If you're making progress at a "snail's pace", your diet is anything BUT perfect....at least for you.
For me, when I ditched the so-called perfect diet of chicken breasts, egg whites, and rice and went with beef and eggs and whole milk, business picked up. The gains I once thought I needed anabolics to achieve I was able to obtain without them.
Now you're talking a language I understand.
But I'm somewhat confused about why those dietary changes produced a significantly improved outcome, MCWAY.
I'll be honest - all those whole foods are excellent [IMO], but I would say my go-to is chicken breasts and rice.
Exactly why might beef be a better choice? Is it the natural fats that made the difference?
I have no issue adjusting to making beef my primary meat protein source, but...what's wrong with chicken breasts? Lol.
You need to understand that when I am committed - I am COMMITTED. When I am committed, I am ALL IN.
I think if you recall my classic bodybuilding website [now offline], you may recall I am very committed.
I mean - does anyone bench press 315x8 at 170 if they aren't training hard and consistently for years? Aside from genetic freaks?
It's been decades, since I weighed 170 lbs. And I have no intentions of being that weight ever again.
I called your training protocol "AWFUL" because YOU said you were feeling beat up and not fully recovered. And who said I had an 80-lb weight advantage on you? I didn't. That would put me at 250, which I haven't weighed in over FIFTEEN YEARS!!
Yes, MCWAY.
Correct.
I find that from day to day, I'm still feeling not recovered *overall*.
I feel fully recovered today, but probably on half my days, I still feel sore from either my back day or my legs day.
However - I have been pushing a hard back day and a hard legs day both in the same week.
That's probably too much. I should probably do one heavy CNS workout per week. This week, legs, next week back, and repeat.
I don't find other muscle groups are as taxing as legs and back. Other areas recover much faster.
Again, just to be clear - it's not that I train legs when my legs are still sore - it's just that I sometimes train legs while my back is still sore, or vice versa. That's what I meant about not recovering completely.
But that's also proof that my workouts are effective - on my most recent legs day, I could not walk easily for the next two days. The issue may be that I'm taxing my CNS too much.
It's a fine line, right? We want to work out hard enough for our workouts to be effective, but not so hard that we over-train. I may be *slightly* overtraining now - but I don't think it's so much that it's making me regress - I am gaining my old strength back from one workout to the next. Literally every workout, I am a bit closer to my old lifts. I feel my physical appearance is improving [pictures below]. And I'd rather slightly over-train, then under-train. Ideally, I want to train the OPTIMAL amount, but...I'm refining everything as I go. I'm getting there, and things are going well.
And why are you stuck on this "18 months" thing? You're basically stating that, despite knowing how to eat and train perfectly, it will take you NEARLY SIX TIMES AS LONG to get the modest gains you seek without steroids as it would with them.
That's a bit of a stretch!
Yes, that's what I'm saying.

Could my subclinical hypothyroidism play a role here, MCWAY?
I'm also a classical ectomorph body structure. Could that be the issue?
My experience with steroids is that within basically a few days, I'm feeling oral steroids, and within a matter of week, I'm getting better pumps and gains than I do from MONTHS of natural training.
I mean - STEROIDS WORK...right? In the 1980's, the press said they didn't work, but...that was bull.
I don't believe that I will get certain qualities without steroids - basically the pumps, the feeling of being full, and my muscles sort of "popping" a bit more.
It's not just about weight, or just about body composition. I think it's about qualities that you just can't get as a natural.
I think I could basically make the same gains in 20% of the time, because of steroids.
And as I said - I don't want to follow a bodybuilding nutrition protocol for five times as long.
Do I think I will make the same gains in 16 weeks on my planned cycle as I would make in 18 months of natural training and eating?
Yeah. More or less, yes.
I'll put it this way: I basically maxed out at the 950-lb tire in town. I couldn't flip it twice, no matter how hard I trained.
I went on Anadrol, and within two weeks, I could flip it two time. And I didn't even train tire at that time.
So yeah, steroids make a huge difference.
I feel you are severely downplaying steroids, MCWAY.
What is your body weight, MCWAY?
Because if you are natural, I just can't imagine your gains are anything special either. At my gym, we have a biohazard bin for needles - it is FULL every time I see it, with steroid gauge needles. Yet I wouldn't think ANYONE at my gym is on steroids - not one. So I simply don't believe that anyone is making natural gains, and even the juicers at my gym are less developed and less strong than me.
Really, MCWAY - what is the natural max for a man of 5'10"? Maybe 180-lb at 6% body fat?
Photos below:
Yesterday: 183-lb.
January 2020: 160-lb.
June 2021: 195-lb.
December 2021: 175-lb.
2007: 193-lb on steroids.
