But this is not what you said earlier! You said that Ronnie's lats were of the same width as Dorian, and I dared you to prove it and you failed. And no, just because Ronnie might appear to be as wide for you doesen't mean that he looks as wide to everyone else. To me, Dorian looks wider. This is especially true since I'm not a bodybuilding newbie such as you, and thus I can see that Ronnie's smaller waist gives the impression of his lats being wider than they really are. Bodybuilding is visual, grnated, but measures are absolute and mathematical. I never said that Dorian was wider - I can't prove it -; I said that, based on the evaluation of their respective physiques, and of the mathematical fact that they weight the same yet Ronnie had clearly bigger quads, as well as the fact that Dorian's taper appear to be as good as Ronnie's even though the latter's waist is smaller, I guesstimated that Dorian's lats were wider. You, conversely, flat out said that Ronnie's lats were as wide. Since you affirmed that, I expected you to provide evidence. Waht evidence did you provide? You showed pics, a purely visual "evidence" that is as unreliable as they come.
yes, this is what I said earlier. Show me where I contradicted myself. I have always maintained that 99 Ronnie's lats were just as wide as Dorian's. I provided video and photographic evidence, which is a hell of a lot more accurate than guessing, to support my claim.
Yes, you copy a lot of my expressions and even my prose style. I guess you admire me, yet don't want to hurt your ego by admitting it. Dorian was more unbalanced than Ronnie? This is not true even if we're talking about the 1999 Coleman, let alone the 2003 one! Dorian's arms were only about an inch or so smaller than Ronnie's in his 1999 version. If Dorian had "twig" arms, then Ronnie's arms were twigs plus an inch! Besides, arms are not that important as a bodypart as far as discrediting Dorian, because Dorian's arms worked for him better from more angles than Ronnie's. Ronnie did not, and I mean, did not have any significant size advantage over Dorian besides quads. That's why they weighted the same, dumbass! Ronnie's ches was huge? Yes, and so was Dorian's! Coleman's back was huge? Yes, and so was Dorian's - even more so than Ronnie's in his 1999 form, even if by only the slimmest of margins. If Ronnie had so many advantages over Dorian in all the bodyparts you've mentioned, then why they weighted the same? Idiot.
your prose style? Since when did you copyright the english language, you dipshit? I still stand by what I said earlier. Ronnie was more balanced than Dorian. At least he was huge everywhere with the exception of his calves. Dorian, on the other hand, looked like a conglomerate of anatomical parts from bodybuilders of different weights. He had the back of a 280 lbs man with the arms of a 200 lbs man and the legs of a 240 lbs man.
Ronnie did have good symmetry from the back in 1999 - except for calves -, but his symmetry sucked in 2003. His hams and glutes grew far more than his back. Look at pics from the 1999 to 2003, and you'll see that, even though Ronnie already had great quads in 1999, they grew exponentially in 2003 and became the most massive in the history of the sport. This is also true for his hams and glutes. This, coupled with the exponential growth of his gut, tells me that most of those 30 lbs he gained were gut, quads, hams and glutes. To put it bluntly, mostly legs and gut distension. My point is that his lower body grew assymetrically in relation to his back in 2003, creating a symmetrical blance. Are you denying that Ronnie's hams and glutes grew only as much as his back? Keep trying! When you compound this with the fact that his calves became even mroe of a liability in 2003, you understnad why I qualified Ronnie's 2003 physique as being assymetrical from the back.
I never said that Ronnie's back in 03 grew proportionally the same as his legs. However, I don't feel this affected his symmetry. He still had the best back of all-time to go with a pair of the biggest legs ever. If anything, I think his monstrous legs actually helped give him better balance. Ronnie in 03 had a sick X-taper that puts Dorian's H-taper to shame.
Yes, and your reply was, I quote:
"Nothing you wrote disproves what I said. Nice try, kid."
Wow! What a profound answer! I think it's funny that you said I wouldn't answer your post because I thoughtg you would destroy me intellectually, but when I do, you just ignore it and say that I'm wrong because you just think I am. Who's the dumbass now, retard?
there was no need to be profound when you didn't even refute me.
You tried top prove that you were so huge dude, and proved only that you are a skinny geek who doesen't even work out.
nice try dumbass, here's what you said earlier.
I wouldn't be surprised if you're a 100 lbs pencil-necked geek who's never worked out in his entire life
Where did I try to prove that I'm huge? I merely responded that I'm not a 100 lbs geek who never worked out. In fact, I weigh 186 lbs right now at 22 yrs old. I know I'm not a monster, by any means, but I'm willing to bet that I looked better at 19 than you did at your prime. I called you out to post a pic of yourself so that the world can see the physique you built with your supreme knowledge of bodybuilding. You are perfectly capable of criticizing others for the way they look, yet you are too much of a pussy to be judged by others. Don't be shy you little bitch of a man.
