Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

how do you get a perfect score in the symmetry round with a double bi like this?

 


I mean, traditionally, both the symmetry round and the posing round has been a "gift" to the winner of the muscularity round, but this is going a bit far...

He actually looks great in that shot despite the poor tan and his bicep is shorter than the other its not like he tore his best muscle ! 1994 was NO contest and everyone knows this except you.


quote Shawn Ray Flex Jan 1995 " Tonight I feel I got what I deserved "


Flex magazine January 1995 Shawn Ray

Dorian was a bigger version of what he's been. I'm not a fan in the sense that his physique is something I aspire to attain. Dorian is in his own class and in his own little world. For that reason, there's nobody they can compare like-to-like with Dorian. They can only bring forward a different package.

( 1994 Mr Olympia ) Tonight I feel that I got what I deserved. With a beaming smile , Shawn concluded: " This is the first time in three years I haven't ' retired ' the night of the show and got drunk. "

[pumpster]

My point was that you are biased towards handsome men: Bob Paris and Frank Zane are two examples.

Dorian was great, but Ronnie would be so much bigger than him it would be crazy to compare.

Hulkster - yes, I will add them.  He looked awesome at that show!!  Was that his best conditioning ever?

Handsome men?  White guys even better.  

[NarcissisticDeity]

My point was that you are biased towards handsome men: Bob Paris and Frank Zane are two examples.

Dorian was great, but Ronnie would be so much bigger than him it would be crazy to compare.

Hulkster - yes, I will add them.  He looked awesome at that show!!  Was that his best conditioning ever?

I'm not biased towards handsome men , you think only handsome men are aesthetic , which is provably wrong and I'm not talking about Ronnie when he was bigger I'm talking about the two at around the same weight !!

and NO 1998 was his best Olympia conditioning ever and 2001 ASC was his best all around conditioning ever.

[Hulkster]

Hulkster - yes, I will add them.  He looked awesome at that show!!  Was that his best conditioning ever?

I think so. He appears to have the same level of detail as the Arnold Classic, but with less of a (relaxed) gut and 10 pounds more mass which you can really see in the comparison shots I posted.

and then we have ND's opinion that he was holding a film of water in his back...

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Handsome men?  White guys even better. 

pumpy you're the one obsessed with white people , you're the one who constantly tries to bring up race thats your hang-up not mine , two of my favorite bodybuilders are Arfican-American and Lebanese , I was a huge fan of Lee Haney , you're the one who accused Lee Priest of being racist because according to you " Most Australians " are  and you reffered to Dorian as the " blocky white guy "  so you have nothing to work with , as usual .

[NarcissisticDeity]

I think so. He appears to have the same level of detail as the Arnold Classic, but with less of a (relaxed) gut and 10 pounds more mass which you can really see in the comparison shots I posted.

and then we have ND's opinion that he was holding a film of water in his back...

 

Wow Ironically Peter McGough said Ronnie wasn't as hard in 99 as he was in 98 and so did Dorian but Hulkster knows lol after all this is the genius who claimed Ronnie has more detail in his calves that Dorian Yates lol

I'm telling you the whole lot of you are ignorant about bodybuilding !

[Hulkster]

when you are going to understand that someone's OPINION means NOTHING if it is NOT SUPPORTED BY PROOF?

Ronnie was just as hard in 99 as he was in 98:

[Hulkster]

99 vs 98

[Hulkster]

more 99 vs 98:

[NarcissisticDeity]

when you are going to understand that someone's OPINION means NOTHING if it is NOT SUPPORTED BY PROOF?

Ronnie was just as hard in 99 as he was in 98:

When are you going to stop setting up strawmen? a crappy scan and a video still? and idiot Peter McGough was at both contests , where you? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm NO the best you could manage was seeing Nimrods  cantaloupes  he saw Ronnie at every stage of his career have you? fuck your slanted ' proof ' anything Peter McGough has to say stops you moronic statements dead in their tracks , what do you know? and who are you? and were you there? lol you are OWNED kid.

[NarcissisticDeity]

What a great post I just made , and whats better is that Peter McGough and Dorian Yates but proved your assessment dead wrong , both were there and both have infinitely more bodybuilding knowledge than you could ever hope to accumlate !!



owned

[Hulkster]

More proving of ND and Peter M. wrong:

there was no real difference:


how many hundreds of 98 vs 99 pics will have to be posted to convince ND that Peter M. was wrong and that the hardness was equal?

 

[Hulkster]

still more 98 vs. 99:

again, no real difference:

[Hulkster]

wow. and notice that Ronnie's quads were much more detailed in 99, a fact noted by the ironman coverage of the olympia that year...

but no, Ronnie was noticably harder in 98...

[Hulkster]

ps those last few 98 pics are of very good quality and my proof is STILL valid..

ND stop making excuses.

they were of equal hardess...if not more detailed in 1999.

[pobrecito]

If Dorian said 98 was better conditioned than 99 as well as viewing with my own eyes the 98 and 99 tapes, then Hulkster will not change my opinion.

Ronnie's conditioning from the front 98 and 99 was very similar...it was from the backside when Ron was much drier in 98.

This is probably Ronnie's greatest shot ever.

[Hulkster]

If Dorian said 98 was better conditioned than 99 as well as viewing with my own eyes the 98 and 99 tapes, then Hulkster will not change my opinion.

Ronnie's conditioning from the front 98 and 99 was very similar...it was from the backside when Ron was much drier in 98.

This is probably Ronnie's greatest shot ever.

but was he really noticably drier from the back in 98?

at least based on the admittedly low quality youtube 98 vid, Ronnie looked more detailed overall in 99.

[Hulkster]

again, the backs are identical in terms of hardness.

Pubic, you say your own eyes tell you that ronnie was dryer in 98.


But what do your eyes tell you about the last 15 pics or so that I have posted showing no real difference?

more:

[Hulkster]

still no difference.

If ronnie was harder in 98 than in 99 it sure isn't obvious...

[Hulkster]

old school ronnie vs. 99 ronnie:

[pobrecito]

The 98 posing routine on youtube is actually fairly good quality.

When he first turns around, you see how dry he was. He was lacking that in 99.

Also, ND pretty much hit it on the head, as Ron got bigger, his conditioning got worse. This is why I'm not a big fan of 2003 Ronnie. Those 99/03 comparison pictures you made were almost embarrasing in how undetailed/watery Ronnie looked in 03 compared to 99.

[Hulkster]

look at this difference, both from the same contests.

I know everyone uses the excuse "he's not flexing yet"

but come on :

[Hulkster]

Ronnie, looking good in 2005:

[Hulkster]

2001 Arnold Classic Vs. 1999 Olympia back shot:

[Hulkster]

again, I don't think Ronnie has ever been any more detailed than 99.

but then again, his 99 O., 2001 AC, and 98 O. are all about the same level of detailed, except for the fact that his quads were smooth in 98.