I don't have a lot of faith in google. They let you see what they want you to see. Often opposing views are buried in the search. Not sayin you Prime but far too many look at the first page of a google search and accept it like gospel and as proof. Seen too much revisionist history on the first few pages of Goggle. Wiki always has an agenda the way they accept and present their history.
Google is a search engine, nothing more. It provides data to match your "search" with a basis of previous search queues based on the words you type.
Nothing posted is to be taken as truth, it's just data so a person can form their own conclusion based on research. Many articles are factual and complete, but i find most are incomplete and based off opinion of the author. No different than me posting my thoughts on GB.

That's why i don't take most search results as gospel, with a little research it's easy to see how biased or incomplete the data is. Just source checking the author can easily provide a lot of missing data.
It's like when i was in college for engineering, the more data we sampled, the easier it was to dissolve the inaccurate data and formulate our own conclusions, based on evidence. A lot of data we sampled was not entirely accurate.
I'm not picking on Prime, or anyone on GB, but it does seem that a lot of people just google search and take it as proof, when it is just data.
There is no one back checking all this data and if the data is wrong or incomplete, there is no recourse. That's why most universities still will not allow this information in a research paper or experiment, because anyone can post an article these days, without a control or peer review.