Something to think about, is that it only makes sense to say the internet is deliberately flooded with pseudo-conspiracy nonsense by those who would want to cast the belief that "conspiracy theorist = bad". Of course.
This thread proves it in strides, when confronted with facts on that day? Coincidence.
What have they debunked here with the evidence presented? Nothing, Ozmo when confronted with the facts from his own answers, comes back with nothing logical, just regurgitating the Government Conspiracy Theory, not supported by any other institution from anywhere in the World.
Example: the pictures of planes that supposedly disintegrated, I already debunked it, we can see the engines in the second crash, in the C-130 I see the the plane wings and engines on the right side of the building where it crashed, look closely, and third plane, the one from Egypt, google the crash, I already posted the pictures, we see the tail, engines and the passengers carriage.
In case of Flight 93, nothing, not even a drop of blood, no engines, not tail, absolutely nothing, except they found debris expanding for miles, those are facts.
He goes and tell us there were conversations of why the twin towers fell that day in universities, I'm still waiting for the links for the studies like say Mit for example. NOTHING. That's what we are having here, a conversation.
Ropo, what else can we expect from that retard, after all the evidence we have presented here, comes back trowing insults and asking for the explosions, enough said.
