you seem to forget that all visual evidence from the contest shows that the "other" experts are correct.
they were there.
what they saw and stated is verified.
McGough's opinion isn't. the visuals do NOT show that Ronnie was noticably softer in 99 than in 98.
if any thing, he was sharper in many areas.
key difference you are overlooking.
an opinion is worthless no matter who says it if it is not supported and verified.
eg. do you agree that the 269 pound pre contest dorian was 'harder than Ronnie ever was"?
LOL I sure hope not.
McGough said that too:
see for yourself LOL

the point is that not everything that Peter says is always true.
some of it is verified - this stuff is true - it is supported and has corroborating evidence.
some is not - eg. his silly comment about the not even in contest shape dorian LOL