because you are a foil hat moron, which are crap from the bottom of the gene pool. You have chosen by yourself that you are just that, it is a voluntary act, so blame yourself if you make people think you are an imbecile. They only react to your behavior, so whose fault is that? If you aren't moron, why do you act like one? Rant of 39 pages, and you are still believing to invisible explosions, because your blind faith? What you are doing there is one of the most complete self ownings in the history of the getbig 

[M4tad0r]

So you want to see all confiscated security recordings just to see that there isn't anything in them? People buying gas at the gas station, people buying tobacco at the tobacco shop etc.? Why? Have they release all the security recordings from all other crimes, like school shootings, movie theater shooting, mass murders what you have there every other day etc.? Nope, they publish only what has something in it related to that crime. As I say, just a normal protocol, no matter how you try to falsify it.

Ropo just shut that fuck up please!!! And yes everything is released eventually thanks to Foia requests, but you wouldn't know because you're a funking euro inbreed trolling us, do you get it?

[M4tad0r]

I call you names because you are insult of the intelligence of the humankind, because you are a foil hat moron, which are crap from the bottom of the gene pool. You have chosen by yourself that you are just that, it is a voluntary act, so blame yourself if you make people think you are an imbecile. They only react to your behavior, so whose fault is that? If you aren't moron, why do you act like one? Rant of 39 pages, and you are still believing to invisible explosions, because your blind faith? What you are doing there is one of the most complete self ownings in the history of the getbig 

[lilhawk1]

completely wrong.

Explain how... The building fell at free fall speed.  It was a controlled demo, it isn't even debatable.  Watch the video.. Also, I can't believe anyone thinks a building just falls totally and completely without being demolished.  It does not happen.  You would have a partial collapse.  It would be asymmetrical.  This is without question..

[Ropo]

You imbecile, the point is WTC6 stood while missing half of it, while building 7 across the street imploded in seconds. The other buildings around building 7, nothing. And all 3 buildings were lease by Larry Silverstein, who 6 weeks prior had taken insurance against terrorist attacks, but according to you: Coincidence!!!

Building 7:

What a load of crap. Building 6 is between WTC 1 and 7, and it is only 28 meters high. When WTC 1 collapsed, part's of it hit the WTC 7, which is a proved fact. Damages of the WTC 6 came from that collapse, and 8 hours later, when WTC 7 collapsed.  

What is so difficult to embed those videos in your messages? Even a child would know how, but your über intelligence cannot do it?

Just for you so you would learn how real explosions look like  

[lilhawk1]

So you want to see all confiscated security recordings just to see that there isn't anything in them? People buying gas at the gas station, people buying tobacco at the tobacco shop etc.? Why? Have they release all the security recordings from all other crimes, like school shootings, movie theater shooting, mass murders what you have there every other day etc.? Nope, they publish only what has something in it related to that crime. As I say, just a normal protocol, no matter how you try to falsify it.

Normal protocol?  Bullshit..  Why release one video at the Pentagon?  There's hundreds of cameras there.. Many better angles without a doubt.  Yet they release the one shitty image, and you can still tell it's not a friggin jet.  

[Ropo]

You are aware explosives explode, not implode?

Well, he thinks that invisible explosives implode, because imagination of the moron has no limits  

Later on the thread he is owning everybody because he is a child and it is important to his tiny little self-esteem, no matter if it makes him look like the pigeon on the chessboard...what he really is. Even in the bunch of foil hats is would be hard to find dumber one, so he must be some kind of elite foil hat