all guns start off legal. they just end up filtering down into criminal hands. if there are less legal guns to start with, as a result there will be less criminals with guns. there are working models of this all over the first world.
and this fallacy that if you give up your guns you will suddenly be overrun by gun toting criminals looking for soft targets, is nonsense. i constantly see on here people saying gun crime is primarily a black problem. well if you look at a lot of the black murder hot spots a lot of them are in states with pretty low overall gun ownership.
so why then do poor blacks currently not tend to victimize the wider community of soft targets. instead they overwhelmingly target other poor blacks that they know for certain will own guns themselves ?
well you can hugely minimise the risk of mass shootings if you make it much harder for people to access guns. again there are tons of working models of this worldwide.
and all this "if we ban guns they'll just use a truck or a pressure cooker blah blah blah" holds no water either. guns are more efficient and more convenient for killing people than pretty much any other instrument. if they weren't you wouldn't all be saying you need your guns for protection. you'd get a truck or pressure cooker instead.
all guns start off legal. they just end up filtering down into criminal hands. if there are less legal guns to start with, as a result there will be less criminals with guns. there are working models of this all over the first world.
If my Aunt had balls she's be my Uncle. Jackass it's to fucking late to play the " if there are less legal guns " 400 Million firearms already floating around. So your " working model " doesn't and wouldn't apply. U.S is unique in this regard and can't be compared to the rest of the first world. Most criminals get their guns illegally , theft , straw purchases , etc
and this fallacy that if you give up your guns you will suddenly be overrun by gun toting criminals looking for soft targets, is nonsense. i constantly see on here people saying gun crime is primarily a black problem. well if you look at a lot of the black murder hot spots a lot of them are in states with pretty low overall gun ownership.
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. Despite your ignorance guns save lives period , end of sentence. You take guns from legal people you create a new class of victims. This is not debatable even anti-gun sources are forced to admit this.
See this is where you go afoul , You're playing with words. " pretty low overall gun ownership " LEGAL gun ownership!!!! Most states where they have oppressive gun laws , also have the highest homicides with guns , Chicago , Baltimore , LA ( Louisiana
) Detroit , etc
We have an issue with to many drunk drivers killing people the solution is less cars , less drunk driving issues , you giving up your car? We have an issue with to many drunk drivers killing people the solution is less alcohol , you giving up your alcohol? Yeah I thought so.
so why then do poor blacks currently not tend to victimize the wider community of soft targets. instead they overwhelmingly target other poor blacks that they know for certain will own guns themselves ?
Most of the black-on-black gun violence is gang related most of the homicides in overall gun stats is gang related in certain pockets of America.
well you can hugely minimise the risk of mass shootings if you make it much harder for people to access guns. again there are tons of working models of this worldwide.
This is such a meaningless statement. How the fuck to you make it harder for people to access guns when there is 400-fucking-million of them already? You offer up no solutions , no proof , just some throw away statement.
well you can hugely minimise the risk of drunk driving deaths if you make it much harder for people to access cars & alcohol.See how that works? Almost silly to punish you for the actions of drunk drivers isn't it?
and all this "if we ban guns they'll just use a truck or a pressure cooker blah blah blah" holds no water either. guns are more efficient and more convenient for killing people than pretty much any other instrument. if they weren't you wouldn't all be saying you need your guns for protection. you'd get a truck or pressure cooker instead.
It holds no water? LMFAO to a simpleton like you it doesn't. Guns are a force multiplier , a woman who is 5'0" 100lbs can defend herself against a guy 6'0" 200lbs ! Guns can save lives and take them and that's all contingent on the person using them. Show me one single fucking person that killed 82 people with a gun, I dare you. I can show you a guy with a truck who did that
No access to guns yet somehow he managed to kill so many people. 168 people with a van full of fertilizer , please show me where a single " mass shooter " killed that many people . I'll be waiting
Oh wait 3000 with some planes , want to continue?
Anything you type holds no water , your " arguments " are sophomorish , ignorant and laced with emotion and virtue signalling. You're irrational and not very well thought out. You claim you don't care , then you do care and you go on tirades on how to fix problems in a country you don't live in and never even had the wherewithal to brush up on the subject you're trying so hard to seem topical in. You're just fucking stupid. There is no kind way to put it.
Keep posting I enjoy highlighting your stupidity
