Still waiting for one of the government shills here to prove that WTC 7 did not fall at free fall speed into its own footprint. Good luck....The laws of physics still stand, even for that day believe it or not.. The 3rd building that day to defy the laws of physics. Tell you what, we should be very afraid that at any time the laws of physics can possibly be suspended on any given day....what the hell are we going to do?
Of course it doesn't mean anything. Let's start with just one piece of evidence that proves the entire thing was an inside job... WTC 7 fell into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds.....FREE FALL SPEED... Explain that... Explain how the laws of physics were temporarily suspended that day..this one piece of evidence proves the entire bullshit story of the 9/11 commission is a farce. There was no resistance from the floors below, which means, controlled demo..look up photos of other building collapses due to structural failure... There is never a total and complete collapse.. It's always asymmetrical and a partial collapse. This is not even debatable...It never happens. Compare how that building fell, and how buildings fall in controlled demo.... Exact same.
Let’s start with “WTC 7 fell into its own footprint”
WTC 7 did not fall into it’s own footprint.
WTC site plan:
If it fell on to its own foot print the Verison Building would not be damaged:
Nor would there be damage to Filterman hall,
Nor damage to the building north of WTC 7 with the terrace
Conclusion:
Footprint argument=debunkedNext:
“6.5 seconds.....FREE FALL SPEED” (I am assuming you think it shouldn’t have looked like it went down all at once.)
It pancaked. Think of the steel beams as connected straws that crumple. The steel beams weaken, to the weight above and buckle providing no resistance until it came to non-buckled beams on the lower floors. (Steel loses its strength when heated) Large chunks of WTC 7 were damaged. (I can post those pics if you want, they are available on the net as well as fireman statements to that regard) Hence it looks as though it all comes down at once. but it came down in stages. Look closely at the video and you will see the 3:58 Mark it doesn’t come down all at once, the Penthouse on the left goes first, supporting the report that the floors failed imploding the building.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPoConclusion:
Freefall speed argument debunkedExplain that... Explain how the laws of physics were temporarily suspended that day..this one piece of evidence proves the entire bullshit story of the 9/11 commission is a farce. There was no resistance from the floors below, which means, controlled demo..look up photos of other building collapses due to structural failure... There is never a total and complete collapse.. It's always asymmetrical and a partial collapse. This is not even debatable...It never happens. Compare how that building fell, and how buildings fall in controlled demo.... Exact same
The rest of this is an assumption based on pre conceived belief without a legitimate knowledge base.
I totally agree with you that it very similar to a demolition. However, many things can look like one thing but be something entirely different. Once the facts are brought to bear the reality is revealed.
Additionally, lets say none of my above arguments are valid, you are still left a video only and no other evidence that it was prewired and demolished. And if it was prewired, it would be stupid to think that it didn’t explode much sooner when it caught fire, burned for hours and was severely damaged.
