Have you ever heard the statement "perception is greater than reality"?
Confidence in the security of our elections is at an all time low. This needs to be changed.
In addition, it's common f'n sense.
The supposed "10% disenfranchised" need to get over it and get an ID. But no, I refuse to believe there are folks who are passionate about voting, but can't get an ID to do so. The math makes no sense. If you can't get an ID, your ability to function in society is likely severely challenged, and voting is likely the furthest thing on your mind.
But thanks for letting us know they're all leftists.
Confidence is at an all time low because the current president lied through his teeth about the last election and stolen elections. If ID works and there isn't evidence of fraud why would you make things more complicated for people? thats not good sense, common sense is for basic things like dont touch a hot stove, good sense is what is missing here.
I am for voter ID but not something which unfairly targets one segment. Because women take mens names they get to get fucked?
ID is fine- license- asking for birth certificate and passport is problematic currently, without phaseout or other means. We are talking about the SAVE act.
I also dont think you read my post. the 10% would find it problematic because half of the population are women. They take mens names. they would be required to go get their name changed on their birth certificates to vote, they can get id, can be professionals etc. the passport means people struggling to get to work, eat have to fork out 200 dollars for a new one- these are your neighbors who might be working multiple jobs to survive, you think they are going to go fork out 200 bucks to vote when they can't make ends meet?
You aren't being logical at all here. No evidence of fraud at any meaningful level, the act will cause problems disproportionately experienced in select groups.
Women are more left leaning in general, poor people as well-- the bill will selectively hinder one side which is why trump said we will never lose again. Obviously it cant be because it cleans up fraud, there is none... so how else would it keep them winning? or is he lying to get the bill through to cause issues for the mid terms so he doesn't become a lame duck, because even if it passes those women will go through the hoops to vote. However, he doesn't care one bit about that once he is gone.
Let's rehash
1. there is no fraud/illegal aliens voting.
2. it isn't impacting republicans or democrats
3.The save act doesn't address any actual problem
4. by addressing this non-problem you create many problems that currently don't exist
5. its meant to maintain power obviously.
